Aarons, Debra. 1994. Aspects of the syntax of American Sign Language: Boston University dissertation.
Aarons, Debra, Benjamin Bahan, Judy Kegl & Carol Neidle. 1992. Clausal structure and a tier for grammatical marking in American Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics15. 103–142.
Abraham, Werner. 1991a. Discourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about? In Werner Abraham (ed.),Discourse particles. Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactical and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, 203–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Abraham, Werner. 1991b. The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In Closs Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.),Approaches to grammaticaliza- tion, Volume 2: Focus on types of grammatical markers, 331–380. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Adone, Dany & Alain G´ebert. 2006. Mauritian Sign Language, Vol. 1. Mauritius:
Editions le Printemps.
Ahlgren, Inger. 1994.Bilingualism in deaf education. Seedorf: Signum.
Altmann, Hans. 1976. Die Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Altmann, Hans. 1993. Satzmodus. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolf- gang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.),Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgen¨ossischer Forschung, 1006–1029. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Armstrong, David F., William C. Stokoe & Sherman E. Wilcox. 1995. Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, David F. & Sherman E. Wilcox. 2003. Origins of sign languages. In Marc Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (eds.),Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, 305–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2003. Classifier construc- tions and morphology in two sign languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.),Perspec- tives on classifier construction in sign language, 53–84. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler. 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology.Language81:2. 301–344.
Atlas, Jay David. 1991. Topic-comment, presupposition, logical form and focus stress implicatures: The case of focal particlesonlyandalso.Journal of Semantics 8. 127–147.
Atlas, Jay David. 1993. The importance of being ‘only’: Testing the neo-gricean versus neo-entailment paradigms.Journal of Semantics10:4. 301–318.
Authenrieth, Tanja. 2002. Heterosemie und Grammatikalisierung bei Modalpar- tikeln. Eine synchrone und diachrone Studie anhand von eben, halt e(cher)t, ein- fach, schlicht und glatt. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Auwera, Johan van der. 1984. Maar en alleen als graadpartikels (Maar and alleen as degree particles). In Johan van der Auwera & Willy Vandeweghe (eds.),Studies over Nederlandse partikelsAntwerp papers in linguistics 35, 103–118. Antwer- pen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
Auwera, Johan van der & Patrick Dendale (eds.). 2000. Modal verbs in Germanic and Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bach, Kent. 1994. Conversational impliciture.Mind and Language9. 124–162.
Bach, Kent. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature.Linguistics and Philosophy 22:4. 327–366.
Baker, Anne, Beppie van den Bogaerde, Roland Pfau & Trude Schermer (eds.). 2008.
Gebarentaalwetenschap. Een inleiding. Deventer: Van Tricht uitgeverij.
Baker, Anne E. 2000. Official recognition of sign language in the Netherlands.Deaf Worlds16:2. 34–38.
Baker-Shenk, Charlotte. 1983. A microanalysis of the non-manual components of questions in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.
Bayer, Josef. 1996. Directionality and logical form. On the scope of focussing par- ticles and wh-in-situ. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bayer, Josef & Hans-Georg Obenauer. 2008. Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. Talk presented at the Particle Workshop, University of Cam- bridge, Cambridge, UK.
Beaver, David I. 2001. Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics.Studies in Logic, Language and Information. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari. 2004. Where did all the arguments go?:
Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Lin- guistic Theory22. 743–810.
Benedicto, Elena, Sandra Cvejanov & Josep Quer. 2007. Valency in classifier predi- cates: A syntactic analysis.Lingua117. 1202–1215.
Berger, Frauke, Anja M¨uller, Barbara H¨ohle, Michaela Schmitz & J¨urgen Weis- senborn. 2006. The acquisition of the additive particleauchin German: A matter of competence or performance? Paper presented at 1st International Conference of SFB 632: Information structure between linguistic theory and empirical methods, Potsdam, Germany.
Berger, Frauke, Anja M¨uller, Barbara H¨ohle & J¨urgen Weissenborn. 2007. The pro- duction and processing of sentences containing the additive particleauch(‘also’) by German 4-year-olds: Data from elicitation and eye-tracking. In Heather Caunt- Nulton, Samantha Kulatilake & I-Hao Woo (eds.),BUCLD 31: Proceedings of the 31st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 105–116.
Boston: Cascadilla Press.
Bergman, Brita. 2001. Sign languages. Paper presented at the official opening of the European Union/Council of Europe Year of Languages: The challenge of linguis- tic diversity in Europe, Lund, Sweden.
Bergmann, Beate. 2008. Die Betrachtung des W-Fragenerwerbs anhand aus- gew¨ahlter Sprachen: Ein Uberblick ¨uber den Erwerb der W-Fragen in¨ der Deutschen Lautsprache, Amerikanischen Geb¨ardensprache und Deutschen Geb¨ardensprache. Frankfurt am Main: Goethe Universit¨at MA thesis.
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1980. Semantic structure and illocutionary force. In Ferenc Kiefer, John Searle & Manfred Bierwisch (eds.),Speech act theory and pragmat- ics, 1–35. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bohl, Saskia. 2006. Zwei Sprachen - ein Lehrer. DAS ZEICHEN - Zeitschrift f¨ur Sprache und Kultur Geh¨orloser74. 412–419.
Bohlinger, Dwight. 1989.Intonation and its uses. Melody in grammar and discourse.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky. 2009.Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective.Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Mor- phology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borst, Dieter. 1985. Die affirmativen Modalpartikeln doch, ja und schon. Ihre Be- deutung, Funktion, Stellung und ihr Vorkommen. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Bos, Heleen F. 1993. Agreement and prodrop in Sign Language of the Netherlands.
In Frank Drijkoningen & Kees Hengeveld (eds.),Linguistics in the Netherlands 1993, 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bos, Heleen F. 1995. Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Heleen F. Bos & Trude Schermer (eds.),Sign Language Research 1994. Proceed- ings of the 4th European Congress on sign language research, 121–147. Seedorf:
Signum.
Boyes Braem, Penny. 1995. Einf¨uhrung in die Geb¨ardensprache und ihre Er- forschung. Seedorf: Signum.
Brandt, Margareta, Marga Reis, Inger Rosengren & Ilse Zimmerman. 1992. Satztyp, Satzmodus und Illokution. Modalpartikeln. In Inger Rosengren (ed.),Satz und Illokution. Band 1.Linguistische Arbeiten, 71–77. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Branson, Jan, Don Miller, Gede Marsaja & Wayan Negara. 1996. Everyone here speaks sign language too: A deaf village in Bali, Indonesia. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Multicultural aspects of sociolinguistics in deaf communities, 39–57. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
Brennan, Virginia M. 1993. Root and epistemic modal auxiliary verbs. Amherst:
University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brentari, Diane. 2012. Phonology. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.),Sign language - An international handbook, 21–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brentari, Diane & Laurinda Crossley. 2002. Prosody on the hands and face. Evidence from American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics5:2. 105–130.
Bublitz, Wolfram. 1978. Ausdrucksweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und Englischen. Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln und Vergewisserungsfragen und ihrer englischen Entsprechungen.Linguistische Arbeiten 57. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
B¨uring, Daniel. 1997.The meaning of topic and focus: The 59th street bridge accent.
London: Routledge.
B¨uring, Daniel. 2005. Binding theory.Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
B¨uring, Daniel. 2007. Semantics, intonation and information structure. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.),The oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 445–474. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
B¨uring, Daniel & Katharina Hartmann. 2001. The syntax and semantics of focus- sensitive particles in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory19. 229–
281.
