The Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
3.2 EXISTENCE OF THE INTEGRAL
The following lemma is the starting point for our study of the integrability of a bounded functionf on a closed intervalŒa; b.
Lemma 3.2.1
Suppose thatjf .x/j M; axb; (1)
and letP0be a partition ofŒa; bobtained by addingrpoints to a partitionP D fx0; x1; : : : ; xng ofŒa; b:Then
S.P /S.P0/S.P / 2M rkPk (2)
and
s.P /s.P0/s.P /C2M rkPk: (3)
Proof
We will prove (2) and leave the proof of (3) to you (Exercise 1). First suppose thatr D1, soP0is obtained by adding one pointcto the partitionP D fx0; x1; : : : ; xng; thenxi 1 < c < xi for somei inf1; 2; : : : ; ng. Ifj ¤ i, the productMj.xj xj 1/ appears in bothS.P /andS.P0/and cancels out of the differenceS.P / S.P0/. Therefore, ifMi1D sup
xi 1xc
f .x/ and Mi 2D sup
cxxi
f .x/;
then
S.P / S.P0/DMi.xi xi 1/ Mi1.c xi 1/ Mi 2.xi c/
D.Mi Mi1/.c xi 1/C.Mi Mi 2/.xi c/: (4) Since (1) implies that
0Mi Mi r 2M; rD1; 2;
(4) implies that
0S.P / S.P0/2M.xi xi 1/2MkPk: This proves (2) forrD1.
Now suppose thatr > 1andP0is obtained by adding pointsc1,c2, . . . ,cr toP. Let P.0/ D P and, forj 1, let P.j / be the partition ofŒa; bobtained by addingcj to P.j 1/. Then the result just proved implies that
0S.P.j 1// S.P.j //2MkP.j 1/k; 1j r:
Adding these inequalities and taking account of cancellations yields
0S.P.0// S.P.r //2M.kP.0/k C kP.1/k C C kP.r 1/k/: (5) SinceP.0/DP,P.r /DP0, andkP.k/k kP.k 1/kfor1kr 1, (5) implies that
0S.P / S.P0/2M rkPk; which is equivalent to (2).
Theorem 3.2.2
Iff is bounded onŒa; b;then Z bProof
Suppose thatP1 andP2 are partitions ofŒa; bandP0is a refinement of both.LettingP DP1in (3) andP DP2in (2) shows that
s.P1/s.P0/ and S.P0/S.P2/:
Sinces.P0/S.P0/, this implies thats.P1/S.P2/. Thus, every lower sum is a lower bound for the set of all upper sums. SinceRb
af .x/ dxis the infimum of this set, it follows of all lower sums. SinceRb
af .x/ dxis the supremum of this set, this implies (6).
Theorem 3.2.3
Iff is integrable onŒa; b;then Z bProof
We prove thatRbaf .x/ dxDRb
the triangle inequality implies that
Now suppose that > 0. From Definition 3.1.3, there is a partitionP0ofŒa; bsuch that Z b
From Definition 3.1.1, there is aı > 0such that ˇˇˇ by Lemma 3.2.1, (8) implies that
Z b
for every Riemann sum off overP. SinceS.P / is the supremum of these Riemann sums (Theorem 3.1.4), we may chooseso that
jS.P / j< Sinceis an arbitrary positive number, it follows that
Z b
Lemma 3.2.4
Iff is bounded onŒa; band > 0;there is aı > 0such that Z ba
f .x/ dxS.P / <
Z b
a
f .x/ dxC (12)
and Z b
a
f .x/ dxs.P / >
Z b
a
f .x/ dx ifkPk< ı.
Proof
We show that (12) holds ifkPkis sufficiently small, and leave the rest of the proof to you (Exercise 3).The first inequality in (12) follows immediately from Definition 3.1.3. To establish the second inequality, suppose thatjf .x/j Kifax b. From Definition 3.1.3, there is a partitionP0D fx0; x1; : : : ; xrC1gofŒa; bsuch that
S.P0/ <
Z b
a
f .x/ dxC
2: (13)
IfP is any partition ofŒa; b, letP0be constructed from the partition points ofP0andP. Then
S.P0/S.P0/; (14)
by Lemma 3.2.1. SinceP0 is obtained by adding at most r points toP, Lemma 3.2.1 implies that
S.P0/S.P / 2KrkPk: (15)
Now (13), (14), and (15) imply that
S.P /S.P0/C2KrkPk S.P0/C2KrkPk
<
Z b
a
f .x/ dxC
2 C2KrkPk: Therefore, (12) holds if
kPk< ıD 4Kr:
Theorem 3.2.5
Iff is bounded onŒa; bandZ b
a
f .x/ dx D Z b
a
f .x/ dxDL; (16)
thenf is integrable onŒa; band Z b
a
f .x/ dxDL: (17)
Proof
If > 0, there is aı > 0such that Z ba
f .x/ dx < s.P /S.P / <
Z b
a
f .x/ dxC (18)
ifkPk< ı(Lemma 3.2.4). Ifis a Riemann sum off overP, then s.P /S.P /;
so (16) and (18) imply that
L < < LC ifkPk< ı. Now Definition 3.1.1 implies (17).
Theorems 3.2.3 and 3.2.5 imply the following theorem.
Theorem 3.2.6
A bounded functionf is integrable onŒa; bif and only if Z ba
f .x/ dx D Z b
a
f .x/ dx:
The next theorem translates this into a test that can be conveniently applied.
