• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

MMD (µm) MMD (µm)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "MMD (µm) MMD (µm)"

Copied!
20
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

OVERVIEW OF MELCOR ACTIVITIES IN CIEMAT (2011)

C. Lopez , M. García, B. Otero, LE. Herranz Unit of Nuclear Safety Research

CIEMAT, SPAIN

(2)

• Containment thermal-hydraulic and aerosol behavior.

LWR (Phebus-FP project) MELCOR 1.8.6 YV 3084 SFR (CP-ESFR project) MELCOR 1.8.6 YV 3084

Scenarios Addressed

• Plant analysis.

BWR3 (Spanish CSN) MELCOR 1.8.6 YV 3084

• Fuel degradation in the presence of air.

SFP (OECD-SFP project) MELCOR 1.8.6 YV 3084 SFP

(3)

• Plant analysis BWR

• SFR-ABCOVE

• Phebus FPT3

184 185 186 2.1

On it On it COR

Converter COR

Converter

186 2.1.1576

SNAP SNAP

SNAP post pro SNAP post pro SNAP running SNAP running

Inputs updating

(4)

• OECD-SFP project: extension to PWR fuel assemblies

• Phebus-FPT3 Benchmark (Sarnet 2)

• Extension of validation against SFR available data (source term)

• Analysis of SGTR scenarios

Stress the need of a SNAP course, not easy to handle

Further work and final remarks

(5)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

(6)

<Diagnostic Message> Time= 3.6644E+04Dt= 9.4609E-01 Cycle= 36593 (CVH) Attempted cycle advancement was unsuccessful - DT reduced to = 4.4202E-01

<Diagnostic Message> Time= 3.6644E+04Dt= 9.4609E-01 Cycle= 36593 (CVH) Attempted cycle advancement was unsuccessful - DT reduced to = 4.4202E-01

Melgen OK!

ERROR-melcor Melgen OK!

ERROR-melcor

v2.1.1576

(Unoptimized)

v2.1.1576

(Unoptimized)

v2.1.4206 v2.1.4206

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Diagnostics during input processing TF package:

NO errors during input processing TF package

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Diagnostics during input processing COR package:

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Diagnostics during input processing TF package:

NO errors during input processing TF package

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Diagnostics during input processing COR package:

ERROR-melgen ERROR-melgen

Inputs updating:

(7)

1. BWR3-Mark I

Accident Sequence

- SBO

- High pressure ( ~75 bar ) - 6 SRVs available

- High pressure ECCS and

IC unavailable

(8)

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Time (h)

MMD (µm)

MMD_DOME C1 MMD_DOME C12

Updating with the MELCOR BMP (Nureg/CR-7008) Revision of the aerosol characterization:

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Time (h)

MMD (µm)

MMD_WW C1 MMD_WW C2

1. BWR3-Mark I

RPV WW

Range of size, shape factors, sticking coefficient…..

1-50 µm

0.1-10 µm

(9)

DTmax, DTplot

1. BWR3-Mark I

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6

Time (h)

Temperature (K)

C1-Ring1 C1-Ring2 C1-Ring3

1 2 3

(10)

• Zr air oxidation leading to cladding ignition

• Prototypic BWR FAs (electrically heated with MgO fuel substitute) in prototypic SFP racks (SS walls with neutron absorber layer - Boraflex)

• Assemblies arrangements

− 1x1: “hot-neighbor” situationignition axial propagation

− 1x4: “cold-neighbor” situationignition radial propagation

2. SFP

(11)

Base Case

Hydraulic model Oxidation model

S

lam

Breakaway Transition Pre- rate

k LF k

ox-air

CVH nodalization

Coarse Fine

n = 6 n = 13 τ

*

( )

Re

LAM H S

S L F A k k

D A

⋅ ⋅

= + ⋅

( )

0 . 1 LF

LF α LF

k 1 α

k k α

max max

post pre

Trans

= −

− +

=

= t

0

t τ d LF t

42.04 12.58

10 τ ≅ T

Base Case, n=10

2. SFP: Modeling studies

(12)

The coarse nodalization leads to different results in spite of preserving total hydraulic losses The variation of S

LAM

in the range of the experimental uncertainty sligthly affects the results The variation of k in the range of the experimental uncertainty hardly affects the results

The coarse nodalization leads to different results in spite of preserving total hydraulic losses The variation of S

LAM

in the range of the experimental uncertainty sligthly affects the results The variation of k in the range of the experimental uncertainty hardly affects the results

