examination by another observer revealed that there was a second pupa almost touching the
first,
and one of these must have escaped detectionfor
three days or more. By the 4thApril,
when this testwas stopped, there had been 16 depositions, and six of the pupae had been found by inspecting the surface of Ihe soil,
four
under thebark
Hake and two away Crom it out in Ihe open. The Iwo found close together mentioned above, had now been joined by athird
(fig. 19). Photographic record was made al 11 a.m. ol the positionol
all six of the surface pupae,aller
which the cage was replaced on Ihe stool under Ihe tree outside. II continued fine anddry
and at ."> p.m. Ihe next evening 1 was immediately able tolocale Iwo
additional
pupae in Ihe cagebolli partly
embedded in Ihe open soil away from Ihe flake of bark. These had certainly notbeen visible tiie previous day when the soil had been moister, but contraction from
drying
had evidently resulted in their becomingpartially
exposed subsequently.Tesi B.
The same gauze cage was used and prepared
with
soil and flake of bark as in Tesi A. and it stem ofAlbizziti
two inches in diameterwas fixed across Ihe top, inside the cage to serve as a possible perching place for the female Hies. Instead of
introducing
flies singly, as in the previous test, I put twelve black lobed G.swynnertoni in together at 9 a.m. on 23rd
April.
The cage was left out in Ihe open on a stool tinder a large shade tree as before.Air
temperature was recorded and Ihe flies in Ihe cage were inspected frequentlyuntil
all had extruded Iheir larvae,'this
lesi began ona day of
brighi
sunshine, bui conditions deteriorated intoprolonged drizzle Ihe
following
day and showers of rain after lhat.Aller
Ihe Hies had all deposiled Iheir larvae, (he flake of barkwas removed and the cage left in silu under the tree outside
until
after flies hadfinished
emergingfrom
the pupae.The results obtained in Ibis lest are shown in 'fable 6.
l'est ('..
Some
oilier
observations on pupation in relation to wet soil were made atordinary
laboratory temperatures by putting black lobed females singly into glass jam pots containing welled earthal the bottom to a depth of above one inch. A dried leaf, beni al
righi
angles, was placed on the surface, so that Ihefly
could reston
il. horizontally
or vertically. Care was taken noi to use water logged soil.If
the surface wasleft
rough (7 observations) Ihe larva always managed lo hide itself and the pupa could noi be seen without scraping Ihe surface of the soil (usually to a depth of about'ft
inch).If
the welled surface was smoothedlightly with
a spatula (2.") observations) the larva was unable to
burrow itilo
it and Ihe resultant pupa was always visible, exposed on thesurface, or
partially
embedded, when the pot was examined thefollowing morning. Two
similar
tesls were madewith
black-lobedG. morsitans. Both pupae were invisible the morning after
larviposition. but they were
only
just embedded. Twofurther
tests were madewith
this species using soil obtainedfrom
its breeding sites(in the Central Province). In one case the pupa was on the
surface and in the other
it
was about A inch below.From the above tests
il
is evident that pupation took place on, or near, the surface when the soil was wet. 'fable 6 shows that such surface pupae were viable, even when deposited in cold wet weather andleft
exposed to wet outside conditions. The table also shows lhatlarviposition
could be delayed lo over 50 hoursaller
the lobes of Ihe larva had blackened, but Iwo oui of five of such cases failed to pupate
properly
and athird
tailed lo produce afly.
The flies were normal in the remainder. Larvae were observed to make prolonged attempt lo burrow, but usually were unable lo gel deej) enough to hide themselves before they had lo pupale. Such prolonged
activity
on Ihe part of the newly born larva, however, could noi have accounted for Ihe occurrence in the field Ip. .312) of two pupae resting on the surface of small flakes of bark, when Ihe larvae musi have pupated where they were born, despite being ona
hard
surface. The nearest approach lo this in the laboratory was Obs. 11 (Table 6) wherein I myself placed a larva on the bark andil forthwith
pupated there. Since this observation wasobviously inconclusive I carried oui tesls lo discover (D) whether surface pupation resulted through the absence' of
light,
and (E) whether animation of the larva was reduced under cold conditions..",:!(; Acta Trop. IX. ì. 1952 Medical Entomology TAHMi 6.
77ie results from 12 blaek-lobed G. swynnertoni kept in gauze cage in the open until all had deposited their larvile.
lixperimenl stalled 9 a.m.. 23. 4. 1952.
I.arvipusite ol p,
(I (12.10 24.5 On surface under
to 12.30) hark
0 (12.30-1) 2(5.5 On surface under bark
o Night 24.5-20.0 Half embedded in the open
1 (3.00-3.15) 20.0 On surface in the open
1 (4.30-5) 19.5 On surface under bark
1 (5.00-5.30) 18.5 Half embedded in the open
(1.15-2) 21.5-2(i.5 Pupa under door of cage
4 Pupa was placed on soil.
10 2 (1.15-2) 2 1.5-20.5 Notdetected 521 4 By exclusion this
was the pupa found under the surface (20.0m». on 18.0.52.)