Bußmann, Hadumod. 1990.Lexikon der Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kroener.
Buxton, Richard B. 2002. An introduction to functional magnetic resonance imag- ing: Principles and techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 1985.Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form.
Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bybee, Joan & Suzanne Fleischman. 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse.
An introductory essay. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.),Modality in grammar and discourse, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Com- pany.
Campbell, Lyle & Richard Janda. 2001. Introduction: Conceptions of grammatical- ization and their problems. Language Sciences23. 93–112.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2007. F¨ur eine syntaktische Analyse von Modalpartikeln. In Eva- Maria Th¨une & Franca Ortu (eds.),Gesprochene Sprache - Partikeln. Beitr¨age der Arbeitsgruppen der 2. Tagung Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft in ItalienDeutsche Sprachwissenschaft international, 89–102. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.),Subject and topic, 27–55. New York:
Academic Press.
Chen, Aoju. 2012. The prosodic investigation of information structure. In Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.),The expression of information structure, 249–286.
Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2000. Speaking, meaning and doing.
In Meaning and grammar. An introduction to semantics, 194–255. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995.The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry24. 239–297.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999.Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspec- tive.Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coerts, Jane. 1992.Nonmanual grammatical markers. An analysis of interrogatives, negations and topicalisations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam:
Universiteit van Amsterdam dissertation.
Coerts, Jane. 1994. Constituent order in Sign Language of the Netherlands and the functions of orientations. In Inger Ahlgren, Brita Bergman & Mary Bren- nan (eds.),Perspectives on sign language structure: Papers from the Fifth Inter- national Symposium on Sign Language Research, vol. 1, 69–88. Durham, UK:
International Sign Linguistics Association.
CommissieNGT, Nederlandse Gebarentaal. 1997. Meer dan een gebaar. Tech. rep.
Rapport van de Commissie Nederlandse Gebarentaal.
Coniglio, Marco. 2006. German modal particles in the functional structure of IP.
University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics16. 57–95.
Coniglio, Marco. 2007a. Deutsche Modalpartikeln: Ein Vorschlag zu ihrer syntak- tischen Analyse. In Eva-Maria Th¨une & Franca Ortu (eds.),Gesprochene Sprache - Partikeln. Beitr¨age der Arbeitsgruppen der 2. Tagung Deutsche Sprachwis- senschaft in ItalienDeutsche Sprachwissenschaft international, 103–114. Frank- furt am Main: Peter Lang.
Coniglio, Marco. 2007b. German modal particles in root and embedded clauses.
University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics17. 109–141.
Coniglio, Marco. 2011.Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: ihre Distribution und Lizensierung in Haupt- und Nebens¨atzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Corina, David, Ursula Bellugi & Judy Reilly. 1999. Neuropsychological studies of linguistic and affective facial expressions in deaf signers. Language and Speech 42:2-3. 307–331.
Coulter, Geoffrey. 1979. American sign language typology. San Diego: University of California dissertation.
Crasborn, Onno. 2001.Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguis- tics (LOT) dissertation.
Crasborn, Onno. 2008. Open access to sign language corpora. In Onno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds.), Construction and exploitation of sign language corpora. 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, 33–38. Paris: ELDA.
Crasborn, Onno & Thomas Hanke. 2004. Metadata for sign language corpora. Back- ground document for an ECHO workshop. Tech. rep. Radboud University Ni- jmegen.
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij. 2013. The phonology of focus in Sign Lan- guage of the Netherlands.Journal of Linguistics1–51.
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij, Annika Nonhebel & Wim Emmerik. 2004.
ECHO data set for Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Tech. rep. De- partment of Linguistics, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Crasborn, Onno & Inge Zwitserlood. 2008. The Corpus NGT. Unpublished manuscript, Nijmegen: Radboud University.
Crasborn, Onno, Inge Zwitserlood & Johan Ros. 2008. Corpus NGT. An open access digital corpus of movies with annotations of Sign Language of the Netherlands.
Tech. rep. Radboud University Nijmegen.
Crean, Edward J. 1997. Breaking the silence. The education of the Deaf in Ireland 1816-1996. Dublin: Irish Deaf Society Publications.
Croze, Cecile, Christian Horn, Tim Riebe, Alain G´ebert & Dany Adone. 2006.Dic- tionary and grammar of Mauritian Sign Language (Dictionnaire et grammaire de la langue des signes mauricienne = Diksioner ek gramer lang sign morisien).
Mauritius: Editions Le Printemps.
Cuenca, Maria J. 1997. Form-use mappings for tag questions. In Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker & Linda Waugh (eds.),Discourse and perspective in cog- nitive linguisticsAmsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Sci- ence. Series IV. Current issues in linguistic theory. Vol. 151, 3–19. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2008. Facial expression as intonation in Israeli Sign Lan- guage: The case of neutral and counterfactual conditionals. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, 61–82. Seedorf: Signum.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler. 2007. Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Unpublished manuscript, Haifa: University of Haifa.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler. 2009. Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language.Language and Speech52:2-3. 287–314.
Dietrich, Rainer. 1992. Modalit¨at im Deutschen: Zur Theorie der relativen Modalit¨at. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Dimroth, Christine. 2004.Fokuspartikeln und Informationsgliederung im Deutschen.
Studien zur Deutschen Grammatik 69. T¨ubingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
Dively, Valerie L. 2001. Signs without hands: Nonhanded signs in American Sign Language. In Valerie L. Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah F. Taub & Anne M.
Baer (eds.),Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 62–73.
Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Doherty, Monika. 1985.Epistemische Bedeutung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Doherty, Monika. 1987.Epistemic meaning. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Dunne, Dee. 2006.Language acquisition by deaf children in Ireland: Some theoret- ical considerations and two case studies. Dublin: School of Linguistic, Speech and Communication Sciences, Trinity College dissertation.
Eccarius, Petra & Diane Brentari. 2007. Symmetry and dominance: A cross- linguistic study of signs and classifier constructions.Lingua117. 1169–1201.
Eichmann, Hanna, Martje Hansen & Jens Heßmann (eds.). 2012. Handbuch Deutsche Geb¨ardensprache. Sprachwissenschaftliche und anwendungsbezogene Perspektiven. Seedorf: Signum.
Eisenberg, Peter & Annette Klosa (eds.). 1998. Duden, Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Emmorey, Karen. 1999. Do signers gesture? In Lynn S. Messing & Ruth Campbell (eds.),Gesture, speech, and sign, 133–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Emmorey, Karen. 2003. Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Emmorey, Karen, Ursula Bellugi, Angela Frederici & Petra Horn. 1995. Effects of age of acquisition in grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks.Applied Psycholinguistics16. 1–23.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1979. Topics or topicalized nominals in Danish Sign Language. InThe sciences of deaf signing. proceedings from a seminar in recent developments in language and cognition: Sign language research, 43–54. Kopen- hagen UP.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1990. Pragmatics of nonmanual behaviour in Danish Sign Language. In William H. Edmondson & Fred Karlsson (eds.), SLR ’87.
Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research.
International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf, 121–
128. Seedorf: Signum.
Esser, J¨urgen. 1984. Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Englisch. Ein Beitrag zur strukturellen Pragmatik. T¨ubingen: Gunter Narr.
Fachgeb¨ardenlexika, Arbeitsgruppe. 1994f. Fachgeb¨ardenlexika zu verschiedenen Themen. Seedorf: Signum.
Fehrmann, Gisela, Walter Huber, Ludwig J¨ager, Horst Sieprath & Isa Werth. 1997.
