• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Impact of submarine groundwater discharge on biogeochemical processes and benthic fluxes in coastal sands

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Impact of submarine groundwater discharge on biogeochemical processes and benthic fluxes in coastal sands"

Copied!
41
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Daphne Donis

1,2

, Felix Janssen

1,2

,

Frank Wenzhöfer

1,2

, Olaf Dellwig

3

, Peter Escher

3

, Michael E. Böttcher

3

1 HGF-MPG Group for Deep Sea Ecology and Technology, Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI), Bremerhaven Germany.

2 Max Plack Institute for Marine Microbiology (MPIMM), Bremen, Germany

3 Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW), Warnemünde, Germany.

Impact of submarine groundwater

discharge on biogeochemical processes

and benthic fluxes in coastal sands

(2)

Area of study

(3)

Low-salinity groundwater escapes at the coast line of Hel Peninsula

through seeps within permeable sandy near shore sediments

Area of study

(4)

- What is the fate of solutes supplied by SGD in the surface sediments?

- How does the presence of SGD impact aerobic benthic processes?

(5)

54.6065

54.606

54.6055

54.605

18.799 18.8 18.801

Latitude

Longitude

High salinity

Low salinity Map of the main seepage areas obtained by high resolution

survey (10 cm b.s.f.) with a conductivity sensor

August 2011

(6)

54.6065

54.606

54.6055

54.605

18.799 18.8 18.801

Latitude

Longitude

High salinity

Low salinity Map of the main seepage areas obtained by high resolution

survey (10 cm b.s.f.) with a conductivity sensor

Sediment parameter Seep Reference TOC (20 cm) % 0.14 (0.15-2cm) 0.11(0.17-2cm)

Grain size (µm) 388 312

Permeability (x10 -11 m 2) 1.95 2.32 Water column

parameter

Seep / Reference

Oxygen 270-320 µmol L-1

Temperature 18-20 °C

Salinity 7 PSU

August 2011

(7)

Porewater profiles

Samples from 5 depths (1-18 cm b.s.f. at seep and ref.) extracted in situ with a porewater lance and ex situ with rhizons

(DIC δ13CDIC Fe2+ Mn2+ Na2+ SO42- PO43- )

In situ incubations (benthic chambers)

21 hours (day/night at seep and reference site) (DIC δ13CDIC Fe2+ Mn2+ Na2+ SO42- PO43- + SGD rates, O2 benthic flux)

(8)

0 7 0

5 10 15 20

cm b. s. f.

Seep site

x Reference site Pore water profiles

Salinity (PSU)

(9)

0 7 0

5 10 15 20

cm b. s. f.

Seep site

x Reference site

Pore water profiles: seep site two-layer structure

Intense advective transport

Salinity (PSU)

(10)

0 7 0

5 10 15 20

cm b. s. f.

Seep site

x Reference site

Salinity (PSU)

Pore water profiles: seep site two-layer structure

Intense advective transport

c

No exchange with bottom water

(11)

0 7 0

5 10 15 20

cm b. s. f.

Groundwater characteristics

Fresh, anoxic , DOC (up to 7 mg L -1) Enriched in

- DIC (δ 13C DIC signature -13.6 ‰) - Methane (300 μmol L-1)

- Sulfides (300 μmol L-1)

- Phosphates and Silicates (60, 600 μmol L-1)

Sal.

(PSU)

O2

μmol L-1

DIC mmol L-1

δ 13C DIC

Fe2+

μmol L-1

Mn2+

μmol L-1

Ca2+

μmol L-1

Mg2+

μmol L-1

SO42-

mmol L-1

PO43-

μmol L-1

HS- μmol L-1

CH4

μmol L-1

Bottom water 7 300 1.7 0.3 0.07 0.04 2.5 8.5 4.6 0.6 0 -

Ground-water (18 cm b.s..f)

0 0 6.4 -13.6 1 5.4 1 0.6 0.03 60 300 300

Salinity (PSU)

(12)

20 cm 15 cm Vol= 5 L

Seepage meters-benthic chambers

(13)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

L m

-2

d

-1

Seepage rates

Seep site

Reference site

20 cm 15 cm Vol= 5 L

Seepage meters-benthic chambers

(14)

Oxygen

20 cm 15 cm Vol= 5 L

Seepage meters-benthic chambers

(15)

40 60 80 100

100% Salinity (7 PSU)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

0% Salinity = 0 PSU

% Salinity

Reference

Seep

(16)

0 2 4 6 0

5 10 15

20 0 2 4 6

0 5 10 15 20

0 1 2 3 4

2 3 4 5 6

SO 4 (mM)SO2- 4 (mmol L-1 )

