• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Exercise 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Exercise 1"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

SoSe 19 Laboratory of Nano-Optics

Ultrafast and Nonlinear Optics

Exercise 1

1 - Gain from a three-level system

Derive expressions for the saturated and small-signal gain of a three-level atom. Your analysis should parallel the analysis given in Sec. 1.3.2 of Ultrafast Optics for a four-level atom, but with level 4 missing. Assume that stimulated emission occurs between levels 3 and 1 and that the population in level 3 relaxes spontaneously to level 1 with time constant τG. Plot a family of curves for the saturated gain as a function of W (different curves represent different values of S) for both three- and four-level atoms. Comment on the main differences in gain behavior of three- and four- level atoms and on the implications for laser operation.

2 - Peak amplitude of a focused ultrafast pulse

A mode-locked laser generates pulses with 105 W of peak power. Spatially the laser output is a Gaussian beam. If the beam is focused in air to a diameter of 10 microns (at e−2 points of the intensity), give the peak intensity and the corresponding peak electric field amplitude.

3 - Characteristic quantities of an ultrafast pulse

A mode-locked laser generates Gaussian pulses with a 1.06-microns center wavelength, 10-ns cavity round-trip time, 1-W average power, and 20-ps FWHM duration. Give values for the number of cavity modes that are oscillating, the optical bandwidth, the peak power, and the pulse energy.

4 - Envelope function under mode-locking

A mode-locked laser usually has a smooth frequency spectrum. Consider a Gaussian

spectrum given by , where .

(a) Assuming constant spectral phase, = 0, work out the expression for the time-domain complex envelope function a(t). (Hint: The Fourier transform of a periodic train of evenly spaced, equal-amplitude delta functions is a periodic train of evenly spaced, equal-amplitude delta functions. This is shown most easily using Fourier series.)

(b) Use a computer and an FFT algorithm to evaluate the time-domain envelope function a(t) for = 10 GHz, = 100 MHz, and = 0. Plot the spectral amplitude function

and the temporal intensity and phase. Give the pulse duration (intensity FWHM). Discuss how the setup of your array representing determines the number of pulses in the time-domain plot.

(c) Now obtain the phases from a random number generator. Plot two examples of the temporal intensity and phase and comment on all the key differences compared to the uniform phase case.

5 - Passive mode-locking with fast saturable absorbers

Consider fast saturable absorber mode-locking with the following parameters: = 2.5×10−19 J, = 5%, = 20%, T = 10 ns, AA =AG =10−4 cm2, σA =10−16 cm2, σG =10−19 cm2, τA =100 fs, τG = 1 μs, ωc =2π×1012 rads−1.

A( ˜ ω) = e

ω˜2/ΔΩ2

m

δ( ˜ ωm Δω)e

m

ω ˜ = ωω

0

ϕ

m

ΔΩ /2π Δω /2π ϕ

m

A( ˜ ω)

A( ˜ ω) ϕ

m

ℏω

0

l

0

l

(i)

(2)

(a) Determine the minimum and maximum values of small-signal gain g0 that yield a stable single- pulse solution. Setting g0 to the average of these values, what are the values of tp and a0 for the (stable) longer-pulse solution? Give numbers for the peak power, pulse energy, average power, and FWHM pulse width.

(b) Using the same g0 as in part (a), write a program to simulate the pulse evolution as it runs repeatedly through the laser cavity. As a suggestion, start your simulation with a noise burst roughly 100 times longer than the steady-state pulse width from above. Do you get a steady-state solution, and does it agree with the solution from theory? Plot pulse parameters (e.g., pulse width, peak power, energy) vs. number of iterations through the laser. Also show a few representative plots of the temporal intensity at different stages during your simulation. [Hint: After each pass through the laser you should recalculate the pulse energy and the gain to be used for the next iteration. The gain may be calculated, for example, from Eq. (2.54) of Ultrafast Optics].

Exercises selected from chapters 1 and 2 of Ultrafast Optics by A.M. Wiener (J. Wiley & Sons, 2009).

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Temperature raise along a straight scan line, just before the next pulse strikes onto surface, for an average power of 100 W and a marking speed of 100 m/s for different spot

The used line scanner has no correction of the pyramidal error. Therefore, to create a smooth surface, the strategy has to be adapted. The results of this optimization are shown in

According to the equation (4) this is a consequence of the strongly increasing threshold fluence and decreasing penetration depth with increasing pulse duration (cf. Figure 5a):

The more hydrophobic coumarins lasing at the longer wavelengths exhibit a smooth increase in lifetime as the solvent becomes less polar and a poorer source

In the frequency domain, the high power per mode in a multigigahertz femtosecond laser frequency comb (FLFC) is a benefit to direct frequency comb spectros- copy [7], length

The SH-Card integrates the 133 MHz Hitachi SH3 processor (SH7709A), an EPSON SED1355 video display controller, 2 MB video memory, a I/O controller companion chip, a synchronous

The input pulses are Gaussian with a 75-ps FWHM pulse duration, a 100-MHz repetition rate, a 1.06-microns center wavelength, and 1 W of average power (coupled into the fiber).. The

The numerical simulations of the electric field evolution within the cavity showed (i) very good agree- ment with experimental results, (ii) stable soliton