Aufbau und Konstruktion des Aachener Tests zur Basiskompetenz in Deutscher Geb¨ardensprache (ATG). Germanistisches Institut und Neurologische Klinik RWTH Aachen.
Fenlon, Jordan, Tanya Denmark, Ruth Campbell & Bencie Woll. 2007. Seeing sen- tence boundaries.Sign Language & Linguistics10:2. 177–200.
Ferreira-Brito, Lucinda. 1990. Epistemic, alethic, and deontic modalities in a Brazil- ian Sign Language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.),Theoretical is- sues in sign language research, Vol. 1.: LinguisticsInternational Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, 229–260. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
F´ery, Caroline. 1993. German intonational patterns.Linguistische Arbeiten 285.
T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
F´ery, Caroline. 2012. Prosody and information structure of the German particles selbst,wiederandauch. In Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya &
Mariko Sugahara (eds.),Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth O. Selkirk, London: Equinox Press.
F´ery, Caroline & Manfred Krifka. 2008. Information structure. Notional distinc- tions, ways of expression. In Piet van Sterkenburg (ed.),Unity and diversity of languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Fintel, Kai von. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Fintel, Kai von. 1997. Bare plurals, bare conditionals, andonly.Journal of Semantics 14. 1–56.
Fintel, Kai von. 2006. Modality and language. In Donald M. Borchert (ed.),Ency- clopedia of philosophy, Detroit: MacMillan Reference USA 2nd edn.
Foolen, Ad. 1983. Zur Semantik und Pragmatik der restriktiven Gradpartikeln. In Harald Weydt (ed.),Partikeln und Interaktion, 188–199. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Foolen, Ad. 1995. Dutch modal particles: The relevance of grammaticalized ele- ments. In Thomas F. Shannon & Johan P. Snapper (eds.),The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1993, 57–70. University Press of America.
Fox, Margalit. 2007.Talking hands. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Francescotti, Robert M. 1995. The conventional implicature approach reconsidered.
Linguistics and Philosophy18. 153–173.
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics31. 931–
952.
Frey, Werner & Karin Pittner. 1998. Zur Positionierung der Adverbiale im deutschen Mittelfeld.Linguistische Berichte176. 489–534.
Frey, Werner & Karin Pittner. 1999. Adverbialpositionen im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Monika Doherty (ed.), Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informa- tionsverteilung, 14–41. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Geraci, Carlo, Katia Battaglia, Anna Cardinaletti & Carlo Cecchetto. 2011. The LIS Corpus Project: A discussion of sociolinguistic variation in the lexicon. Sign Language Studies11:4. 528–574.
Geurts, Bart. 1999.Presuppositions and pronouns. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Geurts, Bart & Rob van der Sandt. 2004. Interpreting focus.Theoretical Linguistics 30. 149–161.
Gijn, Ingeborg van & Anne Baker. 2003. Testing for syntactic dependency - some results from NGT. In Anne Baker, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000, 193–208. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Gornik-Gerhardt, Hildegard. 1981. Zu den Funktionen der Modalpartikel “schon”
und einiger ihrer Substituentia. T¨ubingen: Gunter Narr.
G¨otze, Lutz & Ernest W. B. Hess-L¨uttich. 2002.Grammatik der deutschen Sprache:
Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch. Wahrig. G¨utersloh: Bertelsmann-Lexikon- Verlag.
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grose, Donovan, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Katharina Schalber. 2007. Events and telicity in classifier predicates: A reanalysis of body part classifier predicates in ASL.
Lingua117:7. 1258–1284.
Grosz, Patrick. 2005.‘Dn’ in Viennese German. The syntax of a clitic version of the discourse particle denn. Vienna: University of Vienna MA thesis.
G¨unther, Klaus-B., Ilka Sch¨afke, Renate Poppendieker, Angela Staab, Verena Thiel- Holtz & Angelika Wiechel (eds.). 2004. Bilinguale Erziehung als F¨orderkonzept f¨ur geh¨orlose Sch¨ulerinnen. Abschlussbericht zum Hamburger bilingualen Schul- versuch. Seedorf: Signum.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2007. Eine Implikatur konventioneller Art: Der Dativus Ethicus.
Linguistische Berichte181. 277–308.
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2008. On the interaction between modal particles and sentence mood in German. Mainz: Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨at MA thesis.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1996. Introduction to government and binding theory. Chich- ester: Blackwell 2nd edn.
Hale, Ken & Elizabeth Selkirk. 1987. Government and tonal phrasing in Papago.
Phonology Yearbook4. 151–183.
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Intonation and grammar in British English. Paris:
Mouton & Co.
Halliday, Michael A. K. & William S. Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox Press.
H¨anel, Barbara. 2004.Der Erwerb der Deutschen Geb¨ardensprache als Erstsprache.
T¨ubingen: Gunter Narr.
Hanke, Thomas. 2001. Sign language transcription with syncwriter.Sign Language
& Linguistics4:1/2.
Hanke, Thomas & Jacob Storz. 2008. iLex. A database tool for integrating sign lan- guage corpus linguistics and sign language lexicography. Poster presented at the Workshop Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora, Marrakech.
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vork¨oper. 2006. Deutsche Geb¨ardensprache. Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt: Fachhochschulverlag.
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vork¨oper. 2009. Modality in DGS: A comparison of ‘probability’ and ‘improbability’. Poster presented at the NISL workshop on Nonmanuals in Sign Languages, Goethe-Universit¨at Frankfurt am Main.
Hartmann, Dietrich. 1998. Particles. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.),Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics, 657–663. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Haug, Tobias. 2011.Adaptation and evaluation of a German Sign Language test. A computer-based receptive skills test for deaf children ages 4–8 years old. Ham- burg: Hamburg University Press.
Heine, Bernd. 1976. A typology of african languages, based on the order of mean- ingful elements. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
Helbig, Gerhard. 1988.Lexikon deutscher Partikeln. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklop¨adie.
Helbig, Gerhard & Joachim Buscha. 2000. Leitfaden der deutschen Grammatik.
Berlin: Langenscheidt.
Helbig, Gerhard & Joachim Buscha. 2002.Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch f¨ur den Ausl¨anderunterricht. Berlin: Langenscheidt.
Hendriks, Bernadet. 2008. Jordanian Sign Language: Aspects of grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam dissertation.
Hentschel, Elke. 1986.Funktion und Geschichte deutscher Partikeln: ja, doch, halt, eben. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Herrmann, Annika. 2004. Modal particles and modal meaning in sign language.
A cross-linguistic comparison of spoken German with German Sign Language (inter-modal variation) and further investigation into Irish Sign Language (intra- modal variation) and English.Mainz: Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨at MA thesis.
Herrmann, Annika. 2007. The expression of modal meaning in German Sign Lan- guage and Irish Sign Language. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Stein- bach (eds.), Visible variation. Comparative studies on sign language structure.
Trends in Linguistics, 245–278. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Herrmann, Annika. 2008. Sign language corpus and the problems with ELAN and the ECHO annotation conventions. In Onno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds.),Construction and ex- ploitation of sign language corpora. 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, 68–73.
Herrmann, Annika. 2009. Systematic collection of different annotation sets from various sign language research groups. Towards conventions for sign language annotation. Paper presented at the workshop ’Sign Language Corpora: Linguistic Issues’, Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London.
Herrmann, Annika. 2010. The interaction of eye blinks and other prosodic cues in German Sign Language.Sign Language & Linguistics13:1. 3–39.
Herrmann, Annika. to appear. Information structure in sign languages. In Frank K¨ugler & Stefan Baumann (eds.),Prosody and information status in typological perspectiveSpecial Issue, Lingua.
