• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

KT2Lab@PSI KT2Lab@PSI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "KT2Lab@PSI KT2Lab@PSI"

Copied!
23
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

KT2Lab@PSI KT2Lab@PSI

Lea Caminada,

Lea Caminada, Stefanos Leontsinis, Stefanos Leontsinis, Olaf Steinkamp

Olaf Steinkamp

lea.caminada@physik.uzh.ch

FS 2020 FS 2020

olafs@physik.uzh.ch steleo@physik.uzh.ch

29 May 2020

(2)

Schedule 2020

Filled in request for 7 days, July 16 – 22

→ approval by PSI pending

→ dates may change by a few days,

depending on Covid19 situation and progress at PSI

(3)

Schedule 2020

Each of you comes to PSI for two full days (9h – 17h) Every day, there are two of you at PSI

→ up to you to decide who comes on which days

( but suggest you wait with this until the dates are confirmed )

(4)

Paul Scherrer Institute

(5)

Paul Scherrer Institute

(6)

“Experimentierhalle”

Cockcroft-Walton→Injector →Cyclotron:

→ accelerate protons to p = 590 MeV Proton beam hits two targets:

M (“Mince”) and E (“Epais”)

→ secondary beams

( mostly pions, muons, protons ) to seven experiment areas:

πM1, πM3,

πE1, πE3, πE5, μE1, μE4 ( also neutrons: UCN, SINQ )

(7)

“Experimentierhalle”

Cockcroft-Walton→ Injector→Cyclotron:

→ accelerate protons to p = 590 MeV Proton beam hits two targets:

M (“Mince”) and E (“Epais”)

→ secondary beams

( mostly pions, muons, protons ) to seven experiment areas:

πM1, πM3,

πE1, πE3, πE5, μE1, μE4 ( also neutrons: UCN, SINQ )

(8)

PiM1 Beamline

Dipole magnets to select beam momentum p [MeV] = 300 × B [T] × r [m]

and steer beam direction

Quadrupole magnet to focus beam Collimators to reduce beam intensity

(9)

PiM1 Beamline

magnet QTA11 -87.1427 "A" 0.8 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QTB11 -113.17 "A" 1.5 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QTB12 160.648 "A" 2.5 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet SSB11Y 0.558 "A" 0.2

slit FS11-L 500 "Steps" 1 slit FS11-R 500 "Steps" 1 slit FS11-O 500 "Steps" 1 slit FS11-U 500 "Steps" 1 magnet ASM11 226.784 "A" 1

magnet TS11 150.408 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet TS12 -192.026 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } shutter KSD11

magnet QSL11 -103.529 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QSL12 89.0151 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QSL13 78.7203 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QSL14 -110.835 "A" 2 { {scalevalue "100%"} } slit FS12-L 620 "Steps" 1

slit FS12-R 620 "Steps" 1 slit FS12-O 620 "Steps" 1 slit FS12-U 620 "Steps" 1 magnet ASM12 225.511 "A" 1

magnet TS21 -273.395 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet TS22 217.657 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QSL15 -47.285 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QSL16 63.6361 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QSL17 131.201 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} } magnet QSL18 -133.582 "A" 1 { {scalevalue "100%"} }

(10)

Experiment Area

“Control room

Experim ent

(11)

Goal of the Measurement

Measure decays of charged pions π

+

→ μ

+

ν

μ

μ

+

→ e

+

ν

e

ν

μ

Stop π+ in a scintillator (→ signal starts clock)

Measure e+ in a second scintillator (→ signal stops clock)

Measure time spectrum (→ Time-to-Digital Converter) Determine π+ and μ+ lifetimes

from a fit to the histogram

(12)

Goal of the Measurement

Also: π

+

→ e

+

ν

e

( but strongly suppressed by … what ?!? )

Measure e+ energy spectrum ( using a calorimeter ),

estimate ratio of branching ratios:

π+ → e+ νe is a two-body decay

→ fixed e+ energy

μ+ → e+ νe νμ is a three-body decay

→ wide e+ energy spectrum

(13)

Setup

Beam particles pass through SC1 and SC2 (and are slowed down in plastic moderators)

