M & M ’s tests do substantiate ra th e r fo rce fu lly th a t the V u k o v ia n system is operable in m ost o f Y ug oslavia , the c ity o f N iš being the exception. To the specialist, the salience o f post accentual length in Zagreb cannot be expected because the dia le ct is absolutely devoid o f the feature. The Zagreb K a jk a v ia n dialect, to quote a n oth er o f M a g n e r’s w orks, does not use a fe ature o f post-vocalic length.[ 18] The test o f post-accentual length in Zagreb was, therefore, badly conceived. U n fo rtu n a te ly , th is is one o f the targets o f M & M ’s research since it represents the urban area.
The same th in g applies fo r Nis. P. Iv ic places th is c ity in the area o f the T o rlakia n dialects[ 19]These dialects have no risin g or fa llin g tones, no phonemic vocalic length and m ay have w o rd -fin a l stress. None o f these features belongs to the S tokavian dialect. B ut M & M were te stin g fo r the S tokavian features, despite th e ir non-existence in th is dialect.
M oreover, any in ve stig a to r w ith the results o f M & M ’s te st as presented in the appended tables w ould a u to m a tic a lly suspect some problem w ith the S tokavian dialect in this area;
the average perception is only about the ra te o f chance, low er th a n fo r Zagreb.
M & M do not address the differences in the dialectal areas when there m ig h t be some reason to suspect th a t th e ir tests were ina pp rop riate , except w hen i t was a negative expec- ta tio n . T hus, a p p a re n tly surprised th a t the students had perform ed so w ell, M & M ration*
alize: “ Some o f the students tested in Zagreb and Belgrade were born elsewhere, or th e ir parents m ig rate d fro m the classical areas o f V u k 's prosodic system and the fa m ilie s appar- e n tly managed to re ta in , a t least p a rtia lly , the regional prosodic ch a ra cte ristics.” (p. 104.) So m uch is w ro n g w ith this statem ent — w h y is i t V u k ’s prosodic system i f these students use it, w h y do the fam ilies “ m anage” to re ta in instead o f s im p ly re ta in , w h y are they ta
lk-000 5 0 3 8 5
ing about the students' backgrounds and speech acquisition only in this respect — th a t it can scarcely be coherently criticized. One th in g is clear: M & M have an operating bias.
They are not inve stiga ting for the sake o f finding som ething out, they prefer to prove som ething w hether or not i t is rig h t.
T h e ir bias is a ctu a lly manifested in all apsects o f th e ir investigation: th e ir chúces in related lite ra tu re , th e ir lack o f care or consistency in ad m iniste ring the tests, their disre- gard for the m a te ria l involved in the testing, and th e ir condescending tone which it main•
tained alm ost u n re m ittin g ly throughout the book. Despite all attem pts to do oth?rwise, demonstrate convincingly the tenacity o f the V ukovian accentual norm in Stokavun S-C.
This should be th e ir conclusion, not the reverse.
000 5 0 3 8 5
000 5 0 3 8 5
Titograd 1/26 3/26 3.8 11.5
Sisak 10/25 13/25 18.3 23.6
Zagreb 11/36 21/36 30.5 58.31
Beograd 21/61 29/61 34.4 47.5
Loznica 17/116 36/116 14.7 31.0
Niš 21/43 26/43 48.9 60.5
000 5 0 3 8 5
000 5 0 3 8 5
[17] W. Browne. C ritique in SEEJ, op cit, p. 505.
[18] M agner, Zagreb Kajkavian Dialect, Pennsylvania State Studies. 18, 1966, pp. 21*23.
[19] See his map in Der Serbo-Kroatische Dialekte, I, Mouton: The Hague. 1958.
* יי
ътгз
־ י■ _ י י :
■ ж
B IB L IO G R A P H Y
A bbott, E. A. Flatland. D over Publishers, Inc.: N .Y ., 1952.
Abad, G. A Form al Approach to Lyric Poetry. Quezon C ity : U n iv e rs ity o f the Phillipines Press. 1978.
Abercrom bie. D. “ A P honetician’s V iew o f Verse S tru c tu re .” Studies in Phonetics and Lin* guistics. London, 1965. pp. 16-25.
A b e rn a th y , R. “ Rhym es, Non-Rhymes and A n tirh y m e .” To Honor Roman Jakobson. Vol.