Herrmann, Annika & Bernhard K¨ohler. 2009. Tones in Sign Languages. Poster presented at the NISL workshop on ‘Nonmanuals in Sign Languages’, Frankfurt am Main.
Herrmann, Annika & Nina-Kristin Pendzich. in press. Nonmanual gestures in sign languages. In Cornelia M¨uller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.),Body - Language - Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Berlin, Boston:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach. 2007. Wenn ’ich’ nicht ich ist: Zitieren in Geb¨ardensprachen. In Elke Brendel, J¨org Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Zitat und Bedeutung, 153–180. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach. 2010. Eine neue Perspektive auf Role Shift in Deutscher Geb¨ardensprache (DGS). Perspektivwechsel als nichtmanuelles Kongruenzph¨anomen. DAS ZEICHEN - Zeitschrift f¨ur Sprache und Kultur Geh¨orloser84. 112–119.
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach. 2012. Quotation in sign languages – a vis- ible context shift. In Ingrid van Alphen & Isabelle Buchstaller (eds.),Quotatives.
Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hohenberger, Annette. 2007. The possible range of variation between sign lan- guages: Universal grammar, modality, and typological aspects. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.),Visible variation. Comparative studies on sign language structure.Trends in Linguistics, 341–383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hohenberger, Annette, Daniela Happ & Helen Leuninger. 2002. Modality-dependent aspects of sign language production: Evidence from slips of the hands and their repairs in German Sign Language. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.),Modality and structure of signed and spoken language, 112–
142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
H¨ohle, Barbara, Frauke Berger, Anja M¨uller, Michaela Schmitz & J¨urgen Weis- senborn. 2009. Focus particles in children’s language: Production and compre- hension ofauch’also’ in German learners from 1 year to 4 years of age.Language Acquisition16:1. 36–66.
Hoiting, Nini & Dan I. Slobin. 2001. Typological and modality constraints on bor- rowing: Examples from the Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Diane Brentari (ed.),Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 121–137. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Holla, Madeleine. 2008. Nur- Theorie und Gebrauch vor dem Hintergrund der Semantik-Pragmatik-Schnittstelle. Mainz: Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨at MA thesis.
Holmes, Janet. 1982. The functions of tag questions. English Language Research Journal3. 40–65.
Hoopes, Rob, Mary Rose, Robert Bayley, Ceil Lucas, Alyssa Wulf, Karen Petronio
& Steven Collins. 2002. Analysing variation in sign languages: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Valerie L. Dively & Melanie Metzger (eds.),Signed languages. Discoveries from international research, 135–161. Washington, DC:
Gallaudet University Press.
Hopper, Paul. 1988. Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar constraint. In Deborah Tannen (ed.),Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and under- standing, 117–134. Norwood, NY: Ablex Publishing.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003.Grammaticalization. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Laurence R. 1969. A presuppositional analysis ofonlyandeven. Chicago Linguistic Society5. 97–108.
Horn, Laurence R. 1996. Exclusive company:Only and the dynamics of vertical inference. Journal of Semantics13:1. 1–40.
Horn, Laurence R. 2002. Assertoric inertia and NPI licensing. Chicago Linguistic Society38:2. 55–82.
Horn, Laurence R. 2004. Implicature. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 3–28. Chichester: Blackwell.
Hosemann, Jana. 2009. Einen Augenblick f¨ur die Verbkongruenz in der Deutschen Geb¨ardensprache. Eine Eye-Tracking Studie. Berlin: Humboldt Universit¨at MA thesis.
Huettel, Scott A., Allen W. Song & Gregory McCarthy. 2004. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Hulst, Harry G. van der, Onno Crasborn, Jane Coerts, Els van der Kooij & Anne Baker (eds.). 1999. Gebarentaalonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Husain, Fatima T., Debra J. Patkin, Hung Thai-Van, Allen R. Braun & Barry Hor- witz. 2009. Distinguishing the processing of gestures from signs in deaf individ- uals: An fMRI study.Brain & Language1276. 140–150.
Ikoma, Miki. 2007.Prosodische Eigenschaften der deutschen Modalpartikeln. Ham- burg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Ikoma, Miki & Angelika Werner. 2007. Die Prosodie der Modalpartikel schon:
Wahrnehmung verschiedener Interpretationen. In Eva-Maria Th¨une & Franca Ortu (eds.),Gesprochene Sprache - Partikeln. Beitr¨age der Arbeitsgruppen der 2.
Tagung Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft in Italien, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Ippolito, Michela. 2008. On the meaning ofonly.Journal of Semantics25:1. 45–91.
Irish Deaf Society, Dublin. 1997. The ABC of Irish Sign Language. Video project.
Dublin: Irish Deaf Society Publications.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantics in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1983.Fokus und Skalen. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1984. Funktionale Satzperspektive und Illokutions-Semantik.Lin- guistische Berichte91. 25–58.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1991. On the semantics of modal particles. In Werner Abraham (ed.),Discourse particles. Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logi- cal, syntactical and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, 203–
252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
J¨ager, Agnes. 2008. History of German negation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Janzen, Terry & Barbara Schaffer. 2002. Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASLs grammaticization. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto- Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure of signed and spoken language, 199–223.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and other languages. Kopenhagen: Det kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab.
Johnston, Trevor. 1991. Transcription and glossing of sign language texts: Exam- ples from AUSLAN (Australian Sign Language). International Journal of Sign Linguistics2:1. 3–28.
Johnston, Trevor. 2008. Corpus linguistics and signed languages: No lemmata, no corpus. In Onno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood &
Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds.),Construction and exploitation of sign language cor- pora. 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, 82–87.
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri. 2006. Issues in the creation of a digital archive of a signed language. In Linda Barwick & Nicholas Thieberger (eds.),Sustainable data from digital fieldwork, 7–16. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
Johnston, Trevor, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Lorraine Leeson.
2007. ’Real data are messy’: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Auslan, VGT, and ISL. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.),Visible variation. Comparative studies on sign language struc- ture.Trends in Linguistics, 163–205. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kaplan, David. 2004. The meaning of ouch and oops. Explorations in the theory of meaning as use. Unpublished manuscript, Los Angeles: University of California.
Karagjosova, Elena. 2004. The meaning and function of German modal particles.
Saarbr¨ucken: Universit¨at des Saarlandes dissertation.
K¨arkk¨ainen, Elise. 2003.Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on ‘I think’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Karttunen, Lauri & Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. Syntax and Semantics11. 1–56.
Kaufmann, Stefan. 2004. A modal analysis of expressive meaning: German ja under quantifiers. Paper presented at Kobe Shoin University, Kyoto.
Kay, Paul. 1990. Even.Linguistics and Philosophy13:1. 59–111.
Keller, J¨org. 1998. Aspekte der Raumnutzung in der Deutschen Geb¨ardensprache.
Seedorf: Signum.
Kestner, Karin. 2009. Tommys Geb¨ardenwelt 1 und 2. Zwei CD-ROMs und zwei Geb¨ardensprachb¨ucher f¨ur Kinder ab 3 Jahren zum Erlernen der Geb¨arden- sprache. Schauenburg: Karin Kestner Verlag.
Keyser, Robert & Jenifer Larson-Hall. 2005. What does the critical period really mean? In Judith F. Kroll & Annette M. B. de Groot (eds.),Handbook of bilin- gualism. Psycholinguistic approaches, 88–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiss, Katalin ´E. 1981. Structural relations in Hungarian, a ‘free’ word order lan- guage. Linguistic Inquiry12. 185–213.
Kiss, Katalin ´E. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus.Language74.
245–273.
Knoors, Harry. 2000. Zweisprachige Erziehung und Bildung geh¨orloser Kinder in den Niederlanden.DAS ZEICHEN - Zeitschrift f¨ur Sprache und Kultur Geh¨orloser 14:51. 30–39.
Kohler, Klaus J. 1991. Terminal intonation patterns in single-accent utterances of German: Phonetics, phonology and semantics. In Klaus J. Kohler (ed.),Studies in German intonation, 115–185. Kiel: Institut f¨ur Phonetik und Digitale Sprachver- arbeitung.
K¨onig, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective Theoretical Linguistics. London: Routledge.
K¨onig, Ekkehard. 1993. Focus particles. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Ste- chow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.),Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgen¨ossischer Forschung, 978–987. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
K¨onig, Ekkehard. 1997. Zur Bedeutung von Modalpartikeln im Deutschen: Ein Neuansatz im Rahmen der Relevanztheorie. Germanistische Linguistik136. 57–
75.
K¨onig, Ekkehard, Detlef Stark & Susanne Requardt. 1990.Adverbien und Partikeln.
Ein deutsch-englisches W¨orterbuch. Heidelberg: Groos.
Konrad, Reiner. 2011.Die lexikalische Struktur der Deutschen Geb¨ardensprache im Spiegel empirischer Fachgeb¨ardenlexikographie. Zur Integration der Ikonizit¨at in ein korpusbasiertes Lexikonmodell. T¨ubingen: Narr.
Kooij, Els van der, Onno Crasborn & Wim Emmerik. 2004. Prosodic features of focus in NGT. Paper presented at TISLR 8, Barcelona.
Koster, J. 1987.Domains and dynasties: The radical autonomy of syntax. Dordrecht:
Foris Publications.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Hans-J¨urgen Eik- meyer & Hannes Rieser (eds.),Semantics from different points of view, 117–147.
Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1999. Beyond ouch and oops. How descriptive and expressive meaning interact. Paper presented at the Cornell Conference on Theories of Con- text Dependency.
Krausneker, Verena. 2005. Viele Blumen schreibt man “Bl¨umer”: Soziolinguis- tische Aspekte des bilingualen Wiener Grundschul-Modells mit ¨osterreichischer Geb¨ardensprache und Deutsch. Seedorf: Signum.
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions.
In Joachim Jacobs (ed.),Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, 17–53. Opladen:
Westdeutscher Verlag.
Krifka, Manfred. 1998. Additive particles under stress. In Devon Strolovitch &
Aaron Lawson (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 8. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 111–128. CLC Publications.
Krifka, Manfred. 2006. Basic notions of information structure. In Caroline F´ery &
Manfred Krifka (eds.),Interdisciplinary studies on information structure, vol. 6, 13–55. Potsdam: Universit¨atsverlag Potsdam.
Krifka, Manfred & Renate Musan (eds.). 2012.The expression of information struc- ture. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice G.B. ter Meulen, Godehard Link & Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In Gre- gory N. Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds.),The generic book, 1–124. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Krivonosov, Aleksej. 1963. Die modalen Partikeln in der deutschen Gegen- wartssprache. Berlin: Humboldt Universit¨at dissertation.
Krivonosov, Aleksej. 1977. Deutsche Modalpartikeln im System der unflektierten Wortklassen. In Harald Weydt (ed.), Aspekte der Modalpartikeln. Studien zur deutschen Abt¨onung, 176–216. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Kuno, Susumu. 1972. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English.Linguistic Inquiry3. 269–320.
Kwon, Min-Jae. 2005. Modalpartikeln und Satzmodus. Untersuchungen zur Syn- tax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ludwig Maximilians Universit¨at M¨unchen dissertation.
Lahiri, Utpal. 2009. Scope, presuppositions and scalar additive particles: Positive, negative and concessive scalar particles in Spanish. Paper presented at the gradu- ate college Sentence Types: Variation and interpretation, Frankfurt am Main.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Robert G., Carol Neidle, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Judy Kegl.
1997. Role shift in ASL: A syntactic look at direct speech. InSyntactic structure and discourse function: An examination of two constructions in American Sign Language, Report No. 4, American Sign Language Linguistic Research Project.
Leeson, Lorraine. 2001. Aspects of verbal valency in Irish Sign Language. Dublin:
Trinity College, University of Dublin dissertation.
Leeson, Lorraine & Brian Nolan. 2008. Digital deployment of the Signs of Ireland Corpus in Elearning. Paper presented at the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008, Marrakech.
Leeson, Lorraine & Evelyn Nolan. 1993. Non-manual features in Irish Sign Lan- guage. Unpublished essay.
Leeson, Lorraine & John Saeed. 2012a. Word order. In Roland Pfau, Markus Stein- bach & Bencie Woll (eds.),Sign language - An international handbook, 245–264.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leeson, Lorraine, John Saeed, Deirdre Byrne-Dunne, Alison Macduff & Cormac Leonard. 2006. Moving heads and moving hands: Developing a digital corpus of Irish Sign Language. The ‘Signs of Ireland’ Corpus Development Project. Paper presented at the IT&T conference, Carlow.
Leeson, Lorraine & John I. Saeed. 2012b. Irish Sign Language. Edinburgh: Edin- burgh University Press.
LeMaster, Barbara. 1990.The maintenance and loss of female and male signs in the Dublin deaf community. Los Angeles: University of California dissertation.
LeMaster, Barbara. 1993. When women and men talk differently: Language and policy in the Dublin deaf community. In Thomas Wilson, Hastings Donnan &
Chris Curtin (eds.),Irish towns and cities: Anthropological perspectives on urban life, Belfast, Ireland: The Queen’s University of Belfast.
Leonhardt, Annette. 2002.Einf¨uhrung in die H¨orgesch¨adigtenp¨adagogik. Stuttgart:
UTB.
Leuninger, Helen. 2007. Geb¨ardensprachen und Bilingualismus. Sign language and bilingualism. Sprache, Stimme, Geh¨or. Zeitschrift f¨ur Kommunikationsst¨orungen 31. 156–162.
Leuninger, Helen, Annette Hohenberger, Eva Waleschkowski, Elke Menges &
Daniela Happ. 2004. The impact of modality on language production: Evidence from slips of the tongue and hand. In Christopher Habel & Thomas Pechmann (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production, 219–278. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1997.Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticaliza- tion.Language67. 475–509.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language.
In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.),Language, gesture, and space, 155–170.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2012. Utterance reports and constructed action. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.),Sign language - An international handbook, 365–387. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Ronice M¨uller de Quadros. 2004. The structure and acqui- sition of focus in American Sign Language and Brazilian Sign Language. Paper presented at TISLR 8, Barcelona.
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Ronice M¨uller de Quadros. 2008. Focus constructions in American Sign Language and L´ıngua de Sinais Brasileira. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, 161–176. Seedorf: Signum.
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Ronice M¨uller de Quadros. 2011. Acquisition of the syntax- discourse interface: The expression of point of view.Lingua121. 623–636.
Lindner, Katrin. 1991. ‘Wir sind ja doch alte Bekannte.’ The use of German ja and doch als modal particles. In Werner Abraham (ed.),Discourse particles. Descrip- tive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic prop- erties of discourse particles in German, 163–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Lohnstein, Horst. 2000. Satzmodus - kompositionell. Zur Parametrisierung der Deutschen Modusphrase.Studia Grammatica 49. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Longobardi, Guiseppe & Alessandra Giorgi. 1991.The syntax of noun phrases: Con- figuration, parameters, and empty categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loon, Esther van, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach. in press. The grammatical- ization of gestures in sign languages. In Cornelia M¨uller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.),Body - Lan- guage - Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lucas, Ceil, Robert Bayley & Clayton Valli. 2001. Sociolinguistic variation. In Ceil Lucas (ed.),The sociolinguistics of sign language, 61–111. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press.
