First publ. in: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38 (2006), pp. 69-119
Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2008/5653/
URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-56534
Volltext
First publ. in: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38 (2006), pp. 69-119
Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2008/5653/
URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-56534
ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE
Participants who formed implementation intentions to reduce anxiety perceived goal-relevant targets (e.g., golf hole, dartboard) as physically closer and performed better than
We hypothesized that pairs of loss-frame negotiators with a prosocial goal intention should manage to reduce the resistance to concession making arising from the
As implementation intentions traditionally refer to the individual, my model thus proposes a new type of plan that refers to the group, collective imple- mentation intentions (cII),
Specifically, all participants encountered a screen that read ‘‘Now imagine that on the first day that you start using your chosen mode of travel, the following thought occurs to you:
Accordingly, we had a no- goal control condition and a mere goal intention condi- tion in which tennis players the day before a critical match were assigned the following goal: “I
Results from Study 2 sbowed that implementation intentions linking a critical cue for the habitual response to a healthier alternativc can alter the chances for the
That is, if-then planning substantially increased the likelihood of initiating action compared to merely forming respective goal intentions, and this was the case for each of
By forming implementation intentions, people can strategically switch from conscious and effortful action initiation (guided by goal intentions in the action phase) to