• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

River channel maps

Im Dokument Community Water Model CWatM Manual (Seite 130-135)

THE MODEL ITSELF

10.4 Static data

10.4.4 River channel maps

Channel maps are describing the geometry like the length, slope, width and depth of the main channel inside a grid cell. Data used to get the geometry are mainly taken from elevation model and channel network.

45Wu, H., J. S. Kimball, N. Mantua and J. Stanford (2011). “Automated upscaling of river networks for macroscale hydrological modeling.”

Water Resources Research 47(3).

46Yamazaki, D., T. Oki and S. Kanae (2009). “Deriving a global river network map and its sub-grid topographic characteristics from a fine-resolution flow direction map.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13(11): 2241-2251.

47Zhao, F., Veldkamp, T. I. E., Frieler, K., Schewe, J., Ostberg, S., Willner, S., Schauberger, B., Gosling, S., N. , Müller Schmied, H., Portmann, F., T. , Leng, G., Huang, M., Liu, X., Tang, Q., Hanasaki, N., Biemans, H., Gerten, D., Satoh, Y., Pokhrel, Y., Stacke, T., Ciais, P., Chang, J., Ducharne, A., Guimberteau, M., Wada, Y., Kim, H., & Yamazaki, D. (2017). The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7), 075003

CWATM Documentation

Methodology

Flow through the channel is simulated using the kinematic wave equations. The basic equations used are the equations of continuity and momentum. The continuity equation is:

𝛿𝑄

𝛿𝑥 +𝛿𝐴𝛿𝑡 =𝑞

where:

Q: channel discharge [m3 s-1],

A: cross-sectional area of the flow [m2]

q: amount of lateral inflow per unit flow length [m2 s-1].

The momentum equation can also be expressed as (Chow et al., 1988):

𝐴=𝛼𝑄𝛽

The coefficients and are calculated by putting in Manning’s equation 𝑄=𝐴𝑣=𝐴𝑅2/3

𝑆𝑜 𝑛 = 𝐴5/3

𝑆𝑜 𝑛𝑃2/3

where:

v: velocity [m/s]

n: Manning’s roughness coefficient

P: wetted perimeter of a cross-section of the surface flow [m]

R: hydraulic Radius R=A/P

Solving this for and gives:

𝛼= (𝑛𝑃2/3

𝑆𝑜 )𝛽and𝛽= 0.6

Tocalculate CWatMusesstaticmapsof:

P:wettedperimeterapproximatedinCWatM:P=channelwidth+2*channelbankfuldepth n:Manning’scoefficient

S0:gradient(slope)ofthewatersurface:S0=elevation/channellength

Channel length

The network upscaling method of Wu et al. (2011)45 is tracing the finer river network inside the coarser resolution.

Channel length of 5’ is traced from original SRTM channel length with the diagonal path taken to be 2 straight path.

Channel gradient

Channel gradient (or channel slope) is the average gradient of the main river inside a cell.

The approach taken here is to take the elevation from where the fine resolution channel enters the coarser grid cell and the elevation where it leaves the grid cell. Channel gradient is then calculated as:

Channel gradient = (elevation[in] –elevation[out]) / channel length.

10.4. Static data 127

Figure x: Channel gradient at 5 in % or tan()’

Manning’s roughness

Manning’sroughnesscoefficient(n)isoneofthecalibrationparameterinCWATM.Butonsubbasinlevelanestimation ofthespatialdistributionofnisneeded. nnormallyrangebetween0.025(lowlandrivers)and0.075(mountainous riverswithalotofvegetation,gravels). Alown =smoothsurfaceresultsinafaster traveltimeandhigherpeaks.

A high n = rough surface results in slower travel time and lower peaks. Inspection of the riverbed will reveal characteristicsrelatedtoroughness. AtreatmentoftheuseofManning’scoefficientsisinMcCuen(1998)48.Below isafirst-approximationofManning’scoefficientsforsomewidelyobservedbeds:

n = 0.04 - 0.05 Mountain streams

n = 0.035 Winding, weedy streams

n = 0.028 - 0.035 Major streams with widths > 30m at flood stage

n = 0.015 Clean, earthen channels

For the base map of Manning a regression function is used with 0.025 as the minimum value for flatland rivers with large upstream areas. A maximum of 0.015 is added for flatland rivers and small upstream areas (upstream area dependent) and another maximum of 0.030 is added if in mountainous areas (elevation dependent):

Manning =0.025 + 0.015 * min(50/upstream,1) + 0.030*min(DEM/2000,1) Where:

upstream: upstream catchment area [km]

DEM: elevation from Digital elevation model [m]

48McCuen, R. H. (1998). Hydrologic Analysis and Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.

CWATM Documentation

Figure x: Manning’s roughness coefficient for 5’

Channel Bottom Width

The channel bottom width is calculated in two steps with the first step using a simply regression between channel width and upstream area and the second uses a better correlated one between average discharge and channel width.

First the channel bottom width is calculated by a simply regression between upstream catchment area and width:

Channel width=upstreamArea ×0.0032

ThisfirstmapisusedtorunCWatMtogetanestimateonaveragedischarge.

In the second step a regression formula from Pistocchi et al. 200649is used to calculate the channel bottom width with average discharge as regressor, because discharge seems to be better correlated to width than upstream area. This is quite obvious if you look at small alpine catchment with high precipitation and therefore high discharge and on the other side at big, almost semiarid catchments on the Iberian peninsula with low average discharge:

Channel width=average Q ^ 0.539

49Pistocchi, A., & Pennington, D. (2006). European hydraulic geometries for continental SCALE environmental modelling. Journal of Hydrol-ogy, 329(3-4), 553-567

10.4. Static data 129

Figure 6: Channel width at 5’

Channel bankful depth

Instead of deriving channel hydraulic properties from a non linear correlation with the upstream area we are using the Manning’s equation to get a better estimate. But for the first estimate (same as for channel bottom width) we use a correlation with upstream area:

Channel bankful depth = 0.27 upstreamArea^0.33

In the second step we use the Manning’s equation. We adopt a rectangular cross section and we assume depth is small compared to width. So the perimeter is assumed to be:

P = 1.01 * channel bottom width

Discharge for bankful discharge is assumed to be two times the average discharge (Qavg) 𝑄= 2*𝑄𝑎𝑣𝑔

𝑄= 𝐴5/3

𝑆𝑜

𝑛𝑃2/3𝑊 ℎ5/3

𝑆𝑜 𝑛(1.01𝑊)2/3

Where:

W: Channel width h: bankful depth

Q: bankful discharge ~ 2 * average discharge

As we now know all the other variables we can solve this equation for bankful depth with some assumption:

This leads to the equation:

𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑘𝑓 𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ(ℎ) = 1.004𝑁3/5𝑄3/5𝑊−3/5𝑆𝑜−3/10

Where:

CWATM Documentation

W: Channel width

Q: bankful discharge ~ 2 * average discharge

Im Dokument Community Water Model CWatM Manual (Seite 130-135)