Theorem 3.2.7
Iff is bounded onŒa; b;thenf is integrable onŒa; bif and only if for each > 0there is a partitionP ofŒa; bfor whichS.P / s.P / < : (19)
Proof
We leave it to you (Exercise 4) to show that ifRba f .x/ dxexists, then (19) holds forkPksufficiently small. This implies that the stated condition is necessary for integra-bility. To show that it is sufficient, we observe that since
s.P / Z b
a
f .x/ dx Z b
a
f .x/ dxS.P / for allP, (19) implies that
0 Z b
a
f .x/ dx Z b
a
f .x/ dx < : Sincecan be any positive number, this implies that
Z b
a
f .x/ dx D Z b
a
f .x/ dx:
Therefore,Rb
a f .x/ dxexists, by Theorem 3.2.5.
The next two theorems are important applications of Theorem 3.2.7.
Theorem 3.2.8
Iff is continuous onŒa; b;thenf is integrable onŒa; b.Proof
LetP D fx0; x1; : : : ; xngbe a partition ofŒa; b. Sincef is continuous onŒa; b, there are pointscj andcj0 inŒxj 1; xjsuch thatf .cj/DMj D sup
xj 1xxj
f .x/
and
f .cj0/Dmj D inf
xj 1xxj
f .x/
(Theorem 2.2.9). Therefore, S.P / s.P /D
Xn
jD1
f .cj/ f .c0j/
.xj xj 1/: (20)
Sincef is uniformly continuous onŒa; b(Theorem 2.2.12), there is for each > 0aı > 0 such that
jf .x0/ f .x/j<
b a
ifxandx0are inŒa; bandjx x0j< ı. IfkPk< ı, thenjcj c0jj< ıand, from (20), S.P / s.P / <
b a
Xn
jD1
.xj xj 1/D: Hence,f is integrable onŒa; b, by Theorem 3.2.7.
Theorem 3.2.9
Iff is monotonic onŒa; b;thenf is integrable onŒa; b.Proof
LetP D fx0; x1; : : : ; xngbe a partition ofŒa; b. Sincef is nondecreasing, f .xj/DMj D supxj 1xxj
f .x/
and
f .xj 1/Dmj D inf
xj 1xxj
f .x/:
Hence,
S.P / s.P /D Xn
jD1
.f .xj/ f .xj 1//.xj xj 1/:
Since0 < xj xj 1 kPkandf .xj/ f .xj 1/0, S.P / s.P / kPk
Xn
jD1
.f .xj/ f .xj 1//
D kPk.f .b/ f .a//:
Therefore,
S.P / s.P / < if kPk.f .b/ f .a// < ; sof is integrable onŒa; b, by Theorem 3.2.7.
The proof for nonincreasingf is similar.
We will also use Theorem 3.2.7 in the next section to establish properties of the integral.
In Section 3.5 we will study more general conditions for integrability.
3.2 Exercises
1.
Complete the proof of Lemma 3.2.1 by verifying Eqn. (3).2.
Show that iff is integrable onŒa; b, then sufficiently small. HINT:Use Theorem3:1:4:5.
Suppose thatf is integrable andgis bounded onŒa; b, andgdiffers fromf only at points in a setHwith the following property: For each > 0,H can be covered by a finite number of closed subintervals ofŒa; b, the sum of whose lengths is less than. Show thatgis integrable onŒa; band thatZ b
HINT:Use Exercise3:1:3:
6.
Suppose thatgis bounded onŒ˛; ˇ, and letQW˛Dv0 < v1 < < vLDˇbe a fixed partition ofŒ˛; ˇ. Prove:(a)
7.
A functionf isof bounded variation on Œa; bif there is a numberKsuch that XnjD1
ˇˇf .aj/ f .aj 1/ˇˇK
whenevera Da0 < a1 < < an Db. (The smallest number with this property is thetotal variation off onŒa; b.)
(a)
Prove: Iff is of bounded variation onŒa; b, thenf is bounded onŒa; b.(b)
Prove: Iff is of bounded variation onŒa; b, thenf is integrable onŒa; b.HINT:Use Theorems3:1:4and3:2:7:
8.
LetP D fx0; x1; : : : ; xngbe a partition ofŒa; b,c0 D x0 D a,cnC1 DxnD b, andxj 1cj xj,j D1,2, . . . ,n. Verify thatXn
jD1
g.cj/Œf .xj/ f .xj 1/Dg.b/f .b/ g.a/f .a/
Xn
jD0
f .xj/Œg.cjC1/ g.cj/:
Use this to prove that ifRb
a f .x/ dg.x/exists, then so doesRb
a g.x/ df .x/, and Z b
a
g.x/ df .x/Df .b/g.b/ f .a/g.a/
Z b
a
f .x/ dg.x/:
(This is theintegration by parts formulafor Riemann–Stieltjes integrals.)
9.
Letf be continuous andgbe of bounded variation (Exercise 7) onŒa; b.(a)
Show that if > 0, there is aı > 0such thatj 0j < =2if and0 are Riemann–Stieltjes sums off with respect togover partitionsP andP0 ofŒa; b, whereP0 is a refinement ofP and kPk < ı. HINT:Use Theo-rem2:2:12:(b)
Letı be as chosen in(a)
. Suppose that1 and2 are Riemann–Stieltjes sums off with respect togover any partitionsP1andP2ofŒa; bwith norm less thanı. Show thatj1 2j< .(c)
Ifı > 0, letL.ı/be the supremum of all Riemann–Stieltjes sums off with respect togover partitions ofŒa; bwith norms less thanı. Show thatL.ı/is finite. Then show thatLDlimı!0CL.ı/exists. HINT:Use Theorem2:1:9:(d)
Show thatRba f .x/ dg.x/DL.
10.
Show thatRba f .x/ dg.x/exists iff is of bounded variation andgis continuous on Œa; b. HINT:See Exercises8and9: