1. Look at the list below. Please indicate, with an ‘x’ next to the word, which adjectives apply to ICT professionals.
The following list of words was provided (Gough, 1979):
Capable, Honest, Artificial, Intelligent, Clever, Well-mannered, Cautious, Wide interests, Confident, Inventive, Egotistical, Original, Commonplace, Narrow interests, Humorous, Reflective, Conservative, Sincere, Individualistic, Resourceful, Conventional, Self-confident, Informal, Sexy, Dissatisfied, Submissive, Insightful, Snobbish, Suspicious, Unconventional 2. What additional adjectives describe an ICT professional?
3. What influence do parents have on a child’s interest in ICT?
4. What do you think about an all-girl computer class?
5. What do you think about the ICT characters in this clip (Bellisario, McGill, Binder, Kriozere, & Wharmby, 2011, 20:35–24:40).
6. Do you know any ICT experts? – description of job and person
RE FE RE NCES
Adya, M., & Kaiser, K. M. (2005). Early determinants of women in the ICT workforce:
A model of girls’ career choices. Information Technology & People, 18, 230–259.
Ahuja, M. K. (2002). Women in the information technology profession: A literature review, synthesis, and research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 20–34. doi:10.1057/ palgrave.ejis.3000417.
Anderson, N., Lankshear, C., Courtney, L., & Timms, C. (2006). Girls and ICT Survey:
initial findings. Curriculum Leadership, 4.
Anderson, N., Lankshear, C., Timms, C., & Courtney, L. (2008). ‘Because it’s boring, irrelevant and I don’t like computers’: Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1304–1318.
Anderson, R, & Dexter, S. (2005). School Technology Leadership: An Empirical Investigation of Prevalence and Effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49–82.
Aronson, J. (2004). The threat of stereotype. Educational Leadership, 62(4): 14–19.
Ashcraft, C., Eger, E., & Friend, M. (2012). Girls in IT: The Facts. Boulder, CO:
National Centre for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT). Retrieved July 2013, from http://www.academia.edu/2283166/Girls_in_IT_The_Facts.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012). Retrieved August 2012, from http://www.abs.gov.
au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4125.0main+features1110Jul%202012.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Schools, Australia 2005, Cat 4221.0.
Commonwealth of Australia 2006.
Australian Computer Society. (2012). 2012 Australian ICT Statistical Compendium.
Retrieved November 2012, from http://www.acs.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_
file/0014/13541/2012_Statcompendium_final_web.pdf.
Avison, D., Fitzerald, G, & Powell, P. (2001). Reflections on Information Systems Practice, Education and Research 10 Years of the Information Systems Journal.
Information Systems Journal, 11, 3–22.
Bandias, S., & Warne, L. (2009). Women in ICT – Retain and Sustain: An Overview of the ACS-W Survey. Paper presented at the ACIS Melbourne. Retrieved August 2014, from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=acis2009.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman &
Company.
Barker, L. J., & Aspray, W. (2006). The state of research on girls and IT. In J. M.
Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (pp. 3–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/
mitpress/9780262033459.003.0001.
Barker, L. J., & Aspray, W. (2006). The state of research on girls and IT. In J. M. Cohoon
& W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology (pp. 3–54). Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press.
184
Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward Technology Integration in the Schools: Why It Isn’t Happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.
Bickman, L. (1987). The functions of program theory. New Directions for Program Evaluation No 33. (Ed: BICKMAN, L.) S F, Jossey Bass Publishers, pp. 5–17.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.): Cambridge University Press.
Bovee, C., Voogt, J., & Meelissen, M. (2007). Computer attitudes of primary and secondary students in South Africa. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1762–
1776.
Brown, E. (2010). GO-GIRL response. Educational Horizons, 89(1), 93–98.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, C. (2007). The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications Ltd. London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Butler, D. (2000). Gender, girls, and computer technology: What’s the status now? The Clearing House, 73(4), 225–229.
Butt, C. (2014). IT crowd shrinking as VCE enrolments plummet, The Age. Retrieved September 2014, from http://www.theage.com.au/it-pro/expertise/it-crowd-shrinking-as-vce-enrolments-plummet-20140907-10dizx.html.