Lyons, John. 1977.Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marsaja, I. Gede. 2008. Desa Kolok. A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
Matthews, Patrick A. 1996. The Irish Deaf community. Volume 1: Survey report, history of education, language and culture. Dublin: Institi´uid Teangeola´ıochta Eireann.´
Matthews, Patrick A. & D´onall P. ´OBaoill. 2000. The Irish Deaf community. Vol- ume 2: The structure of Irish Sign Language. Dublin: Institi´uid Teangeola´ıochta Eireann.´
McBurney, Susan. 2012. History of sign languages and sign language linguistics.
In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language - An international handbook, 909–948. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McCawley, James. 1981. Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic: But were ashamed to ask. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCullough, Stephen & Karen Emmorey. 2009. Categorical perception of affective and linguistic facial expressions.Cognition110:2. 208–221.
McCullough, Stephen, Karen Emmorey & Martin Sereno. 2005. Neural organiza- tion for recognition of grammatical and emotional facial expressions in deaf ASL signers and hearing nonsigners. Cognitive Brain Research22. 193–203.
Meibauer, J¨org. 1994.Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung. Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Meibauer, J¨org. 2006. Implicature. In Keith Brown (ed.),Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 5, 568–581. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Meier, Richard P. 2000. Diminishing diversity of sign languages.Science288. 1965.
Meier, Richard P. 2002. Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non- effects of modality upon linguistic structure of sign and speech. In Richard P.
Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.),Modality and structure of signed and spoken language, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meier, Richard P. 2012. Language and modality. In Roland Pfau, Markus Stein- bach & Bencie Woll (eds.),Sign language - an international handbook, 574–600.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Menzel, Wolfgang. 1986. Wortarten.Praxis Deutsch77. 12–18.
Meyenn, Alexander von. 2007. Pressemitteilung: Stellungnahme zur schulischen In- tegration geh¨orloser und hochgradig schwerh¨origer Kinder. Tech. rep. Deutscher Geh¨orlosen-Bund e.V.
Morford, Jill P. 2004. Der Altersfaktor im Geb¨ardenspracherwerb: Eine Neuinter- pretation. DAS ZEICHEN - Zeitschrift f¨ur Sprache und Kultur Geh¨orloser 66.
85–88.
Morgan, Gary & Bencie Woll. 2002.Directions in sign language acquisition.Trends in Language Acquisition Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Morgan, Gary & Bencie Woll. 2007. Understanding sign language classifiers through a polycomponential approach.Lingua117. 1159–1168.
Moro, Andrea. 2008.The boundaries of Babel. The brain and the enigma of impos- sible languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
M¨uller, Anja. 2007. Nur Verstehen? Zum Erwerb der Fokuspartikel im Deutschen.
Unpublished manuscript, Goethe-Universit¨at Frankfurt am Main.
M¨uller, Anja. 2012.Wie interpretieren Kindernur? Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum Erwerb von Informationsstruktur. Potsdam: Universit¨atsverlag Potsdam.
M¨uller, Anja, Petra Schulz & Barbara H¨ohle. 2011. Pragmatic children: How chil- dren interpret sentences with and without only. In J¨org Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.),Experimental pragmatics/semantics, 79–100. Amsterdam: Ben- jamins. Paper presented at the 30th annual conference of the DGfS: Sprachver- gleich, Bamberg, Germany.
Musan, Renate. 2008.Satzglieder.Kurze Einf¨uhrung in die Germanistische Linguis- tik (KEGLI). Heidelberg: Universit¨atsverlag Winter.
Nederstigt, Ulrike. 2001. Prosody: A clue for the interpretation of the additive focus particlesauchandnoch.Linguistische Berichte188. 415–439.
Neidle, Carol. 2001. SignStream. A database tool for research on visual-gestural language.Sign Language & Linguistics4:1-2. 203–214.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Benjamin Bahan, Dawn MacLaughlin & Robert G. Lee.
1996. Non-manual grammatical marking as evidence for hierarchical relations in American Sign Language. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Montr´eal.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Benjamin Bahan, Dawn MacLaughlin & Robert G. Lee.
2000.The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierar- chical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Lan- guage and Speech42:2-3. 143–176.
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publi- cations.
Newmeyer, J., Frederick. 2003. Grammar is grammar and usage is usage.Language 79. 682–707.
Nicodemus, Brenda. 2007.The use of prosodic markers to indicate utterane bound- aries in American Sign Language interpretation. Ann Arbor: University of Michi- gan dissertation.
Nonhebel, Annika, Onno Crasborn & Els van der Kooij. 2004. Sign language tran- scription conventions for the ECHO project. Version 9. Tech. rep. Radboud Uni- versity Nijmegen.
Norrik, R. Neal. 1995. Hunh-tags and evidentiality in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics23. 687–692.
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nunes, Jairo & Ronice Mueller de Quadros. 2004. Phonetic realization of multiple copies in Brazilian Sign Language. Paper presented at TISLR 8, Barcelona.
Nunes, Jairo & Ronice Mueller de Quadros. 2008. Phonetic realized traces in Amer- ican Sign Language and Brazilian Sign Language. In Josep Quer (ed.),Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, Seedorf: Signum.
Nyst, Victoria. 2007.A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana).
Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam dissertation.
OGlias´ain, M´ıche´al. 1996.´ The language question in the census of population (Ceist na teanga sa daon´aireamh). Dublin: Linguistics Institute of Ireland.
Ormelius-Sandblom, Elisabet. 1997. Die Modalpartikeln ja, doch und schon.
Zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik Lunder germanistische Forschungen.
Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Padden, Carol A. 1987. Verbs and role-shifting in American Sign Language. In Carol A. Padden (ed.),Proceedings of the 4th National Symposium on Sign Lan- guage Research and Teaching, 44–57. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
Palmer, Frank R. 2001.Mood and modality.New York: Cambridge University Press 2nd edn.
Papaspyrou, Chrissostomos, Alexander von Meyenn, Michaela Matthaei & Bettina Herrmann. 2008. Grammatik der Deutschen Geb¨ardensprache aus der Sicht geh¨orloser Fachleute. Seedorf: Signum.
Pendzich, Nina-Kristin. 2012. Lexikalische Mimik in Deutscher Geb¨ardensprache:
Georg-August-Universit¨at G¨ottingen MA thesis.
Perniss, Pamela, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.). 2007. Visible variation.
Comparative studies on sign language structure.Trends in Linguistics. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Perniss, Pamela M. 2007. Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua117. 1315–1338.
Petronio, Karen. 1993. Clause structure in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: University of Washington dissertation.
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin. 1997. WH-movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language.Language73:1. 18–57.
Pfau, Roland. 1997. Zur phonologischen Komponente der Deutschen Geb¨arden- sprache: Segmente und Silben.Frankfurter Linguistische Forschungen20. 1–29.
Pfau, Roland. 2005. Phrasal layers and prosodic spreading in sign languages. Paper presented at the Signa Volant Workshop, Milano.
Pfau, Roland. 2006. Visible prosody: Spreading and stacking of non-manual markers in sign languages. Paper presented at the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Washington D.C.
Pfau, Roland. 2008. The grammar of headshake: A typological perspective on Ger- man Sign Language negation. Linguistics in Amsterdam1. 34–71.