I. 1967, 1*14.
Adelsberger, F. “ K ra tk i pregled naše teorije ritm a .” Hrvatsko kolo. Zagreb, 1951.
Anić, V. Je z ik Ante Kovacica. Zagreb, 1971.
A ristotle . On the Art o f Poetry. Cornell U n ive rsity Press: Ith a ca , 1947.
A rtju n o va , N .D . “ O foneticeskoj organizacii ja z y k a i ie ra rx ii ego gram m aticeskix edinic.”
Fonetika, F on o lo g ia, Grammatika, Moscow, 1971, pp. 25*33.
A tk in s . H.G. History o f German Versification. M ethuen and Co: London. 1923.
A ttrid g e , D. “ The Language o f Poetry: M a te ria lity and M e anin g.” Essays in Criticism: A Quarterly Jou rn al. 1981, J u ly , 31 (3), pp. 228*245.
A u ste rlitz, R. Ob'Ugric Metrics: The Metrical Structure o f Ostyák and Vogul Folk'poetry.
H elsinki. 1958.
Avanesov, R .I. Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moscow, 1956.
Axm anova, 0 . Phonology, Morphonobgy, Morphology. M outon:The Hague, 1971.
Barac, A. Vidric. Zagreb. 1940.
Barthes. R. “ S tyle and Its Im age.” Literary Style: A Symposium. O xford, 1971, pp. 3-15.
B ayfield, M. A . The Measure o f the Poets. U n iv e rs ity Press: C am bridge. 1919.
B a x tin , M . Problem s o f Dostoevsky's Poetics. A rd is: A n n A rb o r, 1973.
Beardsley, M . *4Verse and M usic.” Versification: Major Language Types. W .K . W im satt.
ed. N Y U Press: N Y . 1972, pp. 238-252.
Beare. W. Latin Verse and European Song. M ethuen and Co.: London. 1957.
Belie. A. “ Iz novije akcentuacije.” S a s jezik II, 1951. pp. 227-237.
--- . S avrem eni srp sko h rva tski književni jezik: glasovi i akcenat. N aucna knjiga, Beo-grad. 1968.
B elyj, A. Ritm kak dialektika i MMednyj vsadnik”. Moscow, 1929.
Benett, W. German Verse in Classical Meters. M outon: the Hague, 1963.
Benson, A.C . “ Problem s o f Poetic Diction in T w e n tie th C e n tu ry C ritic is m ." Publications o f the MLA o f America. 1945.
Berić, P. **Nekoliko rijeci о viyesnjem kro ju narodni srp ski pesam a.” Serbske letopisi.
B udim . 1829, kn jig a 17, pp. 98-102.
B idw ełl. C. “ The Phonemics and Morphophonemics o f S-C S tress.” Slavic an d East Europe- an Jou rn al. Vol. V II, No. 2, 1963, pp. 160-165.
B irk h o ff, G.D. Aesthetic Measure. Cam bridge, M A , 1933.
--- . “ A M a th e m a tica l T h eo ry o f Aesthetics and its A p p lic a tio n to P oetry and M usic."
Rice Institute Pamphlet* X IX , J u ly , 1923, No. 3.
B rik , Osip M . “ Zvukovye p o v to ry .” Two Essays on Poetic Language. M ichigan Slavic M a te ria ls. M atejka, et al, ed. U n iv e rs ity o f M ich ig an Press: A n n A rb o r, 1964.
Bondarko, L .V . and N .D . Svetozarova. “ 0 v o s p rija tii bezudarnyx slogov.” Fonetika, Fono־ logia, G ram m atika. Moscow, 1971, 38-43.
000 5 0 3 8 5
B rju so v, V . Kratkyj kurs nauki о stixe. U n iv e rs ity o f M ich ig an M icrofilm s: Ann A rbor, 1966.
B u rk iu n d , C a rl E. “ M elody in V erse.” Quarterly Jou rn al o f Speech. 1953, X X X IX : 57-60.
---. “ P oetry: a Sym phonic S tru c tu re .” Quarterly Jou rn al o f Speech, 1951, X X X V I, pp. 179-184..
B uxsta b, B. Ja. “ К voprosu о svjazi tip o v russkogo s tih a so s tilja m i proiznosenija." Slavic Poetics. R. Jakobson, et a l., ed. M outon: Hague, 1973, pp. 67-74.
Chao, Y .R . “ The Non-Uniqueness o f Phonemic Solutions o f Phonetic System s.” Bulletin o f the Institute o f History and Philology. Academ ia Sinica, 4, (1934), pp. 363-398.
C h a tm a n , S. Literary Style: A Symposium. O xford, 1971.
--- . A Theory o f Meter. M outon: The Hague, 1965.
C h a ita n y a , K . Sanscrit Poetics. Nabajeban Press: C a lcu tta , 1965.
C hom sky, N . Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague, 1964.
C hom sky, N . and M . H alle. The Sound Pattern o f English. H a rp e r and Row: N .Y ., 1968.
Cigada, S. SulVautonomia dei valori fonetici nella poesia. M ilan o, 1969.
Cohen, D. and W irth , J ., eds. Testing Linguistic Hypotheses. Hem isphere Publication Cor- poration: W ashington, 1975.
Cooper, G .W . and L.B . M eyer. The Rhythmic Structure o f Music. U n iv e rs ity of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1960.
C orstius, B. Introduction to the Comparative Study o f Literature. Random House: New Y o rk , 1968.
Croce, B. The Essence o f Aesthetic. D. A inslie, tr. A rden: London, 1978.
000 5 0 3 8 5
-173
־
Corovié, V la d im ir. “ О srpskom ja m b u .” G odisnica Nikole Cupica. X X V II I, pp. 162-172, 1909.
---• “ Njegošev deseterac.” Misao. X IX , godiste V II, svezak 141-142, pp. 1371-1382.
C určin , M . “ Petostopni tro h e j.” Srpski knjiïevni glasnik, Beograd, 1905, knj. X V , sv. 6, pp. 442-451; sv. 7, pp. 527-531; sv. 8, pp. 604-613.
--- . “ Ja m p ski stih и srpskom pesnjistvu.” Srpski knjizevni glasnik. Beograd, 1914, kn j. Х Х Х П , sv. 12, pp. 905-915.
D abney, J.P . The Musical Basis o f Verse. Longm ans, Green and Co.: N .Y ., 1901.
D avie, D. “ The Relation between S ynta x and M usic in Some M odern Poems in E nglish.”
Poetics, Poetyka, Poétika. M outon: The Hague, 1961, pp. 203-214.
D a v y, C. Words in the Mind: Exploring some Effects o f Poetry, English and French. Chatto and W indus: London, 1965.
DeGeorge, R. and F ., eds. The Structuralists from Marx to Lévi-Strauss. Doubleday and Co.: N Y , 1972, pp. 124-146.
D eM an, P. Allegories o f Reading. Yale U n iv e rs ity Press:New H aven, 1979.
DeSaussure, F. Course in General Linguistics. M c G ra w -H ill: N .Y . 1966.
D iana, S. “ S u p ro tiv a — Pjesnikova mogućnost.” Mogucnosti. X X V I I I , S p lit, Lipanj-srpanj 1981, b r.6 , pp. 668-673.
D ijk , T .A . van. Some Aspects o f Text Grammar. M outon: The Hague, 1971.
D m itrije v ic , R. Teorija knjïzevnosti sa primerima. Lirska poēzija; epska poēzija. Beograd, 1960.
Dozorec, 2. A . “ Russkij s tix ” Słow iańska metryka porównawcza. I I , W arsaw , 1984, 81-133.
D u cro t, О. and T. Todorov. Encyclopedic Dictionary o f the Sciences o f Language. Johns
D ujm usić, J . Dr Anturi R adie proti Doktoru Tomi Maretiću. Zagreb, 1939.
--- . N auka o pjesni'stvu. Sarajevo, 1906.
Eekm an, T . The Realm o f Rime. H a kk e rt: A m ste rd a m . 1974.
--- . Yugoslav Literature 1945 - 1975.
--- , and D. W o rth , ed. Russian Poetics. U C L A S lavic Studies, vol. 4. Slavica Press:
Columbus, 1983 M ichigan Slavic P ublications: A n n A rb o r, 1978.
Eng, J. van der. “ In te rp la y o f Sem antics, S y n ta x and R h y th m in F e t’s Poem, Whispers, timid breathing." in Comparative Poetics, Fokkem a, ed. Radopi N .V .: A m sterdam , pp. 51-62.
Êjxenbaum , В. “ Metodika russkogo liriceskogo s tix a .” О poeziL Leningrad, 1968.
--- . “ M etodika s tix a .” Skvoz״ literaturu. U n iv e rs ity o f M ichigan M icro film s: A nn A rb o r, pp. 209-214.
--- . “ O zvukax v s tix e ." Skvoz' literaturu. A n n A rb o r: M ichigan M ic ro film s , 1961.
Fasani, R. “ Poesia e fonetica.״* Italianistica: Rivista di Letteratura Italiana. 1980, Sept.-Dec., 9 (3), pp. 499-504.
F ia k e r, A. ed. Hrvatska knjizevnost и evropskom kontekstu. Zavod za znanost 0 knjizev- nosti filozofskog fa ku lte ta S veučilišta u Zagrebu, 1978.
Fokkem a, D .W ., ed. Comparative Poetics. Radopi N .V .:A m s te rd a m , (no year)
Fónagy, I. A Koltoi Nyelv Hangtanából. Budapest, 1959.
--- . L a Vive Voix. Payot: Paris, 1983.
F ow ler, R., ed. Style and Structure in Literature. C ornell U n iv e rs ity Press: Ith a c a , 1975.
Franges, I. “ N oías se moje celo z a ri.” Croatica. 1980*81, X I- X II, 15-16, pp. 41-50.
000 5 0 3 8 5
־ 175
־
. “Tinóvá provansa.” Croaiica. Br.7/8, Zagreb, 1976.
F ra n ice vií, M a rin . “ D ija le k ta ln a poēzija danas.” Knjizevnost ju cer i danas. Zagreb, 1959.
-. “ Ja m b i i tišine Dobriše C e s a riia ." Eseji о starima i novijim, Zagreb. 1977, pp.
237*252.
-. “ О nekim probtem im a našega ritm a .” R ad Jugoslavenke Akademije Znanosti i Umjetnosti. 313, 1957, pp. 3-147.
. “ R itm ička osnova nasega s tih a .” Knjuevnost ju c e r i danas. Zagreb, 1959.
-. “ V e rsifika cija A n tu n a G ustava M atoša.” Eseji о starima i novijim, Zagreb. 1977, pp. 157-182.
Frye, N. Anatomy o f Criticism. Princeton U n iv e rs ity Press: Princeton, 1973.
Friedrich, H. The Structure o f M odem Poetry. N o rth w e ste rn U n iv e rs ity : E vinston, II, 1974.
F u jim u ra , 0 . “ A nalysis o f N asal Consonants.” Jou rn al o f the Acoustical Society t f America.
1962, 34, pp. 1865-1875.
Fussell, P. Poetic Meter and Poetic Form. N .Y ., 1965.
G ardiner, D. Intonation and Music. P hyssardt Series in Prague Linguistics 2: Bloom ing ton, Indiana, 1980.
Garding, E. “ The Im portance of T u rn in g Points fo r the P itch Patterns cf Swedish Accents.” Studies in Stress and Accent. S outhern C a lifo rn ia Occasiona Papers in Linguistics, No. 4, A p ril 1977, pp. 27-35.
Gasparov, M .L . “ K sem antike daktiliceskoj r ifm y v russkom xoreje.” Slavic Poetics. R.
Jakobson, et al, ed. M outon: the H ague, 1973, pp. 143-150.
Geiger, Don. “ O ra l In te rp re ta tio n and the “ N ew C riticism .**” Quarterly Journal o f Speech.
x x v i, 1950, pp. 508-513.
G ibo n. D., ed. Intonation, Accent, Rhythm: Studies in Discourse Phonology. De G ra y to n , 1984.
G o ln iicev-K utuzov, I.N . “ Slovorazdel v russkom stixosloznenii.” Voprosy jazykoznanija.
1959, N0. 4. PP.
Gocharov, B.P. Zvukovaja organizacija stixa i problemy rifmy. Moscow, 1973.
Gros, H. Sound and Form in M odem Poetry. U n iv e rs ity o f M ichigan Press: A n n A rb o r,
Ivanovié, R. “ Poétika M. M ilja n o v a Popoivica.” Uraz. 1981, Nov.-Dec. 50 (11-12), pp.
667-676.