π+ are stopped and decay in SC3 (→ no signal in SC4)

Positrons are detected in SC6 (→ time measurement)

and Calorimeter

(→ energy measurement)

Scintillators and Calorimeter read out by photo-multipliers

(14)

Setup

Calorimeter Scintillators

(15)

Programme at PSI

1. Test scintillators / photomultipliers

→ connect High Voltage, check currents

→ look at noise signal

→ look at signal with radioactive source 2. Mechanical setup

→ connect cables to control room

3. Setup electronics for scintillator readout

→ amplify and discriminate

→ form coincidences

4. Optimize beam parameters

→ direction

→ momentum

(16)

Programme at PSI

1. Test scintillators / photomultipliers

→ connect High Voltage, check currents

→ look at noise signal

→ look at signal with radioactive source 2. Mechanical setup

→ setup detectors in the area

→ connect cables to control room

3. Setup scintillator readout & logic

→ amplify and discriminate

→ form coincidences

4. Optimize beam parameters

→ direction and momentum SC1&SC2&SC3&!SC4

stopping μ+ in SC3

stopping π+ in SC3

(17)

Programme at PSI

5. Setup electronics for time measurement

→ Time-to-Analog Converter

→ Analog-to-Digital Converter

→ Histogram

6. Measure decay-time spectrum

→ take data over night

→ time calibration

7. “Calibrate” calorimeter

→ e+ energy spectrum from each PMT

→ adjust HV to make spectra look similar 8. Measure energy spectrum

→ sum signals of all PMTs

→ take data over night

“Maestro”

(KT1 lab)

(18)

Data Analysis

True time distribution described by

Try adding components to describe

→ background from random coincidences

→ background from hadronic interactions

→ “smearing” due to measurement resolution Analysis of energy spectrum

more “qualitative”

→ no proper energy calibration

→ no theoretical model

(19)

Report

One common report by the whole team

→ physics, motivation

→ description of setup

→ relevant parameters

( beam settings, discriminator thresholds, etc )

→ auxilliary measurements

( beam optimisation, time calibration, … )

→ data

( list of files with short description, histograms )

→ fits to data

→ results ( with uncertainties ! )

→ discussion

(20)

Before we go to PSI

Discuss how you want to communicate with each other

→ need to pass important information from one team to the next Discuss how you want to keep a logbook

→ paper? electronic?

→ will be crucial for writing the report

It might be a good idea to do a first rough analysis already while you are taking the data

→ helps you see immediately if things go badly wrong, if things are missing

→ means you need to prepare some basic analysis tools beforehand (read in and plot histograms, do a basic fit)

→ maybe generate simulated decay-time spectrum ???

(21)

Before we go to PSI

Everyone needs to get an access card and a dosimeter

→ fill in an online form

→ follow a short online training course

→ pass a simple test

We’ll send you the details when we have the

final confirmation of our time slot from PSI

(22)

After we’ve been to PSI

Suggest a short wrap-up meeting with everyone to

→ discuss measurements

→ plan analysis and writing of report

→ opportunity for you to ask us questions Deadline for submitting the report:

31 August 2020

(23)

Questions ???

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

determine sign of re-curling tracks (SciFi) scintillating fibers (SciFi) ~250 ps, detection efficiency > 95 %. scintillating tiles ~70 ps, detection efficiency >

Andre Schöning, PI-Heidelberg 2 PSI2013 Workshop, Sept 12, 2013 upgrade.. History of LFV Decay experiments History of LFV

• Informs global, regional and national energy strategies by hosting high-level events, publishing authoritative studies, and working through its extensive member network

– after kinetic transition, oxygen and nitrogen access to the interface between metal and oxide through the cracks, and oxygen is consumed first. – the consumed oxygen would

The (diagnostic) beam line includes five solenoid magnets, an emittance monitor, an additional YAG screen for the measurement of transverse beam sizes as well as a wall

[r]

Falls es sich nicht vermeiden lässt, dass Chemikalien das PSI über das Abwasser oder die Abluft verlassen, müssen die entsprechenden Grenzwerte gemäss

This report will concentrate on research performed in 2010 on these materials, as an example of a detailed complementary study exploiting the full range of experimental