Buxton, H. (1992). Application Design: A Well-Motivated Approach to Computing? Paper presented at the Women Into Computing-Teaching Computing: Content and Methods Keele University, Staffordshire.
Byrne, G. & Staehr, L. (2005). Women in the Australian IT industry: Where are we now? Australian Journal of Information Systems, 13, 8–18.
Carty, S. (2012). Many Cars Tone Deaf To Women’s Voices, http://autos.aol.com/article/
women-voice-command-systems/ Accessed 22 January 2013.
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2011). On Methods, Methodologies and how they Matter. Paper presented at the ECIS, Helsinki.
Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory driven evaluations: A comprehensive perspective. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging:
how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(6), 1045.
Choudhury, V., Lopes, A. B., & Arthur, D. (2010). Issues and Opinions – IT Careers Camp: An Early Intervention Strategy to Increase IS Enrollments. Information Systems Research, 21(1), 1 - 14. doi: 10.1287/isre.1090.0259.
Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2002). Working with Ethical Symmetry in Social Research with Children. Childhood, 9(4), 477–497.
Christie, R., & Healy, J. (2004). How to Get Them in With Food, Charm and Goodies - the
‘Go For IT gURL!’ Strategy. Paper presented at the Making a Difference, Hobart.
Clark, S., Pickering, S., & Atkins, D. (1991). Girls into IT at Stockton Sixth Form College.
Paper presented at the Women into Computing, Cleveland.
Clayton, D., & Lynch, T. (2002). Ten years of strategies to increase participation of women in computing programs: The Central Queensland University experience, 1999–2001. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 89–93.
Clayton, K. (2005). Get Set: More Smart Women in the Smart State (unpublished report). Brisbane: Queensland Government Office for Women, Education Queensland and Griffith University.
Clayton, K. (2006). Showing girls IT’s amazing. Paper presented at the AusWIT, Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/
bitstream/10072/12064/1/clayton.pdf.
Clayton, K., & Beekhuyzen, J. (2004). Engaging girls in ICTs: Mind the gap! Proceedings of the 2004 Australian Women in IT Conference, AusWIT 2004 “Making a Difference”, 41–50. Retrieved October 9, 2014, from http://www.awicaustralasia.org/
attachments/article/4/AusWIT%202004%20Proceedings.pdf.
Clayton, K., Beekhuyzen, J., & Nielsen, S. (2012). Now I know what ICT can do for me!
Information Systems Journal, 22(5), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.13652575.2012.00414.
Clayton, K., von Hellens, L., & Nielsen, N. (2009). Gender stereotypes prevail in ICT: a research review. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the special interest group on management information system’s 47th annual conference on Computer personnel research, Limerick, Ireland.
Cohoon, J., & Aspray, W. (2006). Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohoon, J., & Asprey, W. (2006). A Critical Review of the Research on Women’s Participation in Postsecondary Computing Education. In J. Cohoon & W. Asprey (Eds.), Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation. The MIT Press.
Cox, M. J., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know?
Education and Information Technologies, 12(2), 59–70.
Cozza, M. (2011). Bridging gender gaps, networking in computer science. Gender, Technology and Development, 15(2), 319–337. doi:10.1177/097185241101500207.
Craig, A. (1998). Peer Mentoring Female Computer Students - Does it Make a Difference? The Third Australasian Conference on Computer Science Education. P.
Strooper. University of Queensland, ACM: 41–47.
Craig, A. (2005). Girls Not Choosing Computing: Causes and Effects. Redress, Journal of The Association of Women Educators, 14(3), 2–7.
Craig, A. (2006). Young Girls ICT Into Computing Too. Report AWISE, Australia, 2–70.
Craig, A. (2010). Attracting women to computing: A framework for evaluating intervention programmes. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG.
Craig, A., Dawson, L., & Fisher, J. (2009). Measuring the success of intervention programmes designed to increase the participation rate by women in computing. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italy.