Ivic, P. “ The Functional Yield o f Prosodic Features in the Patterns o f S-C Dialects. Word, 17, (1961) pp. 293-308.
--- . Der S erbokroatischen Dialekte, I. M outon: The Hague, 1958.
Ivic, P. and I. Lehiste. “ P rilozi is p itiv a n ju fonetske i fonoioike prirode akcenata и sa vre - menon književnom je z ik u .” Zbornik га filoloģiju i lingvistiku. V I, 1963, pp. 31-72;:
V i l i , 1965, pp. 75-118.
Ivšic, S. Akcenat и gram olici Ignjata Alojzye Brlica. Zagreb, 1912.
. Enklitike. Jugoslavenska A kadēm ija Znanosti i U m jetnosti: Zagreb, 1967.
-. !zabrana Djela iz slavenske akcentuacije. (Gesammelte Schriften гит slavischem Akzent.) W ilhelm F in k V erla g, Band 96, München, 1971.
K ra v a r, M. Srpsko-hrvatski jezik, izgovor i intonācijā 8 recitacijama. Zagreb, 1955.
Jagic, V. “ H rva tsko s tih o tv o rs tv o .” Knjizevnik. Zagreb, 1864, s v .III, pp. 312-314.
Jakobson, R. “ The D o m in a n t” Selected Writings, III. Mouton: The Hague, 1981.
% “ Linguistics and Poetics.” Selected Writings III. M outon: the Hague, 1966. pp..
18-51.
“ The M etaphoric and M e to n ym ic Poles” Fundamentals o f Language. M outon::
s’Gravenhage, 1956, pp. 76*82.
. N ouęjiaja russkaja poeztja. Prague, 1921
“ On the identification o f phonem ic en tities.” Selected Writings, I. s’G ra ve n h a g e : Mouton, 1962, pp. 418-425.
*. “ Phonology and Phonetics.” Fundamentals o f Language. M outon: s’G ra ve n h a g e , 1956.
-. “ Poēzija g ra m m a tik i i g ra m m a tik a poèziji.” Poetics, Poetyka, P oētika. Mouton:
The Hague, 1961, 397-417.
-. “ S tru k tu ra dveju srp sko h rva tskih pesama.” Zbornik га filoloģiju i lingvistiku.
IV -V , 131-139.
־. “ Studies in C om parative S lavic M e trics .” Oxford Slavonic Papers. I l l , 1952, 21-6 6.
-, and C. Lévi-S trauss. "Les Chats de B audelaire.” The Structuralists from Marx to Lévi-Strauss, DeGeorge, ed. Doubleday and Co.: N Y , 1976, pp. 124-146.
*, and E. W augh. The Sound Shape o f Language. In dian a Press: Bloom ington, 1979.
Jarceva, V . Fonetika, Fonologia, Grammatika. Moscow, 1971.
J a rv is . D.R. “ W h itm a n and Speech-Based Prosody.” Walt Whitman Review. June, 1981, 27 (2), pp. 51-62.
Jones, F. P. “ S ta tistica l analysis o f Greek hexam eter verse.” Computers and the Humani ties. 3, 1969, 5, 304.
Jones, L. G. “ D istin ctive Features and Sound Tropes.” Russian Poetics. T . E ekm an, et aĻ eds. Slavica Press: Columbus, 1973, pp. 195-208.
־. “ T o n a lity S tru c tu re in Russian V erse.” International Jou rn al o f Slavic Linguistics
2
nd Poetics. 9, 1965, pp. 125-151.Joos. M. “ D escription o f Language Design.” Jou rn al o f the Acoustical Society o f America.
22,(1950), pp. 702-708.
Kadić, A. Contemporary Croatian Literature. M outon: ,S-Gravenhage. 1960.
K ahn, D. Syllable-Based Generalizations. G arland Publishers: N Y ., 1980.
K alace vi, S.B. Stix i ritm. Moscow, 1978.
K alenic, V. “ Pjesnički je z ik T in a U jevica.” Zbornik zagrebacki slavisticke skole. IV , 4, 1976, pp. 198-211.
Kecskés, A. and K erek, A . “ D irections in H u n g a ria n M e trie Research.” in Language, Liter-ature and. Meaning II: Current Trends in Literary Research J . O d m ark, ed. Benja- m ins: A m ste rd a m , 1980.
