• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

2. Outside REACH: Policy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "2. Outside REACH: Policy"

Copied!
12
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Ein Jahrzehnt REACH

REACH nach 2018 - Erwartungen

Bjorn Hansen

Head of Unit: Sustainable Chemicals

European Commission, DG Environment Dortmund, Germany, 30-06-2017

(2)

Outline

1. Introduction

2. Beyond 2018: Outside REACH 3. Beyond 2018: Inside REACH 4. Conclusions

(3)

1. Introduction

We are finishing off the REACH Refit Evaluation combining:

- - The 2nd 5-yearly report

- - Certain reviews: polymers, 1-10 tonne information requirements, CSR for CMRs - - Better Regulation Refit Evaluation

(4)

1. Introduction

So I cannot give the Commission view, I can give my view and what options are there:

(5)

2. Outside REACH: Policy

The big questions:

- - Where is the EU going?

- Commission White Paper and 5 scenarios - - Where are our trading partners going?

(6)

2 . O uts id e R E ACH : P o li cy

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Date 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Legislation

Concern

(7)

Substance Mixture Article

Waste Phase REACH Phase

Registration and Authorisation Re-use

Recycling Recovery

Only through EoW

Discarded

Always

2. Outside REACH: Circular Economy

Note: An article is when the shape is more important than the chemical composition and once an article always an article!

(8)

- 2018: Fitness Check of all chemicals legislation (except REACH)

- 2018: Non-toxic Environment Strategy

- 2020: The beyond 2020 chemicals and waste

- Ongoing: work on 'emerged areas':

Endocrine Disruptors

Nanomaterials

Substances in articles

(unintentional) mixtures

2. Outside REACH: Chemicals

(9)

2018 Status:

- all chemicals registered

- many registrations not compliant

- grouping of chemicals coming

- baseline work:

Registration of new chemicals

Restrictions

Authorisation

3. Inside REACH

(10)

But how may things look like after 2018:

How efficient is ….. ?

Do we need to change something on …..?

- Registration (polymers, information requirements)

- Evaluation

- Restrictions

- Authorisation

- Fees

3. Inside REACH

(11)

Happy Birthday REACH and all who have worked on it the last 10 years!

- We have achieved a lot (Sekt) - We need to improve (Selters)

- Whatever improvements/changes: they need an open and fair discussion!

4. Conclusions

(12)

Thank you for your attention

Bjorn Hansen, Head of Unit, Chemicals,

DG Environment, European Commission, Brussels http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

For some areas there are both stationary nodes, which stay in the distinct area moving according to a random based mobility model, as well as transport nodes that carry the patients

identified modeling concepts relevant for process level audit risk assessment like process objectives, risks, controls and financial statement line items (accounts), to name only

To which extent this tool supports the feature to create security mechanism, or at-least include a feature similar to declare security mechanism in efficient

One such approach, Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements (PAIRS) (Salo and Hihalainen 1992), is based on Value Tree Analysis (von Winterfeldt and Edwards 1986)

For the analysis of the CSR, markers of interest were identified based on (1) the legal requirements ´ of the REACH-Regulation concerning exposure information

„Bessere Ergebnisse durch bessere Rechtsetzung – Eine Agenda der EU“ 2 enthält das Pa- ket einen Vorschlag für eine Interinstitutionelle Erklärung zwischen Kommission, Rat und

 The current achievements of EU better regulation, in particular the broad uptake of impact assessment across Commission services, cannot hide the persistence of quality

Following this central directive, the Ministry of Labour and Social Security specified approaches for rural migrant workers to access health care services and medical insurance