Pfau, Roland. 2012. Manual communication systems: Evolution and variation. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.),Sign language - An inter- national handbook, 513–551. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pfau, Roland & Susanne Gl¨uck. 2000. The pseudo-simultaneous nature of complex word forms in German Sign Language. In Nancy Antrim, Grant Goodall, Martha Schulte-Nafeh & Vida Samiian (eds.),Proceedings of the 28th Western Confer- ence on Linguistics, 428–442. Fresno, CA: California State University.
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer. 2007. On the syntax of negation and modals in Catalan Sign Language and German Sign Language. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau &
Markus Steinbach (eds.),Visible variation. Comparative studies on sign language structure.Trends in Linguistics, 129–161. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer. 2010. Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.),Sign languages, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2005. Relative clauses in German Sign Lan- guage: Extraposition and reconstruction. In Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds.),Proceedings of NELS 35, 507–521. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2006a. Modality-independent and modality- specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages, vol. 24 Linguistics in Potsdam. Potsdam: Universit¨atsverlag Potsdam.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2006b. Pluralization in sign and in speech: A cross-modal typological study.Linguistic Typology10. 135–182.
Pierrehumbert, Jane. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation.
Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia Hirschberg. 1990. The meaning of intonational con- tours in interpretation of discourse. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E.
Pollack (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pike, Kenneth L. 1948. Tone languages. A technique for determining the number and type of pitch contrasts in a language, with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pittner, Karin. 1999. Adverbiale im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Stellung und Interpretation.Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 60. T¨ubingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
Pittner, Karin. 2002. Adverbien der Art und Weise im Deutschen und Englischen: zu ihrer Stellung und Interpretation. In Friederike Schmoee (ed.),Adverb - Zentrum und Peripherie einer Wortart, 43–59. Wien: Edition praesens.
Plaza-Pust, Carolina & Esperanza Morales-L´opez (eds.). 2008. Sign bilingualism:
Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations.Studies in Bilingualism 38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Poizner, Howard, Edward Klima & Ursula Bellugi. 1987. What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Portner, Paul H. 2005. What is meaning? Fundamentals of formal semantics.
Malden: Blackwell.
Portner, Paul H. 2009.Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicature.Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 7. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, Christopher. 2007a. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics33:2.
165–197.
Potts, Christopher. 2007b. Into the conventional-implicature dimension.Philosophy Compass4:2. 665–679.
Potts, Christopher. 2012. Conventional implicature and expressive content. In Clau- dia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.),Semantics: An inter- national handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 2516–2535. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Prillwitz, Siegmund, Thomas Hanke, Susanne K¨onig, Reiner Konrad, Gabriele Langer & Arvid Schwarz. 2008. DGS corpus project. Development of a corpus based electronic dictionary German Sign Language/German. Poster presented at the Workshop Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora, Mar- rakech.
Prillwitz, Siegmund und Heiko Zienert. 1990. Hamburg Notation System for sign language. Development of a sign writing with computer application. In Siegmund Prillwitz & Thomas Vollhaber (eds.),Current trends in European sign language research, 335–379. Seedorf: Signum.
Pyers, Jennie & Ann Senghas. 2007. Reported action in Nicaraguan and American Sign Languages: Emerging versus established systems. In Pamela Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.),Visible variation. Comparative studies on sign language structure.Trends in Linguistics, 279–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Quadros, Ronice M¨uller de. 1999. Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language.
Portenon, Porto Allegre: Pontif´ıcia Universidade Cat´olica do Rio Grande do Sul dissertation.
Quer, Josep. 2001. Interpreting mood.Probus13. 81–111.
Quer, Josep. 2005. Context shift and indexical variables in sign languages. In Efthymia Georgala & Jonathan Howell (eds.),Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory 15, 152–168. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Quer, Josep. 2011. Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. In Elke Brendel, J¨org Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.),Understanding quotation, 277–302. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.
Rathmann, Christian. 2000. The optionality of agreement phrase: Evidence from signed languages. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.
Rathmann, Christian. 2001. The optionality of agreement phrase: Evidence from signed languages. Paper presented at the Conference of the Texas Linguistic So- ciety, University of Austin.
Razum, Kathrin & Peter Eisenberg (eds.). 2005.Duden, Die Grammatik. Mannheim:
Dudenverlag 7th edn.
Reetz, Henning & Allard Jongman. 2009. Phonetics. Transcription, production, acoustics, and perception. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Reich, Ingo. 2012. Information structure and theoretical models of grammar. In Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.),The expression of information structure, 409–447. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Reilly, Judy & Diane Anderson. 2002. FACES: The acquisition of non-manual mor- phology in ASL. In Gary Morgan & Bencie Woll (eds.),Directions in sign lan- guage acquisition., vol. 2 Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 159–181.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Reilly, Judy, Marina McIntire & Ursula Bellugi. 1990. The acquisition of condition- als in American Sign Language development: Grammatical facial expressions.
Applied Psycholinguistics11. 369–392.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1991. Elliptical conjunctions - non-quantificational LF. In Asa Kasher (ed.),The Chomskyan Turn, 360–384. Oxford: Blackwell.
Reis, Marga. 1999. On sentence types in German: An enquiry into the relation be- tween grammar and pragmatics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Germanic Linguis- tics and Semiotic Analysis4:2. 195–236.
Reis, Marga. 2005. On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German - A reply to B¨uring and Hartmann 2001.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory23. 459–
483.
Reis, Marga & Inger Rosengren. 1997. A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of Germanauch.Journal of Semantics14. 237–309.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.),Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Roberts, Craige. 1989. Modal subordination and pronomonal anaphora in discourse.
Linguistics and Philosophy12. 683–721.
Roberts, Craige. 1999. Presupposition. In Robert A. Wilson & Franck C. Keil (eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences, 664–665. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roberts, Craige. 2006. Only, presupposition and implicature. Submitted to Journal of Semantics.
Roberts, Craige. 2008. Resolving focus. Paper presented at Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS).
Roberts, Ian. 2007.Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rooij, Robert van & Katrin Schulz. 2005.Only: Meaning and implicatures. Unpub- lished manuscript, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.
Ross, John R. & William E. Cooper. 1979. Like syntax. In William E. Cooper &
Edward C. Walker (eds.),Sentence processing. Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett, 343–418. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rothstein, Susan. 1991. Heads, projections, and category determination. In Kather- ine Leffel & Denis Bouchard (eds.), Views on phrase structure, 97–112. Dor- drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Saeed, John. 1984.The syntax of topic and focus in Somali. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Salazar, Ventura. 2008. The expression of modality in Spanish Sign Language. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Functional Grammar (ICFG13), University of Westminster, London.
Sandler, Wendy. 1999. Prosody in two natural language modalities. Language and Speech42:2-3. 127–142.
Sandler, Wendy. 2005. Prosodic constituency and intonation in a sign language.
In Daniela Happ & Helen Leuninger (eds.),Geb¨ardensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung.Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 13, Hamburg: Helmut Buske Ver- lag.
Sandler, Wendy. 2010. Prosody and syntax in sign languages. Transactions of the Philological Society108:3. 298–328.
Sandler, Wendy. 2012. Visual prosody. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.),Sign language - An international handbook, 55–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic univer- sals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandler, Wendy & Irit Meir. 2008. A language in space: The story of Israeli Sign Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Svetlana Dachkovsky, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff.
2011. The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax. Lingua 121:13.
2014–2033.
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2005. The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102:7. 2661–2665.