K erek, A. Hungarian Metrics. In dian a U n iv e rs ity Publications, U ra lic and A lta ic Series, vol. 117, M outon: The Hague, 1971.
K ip a rs k y , P. “ G ra m m a r o f P o e try.” International Jou rn al o f Slavic Linguistics and Poetics.
X X V II, Supplem ent, 1983.
-. “ M e tric a l S tru c tu re assignm ent is cyclic.” Linguistic Inquiry /0 , 1979, pp.
421-441.
״. “ The R hyth m ic S tru c tu re o f English V erse.” Linguistic Inquiry 8, 1977, pp.
189-247.
--- . “ The Role o f Lin gu istics in a Theory o f P o e try ." Daedalus. 1973, pp. 231-244.
K ip a rs k y , P. and H alle, M. “ Tow ards a Reconstruction o f the Indo-European Accent." in Studies in Stress and Accent. L. H ym a n , ed. Southern C a lifo rn ia Occasional Papers in L in g u istics No. 4, U .S.C .: Los Angeles, 1977.
K linkenberg, J . “ S ty lis tic s and Poetics.” in Trends in Romance Linguistics am d Philology.
Rebecca Posner, ed. M outon: The Hague, 1982, pp. 45-78.
Koch, W .A . Recurrence and a Three-Modal Approach to Poetry. M outon: the Hague, 1966.
Kolm ogorov, A . and A. K ondratov. “ R itm ik a poem M ajakovskogo.” Voprosy jazykoznanija, No. 3, 1962, pp. 62-74.
K ondratov, A. “ Ê voljucija r itm ik i M ajakovskogo.” Voprosy jazykoznanija. No. 5, 1962.
Kopczyńska, Z. and L. Pszczolowska. “ Le role de !1intonation dans la ve rsifica tio n .” Poet■ ics, Poetyka, Poétika. M outon: The Hague, 1961, pp. 215-224.
K o r i, F. Vuedenije v nauku о slavjanskom stixoslozenii. 1907.
Kosutić, R. O tonskoj metrici и novoj srpskoj poeziji. Beograd, 1941.
Kovacevic, M. “ U jeviceva poētika stvaralačkog procesa.” Croatica, 1980-81, X I- X II, 15-16. pp. 87*104.
K riste va , J. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Colum bia U n iv e rs ity Press: N Y , 1980.
K u ra th , H. A Phonology an d Prosody o f M odem English. U n iv e rs ity o f M ichigan: A nn A rb o r, 1964.
K rucenyx, A. Slovo k a k takovoje. Moscow, 1913.
Kušner, B. A. uO zvukovoj sistem e poèticeskoj re ci.” S bom iki po teoriji poeticeskogo jazy ka. I, Petrograd, 1916, pp. 42-49.
Langer, S. Feeling and Form, S chribner's Sons: N Y ., 1953.
Lehiste, I. “ R h y th m in Spoken Sentences and Read P oe try” . U npublished. Presented a t the F ifth Phonologie-Tagung, Eisenstadt, June, 1984.
״. “ Some Acoustic C orrelates o f Accent in S erbo-C roatian.” Phonetica. 3, 1961, pp.
114-147.
־. “ Some R em arks about the Tem poral S tru c tu re o f the Deseterac” . Zbornik Mat■ ice srpske га filoloģiju i lingvistiku. X X V II - X X V III, 1984-85, pp. 405-410.
. Suprasegmentale. M IT Press: Cam bridge, 1970.
Lehiste, I. and Iv ic , P. Accent in Serbo-Croatian. U n iv e rs ity o f M ich ig an Press: A nn A rb o r, 1963.
*. “ E xpe rim en ts w ith Synthesized Serbo-Croatian Tone.” Phonetica. 26, 1972, pp.
1*15.
Levin. S. “ The C onventions o f P o e try ." Literary Style: A Symposium. O xfo rd , 1971, pp.
177-196.
. Linguistic Structures in Poetry. M outon: the Hague, 1973.
--- . “ S ta n d a rd Approaches to M etaphor and a Proposal fo r L ite ra r y M etaphor. Met•
aphor an d Thought, A . O rto n y, ed. C am bridge U n iv e rs ity Press: Cam bridge, 1981, pp. 124-135.
