• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Metastudie zu Elektromobilität

5. Ergebnisse

5.1. Metastudie zu Elektromobilität

20.04.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 13th Consortium Meeting 3

Objective: Developing of 3 scenarios (Status quo, 2030 A, 2030 B) similar to those developed in Actions 10 and 13

Procedure: based on the political targets related to e-mobility in the Greater Region, figures about the estimated e-vehicles (Units, Capacity) and their distribution in the GR will be collected. The output is a share of e-vehicles for three different scenarios and for four different regions →Subaction 16.4

Main responsible: IZES

Start: 01 December 2019

End: 31 December 2019

Subaction 16.1 (first Part)

08.07.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 14th Consortium Meeting 17

Subaction 16.1 (first Part)

2030 A : Conservative scenario

2030 B : Optimistic scenario (will follow) Status quo 2030 A 2030 B

FR 7,346 200,049 155,623

DE 5,576 46,722 390,769

LU 6,251 79,480 229,090

BE 5,950 75,412 131,097

Source: B. Dröschel, "20200122_Entwicklung Pkw_E-Mob_GR.xls"

Status quo 2030 A 2030 B

FR 0.7% 18.7% 14.6%

DE 0.2% 1.9% 15.7%

LU 3.1% 38.8% 100.0%

BE 0.4% 4.9% 8.6%

Source: EUROSTAT Siehe Datei "20200616_Entwicklung Pkw_E-Mob_GR_AB_DRÖ"

Number of EV in the GR

Penetration of EV in the GR

8

20.04.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 13th Consortium Meeting 5

Objective: Collecting data about the user behavior of e-vehicles

Procedure: Based on mobility studies the user behavior (Annual mileage, daily mileage, vehicle utilization ratio, arrival time and departure time) will be determined. The outputs are distributions allowing the determination of average loading behavior of e-vehiclesSubaction 16.2

Main responsible: ESEM

Start: 01 January 2020

End: 31 January 2020

Subaction 16.1 (second Part)

20.04.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 13th Consortium Meeting 6

Subaction 16.1 (second Part)

Assumptions based on : Doctoral thesis of Röhrenbeck 2019

Serviceable battery capacity : 30 kWh

Average consumption : 0.2 kWh/km

Charging power : 3.7 kW

Charging location : charging almost at home only ( ~ if daily mileage

>100 km)

Further assumptions

A similar user behavior can be assumed for all parts of the GR

9

5.2. Modellierung des Ladeverhaltens

20.04.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 13th Consortium Meeting 7

Objective: Modelling of e-vehicle (EV) charging behavior

Procedure: Based on the user behavior determined in subaction 16.1 and several EV specific data like battery capacity, average consumption and charging capacity, an EV charging profile can be determined. The output is also an EV charging model.

→ Subaction 16.4

Main responsible: ESEM

Start: 01 January 2020

End: 31 Mach 2020

Subaction 16.2

20.04.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 13th Consortium Meeting 8

Synthetic charging profile of EV :

Subaction 16.2

Time in ¼ h

Pin W

Source: Röhrenbeck 2019

Represents an average of 1000 EV charging profile

Correlates with several presented profiles in the literature

Pin WPin WPin W

Time in ¼ h

Time in ¼ h

Time in ¼ h

10

5.3. Reglerentwurf und Weiterentwicklung

20.04.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 13th Consortium Meeting 9

Objective: Refining the HP-Controller

Procedure: Integration of new simplified building models of multi-family homes in the controller, adjusting of the building heating curve and the HP power.

→Subaction 16.4

Furthermore, an EV-control scheme will be investigated on in order to allow a market driven charging control, similar to the developed HP-control.

