• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Symmetries of periodic crystals

Consider D=d= 3 w.l.o.g. with G1,G2,G3 linearly independent.5 The construc-tion [MS66]

Li:= ÿ3

i,j,k=12fiÁijk GjGk

G1·(G2G3) (2.8)

with Áijk the rank-3 Levi–Civita symbol defines L1,L2,L3 such that

Li·Gj = 2fi”ij (2.9)

and

n(r) = n(r+z1L1+z2L2 +z3L3) ’z1, z2, z3 œZ. (2.10) This is easily verified from the definitions (2.8) and (2.6). In other words, n is invariant on a lattice (set) L[{L1,L2,L3}] µ R3 spanned by its non-unique basis vectors L1,L2,L3

L[{L1,L2,L3}] ={z1L1+z2L2 +z3L3|z1, z2, z3 œZ}. (2.11) L is called a “Bravais lattice”. In the same way, eq. (2.7) defines a reciprocal (space) lattice G[{G1,G2,G3}] which is spanned by a basis {G1,G2,G3} µG. L and G are mutually dual lattices, i.e. their bases form pairs that satisfy the condition (2.9).

Hence the real space Bravais lattice L as a starting point of the description is equivalent to the reciprocal lattice G. The latter is then introduced by discussing the condition of constructive scattering interference which is identical to eq. (2.9) and ultimately leads to Bragg’s law and its diffraction (Bragg) peaks. Equation (2.10) is the counterpart to the (artificial) construction rule of a microscopically periodic crystal lattice. While holding for the average particle density n, lattice-periodicity will not be obeyed by the microscopic particle density, t) at any given time t.

It is obvious from their definitions (2.11) respectively (2.7) that L and G form abelian groups with respect to vectorial addition of their elements6. This so-called

“translation group” of a Bravais lattice is made visible in defining a building block which contains exactly one lattice point and fills space completely without overlap.

The definition of such a primitive “unit-cell” is not unique. It is however preferably made such that it reflects the full symmetry of the given lattice. This can be achieved by constructing the Wigner-Seitz cell [WS33] like e.g. for the square lattice in figure 2.2(a). It is in turn quadratic and can be mapped onto itself by a set PL of symmetry operations, having in common that they leave the central lattice point L0(=0 w.l.o.g.)invariant. These point transforms can be described as

5The formulation of similar statements forD= 2 andD= 1linearly independentGi ind(ØD) dimensions is straightforward. Linear independence of theGiis assumed throughout this section on periodic crystals.

6We will denote this group identically to the lattice, i.e.LandGrespectively.

L0

(a)

glide plane

(b) (c)

Figure 2.2.:2d periodic crystal with subsequently reduced symmetry and the Wigner-Seitz cells (solid light blue). (a)has the full holohedral symmetry. Additionally shown are the bisectant lines for the Wigner-Seitz cell. (b) has a geometrically similar Wigner-Seitz cell with point symmetry reduced to that of a rectangle. It also possesses a glide plane (solid green with arrows for the translation) and gives an example for a non-symmorphic space group. Both (b)and (c) belong to the rectangular crystal system although (c) does not have the full rectangular point symmetry. (c) shows the conventional unit cell (gray stripes) which differs from the Wigner-Seitz cell for this non-primitive, centered, lattice.

• Inversions: r‘æ ≠r

• Reflections r‘ær≠2 (ˆs·r) ˆswith ˆs a mirror plane normal

• Rotations r‘æR·r with RœSO (3) a proper7 rotation matrix

and concatenations thereof, all representable by matrices. By the periodicity require-ment (2.10) the rotations RœPL are restricted to 2, 3, 4 and 6-fold axes [Böh02]

which limits the total number of point symmetries allowed in periodic crystals8. PL in turn forms one of a,D-dependent, number (cf. table 2.2) of different “holohedral point groups”. The subscript “L” indicates that so far the point-symmetries of a Bravais lattice Lare considered. The lattice-periodic equilibrium density n can still lower the symmetry, and the defining property for the elements P of the actual

“crystallographic point group” P of a crystal is

{P œPL|Pn(•≠rn) :=n(P ·(•≠rn))©n(•≠rn)} with rn:symmetry point,

•:space argument.

The definition involves that rn is chosen to maximize the order of P which is a

— generically proper — subgroup of PL. The lattice point group PL of smallest order which containsP gives the “crystal system” associated with n. Two crystals with the same point group belong to the same crystal system but can still have two

7det (R) = +1

8Crystals with rotation axes of higher order necessarily are quasicrystals.

Table 2.2.: Number of classes for some characterizations of symmetry in periodic crystals.

number of crystal systems Bravais lattices point groups space groups symmorphic non-sym.

d= 2 7 14 32 73 157

d= 3 4 5 10 13 4

Bravais lattices which are not related to each other by rescaling of their basis vectors.

Bravais lattices from the same crystal system have the same “conventional unit cell”, decorated with lattice points in specific ways (cf. [KBB02, Bild 1.6]). For example, the conventional unit cell of a rectangular lattice in 2 dimensions can be decorated by a centered lattice point like in figure 2.2(c) without alteringPL9. This results in a number of different Bravais lattices greater than the number of crystal systems.

Figure 2.2(b) finally shows a structure with invariance transforms which can be described neither by a translation nor a mirror operation but only by a concatenation of both. The “space group” Sof a crystal contains all such pairs leaving n invariant,

S=; 1TœRd,P œO (d)2---n

3

P · •+T4©n(•)<. (2.12) In ”symmorphic” space groups, the members of each pair (T,P)œS are symmetry operations themselves, i.e. (T,1)œS and (0,P)œS. The space group can then be written as a “direct product” of a crystallographic point group and a translation group. Structures like that in fig. 2.2(b) belong to the non-symmorphic space groups where this is not possible. [Bur66] presents a systematical derivation ford= 3 and its extension to arbitrary dimension. The number of distinct crystal systems, Bravais lattices, point groups and space groups is given in tab. 2.2 for d = 2 and d = 3 [Wil06].

Before moving on to the introduction into linear hydrodynamic in the nextchapter 3, we introduce some further concepts that will be frequently used in later discussions.

First note that from a given lattice periodic density nÕ, more complex structures n of the same lattice periodicity can be easily defined by superposition of translated replicas of nÕ,

n(r) :=ÿB

s=1

nÕ1rb(s)2(2.6)== ÿ

G

nÕgeig·r

ÿB s=1

eig·b(s). (2.13) The setÓb(1),b(2), . . . ,b(B)Ôis called a “basis” and defines the second sum in eq. (2.13)

— the “geometric form factor”. The need to abandon a unique microscopic crystal

9Note that, unlike the primitive one, this conventional unit cell contains 1 + 41/ 4 = 2lattice points.

reference state was amply explained in the introduction chapter 1. Nonetheless, most equilibrium densities n considered in the following have an intuitive classical, defect-free low-temperature limit similar to figure1.1(a). We will refer to that picture as the “perfect-lattice” limit/regime ofn. It is characterized by a so-called “Dirac comb” [Cór89],

n(r) = ÿB

s=1

ÿ

RœL

1rRb(s)2 (2.14)

and yields nothing else than a reference configuration of the potential-expansion method. On that footing,nwill be called “primitive” if its Wigner-Seitz cell contains exactly one particle in the perfect-lattice regime, otherwise “non-primitive”. Inversion-symmetry of n will mean that each basis position in the perfect-lattice regime is a center of inversion. The density (2.14) consists of translated replicas of a given Bravais lattice Lwhich will be referred to as “sublattices”.

Finally, we introduce the so-called “Brillouin zones” which are defined on the basis of the reciprocal lattice G. They form a hierarchical order with the nth Brillouin zone BZn defined as

BZn =ÓqœRd---ÎqgÎ<ÎqÎ for exactly n≠1 points gœGÔ. (2.15) This definition can be easily visualized by drawing the bisectant planes to each reciprocal lattice vector gœG w.r.t. to the origin (cf. figure 2.2(a)). If not further specified “Brillouin zone” (BZ) refers to the first Brillouin zone throughout this thesis. It is identical with the Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice.