• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Influence of Desensitising on Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Adhesives

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Influence of Desensitising on Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Adhesives"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Introduction

Studies on new desensitising agents have mainly focused on their tubular-occluding effects and effectiveness in decreasing pain.

In clinical practice, tooth sensitivity often occurs when the tooth has a defect and it needs subsequent resin restoration.

The desensitising agents could be used before bonding to reduce postoperative sensitivity. However, there is a concern that dentine desensitisers may change the properties of dentin, and such modification may have adverse effects on the bonding performance of adhesive systems. More information is required on the effect of these new desensitisers used immediately before adhesive bonding.

Gernhardt C.R.*, Luellau B., Brandt K.V.

Influence of Desensitising on Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Adhesives

Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg

University Outpatient Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Halle (Saale), Germany

Results

Significantly higher values could be found for Futurabond U in the etch-and-rinse mode (21.45 MPa) compared to the self-etch mode (16.09 MPa) on enamel. Compared to the other two adhesives, no significant differences could be detected. The additional application of the oxalate-containing desensitiser in the case of dentin samples did not show any significant difference in the etch-and-rinse mode. For groups in self-etch mode, the desensitiser application resulted in significantly reduced tensile bond strength values compared to groups without desensitiser application.

Correspondence: Prof. Dr. Christian R. Gernhardt

Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Magdeburger Str. 16, D-06112 Halle (Saale), e-Mail: christian.gernhardt@uk-halle.de

97

th

General Session & Exhibition of the IADR June 19

th

-22

nd

2019 Vancouver, BC, Canada

Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg

Fig. 4: The main results (in MPa)

Fig. 1: Futurabond U

Material and Methods

180 human third molars were included. Standardised enamel and dentin specimens were prepared. 15 enamel and dentin samples each were assigned to one of the following experimental groups (Tab. 1):

Enamel groups: 1: Futurabond U, etch & rinse; 2: Futurabond U, self- etch; 3: Futurabond® DC; 4: Solobond M. Dentin groups: 5:

Futurabond U, etch & rinse; 6: Desensitiser, Futurabond U, etch &

rinse; 7: Futurabond U, self-etch; 8: Desensitiser, Futurabond U, self- etch; 9: Futurabond DC; 10: Desensitiser, Futurabond® DC; 11:

Solobond M; 12: Desensitiser, Solobond M. The oxalate-containing desensitiser was applied in advance to the dentin samples. The adhesives were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.

After polymerisation of the composite, microtensile bond strength values were determined using a universal testing machine.

Aim of the study

The aim of the study was to evaluate microtensile bond strength of a universal adhesive (Futurabond U, Voco GmbH, Germany) in self-etch and etch-and-rinse mode on human enamel and dentin compared with established systems. Additionally, the influence of an oxalate- containing desensitiser was evaluated.

Conclusion

Regarding the limitations of an in-vitro study, it can be concluded that Futurabond U has very promising results on enamel and dentin compared to the established adhesives. The influence of an oxalate- containing desensitiser on the adhesion is only visible in the case of the self-etch application mode.

Desensitiser Adhesive and application mode Futurabond U Futurabond DC Solobond M Etch&rinse Self-etch

Enamel no 1 2 3 4

Dentin 5 7 9 11

yes 6 8 10 12

Table 1:Group classification

References

1. Pei, Dandan; Liu, Siying; Huang, Cui; Du, Xijin; Yang, Hongye;

Wang, Yake; Deng, Donglai (2013): Effect of pretreatment with calcium-containing desensitizer on the dentine bonding of mild self-etch adhesives. In: Eur J Oral Sci 121 (3 Pt 1), S. 204–210.

DOI: 10.1111/eos.12047

2. Aranha, Ana Cecilia Correa; Siqueira Junior, Adonis De Santi;

Cavalcante, Larissa Maria Assad; Pimenta, Luiz Andre Freire;

Marchi, Giselle Maria (2006): Microtensile bond strengths of composite to dentin treated with desensitizer products. In: J Adhes Dent 8 (2), S. 85-90

3. Seara, S. F.; Erthal, B. S.; Ribeiro, M.; Kroll, L.; Pereira, G D S (2002): The influence of a dentin desensitizer on the microtensile bond strength of two bonding systems. In: Oper Dent 27 (2), S. 154–160

Fig. 2: Futurabond DC

Fig. 3: Solobond M

Futurabond U E&R Futurabond U Self- Etch

Futurabond DC Solobond M

21.45

16.09

20.60 21.10

18,42

14.83

13.10

16.66 17.68

8.29 9.26

15.12

Enamel Dentin Dentin + Desensitizer

MPa

Futurabond U E&R Futurabond U Self-Etch Futurabond DC Solobond M

18,42

14.83

13.10

16.66 17.68

8.29 9.26

15.12

Dentin Dentin + Desensitiser

MPa

Fig. 5:The desensitizer groups (in MPa). *** significant difference p<0.05.

*** ***

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Summarizing, mainly three discoveries/strategies have stimulated the recent research on laminates: the possibility to increase the work of fracture by alternating porous thin

Figure 4.10: Residual stresses in the parallel (dash-dotted line) and transverse (dashed line) directions caused by turning of SAE 1045 for different cutting feeds. It can be seen

2 At the moment, when it comes to clinical evidence, a 5-year follow-up period is most likely the longest rand- omized clinical trial available on the clinical performance

Simple bond strength tests, eg, the shear bond strength test, give some initial indication of bonding performance, but should definitely be complemented not only by multiple

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of preapplication of 2% chlorhexidine gluco- nate on the immediate microtensile bond strength of a

The null hypotheses tested were: (1) different treatments performed in the dentine surface do not cause interference in the bond strength of self-adhesive resin ce- ment to

Objective: To evaluate adhesives’ enamel bonding performance utilising the traditional microtensile bond strength test (μTBST) and a new double-sided microtensile bond strength

Similar to solid wood, as the temperature decreased from 20 to -60 C, the shear strength of tested PUR adhesive- bonded wood joints decreased from 10.9 to 7.9 MPa, a decrease of 27.5