Craig, A., Fisher, J., & Dawson, L. (2011). Women in ICT: Guidelines for evaluating intervention programmes. Proceedings of The 19th European Conference on Information Systems–ICT and Sustainable Service Development (ECIS 2011) Helsinki, Finland.
Craig, A., Fisher, J. & Lang, C. (2007). ICT and Girls: The Need for a Large Scale Intervention Programme. Proceedings of 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Toowoomba. 761–769.
Craig, A., Fisher, J., Forgasz, H., & Lang, C. (2011). Evaluation framework underpinning the Digital Divas programme. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’11) (pp. 313–317). Darmstadt, Germany, June 27–29. [ISBN: 978-1-4503-0697-3]
Available on-line http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1999835&dl=ACM&coll=DL
&CFID=94605619&CFTOKEN=83240814.
Craig, A., Lang, C, & Fisher, J. (2008). Twenty years of Girls into Computing Days: Has it been worth the effort? Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, 339–353.
Craig, A., Scollary, A., & Fisher, J. (2003). Overcoming the Adversity of Diversity: An Australian Story. Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Florida, USA.
186
Cressell, J. W. (2008). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International.
Crump, B. J. (2001) Equity in the tertiary programming learning environment. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) International Education Research Conference, Coldstream, VIC. Retrieved October 9, 2014, from http://www.aare.edu.au/publications-database.php/3038/
equity-in-the-tertiary-programming-learning-environment.
Darke, K., Clewell, B., & Sevo, R. (2002). Meeting the challenge: The impact of the National Science Foundation’s Program for women and girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 285–303.
Davidson, J. (2012). The Journal Project: Qualitative Computing and the Technology/
Aesthetics Divide in Qualitative Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(2).
Dawson, C., & Rakes, G. C. (2003). The influence of principals’ technology training on the integration of technology into schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 29–49.
Department of Education (2012). uCube. Retrieved January 2013, from http://
education.gov.au/ucube-higher-education-data-cube.
Department of Education (2014). Summary of 2010 Higher Education Statistics.
Retrieved August 2014, from http://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/
other/2010_attachment_a.pdf.
Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR]. (2013).
Australian Jobs 2013. Australian Government. Retrieved October 9, 2014, from http://www.cdaa.org.au/ContentUpload/Docs/australianjobs2013.pdf.
Department of State Development, Business and Innovation (2012). Retrieved August 2014, from http://dsdbi.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/95334/6592-ICT-workforce-development-plan-A4-20pp-booklet-web-2.pdf.
DEST (2006). Youth attitudes survey population study on the perceptions of science, mathematics and technology study at school and career decision making. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/5D23C185-9031-4881-9FC9-89514F935ACB/13057/Youth_Attitudes_Survey.pdf (no longer available).
DEST (2008). Digital Education Revolution http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_
education/policy_initiatives_reviews/key_issues/digital_ed_revolution/default.htm (no longer available).
DICTA (2006). Building Australian ICT Skills Report, Australian Government, June.
Doerschuk, P., Liu, J., & Mann, J. (2007). Pilot Summer Camps in Computing for Middle School Girls: From Organization Through Assessment. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(3), 4–8.
Dove - Evolution Commercial (2006) available from https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=OXf8fr0Kp3Q&list=RDeNoo-ivduNw&index=11.
Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L.,
& Midgley, C. (1985). Self-perceptions, task perceptions, socializing influences, and the decision to enroll in mathematics. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M.
Wilson (Eds.), Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation (pp. 95–121).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eccles, J. (1985). Sex differences in achievement patterns. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Psychology and gender: Nebraska symposium on motivation 1984 (pp. 97–132).
Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices.
Psychology of women quarterly, 18(4), 585–609.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Studying gender and ethnic differences in participation in math, physical science, and information technology. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 110, 7–14.
Eccles, J. S. (2006). Families, schools, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization:
Theory and research (pp. 665–691). New York: Guilford Press.
Fisher, J., Lang, C., & Craig, A. (2013). Women in the IT workplace: Learnings for managers. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht.
Fisher, J., Lang, C., Craig, A., Forgasz, H. (2007). Effectiveness of ‘Girls Only’ Computer Clubs in Australia, Report compiled on behalf of VicICTforWomen.
