• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Mechanics and Cooling of the Mu3e Detector

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Mechanics and Cooling of the Mu3e Detector"

Copied!
13
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Mechanics and Cooling of the Mu3e Detector

Adrian Herkert

on behalf of the Mu3e collaboration

Physikalisches Institut Heidelberg University

02.03.2016

(2)

The Mu3e Experiment

Search for the Decay µ + → e + e e +

B = 1 T

ˆ Standard Model:

BR < 10 −54

ˆ Current upper BR limit:

1.0 × 10 −12 at 90 % CL (SINDRUM, 1988)

U. Bellgardt et al., Nucl. Phys. B 299 1, 1988

ˆ Mu3e sensitivity goal:

1 in 10 16 µ-decays

ˆ µ -rate:

10 7 − 10 9 1 s

(3)

Backgrounds

Internal Conversion

ˆ µ + → e + e e + ν e ν µ

R. M. Djilkibaev, R. V. Konoplich, Phys. Rev. D 79, 073004, 2009

Accidentals

ˆ Ordinary Michel decays plus additional e

→ High momentum resolution needed

→ High momentum, time, and

vertex resolution needed

(4)

Detector Design for Minimum Material Budget

Target Inner pixel layers

Scintillating f bres

Outer pixel layers Recurl pixel layers

Scintillator tiles μ Beam

ˆ Pixel tracker: 4 barrels of thin pixel sensors

ˆ Timing detectors:

ˆ Fibre tracker inside central detector

ˆ Scintillating tiles inside recurl stations

ˆ 1 T solenoid

(5)

Pixel Tracker Mechanics

→ x/X 0 ≈ 0.1 %

ˆ HV-MAPS

ˆ can be read out fast

ˆ can be thinned to 50 µm

L. Huth, T99.5

ˆ Flexprint

ˆ Kapton support structure

ˆ 25 µm thin

36 cm

(6)

Cooling Concept

Goal: T HV-MAPS < 70 C

Layer 4 Layer 3

Layer 1 Layer 2 FPGA

Water

Global He flow Gap He flow

Local He flow

(7)

Local Cooling Channels

(8)

CFD Simulations of the Cooling System

Detector Model

End wheel

Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4

Beam pipe Front-end electronics

(9)

CFD Simulations of the Cooling System

Results

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

P/A = 250 mW/cm2 PFPGA = 25 W vglobal ≈ vgap ≈ 4 m/s vlocal ≈ 16 m/s vwater ≈ 1.4 m/s

ΔT [°C]

Position [cm]

Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4

(10)

Measurement of Flow-induced Vibrations

Michelson Interferometer

Laser

Photo diode

Mirror 2 (vibrating) Mirror 1

Oscilloscope Beam

splitter

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Intensity [a.u.]

t [ms]

Ideal signal for an oscillating mirror

(11)

Beam splitter

Photo diode Laser

Mirror

Loudspeaker

Lens

Module prototype Helium in

Measurement of Flow-induced Vibrations

Setup

(12)

Measurement of Flow-induced Vibrations

Results

Superpositions?

→ Alternating sum

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28

Amplitude [µm]

Local He flow velocity [m/s]

Max. observed amplitude Average amplitude

-5 0 5 10 15 20

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Displacement m]

time [s]

Alternating sum

FFT

10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102

0 50 100 150 200

Amplitude [µm]

Frequency [Hz]

FFT

(13)

Summary

ˆ Minimum material cooling system was designed

ˆ CFD simulations give promising results

ˆ Flow-induced vibrations were measured to be of neglectable size

Outlook

ˆ Lab tests of helium cooling of layers 1 & 2 are planned

ˆ Modifications of interferometer setup are planned for more

reliable results

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The described passive cooling measures provide particular economic and ecological advantages. Due to the absence of additional aggregates, the operating and maintenance costs of

Looking at a photograph showing Malevich's group of Suprematist paintings for the exhibition 0,10 we can observe that the artist placed the Black Square diagonically in the

Figure 4.8: Orientation of the MuPix chips on layers 1 &amp; 2 with the detector in yellow, periphery in red and blue cooling flow..

Flow directions in the inner double layers... Outer

Perić, A novel monolithic pixelated particle detector implemented in high- voltage CMOS technology. Nucl.Instrum.Meth., 2007,

HV-MAPS pixel size = 80µm mount to 2x2cm 2 sensors thinned to 50µm.. Kapton as

ring 1 8 edges diameter 52mm Outer/Recurl pixel layers.. ring 3 24 edges

The measurement with helium showed that cooling of the layers with a heat dissipation of 400 mW / cm 2 caused a temperature increase of around 70 − 75 K compared to the