• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

The Farrell-Jones Conjecture for algebraic K-theory holds for word-hyperbolic groups and

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "The Farrell-Jones Conjecture for algebraic K-theory holds for word-hyperbolic groups and"

Copied!
19
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

The Farrell-Jones Conjecture for algebraic K-theory holds for word-hyperbolic groups and

arbitrary coefficients.

Wolfgang Lück

ICM06 Satellite on K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry in Valladolid

September 2006

(2)

Outline

We explain our main Theorem that theFarrell-Jones Conjecture for algebraic K -theoryis true for every word-hyperbolic groupGand every coefficient ringR.

It predicts the structure of the algebraicK-groupsKn(RG).

We discussnew applicationsfocussing on

Vanishing of the reduced projective class group and the Whitehead group of torsionfree groups;

Conjectures generalizing Moody’s Induction Theorem;

Bass Conjecture;

Kaplanky Conjecture

Algebraic versus homotopyK-theory, Nil-groups;

L2-invariants;

We make a few comments about theproof.

(3)

Conjecture

TheFarrell-Jones Conjecture for algebraic K -theorywith

coefficients in R for the group G predicts that theassembly map HnG(EVCyc(G),KR)→HnG(pt,KR) =Kn(RG)

is bijective for all n∈Z.

Ris any (associative) ring (with unit) andGis discrete;

Kn(RG)is the algebraicK-theory of the group ringRG;

VCycis the family of virtually cyclic subgroups;

Given a family of subgroupsF, letEF(G)be the classifying space associated to it;

HG(−;KR)is theG-homology theory with the property that for every subgroupH ⊆G

HnG(G/H;KR) =Kn(RH).

(4)

The Farrell-Jones Conjecture gives a way to computeKn(RG) in terms ofKm(RV)for all virtually cyclic subgroupsV ⊆Gand allm≤n.

It is analogous to the Baum-Connes Conjecture.

Conjecture

TheBaum-Connes Conjecturepredicts that the assembly map KnG(EG) =HnG(EFin(G),Ktop)→HnG(pt,Ktop) =Kn(Cr(G)) is bijective for all n∈Z.

HereHG(−;Ktop)is theG-homology theory with the property that for every subgroupH ⊆G

HnG(G/H;Ktop) =Kn(Cr(H)).

(5)

Theorem (Bartels-L.-Reich (2006))

The (Fibered) Farrell-Jones Conjecture for algebraic K -theory with (G-twisted) coefficients in any ring R is true for

word-hyperbolic groups G.

We emphasize that this result holds for all ringsRand not only forR=Z.

Corollary

If G is a torsionfree word-hyperbolic group and R any ring, then we get an isomorphism

Hn(BG;K(R))

M

(C),C⊆G,C6=1 C maximal cyclic

NKn(R)

=

−→ Kn(RG).

(6)

We are not (yet?) able to prove theL-theory version. The L-theory version implies theNovikov Conjecture.

If one knows theK- andL-theory version for a groupGin the caseR=Z, one gets the Borel Conjecture in dimension≥5 Conjecture

TheBorel Conjecture for Gpredicts for two closed aspherical manifolds M and N withπ1(M)∼=π1(N)∼=G that any homotopy equivalence M→N is homotopic to a homeomorphism and in particular that M and N are homeomorphic.

(7)

LetFJ(R)be the class of groups which satisfy the Fibered Farrell-Jones Conjecture for algebraicK-theory with

coefficients inR.

Theorem (Bartels-L.-Reich (2006))

1 Every word-hyperbolic group and every virtually nilpotent group belongs toFJ(R);

2 If G1and G2belong toFJ(R), then G1×G2belongs to FJ(R);

3 Let{Gi |i∈I}be a directed system of groups (with not necessarily injective structure maps) such that Gi ∈ FJ(R) for i ∈I. Thencolimi∈IGi belongs toFJ(R);

4 If H is a subgroup of G and G∈ FJ(R), then H ∈ FJ(R).

(8)

In order to illustrate the depth of the Farrell-Jones Conjecture, we present some conclusions which are interesting in their own right.

Corollary

Let R be a regular ring. Suppose that G is torsionfree and G∈ FJ(R). Then

1 Kn(RG) =0for n≤ −1;

2 The change of rings map K0(R)→K0(RG)is bijective. In particularKe0(RG)is trivial if and only ifKe0(R)is trivial;

3 The Whitehead groupWhR(G)is trivial.

The idea of the proof is to study

Hn(BG;K(R)) =HnG(ET R(G);KR)→HnG(EVCyc(G);KR)→Kn(RG).

(9)

In particular we get for a torsionfree groupG∈ FJ(Z) Kn(ZG) =0 forn≤ −1;

Ke0(ZG) =0;

Wh(G) =0;

Every finitely dominatedCW-complexX withG=π1(X)is homotopy equivalent to a finiteCW-complex;

Every compacth-cobordismW = (W;M0,M1)of

dimension≥6 withπ1(W)∼=Gis trivial, i.e., diffeomorphic toM0×[0,1]relativeM0. (ForG={1}this implies the Poincaré Conjecturein dimensions≥5.)

(10)

Theorem

1 Let R be a regular ring withQ⊆R. Suppose G∈ FJ(R).

Then the map given by induction from finite subgroups of G colim

OrFin(G)K0(RH)→K0(RG) is bijective;

2 Let F be a field of characteristic p for a prime number p.

Suppose that G∈ FJ(F). Then the map colim

OrFin(G)K0(FH)[1/p]→K0(FG)[1/p]

is bijective.