Fisher, J., Lang, C., Craig, A., Forgasz, H., & Lazarenko, K. (2009). Report on the effectiveness of “girls only” computer clubs in Australia. Retrieved October 9, 2014, from http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:16687.
Fisher, J., Lang, C., Forgasz, H., & Craig, A. (2009). Digital divas: Working to change students’ perceptions about ICT courses and careers. Curriculum Leadership, 7(31).
Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Fogarty, G., Cretchley, P., Harman, C., Ellerton, N., & Konki, N. (2001). Validation of a questionnaire to measure mathematics confidence, computer confidence, and attitudes towards the use of technology for learning mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 154–160.
Forgasz, H. (2006). Teachers, equity and computers for secondary mathematics learning.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 437–469.
Fuller, A., Connor, H., Johnston, B., & Turbin, J. (2009). The Evaluation of Computer Clubs for Girls: Final Report to SEEDA. Retrieved October 9, 2014, from http://
eprints.soton.ac.uk/188683/1/CC4G_Evaluation_ISBN__9780854329151.pdf.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 148.
Gal-Ezer, J., Shahak, D., & Zur, E. (2009). Computer science issues in high school:
gender and more… ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(3) 278–282.
Geer, R., & Sweeney, T. (2012). Students’ voices about learning with technology. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 294–303.
Gibbs, G. (2002). Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVIVO. Philadelphia:
Open University Press.
Graham, S., & Latulipe, C. (2003). CS Girls Rock: Sparking Interest in Computer Science and Debunking the Stereotypes. Association for Computing Machinery SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1), 322–326.
Gras-Velazquez, A., Joyce, A., & Debry, M. (2009). Women and ICT: Why are girls still not attracted to ICT studies and careers? (White Paper). Brussels: European Schoolnet (EUN Partnership AISBL).
Greene, J., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W. (1989). Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(1), 255–274.
Gürer, D., & Camp, T. (2002). An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 121–127.
Harding, J. (1994). The GASAT Experience-Organisation Report. GATES, Vol. 1(1), p. 41.
Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference. What is the research evidence? Retrieved July 2014, from https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/proflearn/docs/pdf/qt_hattie.pdf.
188
Hawkins, J. (1985). Computers and girls: rethinking the issues. Sex Roles 13(3/4), 169–178.
Heo, M., & Myrick, M. (2009). The Girls’ Computing Club: Making Positive Changes in Gender inequity in Computer science with an informal, female learning Community. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 5(4), 44–56.
Hermon, M. (2006). Computer Club for Girls, Keynote Address AusWIT 2006. Retrieved February 2008, from http://www.ozwit.org/version_three/files /AUSTRALIA%20 presentation.ppt#256,1,Computer Clubs for Girls CC4G (no longer available).
Hesse-Biber, S., & Johnson, B. (2013). Coming at Things Differently: Future Directions of Possible Engagement with Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 103–109.
Ho, S., & Frampton, K. (2010). A Competency Model for the Information Technology Workforce: Implications for Training and Selection. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27(5), 63–80.
Johnson, D. G. & Miller, K. W. (2002). Is diversity in computing a moral matter?
SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 9–10.
Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: Accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Advances in experimental social psychology, 28, 281–388.
Kelleher, C. Motivating Programming: Using storytelling to make computer programming attractive to middle school girls. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007.
Klawe, M., Whitney, T., & Simard, C. (2009). Women in Computing – take 2.
Communications of the ACM, 52(2): 68–76.
Kwan, S. K., Trauth, E. M., & Driehaus, K. C. (1985). Gender differences and computing:
students’ assessment of societal influences. Education & Computing, 1(3), 187–194.
Lai, K., Trewern, A., & Pratt, K. (2002). Computer Coordinators as Change Agents:
Some New Zealand Observations. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 539–551.
Lang, C. (2003). Flaws and gaps in the women in computing literature. AusWIT 2003 - Participation, Progress and Potential. Hobart, Australia, University of Tasmania.
