• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Investigation of a Type-II VECSEL

sig-natures, and dipole transition strengths enables the identification of the transitions and label them as type-II and type-I. Hence, the electron- to hole-state transitions in the excitonic spectra are allocated and the Sb content is proven to be a valuable tool to alter the emission, i.e. an increase of the emission wavelength requires more Sb.

3.4 Investigation of a Type-II VECSEL

Growth Direction (nm)

0 2 4

Refractive Index Pro fi le Longitudinal Light Mo de

0 2 4

0 2000 4000 6000

Air RP G

DB R

Bo nd

Figure 3.11: Longitudinal light mode intensity for 1171 nm (solid line) and the re-fractive index profile for the VECSEL sample #26371-2 (shaded area) are plotted at 300 K. The positions of the active regions in the RPG are highlighted by vertical lines.

The refractive index profile of VECSEL sample #26371-2 and the 1171 nm longi-tudinal light mode inside are plotted in Fig. 3.11. It is directly observable that the sample is resonant for the 1171 nm light mode because the standing wave has its max-ima close to the positions of the active regions. Therefore, absorption and stimulated emission processes can happen with a high probability and efficiency. This structure is called a resonant setup, as no mismatch in detuning between the resonator and material gain is present. Laser emission from this sample was measured and presented in Papers [IV] and [V].

Spectrally resolved for all wavelengths, a filter function is defined to quantify the resonance properties of the cavity [134]. The definition of the filter function includes the intensity of the longitudinal light mode at the positions of the active regions in the RPG. A peak value of 4 is the maximum the filter function can reach as it is calculated for the in- and outward propagating light intensity.

Another quantity of interest is the total reflectivity of VECSEL chips. Experimental data in the form of a reflectivity spectrum was obtained for the unexcited sample

#26371-2. Figure 3.12 compares the experimental reflectivity (shaded area) with the theoretically calculated spectra (solid lines) for no excitation up to gain conditions.

Both unexcited spectra show a broad stop band, where ideally the laser mode should be placed centrally. The filter function peak and the absorption dip of both spectra show a good agreement in the position with the resonance around 1170 nm. In the computed curves, no peak arises right in the middle of the stop band as the excitation

0 · 10

12

/cm

2

1 · 10

12

/cm

2

2 · 10

12

/cm

2

3 · 10

12

/cm

2

0.0 0.5 1.0

Re fl ectivity

Wavelength (nm)

1150 1200 1250 1300

Filter Function

2

0 4

Figure 3.12: Experimental (shaded area) and theoretical (solid lines) reflectivity spec-tra and corresponding filter function (dotted line) at 300 K. The charge carrier density is varied between 0·1012/cm2 (bright) and 3·1012/cm2 (dark) and an inhomogeneous broadening of 20 meV is applied.

density is increased. Nevertheless, a laser mode around 1170 nm is predicted with the reflectivity rising to values higher than 1 at this position. This is in very good agreement with the experimentally found values ranging from 1173 nm up to 1183 nm in Paper [IV].

To further support this analysis, intensity dependent reflectivity measurements were performed in Ref. [VII]. It was confirmed that the laser mode is just at the edge of the stop band. The analysis in this Paper shows how the mode grows with excitation power.

3.4.2 Detuning and Modal Gain

Suggestions resulting from a theoretical analysis can be used to optimize the VECSEL structure. Therefore, it is very helpful to define quantities like the detuning between cavity resonance and the RPG’s material gain maximum. The linkage of both brings up the modal gain of the system which highlights the amplification of material gain by the whole cavity. While the cavity resonance is presented in Paper [IV], the modal gain of sample #26371-2 is displayed in Ref. [VII] and presented in the following.

In comparison to the material gain of a semiconductor heterostructure, the modal gain also covers the influence of the cavity. It is a multiplication of material gain

3.4 Investigation of a Type-II VECSEL and filter function and is influenced by the dependencies of both quantities. There-fore, it is reasonable to have a closer look at the temperature dependent shifts of both components of the modal gain. Both quantities have different shift rates as pre-sented in Fig. 3.13 (a). The material gain (solid lines) and the filter function (dashed lines) are plotted having a charge carrier density of2.0·1012/cm2 at 300 K (thin) and 2.5·1012/cm2 at 350 K (thick). It becomes clear that the material gain shifts faster with an increasing temperature even if the charge carrier density is increased. This suggests that with an increasing temperature, the gain outruns the cavity resonance and therefore no sufficient modal gain is present in sample #26371-2. Figure 3.13 (b) depicts the resulting modal gain for both cases. In direct comparison, for 300 K (thin) a more pronounced peak is present which is close to the peak position of the filter function. Meanwhile for 350 K (thick) the modal gain is smaller and decreases to zero as the sample’s temperature is further increased.

From Fig. 3.13 it becomes clear that the peaks of the filter function and the material gain are not necessarily at the same position. Additionally, a different temperature dependence for both quantities is exposed. Thus, it is useful to specify a detuning be-tween active material and cavity. To make this definition most general and practicable, the detuning is defined between the low-density PL of the semiconductor heterostruc-ture and the resonance of the cavity. According to Ref. [131], a negative detuning,

0 1 5 2 250

Filter Fucntion

300 K 350 K 350 K 300 K

300 K 350 K

Wavelength (nm)

0 500 1000

Modal Gain Mat Gain (1/cm) . 0

4

2

1160 1180 1200 1220 1240 1260

(b) (a)

Figure 3.13: Modal gain properties of sample #26371-2. (a) Material gain (solid lines) and filter function (dashed lines) for 300 K (thin) and 350 K (thick), with carrier densities of 2.0·1012/cm2 and 2.5·1012/cm2 for 300 K and 350 K, respectively. (b) Resulting modal gain is plotted for both temperatures.

i.e. PL blue shifted to cavity, is needed for efficient laser operation in type-I systems.

For a type-II setup instead, a positive detuning is preferable, as the material gain blue shifts when increasing the pump power, as explained in Sec. 3.2.1 and outlined in Pa-pers [IV] and [V]. Nevertheless, even an increasing pump power together with a blue shift in the material gain can lead to an overall red shift of the modal gain. This case appears when keeping the temperature constant while the material gain amplitude increases faster than the overlap of cavity resonance and shifting material gain edge.

Corresponding to the previous result, the initial detuning between the low-density PL of the “W”-structure and the cavity resonance is an important quantity for VEC-SELs. This analysis suggests that for high power operation a situation is favorable where the gain is initially blue shifted in comparison to the cavity resonance. The overlap between both increases with increasing temperature and pump power, and therefore enables high power operation. For VECSEL #26371-2 a low threshold con-figuration is achieved as the experimental investigations in Paper [IV] confirm.

To demonstrate the low threshold behavior, a calculation of the modal gain in

2.0 · 1012/cm2at 300 K 2.5 · 1012/cm2at 350 K

0 100 200

Resonance Material Gain (1/cm)

Δ Detuning (nm)

1100 1200 1300

Peak Pos (nm) .

Material Gain Material Gain Modal Gain Modal Gain

0 -25

-50 25 50

(a)

(b)

Figure 3.14: Effect of detuning change on modal gain. (a) Material gain value at the cavity resonance (peak position of the filter function) against an artificial change of the detuning. Carrier densities of 2.0·1012/cm2 (bright) and 2.5·1012/cm2 (dark) were assumed for 300 K and 350 K, respectively. (b) Corresponding material (solid lines) and modal (dashed lines) gain peak positions.

3.5 Optimization Capabilities of Type-II Lasers