D ep th cm

Temporal and spatial solute concentration gradients- Conservative behavior

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

SO

42-

(mmol L

-1

) DIC (mmol L

-1

)

DIC (mmol L-1)

SO

2-4

DIC

Time

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

(17)

0 10 20 30

P (microM)

0 1 2

Fe (micromol L1 )

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Mn (microM)

0 20 40 60 80

0 5 10 15

20 0 1 2 3

0 5 10 15

20 0 5 10

0 5 10 15 20

μmol L-1

Fe

2+

(μmol L

-1

) Mn

2+

(μmol L

-1

) PO

3-4

(μmol L

-1

)

D ep th cm

Time

21:00 17:00 21:00 17:00 21:00 17:00

PO

3-4

Fe

2+

Mn

2+

Temporal and spatial solute concentration gradients- Non conservative behavior

(18)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

Time

µ mo l O

2

L

-1

Night Day

- - - theoretical dilution

Temporal oxygen concentration gradients

(19)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

Time

µ mo l O

2

L

-1

Night Day

- - - theoretical dilution

Benthic oxygen flux

= based on slope of linear regressions of solute concentration time series (optode readings) for dark and light periods.

Temporal oxygen concentration gradients

(20)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

Time

µ mo l O

2

L

-1

Night Day

- - - theoretical dilution

Benthic oxygen flux

= based on slope of linear regressions of solute concentration time series (optode readings) for dark and light periods.

Measured oxygen flux = all processes of oxygen removal and release.

Temporal oxygen concentration gradients

(21)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

Time

µ mo l O

2

L

-1

Night Day

- - - theoretical dilution

Benthic oxygen flux

= based on slope of linear regressions of solute concentration time series (optode readings) for dark and light periods.

SGD-related apparent flux = due to the replacement of oxic chamber water with anoxic ground water Measured oxygen flux = all processes of oxygen removal and release.

Temporal oxygen concentration gradients

(22)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

Time

µ mo l O

2

L

-1

Night Day

- - - theoretical dilution

Benthic oxygen flux

= based on slope of linear regressions of solute concentration time series (optode readings) for dark and light periods.

SGD-related apparent flux = due to the replacement of oxic chamber water with anoxic ground water Net oxygen flux = corrected for SGD-related apparent flux

Measured oxygen flux = all processes of oxygen removal and release.

Temporal oxygen concentration gradients

(23)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

Time

µ mo l O

2

L

-1

Night Day

- - - theoretical dilution

Benthic oxygen flux

= based on slope of linear regressions of solute concentration time series (optode readings) for dark and light periods.

Measured oxygen flux = all processes of oxygen removal and release.

Temporal oxygen concentration gradients

(24)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

Time

µ mo l O

2

L

-1

Night Day

- - - theoretical dilution

Benthic oxygen flux

= based on slope of linear regressions of solute concentration time series (optode readings) for dark and light periods.

SGD-related apparent flux = due to the replacement of oxic chamber water with anoxic ground water Measured oxygen flux = all processes of oxygen removal and release.

Temporal oxygen concentration gradients

(25)

21:00 1:00 5:00 9:00 13:00 17:00

Time

µ mo l O

2

L

-1

Night Day

- - - theoretical dilution

SGD-related apparent flux = due to the replacement of oxic chamber water with anoxic ground water Net oxygen flux = corrected for SGD-related apparent flux

Measured oxygen flux = all processes of oxygen removal and release.

Benthic oxygen flux

= based on slope of linear regressions of solute concentration time series (optode readings) for dark and light periods.

Temporal oxygen concentration gradients

(26)

−80

−40 0 40 80

-2-1

mmo l O m d

2 120

−80

−40 0 40 80

120

Reference

Seep

Benthic oxygen flux

Measured flux

Apparent flux (SGD) Flux corrected for SGD

Night Day

(27)

−80

−40 0 40 80 120

−80

−40 0 40 80 120

−80

−40 0 40 80 120

−80

−40 0 40 80 120

mmo l O

2

m

-2

d

-1

Reference

Seep

Night Day

Benthic oxygen flux

Measured flux

Apparent flux (SGD)

CH

4

and H

2

S oxidation

Flux corrected for SGD

(28)

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

O 2

CH

4

H

2

S

(29)

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

- If so, no oxygen would be left for OM mineralization..

O 2

CH

4

H

2

S

OM mineralization ?

(30)

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

- If so, no oxygen would be left for OM mineralization..

..but we do not see OM accumulation

O 2

CH

4

H

2

S

OM mineralization ?

(31)

O 2

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

- If so, no oxygen would be left for OM mineralization..

