• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Part 2: Bifurcation analysis for type 2 functional response

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "Part 2: Bifurcation analysis for type 2 functional response"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Exercise 2: The spruce budworm project – Resource dynamics with type 2 or 3 functional response

A famous application of bifurcation theory is the analysis of spruce budworm population dynamics [Ludwig et al. 1978, Qualitative analysis of insect outbreak systems: The spruce budworm and forest, Journal of Animal Ecology]. Spruce budworms are insects that feed on spruce and fir trees in North American forests. Most of the time, spruce budworms are present at low density and cause little damage. Apparently they are effectively held in check by their bird predators. Parasites and harsh weather conditions may also contribute to limiting their growth. But once every few decades there is an outbreak. Spruce budworm populations increase dramatically and substantially damage the forests.

The spruce budworm system consists of three trophic levels: the trees, the budworms, and the birds. However, trees and birds have a much longer generation time than budworm.

To understand short-term budworm dynamics, we can therefore assume that tree biomass (related to the budworm’s carrying capacity) and bird density are constant. A general model for spruce budworm densities N with logistic growth and bird predation is:

N˙ =rN 1− N

K

− Ce(N)N

1 +e(N)thN, (1)

where r is the intrinsic growth rate, K is the carrying capacity, C is bird density, e(N) is the efficiency of bird predation, and th is the handling time. We will analyze this model both for a type 2 functional response and for a type 3 functional response and then compare the results. For all plots, rough hand drawings are fine, but if you like, you can also use mathematica, R, maple or some other software package.

Part 1: Nondimensionalization and Allee effect

• Show that model (1) with a type 2 functional response (e(N) = e) can be nondimen- sionalized as

˙

x=x(1−x)− ax

1 +bx. (2)

What are the underlying transformations?

• Show that model (1) with a type 3 functional response (e(N) =e·N) can be nondi- mensionalized as

˙

x=x(1−x)− ax2

x20+x2. (3)

What are the underlying transformations?

• For what combinations ofa,b, and x0 do the population experience an Allee effect?

Under what conditions is the Allee effect strong?

1

(2)

Part 2: Bifurcation analysis for type 2 functional response

• Plot logistic growth rate (first part of (2)) and consumption rate (second part of (2)) on the same axes. Sketch the various qualitatively different cases.

• Compute the equilibria and draw two bifurcation diagrams with a as bifurcation parameter, one for b < 1 and one for b > 1, e.g. 0.75 and 5. What kinds of bifurcations do you find?

• How do the bifurcation values of a depend on b? Plot these curves, but exclude branches that correspond to bifurcation points outside the biological state space.

Label the different regions in the (a, b)-plane with the number of stable equilibria and their qualitative biological behavior.

Part 3: Bifurcation analysis for type 3 functional response

• Plot logistic per-capita growth rate (g(x) = 1−x) and per-capita consumption rate (h(x) = x2ax

0+x2) on the same axes. Sketch the various qualitatively different cases.

• Based on these curves, make a qualitative sketch of a bifurcation diagram with a as bifurcation parameter and x0 < 0.19. (Actually computing the equilibria requires solving a cubic equation). Don’t forget the equilibrium at 0.

• Compute the bifurcation values of a as a function of x0. To do this, notice that at a bifurcation point g(x) = h(x) and dg/dx = dh/dx. Combine these two equations to derive parametric equations a(x) andx0(x). Plot the corresponding curves in the (a, x0) plane.

• Label the different regions in the plane with the number of stable equilibria and their qualitative biological behavior.

Part 4: Comparison and biological interpretation

• Compare your results for parts 2 and 3. What are the qualitative differences between the two scenarios? Ludwig et al. (1978) used only one of the functional responses.

Guess which one. Hint: Which one fits better to the dynamics described in the introduction?

• Discuss possible causes for an outbreak.

• After an outbreak, what could bring the spruce budworm population back to a lower density?

2

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Feeding experiments with specifically 13 C-labeled glucose disclosed that the diterpenoid part of the striatals/striatins is formed via the mevalonate pathway, whereas the

The striatals (1) and striatins (2) are an unusual group of diterpenoids isolated from cultures of the bird’s nest fungus Cyathus striatus (Basidiomy- cetes) (Hecht et al.,

These data suggest that PARP-1/2 activity is important to support the progression of replication forks in response to fork stalling and topological stress, associated

Syntaxin 1 (HPC-1) is associated with chromaffin granules. Participation of the syntaxin 5/Ykt6/GS28/GS15 SNARE complex in transport from the early/recycling endosome to the

The select code number entered through the calculator keyboard, or specified in a peripheral control program, identifies the individual tape cartridge units.. When the 9877 A is

The DELETE option erases a selected file definition and all the files associated with the definition: the data file, the report and label files, the index files,

Table 3: Small a n d Detailed FAP Commodity List, Mapping Table 4: Feed Factors.. Table 5: Corn bination of Original a n d Aggregated Prices for World

As TSFs move across the network, the relation between V and u ∗ and thus the wind regime can change suddenly at a point measurement depending on which TSF air layer is sampled,