Schaffer, Barbara. 1999. The discourse basis for the interplay of syntax and prag- matics in the expression of necessity and possibility in ASL. Paper presented at the 6th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Stockholm University.
Schaffer, Barbara. 2000.A syntactic, pragmatic analysis of the expression of neces- sity and possibility in American Sign Language. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico dissertation.
Schaffer, Barbara. 2002. Can’t: The negation of modal notions in ASL. Sign Lan- guage Studies3:1. 34–53.
Schaffer, Barbara. 2004. Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: Modality in ASL.Cognitive Linguistics15:2. 175–195.
Schaffer, Barbara. 2006. The acquisition of markers of modality among deaf chil- dren. In Marc Marschark, Brenda Schick & Patricia Spencer (eds.),Advances in the sign language development of deaf children, 291–313. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
Scheer, Tobias. 2011. A guide to morphosyntax-phonology interface theories. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schembri, Adam. 2007. The British Sign Language Corpus project. Paper presented at the 4th UK Council on Deafness Annual Deafness Conference, London.
Schembri, Adam. 2008. The British Sign Language Corpus project: Open access archives and the observer’s paradox. Paper presented at the Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora Workshop, Marrakech.
Schembri, Adam, Caroline Jones & Denis Burnham. 2005. Comparing action ges- tures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education10:3. 272–290.
Schuhmann, Paul. 1940.Geschichte des Taubstimmenwesens vom deutschen Stand- punkt aus dargestellt. Frankfurt am Main: Diesterweg.
Scuffil, Michael. 1982. Experiments in comparative intonation: A case study of English and German. T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Searle, John. 1969.Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook3. 371–405.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In Jason Riggle John Goldsmith & Alan C.L. Yu (eds.),The handbook of phonological theory, 435–484. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 2nd edn.
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax. The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Senghas, Richard J., Ann Senghas & Jennie E. Pyers. 2005. The emergence of Nicaraguan Sign Language: Questions of development, acquisition, and evolution.
In Jonas Langer, Sue T. Parker & Constance Milbrath (eds.),Biology and knowl- edge revisited: From neurogenesis to psychogenesis, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum Associates.
Skopeteas, Stavros. 2012. The empirical investigation of information structure. In Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.),The expression of information structure, 217–247. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Skopeteas, Stavros, Ines Fiedler, Sam Hellmuth, Anne Schwarz, Ruben Stoel, Gis- bert Fanselow, Caroline F´ery & Manfred Krifka (eds.). 2006. Questionnaire on Information Structure (QUIS).Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS). Potsdam: Universit¨atsverlag Potsdam.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton K. Munitz & Pe- ter K. Unger (eds.),Semantics and philosophy, 197–213. New York: New York University Press.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Lan- guage and Information7. 3–19.
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground.Linguistics and Philosophy25. 701–721.
Stechow, Arnim von. 1991. Current issues in the theory of focus. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.),Semantik. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgen¨ossischen Forschung, vol. 6, 804–825. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Steinbach, Markus. 2007. Geb¨ardensprachen. In Markus Steinbach, Ruth Al- bert, Heiko Girnth, Annette Hohenberger, Bettina K¨ummerling-Meibauer, J¨org Meibauer, Monika Rothweiler & Monika Schwarz-Friesel (eds.), Schnittstellen der germanistischen Linguistik, 137–185. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Steinbach, Markus. 2008. Geb¨ardensprachen und das Gehirn: Psycho- und neurolin- guistische Grundlagen einer sichtbaren Sprache. In Helmut Fink & Rainer Rosen- zweig (eds.),Neuronen im Gespr¨ach - Sprache und Gehirn, 99–128. Paderborn:
Mentis Verlag.
Stokoe, William C. 1960. Sign language structure. An outline of the visual commu- nication system of the american deaf.Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers 8.
Buffalo: University of Buffalo.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll. 1999. The linguistics of British Sign Lan- guage: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swart, Henriette de & Helen de Hoop. 2000. Topic and focus. In Lisa Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.),The first Glot International state-of-the-article book, 105–130.
Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Szagun, Gisela. 2007. Wunderwerk Cochlea-Implantat? Sprachentwicklung bei jun- gen Kindern mit Cochlea-Implantat. DAS ZEICHEN. Zeitschrift f¨ur Sprache und Kultur Geh¨orloser75. 110–121.
Szagun, Gisela. 2008. The younger the better? Variability in language development of young German-speaking children with cochlear implants. In Theodoros Mari- nis, Angeliki Papangeli & Vesna Stojanovik (eds.),Proceedings of the Child Lan- guage Seminar 2007 - 30th aniversary, 183–194. Reading: University of Reading.
Sze, Felix. 2008. Blinks and intonational phrasing in Hong Kong Sign Language.
In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, 83–107.
Seedorf: Signum.
Tench, Paul. 1988.The roles of intonation in English discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
Tervoort, Bernard T. 1991. Kommunikationspraktiken an niederl¨andischen Geh¨orlosenschulen. DAS ZEICHEN - Zeitschrift f¨ur Sprache und Kultur Geh¨orloser5:15. 23–29.
Thompson, Robin, Karen Emmorey & Robert Kluender. 2006. The relationship be- tween eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language. An eye-tracking study.Natural Language and Linguistic Theory24. 571–604.
Thompson, Robin L., Karen Emmorey & Robert Kluender. 2009. Learning to look:
The acquisition of eye gaze agreement during the production of ASL verbs.Bilin- gualism: Language and Cognition12. 393–409.
Thorburn, William M. 1915. Occam’s razor.Mind24. 287–288.
Thurmair, Maria. 1989. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. T¨ubingen:
Niemeyer.
Trask, Robert Lawrence. 1997. A student’s dictionary of language and linguistics.
London: Arnold.
Tucker, Archibald N. & Margaret A. Bryan. 1966. Linguistic analyses. The Non- Bantu languages of North-Eastern Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Uhmann, Susanne. 1991. Fokusphonologie. Eine Analyse deutscher Intonation- skonturen im Rahmen der nicht-linearen Phonologie.Linguistische Arbeiten 252.
T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Valk, Peter E., Dale L. Bailey, David W. Townsend & Michael N. Maisey. 2004.
Positron emission tomography: Basic science and clinical practice. Heidelberg:
Springer Verlag.
Vallduv´ı, Enric. 1992.The informational component. New York: Garland.
Vallduv´ı, Enric & Elisabeth Engdahl. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging.Linguistics34. 459–519.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2004.The role of mood marking in complex sentences:
A case study of Australian languagesPreprints of the Department of Linguistics 215. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Vos, Connie de. 2012. Kata Kolok: An updated sociolinguistic profile. In Ulrike Ze- shan (ed.),Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights, 381–386. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Waleschkowski, Eva. 2009. Focus in German Sign Language. Poster presented at the NISL workshop on ‘Nonmanuals in Sign Languages’, Goethe-Universit¨at Frankfurt am Main.
Waltereit, Richard. 2001. Modal particles and their functional equivalents: A speech- act-theoretic approach.Journal of Pragmatics33. 1391–1417.
Waltereit, Richard. 2006. Abt¨onung: zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modapartikeln und ihren funktionnalen ¨Aquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen.
T¨ubingen: Niemeyer.
Weast, Traci. 2008. Questions in American Sign Language: A quantitative analysis of raised and lowered eyebrows. Arlington: University of Texas dissertation.
Wegener, Heide. 1989. Eine Modalpartikel der besonderen Art: Der Dativus Ethicus.
In Harald Weydt (ed.),Sprechen mit Partikeln, 56–73. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.
Wells, John C. 2007. English intonation: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