I-e v itin , K. and M elam ed, A . “ K ib e rn e tika i iskusstvo .” Literatum aja Rossija. 1963, No.
9., pp.
L ib e rm a n and Prince. “ On Stress and L in g u is tic R h y th m .” Linguistic lnquiryņ 8, 1977, pp.
249-336.
Lieberm an, M .R . and Lieberm an, P. “ Olson’s Projective Verse and the Use o f B reath Con- tro l as a S tru c tu ra l E lem ent." Language and Style. O ffp rin t.
Lieberm an, P. “ In to n a tio n , Perception and Language.” MIT Research Monograph No. 38, 1968.
•. “ P e rtu rb a tio n s in V erbal P itch .” Jou rn al o f the Acoustical Society o f America. 33, 1961, pp. 597-603.
“ Some Acoustic C orrelates o f W ord Stress in A m erican E ng lish .” Jou rn al o f the Acoustical Society o f America. 32, 1960, 451-453.
Loreau, M. “ L a poesie, la peinture e t le fondem ent du langage.” Revue Internationelle de Philosophie. Bruxelles. 1967, 81, pp. 300-346.
Lo tm a n, Ju . Analysis o f the Poetic Text. J. B arton, tra n s la to r and editor. A rdis: Ann A rb o r, 1976.
. L ekcii po strukturalnoj poetike. B row n U n iv e rs ity Press: Providence, 1968.
•. Structure o f the Artistic Text M ichigan S lavic C o n trib u tio n s, No. 7: A nn A rbor, 1977.
Lotz, J . “ M e tric T yp o lo g y.” Style in Language. T . Sebeok, ed. M IT Press: Cam bridge, 1960, pp. 135-148.
Lukács, G. Theory o f the N ovel M IT Press: Cam bridge, 1978.
M acLeish, A . Poetry and Experience. Houghton M ifflin : Boston, 1961.
Magner, T. Zagreb Kajkavian Dialect. Pennsylvania State Studies» 18, 1966.
—, and M a te jk a , L. Word Accent in Modern Serbo-Croatian. Penn S tate U n iv e rs ity Press, 1971.
M ajakovskij, V . Polnoe sobranie socinenij. Moscow: X u d0 2estvennąja lite ra tu ra , 1955-1961.
. “ К а к delat* s tix i.״ | Polnoe sobranije socenenija. X II. pp. 81*117.
M alm berg, В. Structural Linguistics and Human Communication. B e rlin : S p rin g e r, 1967.
M arcus. S. Matemati’ck a poétika. Beograd, 1974.
M a retić, T. “ G ra3a K aciceva deseterca.” Glas srpske kraljevske akadem ije. Beograd. 1931, C X L IV (74), pp. 5-38.
“ O g ra d i našega narodna deseterca.” Nastavni vjesnik. Zagreb, 1902, kry. X, sv.
2, pp. 145-175.
. Metrika narodnik nasih pjesam a. Zagreb. 1907.
. Metrika m uslim anske narodne epike. Zagreb, 1936.
M a rkov, V .F . “ V zaščitu raznoudam oj r ifm y (in fo rm a tiv n i obzor.) R ussian Poetics. T.
Eekm an and D. W o rth , eds. U C L A S lavic Studies, Vol. 4, S lavica: Colum bus, pp.
235*258.
M a rtin e t, A . “ C oncerning the Preservation o f U seful Sound F e atu res.” Word. IX , 1953, pp. 1*11.
. Phonology as functional phonetics. O xford U n iv e rs ity Press: London, 1949.
M a rtin e z-B o n a ti, F. Fictive Discourse and the Structure o f Literature. C o rn e ll U n iv e rs ity Press: Ith a ca , 1981.
M atić. S. “ A kcen at u nasem s tih u - naš narodni ep i naš s tih .” Novi ogledi i studije. N ovi Sad, 1964, pp. 321-356.
“ P rincip i um etnićke versifìkacije srpske. G odisnjica N ikole Cupića. Beograd.
1930, knj. 39, sv. 71, pp. 119-162; 1931, knj. 40, sv. 72, pp. 51-72; 1932, knj.
41, sv. 73, pp. 128-166.
M atos, A. G. “ O s v rt na Antoloģiju novije srpske lirike. ” Vijenac. 1912, sv.3.