Died later.
1 1 2.15-3 20.5 Larvaunderdoor of cage
4 Larva was placed on top of bark and had pupated where it was
TABLE 7.
Test D. Pupation in the dark. The depth beneath the soil of ten G. swynnertoni pupae, from flics kept in the dark on dry soil at ordinary laboratory
temperatures.
rature 24.0 25.5 26.0 to to 24.5 to 26.0 25.0 24.0
(°c.)
26.0 26.0Test D (Table 7) shows that the larvae observed
all
burrowed despite the absence oflight,
to depthsvarying
according to theindividual
and not correlatedwith ordinary
laboratory temperatures.Test E.
Forty-eight
observations were made at moderatelyhigh
temperatures, 24.5" C. to 26° C. and eight at much lower temperature,approximately 20° C. The results are shown
in
Table 8,which
TABLE 8.
77ie depth to which G. swynnertoni larvae burrowed in dry soil at ordinary laboratory temperatures (24.5° C.-26" C.) and in similar soil kept at approx.
20« C.
Depth Surface Just
hidden V4 inch 12 inch 3/4 inch
24.5-26.01C. nil 1 6 22 19
Approx. 20"C. 2 1 4 1 nil
shows
lhat
surface pupation never occurred ondry
soil atordinary
laboratory
temperatures, the greatmajority
penetrating to a depth of overhalf
an inch.In dry
soil kept at approximately 20° C, on the other hand, larvae tended toburrow
less deeply and two out of eight pupated on the surface.338 Acta Trop. IX, 4, 1952— MedicalEntomology Times of
larviposition.
Between June 1948 and December 1949 I made .'184 observations on the time of
larviposition
in G. swynnertoni and 99 on G.morsitans. Each
fly
was kept singly in a corked3X1
inch glasscylinder
having the olher end coveredwith
cloth mosquitonetting. When
it
could be seenthat
thelarval
lobes had blackenedthese tubes were rested obliquely on the
rim
of white enamel plateswith
the gauze-covered end downwards. The total results were examinedin relation
to seasons,but
though they gave aslight suggestion that
larviposition
tended to be later betweenmid-May
andmid-July,
no marked correlation was apparent, neither was there any difference between resultsfrom wild
females
from
the bush and femaleswhich
had emergedfrom
pupaein
thelaboratory
and had mated there.On 10th
April
1952, two black lobed female G. swynnertoni,which
hadbeenin
3X
1 inch tubes on an enamel plateuntil
2 p.m.,wTere transferred to jars
of dry
soil. The temperature was 27° C.One produced its
larva
almost immediately and the secondwithin
2A minutes. Two olher black-lobed females were transferred at
2 p.m.
from
tubes to wet soil,but without
result. These were then changedfrom their
wet soil jars to dry. Both remained motionlessas soon as they touched the
dry
soil and one produced a larva three minutes later. Thefourth did
nothingwithin
ten minutes, so she wasput
back to her wet soil pol, where she gavebirth
about6 p.m. the same day. These observaiions suggest that
dry
soil and warm conditions arewhat
the femalefly
prefers, and that intheir
absence (see Table 6) she can postpone
larviposition
to someextent. Accordingly,
for
comparisonwith
previous datti, I recorded 56 observations of the time when G. swynnertoni larviposited ondry
soil. The flies (capturedin
Block 9) were maintained asbefore, singly
in
3X
1 inch lubes,until
the black lobes of the larva could be seen, afterwhich
they were placed singlyin
glass jars containing earth obtainedfrom
a breeding sitein
Block 9. The past results obtainedfor
G.morsitans and G.swynnertoni are shown in Table 9, alongwith
the results on G. swynnertoni when placed ondry
soil.Both
with
G. morsitans and G. swynnertoni,which
larviposited in3X1
inch tubes, the peak lime wasfrom
4 p.m. todark:
nineteen of the 64
"night"
observations in the case of G. sivyn-nertoni were close on 7 p.m., just as darkness sets in, and of course the remainder may have been spread over several hours.The results
for
G. swynnertoni ondry
soil are more or less evenly scattered through Ihe hot hoursol
Ihe day,from
11 a.m. to5 p.m. The
indication
again is therefore that the female is able tohold up
larviposition lor
a lew hoursif
she is not satisfiedwith
TABLE 9.
The times of larviposition, at ordinary laboratory temperature, of G. morsitans and G. swynnertoni contained singly in tubes and the times for G. swynnertoni
on dry soil.
Time of larviposition at normal laboratory
temperatures
3" x 1" glass tubes
G. morsitans G.swynnertoni
Total observations 0!) 384 50
her environment. There were no depositions before 9 a.m. when flies were kept in day-light, but Table 7 shows there were two such
occurrences out of ten flies kept in total darkness.
The fact that the female holds up
larviposition if
kept in3X1
inch tube affords a
fairly
ready means of obtaining a tsetse larvawithin
it few minutes when one is needed,by
merelytransferring
the