• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

5.3 Bi-invariant symplectic gravity

5.3.9 Extension to the superstring

Having reformulated successfully the bosonic low energy effective action of string theory in a frame with dynamical variables (ˆg, β, φ), the question arises if this is extendable also to the type II superstring actions. As spinors are independent of gauge transformations of the B-field and are not affected by the Lie algebroid constructions so far, we do not expect a nontrivial transformation behavior of them under the field redefinitions (5.3.89). In contrast to this, the spin connection uses the tangent bundle and should therefore be generalized to Lie algebroids. Let us discuss the different sectors in turn.

The R-R sector

In the R-R sector we first consider the p-form fields Ca1...ap. They are tensorial in the standard sense and they remain invariant under gauge transformations of the B-field. As discussed in section 5.3.5, especially equation (5.3.62) we can convert the p-form fields by use of the anchor form the (G, B, φ)-frame to the (ˆg, β, φ)-frame

a1...ap = βa1b1· · ·βapbbCb1...bp . (5.3.98)

From the theory established in section 5.3.5, we know that the totally antisym-metricp-vectors ˆCa1...ap are standard- andβ-tensors. In addition we know that the β-covariant derivative ˆ∇of these multi-vectors again gives a bi-covariant tensor:

a1...ap+1 = ˆ∇[a1a2...ap+1]. (5.3.99) However, to interpret them as proper physical field strengths, we have to show that they are invariant under the corresponding gauge transformations of the p-form fields ˆCa1...ap:

δΛa1...ap = ˆ∇[a1Λa2...ap]. (5.3.100) Let us show the invariance explicitly:

δΛa1...ap+1 = ˆ∇[a1∇ˆa2Λa3...ap+1]

= ˆRk[a3a1a2Λa4...ap+1]k = 0, (5.3.101) where in the last line we first used vanishing torsion for the Levi-Civita connection and then the Bianchi identity (5.3.68) for the Riemann curvature tensor in (ˆg, β, φ)-frame. Therefore, identifying Ca and Ca1a2a3 with the one- and three-form gauge potentials of type IIA supergravity, we have found corresponding expressions in the symplectic frame.

In analogy to the standard formulation, we then introduce generalized field strengths of the form:

2 = ˆF2 , Fˆ4 = ˆF4 −Θ∧Cˆ1, (5.3.102) and for the corresponding action we consider:

IIAR-R = 1 2κ210

Z

d10xp

−|ˆg|

β−1

12|Fˆ2|212|Fˆ4|2

, (5.3.103)

where we employ:

|Fˆp|2 = 1 p!

a1...apa1...ap . (5.3.104) As was explained in detail, these expressions are bi-invariant scalars and combined with the corresponding measure in (5.3.103), we get a bi-invariant action for the R-R field strengths. It remains to reformulate the Chern-Simons part of the R-R sector of type IIA supergravity which is given by:

SIIACS = 1 4κ210

Z

H∧F4∧C3

= 1

210 1 3! 4! 3!

Z

d10x a1...a10Ha1a2a3F(4)a4a5a6a7C(3)a8a9a10 .

(5.3.105)

5.3 Bi-invariant symplectic gravity 111 Here, we denote by a1...a10 = ±1 the epsilon-tensor density. Noting the fact that a1...a10/p

−|G|transforms as a standard tensor field and is invariant underB-field gauge transformations, one can show in a straightforward way thatb1...b10/p

−|ˆg|

is a β-tensor. Thus, we are able to write down the Chern-Simons part of the type IIA action in the symplectic frame:

IIACS = 1 4κ210

1 3! 4! 3!

Z

d10x β−1

b1...b10Θb1b2b3(4)b4b5b6b7(3)b8b9b10 . (5.3.106) Let us conclude our exposition of the R-R part by the following remark. Having already seen the invariance of the field strengths ˆF under gauge transformations of the multi-vectors ˆC, by using also the Bianchi identity of Θ, rewritten in the form

∇ˆ[aΘbcd]= 0 , (5.3.107)

it is possible to show the invariance of the complete transformed type IIA action under the following set of gauge transformations:

δΛ(0)a = ˆ∇aΛ(0) , δΛ(2)a1a2a3 = ˆ∇[a1Λa(2)2a3], δΛ(0)a1a2a3 =−Λ(0)Θa1a2a3 .

(5.3.108)

The NS-R and R-NS sectors

As was mentioned in the introduction to this section, the spin connection uses the tangent bundle and therefore should be transformed carefully to the Lie algebroid setting. Due to its structure, involving Christoffel symbols and derivatives of vielbein matrices, it is not clear a priori, if the transformation works. But it turns out, due to the inhomogeneous transformation behavior of the Christoffel symbols (5.3.58), that we get a spin connection in the (ˆg, β, φ)-frame having the same structure as the standard one with partial derivatives replaced by the Da -derivative and standard Christoffel symbols replaced by the ones in the symplectic frame.

Let us first establish our notation and state that

α, β, γ, . . . denote Lorentz-frame indices, a, b, c, . . . denote space-time indices.

The vielbein matriceseαarelating these two frames viaea=eaαeαandea=eαaeα are defined in the usual way by requiring that:

eαaeβbGabαβ , (5.3.109)

with ηαβ = diag (−1,+1, . . . ,+1). In these conventions the spin connection can be expressed in terms of the Christoffel symbols Γcab as follows

ωcαβ =eaαeβbΓacb+eaαceβa. (5.3.110) Introducing spacetime-dependent gamma matrices by contracting with the vielbein γa = γαeαa and using standard notation γa1...ap = γ[a1γa2· · ·γap], we write the kinetic term for the dilatinoλ as:

LλIIA =λγaa4iωa αβγαβ

λ . (5.3.111)

Let us now transform this expression into the symplectic frame. By applying the anchor map to a basis in the Lorentz frame, we get:

eα = eαadxa →eαaβabb =:ηαγmγm . (5.3.112) Note, that this is compatible with the expected definition of the vielbein matrices in the symplectic frame:

ˆ

eαaβbabαβ . (5.3.113) We thus take the following definition for the new vielbein matrices in terms of the standard ones:

ˆ

eαaαβeβbβba. (5.3.114) To finally state the result for the dilatino kinetic term and the corresponding form of the new spin connection let us recall that spinors are not affected by transformation to a Lie algebroid. Thus, ˆλ = λ and let us in addition define the new gamma matrices by:

ˆ

γa = γααa = γβeβbβba . (5.3.115) Due to its importance let us state the result in a separate proposition and give a detailed proof of the transformation.

Proposition 5.3.5. With the definitions given above, the kinetic term for the dilatino in the symplectic frame is given by:

λIIA = ˆλγˆa Da4iωˆaβδˆγβδˆλ , (5.3.116) where the transformed spin connection takes the form:

ˆ ωaαβ

= ˆebαβcΓˆbac

+ ˆebαDaˆeβb. (5.3.117)

5.3 Bi-invariant symplectic gravity 113 Proof. Writing out the definition and employing the relation (5.3.58) together with the transformation behavior (5.3.114) gives

LIIA = ¯λγah

a4i

ekα0eβbΓkab+ekα0aeβk

ηαα0γαβi λ

= ¯λˆγa0βa0a h

a4i(ekα0eβb(−βkk0βaa00βbb0Γˆk0a00b0 −βb0baβkb0) +βkk0ηα0α00k0α00ak00kηββ0β0k00))ηαα0γαβi

λ

=λˆ¯ˆγa0h

Da04i(ˆek0αβ0bΓˆk0a0b0 + ˆek0αaβ0k0αα0γα0β0i λ ,ˆ

(5.3.118)

where we also used the transformation behavior of the inverse vielbein in the symplectic frame ˆeaα = ηαββabebβ, which gives again the right sign in the second term.

The remaining part in this sector is the kinetic term for the gravitino Ψa, which also has a spacetime-vector index. It is given by the Rarita-Schwinger Lagrangian:

LΨIIA = Ψaγabcb4iωb αβγαβ

Ψc. (5.3.119)

In this form, the connection coefficients of the covariant derivative drop out due to the totally anti-symmetrized gamma matrices. Note that this is a special property of the Levi-Civita connection of Riemannian geometry and is different e.g. in theories with torsion. In the case of a general Lie algebroid, even the Levi-Civita connection can have an antisymmetric part and therefore we keep the general form (5.3.119). To transform the above expression into the symplectic frame, we first note the transformation of the vector index of the gravitino:

ΨˆaabΨb . (5.3.120)

Performing an analogous transformation as done for the dilatino kinetic term, we observe that this factor of βab is crucial: It is needed to transform the covariant derivative in the right way to the symplectic frame. The result is then given by:

ΨIIA = ˆΨaγˆabc

∇ˆb4iωˆbαβγαβ

Ψˆc . (5.3.121) Note, that now the antisymmetric part of the symplectic Christoffel symbols enter in the new kinetic term: ˆΓc[ab]= 12Qcab.

This completes our exposition of the fermionic terms in type IIA supergravity, since all the terms can be transformed to the symplectic frame in the ways des-cribed above. We therefore constructed a complete type IIA supergravity theory in the symplectic frame. A natural question to ask is, whether this theory can be obtained from first principles, i.e. by supersymmetrizingβ-diffeomorphims and then writing down an invariant theory. We will comment about this question in chapter 6 on future directions.