• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Algorithmic Game Theory Winter Term 2021/22

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Algorithmic Game Theory Winter Term 2021/22"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Thomas Kesselheim October 21, 2021

Alexander Braun Due date: October 27, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

Algorithmic Game Theory Winter Term 2021/22

Exercise Set 2

If you want to hand in your solutions for this problem set, please send them via email to alexander.braun@uni-bonn.de – make sure to send a pdf-file which contains your name and your email address. Of course, submitting solutions in groups is also possible.

If you would like to present one of the solutions in class, please also send an email to alexander.braun@uni-bonn.de containing the task which you would like to present and in which of the tutorials you would like to do so. Deadline for the email is Wednesday, 10:00 am. Please note that the tasks will be allocated via a first-come-first-served procedure, so sending this email earlier than Wednesday morning is highly recommended.

Exercise 1: (3+2 Points)

Consider the bimatrix game Battle of the Sexes given in Example 3.3 of the third lecture.

a) Compute a mixed Nash equilibrium by choosing probabilities for one player that will make the other player indifferent between his pure strategies (see Example 3.11).

b) Determine the probabilities of the mixed Nash equilibrium graphically by plotting the players’ expected costs.

Exercise 2: (4 Points)

We define a strategy si ∈ Si of a normal-form cost-minimization game to be strictly domi- nated, if there exists a strategy s0i such that ci(s0i, s−i) < ci(si, s−i) for all s−i ∈ S−i. Prove that for all mixed Nash equilibria σ, there is no player i∈ N with a mixed strategy σi such that σi,si >0 for a strictly dominated strategy si ∈Si.

Exercise 3: (3 Points)

Have a look at the proof of Nash’s Theorem (4.3) in which normal-form payoff-maximization games are considered. Let N = {1, . . . , n} and Si = {1, . . . , mi} for all i ∈ N. The set of mixed states X can be considered as a subset of Rm with m=Pn

i=1mi. Show that X is convex and compact.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Consider the local search problem Positive Not-All-Equal kSat (Pos-NAE-kSAT) from Tuto- rial 3, Task 1 which is defined the following way:.. Instances: Propositional logic formula

Prove a statement as in Proposition 7.7.. for this modified

Referring to the Price of Anarchy from Lecture 8, we introduced a more optimistic point of view called the Price of Stability in Lecture 9.. For an equilibrium concept Eq, it is

Show that truthful bidding does not necessarily lead to a pure Nash equilibrium even in the special case of three players and k = 2.. Exercise 3:

Recall the auction of k identical items from the previous exercise sets: Each bidder can acquire at most one of the items. Otherwise, that is, if she does not get an item, she has

If you want to hand in your solutions for this problem set, please send them via email to alexander.braun@uni-bonn.de - make sure to send a pdf-file which contains your name and

If you want to hand in your solutions for this problem set, please send them via email to alexander.braun@uni-bonn.de - make sure to send a pdf-file which contains your name and

If you want to hand in your solutions for this problem set, please send them via email to alexander.braun@uni-bonn.de - make sure to send a pdf-file which contains your name and