Main responsible: ESEM

Start: 01 Mach2020

End: 31 July 2020

Subaction 16.3

June 11, 2019 A. Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 9th Consortium Meeting 4

Motivation & Concept

Central

Local

Decentral

11

June 11, 2019 A. Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 9th Consortium Meeting 5

Motivation & Concept

Central

Local

Decentral

 Reduce active power balancing

issues

 Provide flexibility to

the LV grid

 Minimize operational costs

June 11, 2019 A. Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 9th Consortium Meeting 6

Motivation & Concept

Central

Local

Decentral

 Market signal

m  Network signal

n  Storage level

l

12

June 11, 2019 A. Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 9th Consortium Meeting 8

 Prioritization: lccnccmcc

Switching signal

n

cc

m

cc

= +

l

cc

m

cc

n

cc

l

cc

n

cc

+ n

cc

l

cc

l

cc

m

cc

m

cc

 Storage level : lcc

 Grid signal : ncc

 Market signal : mcc  Switching signal : ycc

5.4. Auswirkungen eines Rollouts von Wärmepumpen und Elektroautos

20.04.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 13th Consortium Meeting 10

Objective: Examination of the impact of EV, PV and HP on the LV grids in the Greater Region

Procedure: The procedure developed in Action 10 will be adopted. The additional e-vehicle loads will be taken into account. The output is an indication about the LV grid state in the GR for the three different scenarios.

Main responsible: ESEM

Start: 01 July 2020

End: 31 August 2020

Subaction 16.4

13

08.07.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 14th Consortium Meeting 8

Grid Assessment | France

Undervoltage and overload problems due to the high HP penetrations in 2030 (51.6 %).

Within the bounds Limit violation

The limit violations are mainly due to the high HP penetration. EVs will make the situation worse in the future.

Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload

S1a 12 12

S1b 410 259

S2a 627 8 468 3

Region Grid type Status quo

Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload

S1a 5

Region Grid type Status quo

08.07.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 14th Consortium Meeting 9

Grid Assessment | Germany

Transformer overload in the LV-grid S2b in 2030, due to the high PV share.

Within the bounds Limit violation

No additional limit violations du to electric vehicles, as the penetrations are still low until 2030 (A : 1.9%, B : 15.7%).

Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload S1a

S1b S2a

S2b 451 443

S3a

Status quo 2030 A

Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload S1a Grid type 2030 Region

Germany

Status quo

14

08.07.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 14th Consortium Meeting 10

Grid Assessment | Luxemburg

Transformer overload in S2b, due to the high PV share, as for DE.

Overvoltage in the radial S1a grid, as PV penetration in LU is higher than in DE.

Within the bounds Limit violation

Additional undervoltage and overload problems due to the very high EV penetration in Luxemburg.

Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload

S1a 3512 1107 3510 2623

S1b 1733

S2a 2521

S2b 195 2854

S3a 189 2956

S3b 2

S4a 2426 2893

S4b 2751

2030 A 2030 B

Luxemburg

Region Grid type Status quo

Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload

S1a 3676

Region Grid type Status quo

08.07.2020 Anes Benzarti PtH4GR²ID – 14th Consortium Meeting 11

Grid Assessment | Belgium

The BE grids are stronger compared to the LU ones. No limit violations until 2030.

Within the bounds Limit violation

Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload S1a

Region Grid type Status quo

Belgium has the lowest penetration of EV. No limit violations even when considering the political targets related to EV.

Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload Overvoltage Undervoltage Overload S1a

Region Grid type Status quo

15

6. Zusammenfassung

Sowohl die aktuellen Durchdringungen an Elektroautos in den Ländern der Großregion als auch die Entwicklungsziele auf der Basis energiepolitischer Zielsetzungen weisen erhebliche Diskrepanzen auf.

Während in Luxemburg bei einem optimistischen Szenario für das Jahr 2030 davon ausgegangen wird, dass im Durschnitt jeder Haushalt über ein Elektroauto verfügt, weist Belgien eine geringe Elektrifizierung im Mobilitätssektor auf. Hierbei wird davon ausgegangen, dass etwa jeder zehnte Haushalt über einen elektrisch angetriebenen Pkw verfügt.

Durch die zusätzliche Berücksichtigung der Elektroautos in den Netzberechnungen ergeben sich ab dem Jahr 2030 aufgrund der hohen zu erwartenden Durchdringungen von Elektrofahrzeugen erhebliche Unterschiede. Bei gleichbleibender Netzauslegung ist mit häufigem Auftreten von Grenzwertverletzungen zu rechnen.

Ein Managementsystem hat das Potenzial die in Zukunft auftretenden Überlastungen teilweise zu vermeiden. Um den zu erwartenden Überlastungen und Spannungsbandverletzungen entgegenzuwirken, ist eine Netzverstärkung bzw. ein Netzausbau im Niederspannungsbereich vonnöten.

7. Publikationen