Lang, C. (2003). Gender and the geek factor: why don’t women do IT? Traffic, 3, 79–91.
Lang, C. (2007). Twenty-first century Australian women and IT: Exercising the power of choice. Computer Science Education, 17(3), 215–226.
Lang, C. (2012). Sequential Attrition of Secondary School Student Interest in IT Courses and Careers. Information Technology and People, 25(3), 281–299.
Lang, C., Craig, A., Fisher, J., & Forgasz, H. (2010). Creating Digital Divas – scaffolding perception change through secondary school and university alliances. Ankara, Turkey, ACM. Paper presented at the ITiCSE (Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education) Conference. Ankara, Turkey.
Lang, C., Fisher, J., & Craig, A. (2008). Digital Divas: Putting the ‘Wow’ back into IT for girls: the Brentwood Secondary School Trial, Report http://www.vicictforwomen.com.
au/www/html/201-computer-club-for-girls.asp (Accessed Feb 2008; no longer available).
Leder, G. C. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 597–622). New York: Macmillan.
Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2012). The Gendering of Mathematics: Views from the Street and from Facebook. In Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität (pp. 166–175). Vieweg: Teubner Verlag.
Lee, V. E. & Smith, J. B. (2001). Restructuring High Schools for Equity and Excellence:
What Works. Sociology of Education Series. New York: Teachers College Press.
Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ Views on Factors Affecting Effective Integration of Information Technology in the Classroom: Developmental Scenery.
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233–263.
Leyden, F. (2004, October 5). More women, more earnings, survey shows.
The Age Newspaper. Retrieved from http://www.theage.com.au/
articles/2004/10/04/1096871813256.html?from=storylhs.
Lyon, A. (2003). Broadening Pathways for Young Women through VET: A report to the Victorian Office of Training and Tertiary Education Collingwood, Equity Research Centre, State of Victoria.
Margolis, J. & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the Clubhouse - Women in Computing.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Mastropieri, M., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Graff, H., Marshak, L., Conners, N., … Cuenca-Sanchez, Y. (2009). What is published in the field of special education? an analysis of 11 prominent journals. Exceptional Children, 76(1), 95–109.
McKemmish, Sue, Burstein, Frada, Faulkhead, Shannon, Fisher, Julie, Gilliland, Anne, McLoughlin, Ian, & Wilson, Rob. (2012). Working with Communities:
Community Partnership Research in Information Technology, Management and Systems. Special Issue of Information, Communication and Society, 15(7).
McNamara, C. (2014). Basic Guide to Program Evaluation. Free Management Library, Retrieved October 2014, from http://managementhelp.org/evaluation/program-evaluation-guide.htm.
Meelissen, M. R. M., & Drent, M. (2008). Gender differences in computer attitudes:
Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 969–985.
Mercier, E. M., Barron, B., & O’Connor, K. M. (2006). Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 335–348.
Meredyth, D., Russell, N., Blackwood, L., Thomas, J., & Wise, P. (2000). Real time:
computers, change and schooling: a national sample study of the information technology skills of Australian school students, Australian Key Centre for Cultural and Media Policy.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). London:
Sage.
Miliszewska, I., & Moore, A. (2011). Attracting girls to ICT studies & careers – A snapshot of strategies. Redress, 20(3), 10–14.
Miliszewska, I., Barker, G., Henderson, F., & Sztendur, E. (2006). The issue of gender equity in computer science-what students say. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5(1), 107–120.
Miller, L. (2012, November 10). The geek queen. Good Weekend: The Age Magazine, 10–14.
Miranda, H., & Russell, M. (2011). Predictors of teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A multilevel SEM approach using data from the USEIT study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 301–323.
Modi, K., Schoenberg, J., & Salmond, K., (2012). Generation STEM: What girls say about science, technology, engineering and math. Girl Scouts of the USA. Retrieved from http://www.girlscouts.org/research/pdf/generation_stem_full_report.pdf.
MORI (2001). Image of ICT for e-skills, London, http://www.e-skills.com/cgi-bin/
go.pl/publications/category.html?category_uid=9 (Accessed April 2008; no longer available).