Mechanics and Cooling of the Mu3e Detector
Adrian Herkert
on behalf of the Mu3e collaboration
Physikalisches Institut Heidelberg University
02.03.2016
The Mu3e Experiment
Search for the Decay µ + → e + e − e +
B = 1 T
Standard Model:
BR < 10 −54
Current upper BR limit:
1.0 × 10 −12 at 90 % CL (SINDRUM, 1988)
U. Bellgardt et al., Nucl. Phys. B 299 1, 1988
Mu3e sensitivity goal:
1 in 10 16 µ-decays
µ -rate:
10 7 − 10 9 1 s
Backgrounds
Internal Conversion
µ + → e + e − e + ν e ν µ
R. M. Djilkibaev, R. V. Konoplich, Phys. Rev. D 79, 073004, 2009
Accidentals
Ordinary Michel decays plus additional e −
→ High momentum resolution needed
→ High momentum, time, and
vertex resolution needed
Detector Design for Minimum Material Budget
Target Inner pixel layers
Scintillating f bres
Outer pixel layers Recurl pixel layers
Scintillator tiles μ Beam
Pixel tracker: 4 barrels of thin pixel sensors
Timing detectors:
Fibre tracker inside central detector
Scintillating tiles inside recurl stations
1 T solenoid
Pixel Tracker Mechanics
→ x/X 0 ≈ 0.1 %
HV-MAPS
can be read out fast
can be thinned to 50 µm
L. Huth, T99.5
Flexprint
Kapton support structure
25 µm thin
36 cm
Cooling Concept
Goal: T HV-MAPS < 70 ◦ C
Layer 4 Layer 3
Layer 1 Layer 2 FPGA
Water
Global He flow Gap He flow
Local He flow
Local Cooling Channels
CFD Simulations of the Cooling System
Detector Model
End wheel
Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4
Beam pipe Front-end electronics
CFD Simulations of the Cooling System
Results
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
P/A = 250 mW/cm2 PFPGA = 25 W vglobal ≈ vgap ≈ 4 m/s vlocal ≈ 16 m/s vwater ≈ 1.4 m/s
ΔT [°C]
Position [cm]
Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 Layer 4
Measurement of Flow-induced Vibrations
Michelson Interferometer
Laser
Photo diode
Mirror 2 (vibrating) Mirror 1
Oscilloscope Beam
splitter
-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Intensity [a.u.]
t [ms]
Ideal signal for an oscillating mirror
Beam splitter
Photo diode Laser
Mirror
Loudspeaker
Lens
Module prototype Helium in
Measurement of Flow-induced Vibrations
Setup
Measurement of Flow-induced Vibrations
Results
Superpositions?
→ Alternating sum
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Amplitude [µm]
Local He flow velocity [m/s]
Max. observed amplitude Average amplitude
-5 0 5 10 15 20
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Displacement [µm]
time [s]
Alternating sum
FFT
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102
0 50 100 150 200
Amplitude [µm]
Frequency [Hz]
FFT