(11)

Conjecture

Let R be a commutative integral domain and let G be a group.

Let g∈G be an element in G. Suppose that either the order|g|

is infinite or that the order|g|is finite and not invertible in R.

Then theBass Conjecturepredicts that for every finitely generated projective RG-module P the value of its Hattori-Stallings rankHSRG(P)at(g)is trivial.

(12)

Theorem

Let G be a group. Suppose that colim

OrFin(G)

K0(FH)⊗ZQ→K0(FG)⊗ZQ

is surjective for all fields F of prime characteristic. (This is true if G∈ FJ(F)for every field F of prime characteristic).

Then the Bass Conjecture is satisfied for every integral domain R.

(13)

Conjecture

The Kaplansky Conjecturesays for a torsionfree group G and an integral domain R that0and1are the only idempotents in RG.

The Kaplansky Conjecture is related to the vanishing of Ke0(RG).

Lemma

Let F be a field and let G be a group with G∈ FJ(F). Suppose that F has characteristic zero and G is torsionfree or that F has characteristic p, all finite subgroups of G are p-groups and G is residually amenable.

Then0and1are the only idempotents in FG.

(14)

Conjecture

Let R be a regular ring withQ⊆R. Then we get for all groups G and all n∈Zthat

NKn(RG) =0

and that the canonical map from algebraic to homotopy K -theory

Kn(RG)→KHn(RG) is bijective.

Theorem

Let R be a regular ring withQ⊆R. If G∈ FJ(R), then the conjecture above is true.

(15)

Conjecture

If X and Y are det-L2-acyclic finite G-CW -complexes, which are G-homotopy equivalent, then their L2-torsion agree:

ρ(2)(X;N(G)) =ρ(2)(Y;N(G)).

TheL2-torsionof closed Riemannian manifoldM is defined in terms of the heat kernel on the universal covering. IfM is hyperbolic and has odd dimension, itsL2-torsion is up to dimension constant its volume.

The conjecture above allows to extend the notion of a volume to word-hyperbolic groups whoseL2-Betti numbers all vanish.

(16)

Theorem

Suppose that G∈ FJ(Z). Then G satisfies the Conjecture above.

Deningercan define ap-adic Fuglede-Kadison

determinantfor a groupGand relate it top-adic entropy provided that WhFp(G)⊗ZQis trivial.

The surjectivity of the map colim

OrFin(G)K0(CH)→K0(CG)

plays a role in a program to prove theAtiyah Conjecture which predicts for a closed Riemannian manifold with torsionfree fundamental group that theL2-Betti numbers of its universal covering are all integers.

(17)

There is no group known for which the Farrell-Jones Conjecture, the Fibered Farrell-Jones Conjecture or the Baum-Connes Conjecture is false.

However,Higson, Lafforgue and Skandalishave constructed counterexamples to the

Baum-Connes-Conjecture with coefficients. They describe precisely what properties a groupΓmust have so that it doesnotsatisfy the Baum-Connes Conjecture with coefficients. Gromovoutlines the construction of such a groupΓas a colimit over a directed system of groups {Gi |i ∈I}such that eachGi is word-hyperbolic.

Our main result implies that theFibered Farrell-Jones Conjecture for algebraicK-theorywith twisted coefficients in any ring does hold forΓ.

(18)

Here are the basic steps of the proof of the main Theorem.

Step 1: Interprete the assembly map as aforget control map.

Step 2: Show for a finitely generated groupGthatG∈ FJ(R) holds for all ringsR if one can construct the followinggeometric data:

AG-spaceX, such that the underlying spaceX is the realization of an abstract simplicial complex;

AG-spaceX, which containsX as an openG-subspace.

The underlying space ofX should be compact, metrizable and contractible,

such that the following assumptions are satisfied:

(19)

Z-set-condition

There exists a homotopyH:X×[0,1]→X, such that H0=idX andHt(X)⊂X for everyt>0;

Long thin covers

There exists anN ∈Nthat only depends on theG-space X, such that for everyβ≥1 there exists anVCyc-covering U(β)ofG×X with the following two properties:

For everyg Gandx X there exists aU∈ U)such that{g}β× {x} ⊂U. Heregβdenotes theβ-ball aroundg inGwith respect to the word metric;

The dimension of the coveringU)is smaller than or equal toN.

Step 3: Prove the existence of the geometric data above.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Often there are nice geometric models for E G also for topological groups, for instance the Bruhat-Tits building for reductive p-adic groups, the space of Riemannian metrics on a

Show that the K -theoretic Farrell-Jones Conjecture implies the version for torsionfree groups and regular rings.. Theorem (L-theory and

Namely, in the Borel Conjecture the fundamental group can be complicated but there are no higher homotopy groups, whereas in the Poincaré Conjecture there is no fundamental group

Many groups of the region ‘Hic abundant leones’ in the universe of groups in the sense of Bridson do satisfy the Full Farrell-Jones Conjecture.. We have no good candidate for a

However, our results show that these groups do satisfy the Full Farrell-Jones Conjecture and hence also the other conjectures mentioned above.. We have no good candidate for a group

Namely, in the Borel Conjecture the fundamental group can be complicated but there are no higher homotopy groups, whereas in the Poincar´ e Conjecture there is no fundamental group

Wolfgang Lück (Bonn, Germany) The Farrell-Jones Conjecture Göttingen, June 22, 2011 1 /

What are candidates for groups or closed aspherical manifolds for which the conjectures due to Farrell-Jones, Novikov or Borel may be false. There are still many interesting groups