BWR 1x1 BWR 1x1

2. SFP: CVH nodalization and hydraulic model

(13)

Heavily parametrized (slight variation of τ correlation)

The BC does not seem to represent the actual oxidation phenomena

Best estimate is achieved by accelerating pre-breakaway kinetics and making abrupt transition Heavily parametrized (slight variation of τ correlation)

The BC does not seem to represent the actual oxidation phenomena

Best estimate is achieved by accelerating pre-breakaway kinetics and making abrupt transition BWR 1x4

BWR 1x4

LFmax LFmax LF=1.0

LF=1.0 LF=1.0 LF=1.0

2. SFP: Zr air oxidation model

(14)

Focus:

Project: EU-ESFR (SP3 - Safety)

Scenario: ABCOVE Program

CSTF Facility

AB5 Na spray fire

AB6 NaI + Na spray fire

AB7 Na pool fire – NaI injection

In-containment Aerosol dynamics

3. SFR

(15)

3. SFR: modeling challenges

CB

Q

ch

+ Q

s

CB

Q

ch

+ Q

s

100% atm 100% atm

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Time (s)

Energy Source (MJ)

TF TF

Q

ch

Q

ch

Q

s

To account for the T between the aerosols and the atmosphere

Q

s

To account for the T between the

aerosols and the atmosphere

(16)

CIEMAT Q

ch

CIEMAT

Q

ch

50% atm + 50% ‘Fire ball’ 50% atm + 50% ‘Fire ball’

(TF)

(TF) (HS) (HS)

Fire ball hypothesis

(HS rectangular, vertical)

Fire ball hypothesis

(HS rectangular, vertical)

• Shielding effect

• HS surface

• HS thickness

• HS density

• HS Cp

• Shielding effect

• HS surface

• HS thickness

• HS density

• HS Cp

A dense & compact mass to preserve the thermal

capacity and thermal inertia of the hot aerosols cloud A dense & compact mass to preserve the thermal

capacity and thermal inertia of the hot aerosols cloud

3. SFR: modeling challenges

(17)

300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Time (s)

Temperature (K)

AB5 100 % atm Fire Ball approx

3. SFR: modeling challenges

(18)

Objective FPT3 test:

Flow Fuel Containment

Steam poor (steam starvation)

BR3 24.5 GWd/tU B4C control rods

Evaporating acidic sump Recombiners

● Uncertainty analysis to the Th’s and aerosol modeling of FPT3

Aerosols

Iodine source Particle size Density

Th’s: 24 var

Rh

o

T

wet-cond

4. Phebus-FPT3

Uncertainty

(19)

MELCOR

93 runs

MELCOR

93 runs

Stochastic approach: Wilks Theory

4. Phebus-FPT3: User tool kit for uncertainty analysis

“93 samplings determine a 95% of the CI with a 95% of CL”

Fortran Applications:

• n samples

• Different distributions

• Time dependent profiles BC

• n samples

• Different distributions

• Time dependent profiles BC

n inputs: Postprocessing:

• n output files

• Defined output variables

• n output files

• Defined output variables

Specific for Phebus-FPT3

Specific for Phebus-FPT3

(20)

T Vap Time

Vapo mass flow rate

MELCOR

93 runs

MELCOR

93 runs

4. Phebus-FPT3: On going analysis

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

On the other hand, the finding that MMD2 is specifically expressed in brain and testis of mouse and human, and not in macrophages or any other tested cell line, raises many questions

With respect to more immediate concerns related to the sovereign debt crisis, EU leaders – with the exception of the UK and the Czech Republic – signed a new intergovernmental treaty

The main objective of the consultation was to identify the preferences of PARADIGM stakeholders with regards to core components addressing the long-term sustainability of PE.

Σ = 136 Abbreviations: AL, active layer; PF, permafrost; MP, mudpool; TZ, transition zone; SF, slumpfloor; TS, thaw stream; MS-SC, marine sediment from short core; MS-SU, marine

Strontium isotope ratios of modern environmental samples (rock and soil leachates, snail shells, ground vegetation and tree leaves) collected from 39 locations in the vicinity of

Since the heating rates depend inversely on the loop length, it could be the result of stronger heating along the short field lines in the lower regions, even if the heating rate

If the hypotheses are arranged in the order of performance, in the HS treatment, coarse thinking is the best predictor of behavior, followed by the risk averse hypothesis, then by

3.Exceedance of the critical load of acidity at the 17 ICP IM sites: (a) Acidity CLF for the sites and their normalized depositions in 2017 (Note: for two sites the N deposition is