..but we do not see OM accumulation

OM mineralization

CH

4

H

2

S

(32)

O 2

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

- If so, no oxygen would be left for OM mineralization..

..but we do not see OM accumulation

CH

4

H

2

S

OM mineralization

(33)

O 2

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

- If so, no oxygen would be left for OM mineralization..

..but we do not see OM accumulation

CH

4

H

2

S

AOM

OM mineralization

(34)

O 2

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

- If so, no oxygen would be left for OM mineralization..

..but we do not see OM accumulation

CH

4

H

2

S

AOM

How much sulfide is removed?

How much oxidized?

Open questions

OM mineralization

(35)

O 2

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

- If so, no oxygen would be left for OM mineralization..

..but we do not see OM accumulation

CH

4

H

2

S

AOM

How (and when) is the oxidized iron pool

replenished?

Open questions

How much sulfide is removed?

How much oxidized?

OM mineralization

(36)

O 2

- Oxygen may be fully used to oxidize H

2

S and CH

4

- If so, no oxygen would be left for OM mineralization..

..but we do not see OM accumulation

CH

4

H

2

S

AOM Which methane oxidation pathway?

Open questions

How (and when) is the oxidized iron pool

replenished?

How much sulfide is removed?

How much oxidized?

OM mineralization

(37)

Combining porewater sampling and flux measurements with “seepage meter-benthic chambers” seem to be a trustworthy approach to tackle accumulation or removal of groundwater constituents along its flowpath and the effect on benthic coastal systems

Conclusions

(38)

• Both sites show similar bulk oxygen fluxes and are net autotrophic

• Oxygen fluxes at the reference site match previous studies that identified aerobic respiration as the major OM remineralization pathway.

• At the seep site seepage of anoxic waters significantly contributes to oxygen uptake and anaerobic mineralization pathways may

play a more prominent role.

Conclusions

Combining porewater sampling and flux measurements with “seepage meter-benthic

chambers” seem to be a trustworthy approach to tackle accumulation or removal of

groundwater constituents along its flowpath and the effect on benthic coastal systems

(39)

• Both sites show similar bulk oxygen fluxes and are net autotrophic

• Oxygen fluxes at the reference site match previous studies that identified aerobic respiration as the major OM remineralization pathway.

• At the seep site seepage of anoxic waters significantly contributes to oxygen uptake and anaerobic mineralization pathways may

play a more prominent role.

Conclusions

Combining porewater sampling and flux measurements with “seepage meter-benthic

chambers” seem to be a trustworthy approach to tackle accumulation or removal of

groundwater constituents along its flowpath and the effect on benthic coastal systems

(40)

• Both sites show similar bulk oxygen fluxes and are net autotrophic

• Oxygen fluxes at the reference site match previous studies that identified aerobic respiration as the major OM remineralization pathway.

• At the seep site seepage of anoxic waters significantly contributes to oxygen uptake and anaerobic mineralization pathways may

play a more prominent role.

Conclusions

Combining porewater sampling and flux measurements with “seepage meter-benthic

chambers” seem to be a trustworthy approach to tackle accumulation or removal of

groundwater constituents along its flowpath and the effect on benthic coastal systems

(41)

Acknowledgments

7th framework program, ITN-SENSEnet project Amber project, BONUS+

Patrick Meyer (MPI, Bremen, Germany)

Susan Volger (IOW, Warnemünde, Germany)

Lech Kotwicki, Beata Szymczycha (Institute of Oceanology, Warsaw, Poland)

HGF-MPG Group for Deep Sea Ecology and Technology, MPI, Bremen, Germany

Sea-tech and electronic workshop TAs at MPI (Bremen) and Hel Marine Station.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

• Water routing, fragmentation and edge effects are enhancing/ reducing fluxes and storage of C/N at  landscape scales. • Effects

The combination of neural-network based self-organizing maps and the nonlinear Sammon’s projection (SOM-.. SM) used the variance between measurement points in time to create a

The simulated groundwater flow paths and the water composition indicate that deep, land-derived submarine groundwater discharge differs in quality depending on its

3- To establish a quantitative relationship between the flow of submarine groundwater discharge and the inventory of water column radon-222 and then estimating the quantity of

in: Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 29 (2006),

A prerequisite for the implementation of these initiatives is to have a thorough knowledge of the system and simultaneously a consistent database, usually collected at a country

Statistical differences (two-way ANOVA) between year, sediment type and study site in the biomass, abundance and species number of macrozoobenthos in the coastal sea of

The author wishes to thank the reviewers f o r valuable comments and fruitful discussions on the subject of the study... THE JMPACT OF ACID DEPOSITION ON GROUNDWATER- A