M azuranic, A. Slovnica hervatska. Zagreb, 1859.
M cC aw ley, J. “ W h a t is a Tone Language?” Tone. V . F ro m k in , ed. Academic Press: N .Y ., 1978.
M cLean. M . “ The Rule o f E ig h t” and T e xt-M u sic R elationships in T ra d itio n a l M aori W aia ta .” Anthropological Linguistics. 1982, F a ll, 24, (3), pp. 280-300.
M e lvin g e r, J. “ Prozodijske duljine и stih o vim a D ra g u tin a T a dija n o vica .” Jezik. 30, 1983, pp. 33-40.
M eyer, L. B. Emotion an d Meaning in Music. Chicago: U n iv e rs ity o f Chicago Press, 1956.
Mooij, J .J .A . “ On the Foregrounding o f G raphic Elem ents in P o e try.” in Comparative Poet• ics. Fokkem a, ed. (No year) pp. 89-102.
M o rton , J and Jassem . W. “ Acoustic C orrelates o f S tre ss.” Language and Speech. Vol. 8, pt. 3, 1965
M rko n jic, Z. Suvremeno hrvatsko pjesnistvo (razdioba). Zagreb, 1971.
M u k a ro v s k y , J . Aesthetic Function, Norm and Value as Social Facts. U n iv e rs ity o f M ichi- gan Press: A nn A rb o r, 1970.
On Poetic Language. J . B urbank and P. S teiner, tra n s, and ed. Peter de Ridder Press: Lisse, 1976.
־. Studien ги г strukturalischen Aesthetik und Poetik. C a rk H anser V erlag: M unich, 1974.
M uljacić, Z. Opca fonologija i fon olog ia suvremenog tal ijans koga je
2
ika. Zagreb, 1972.N ehajev, M . “ V la d im ir N azo r,” Savremenik. Zagreb, 1911, b r.3, pp. 157-165.
N ikolić, В. Osnovi тІаЗе novostokavske akcentologije. Beograd» 1970.
N olan, F. The Phonetic Bases o f Speaker Recognition. Cambridge U n iv e rs ity Press: Cam- bridge, 1983.
N orm an, C., ed. Poets on Poetry. N .Y ., 1962.
Ogden, R. Psychology o f Art. N .Y ., 1938.
Olson, S.H . The Structure o f Literary Understanding. Cam bridge, Eng., 1978.
Peco. A. “ O rtoepski n o rm a tiv i standarnog ije k a v iz m a .” Knjizeunost i jez ik : casopis za srpsko-hrvatski jezik i knjizevnost. Beograd. 12, 1965, pp. 27*42.
--- . Osnovi akcentologije srpsko'hrvatskog jezika. Beograd, 1971.
PerlofT, M . “ B arthes and the Zero Degree o f G enre.” World Literature Today, A u tu m n , 1985, pp. 510*516.
Peti, M. “ O je z iku U jeviceva pje sništva .” Croatica. 1980-81, Х І־Х П , sv. 15-16, pp.
219-246.
Petkovic, N . Artikulācijā pesme. Sarajevo, 1968.
Petőfi, J.S . and Rieser, H. Studies in Text Grammar. D ordrecht: H olland, 1973.
P e tra v ií, A . K lasie na metrika и hrvatskoj i srpskoj knjizevnosti. Beograd, 1939.
P e tro v ii, S. “ T e o rija s tih a .” K o b . Zagreb. 1963, god. I, sv. C X X I, br.3, pp. 330-339.
--- . “ S tih A .B . â im ic a i pitanje о ko m p a ra tivn o j tipologiji slobodnog s tih a ." Croatica, 7-8, 1976.
Picchio, R. “ The Isocolic P rinciple in Old Russian Prose.” Slavic Poetics. R. Jakobson, et a/., ed. M outon: The Hague, 1973, pp. 299-331.
00050385
- 185 *
--- . “ On the Prosodic S tru c tu re o f the Ig o r T a le .“ Slavic and East European Joum aL vol. 16/2, 1972, pp. 147-162.
Plato. “ C ra ty lu s .” Dialogues o f Plato, B. J o w e tt, tra n s ., Random House: N Y , pp. 173-232.
Plato. “ C ra ty lu s .” Dialogues o f Plato, B. J o w e tt, tra n s ., Random House: N Y , pp. 173-232.