Blood samples were obtained within the course of the regular health monitoring schemes by state approved veterinarians, in accordance with the respective national regulations.
References
Ai H, Fang X, Yang B, Huang Z, Chen H, Mao L, Zhang F, Zhang L, Cui L, He W, et al.
2015. Adaptation and possible ancient interspecies introgression in pigs identified by whole-genome sequencing. Nat Genet 47: 217–25.
Ai H, Huang L, Ren J. 2013. Genetic Diversity, Linkage Disequilibrium and Selection Signatures in Chinese and Western Pigs Revealed by Genome-Wide SNP Markers ed.
C.A. Kozak. PLoS One 8: e56001.
Aken BL, Ayling S, Barrell D, Clarke L, Curwen V, Fairley S, Fernandez Banet J, Billis K, García Girón C, Hourlier T, et al. 2016. The Ensembl gene annotation system. Database 2016: baw093.
Amaral AJ, Ferretti L, Megens H-J, Crooijmans RPMA, Nie H, Ramos-Onsins SE, Perez-Enciso M, Schook LB, Groenen MAM. 2011. Genome-Wide Footprints of Pig Domestication and Selection Revealed through Massive Parallel Sequencing of Pooled DNA ed. H. Ellegren. PLoS One 6: e14782.
116 Chapter 5 Bergles DE, Roberts JDB, Somogyi P, Jahr CE. 2000. Glutamatergic synapses on
oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the hippocampus. Nature 405: 187–191.
Bollen P, Ellegaard L. 1997. The Göttingen Minipig in Pharmacology and Toxicology.
Pharmacol Toxicol 80: 3–4.
Bosse M, Megens H-J, Madsen O, Crooijmans RPMA, Ryder OA, Austerlitz F, Groenen MAM, de Cara MAR. 2015. Using genome-wide measures of coancestry to maintain diversity and fitness in endangered and domestic pig populations. Genome Res 25: 970–
981.
Bulmer MG. 1971. The Effect of Selection on Genetic Variability. Am Nat 105: 201–211.
Chiel HJ, Beer RD. 1997. The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends Neurosci 20: 553–557.
Eding H, Bennewitz J. 2007. Measuring genetic diversity in farm animals. In Utilisation and conservation of farm animal genetic resources (ed. K. Oldenbroek), pp. 103–130, Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Fang X, Mou Y, Huang Z, Li Y, Han L, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Chen Y, Jiang X, Zhao W, et al.
2012. The sequence and analysis of a Chinese pig genome. Gigascience 1: 16.
Fitzpatrick JL, Evans JP. 2009. Reduced heterozygosity impairs sperm quality in endangered mammals. Biol Lett 5: 320–3.
Gaerke C, Ytournel F, Sharifi a. R, Pimentel ECG, Ludwig A, Simianer H. 2014. Footprints of recent selection and variability in breed composition in the Göttingen Minipig genome. Anim Genet 381–391.
Giuffra E, Kijas JMH, Amarger V, Carlborg O, Jeon J-T, Andersson L. 2000. The Origin of the Domestic Pig: Independent Domestication and Subsequent Introgression. Genetics 154: 1785–1791.
Glodek P, Oldigs B. 1981. Das Göttinger Miniaturschwein. Parey, Berlin and Hamburg.
Groenen MAM, Archibald AL, Uenishi H, Tuggle CK, Takeuchi Y, Rothschild MF, Rogel-gaillard C, Park C, Megens H, Li S, et al. 2012. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 491: 393–398.
Hedrick PW. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity (Edinb) 73: 363–372.
Chapter 5 117 Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids
Res 28: 27–30.
Kijas JW, Townley D, Dalrymple BP, Heaton MP, Maddox JF, McGrath A, Wilson P, Ingersoll RG, McCulloch R, McWilliam S, et al. 2009. A Genome Wide Survey of SNP Variation Reveals the Genetic Structure of Sheep Breeds ed. H. Ellegren. PLoS One 4:
e4668.
Kim TH, Kim KS, Choi BH, Yoon DH, Jang GW, Lee KT, Chung HY, Lee HY, Park HS, Lee JW. 2005. Genetic structure of pig breeds from Korea and China using microsatellite loci analysis. J Anim Sci 83: 2255.
Lacy RC. 1987. Loss of Genetic Diversity from Managed Populations: Interacting Effects of Drift, Mutation, Immigration, Selection, and Population Subdivision. Conserv Biol 1:
143–158.
Larson G, Cucchi T, Fujita M, Matisoo-Smith E, Robins J, Anderson A, Rolett B, Spriggs M, Dolman G, Kim T-H, et al. 2007. Phylogeny and ancient DNA of Sus provides insights into neolithic expansion in Island Southeast Asia and Oceania. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 4834–9.
Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–60.
McKay SD, Schnabel RD, Murdoch BM, Matukumalli LK, Aerts J, Coppieters W, Crews D, Neto E, Gill CA, Gao C, et al. 2008. An assessment of population structure in eight breeds of cattle using a whole genome SNP panel. BMC Genet 9: 37.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, et al. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20: 1297–303.
Meador-Woodruff JH, Clinton SM, Beneyto M, McCullumsmith RE. 2003. Molecular Abnormalities of the Glutamate Synapse in the Thalamus in Schizophrenia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1003: 75–93.
Meuwissen TH. 1997. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 75: 934.
118 Chapter 5 Niswender CM, Conn PJ. 2010. Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors: Physiology,
Pharmacology, and Disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 50: 295–322.
Picard. 2009. http://picard.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 2013-07-26.
Picetti R, Saiardi A, Samad TA, Bozzi Y, Baik J-H, Borrelli E. 1997. Dopamine D2 Receptors in Signal Transduction and Behavior. Crit Rev Neurobiol 11: 121–142.
Quignon P, Herbin L, Cadieu E, Kirkness EF, Hédan B, Mosher DS, Galibert F, André C, Ostrander EA, Hitte C. 2007. Canine Population Structure: Assessment and Impact of Intra-Breed Stratification on SNP-Based Association Studies ed. P. Awadalla. PLoS One 2: e1324.
Reimer C, Rubin C-J, Weigend S, Waldmann K-H, Distl O, Simianer H. 2014. The Minipig Genome Harbors Regions of Selection for Growth. 10th World Congr Genet Appl to Livest Prod Proceedings; Vancouver, BC, Canada ; August 17-22, 2014.
Rubin C-J, Megens HJ, Martinez Barrio A, Maqbool K, Sayyab S, Schwochow D, Wang C, Carlborg O, Jern P, Jorgensen CB, et al. 2012. Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 19529–19536.
Sanacora G, Zarate CA, Krystal JH, Manji HK. 2008. Targeting the glutamatergic system to develop novel, improved therapeutics for mood disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7: 426–
437.
Scandura M, Iacolina L, Crestanello B, Pecchioli E, Di Benedetto MF, Russo V, Davoli R, Apollonio M, Bertorelle G. 2008. Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable? Mol Ecol 17: 1745–62.
Schliep KP. 2011. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27: 592–593.
Sherry ST, Ward M-H, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K. 2001.
dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 308–311.
Siddoway B, Hou H, Xia H. 2011. Glutamatergic Synapses: Molecular Organisation. In eLS, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK.
Stranger BE, Stahl EA, Raj T. 2011. Progress and promise of genome-wide association studies for human complex trait genetics. Genetics 187: 367–83.
Chapter 5 119 Swindle MM, Makin A, Herron AJ, Clubb FJ, Frazier KS. 2012. Swine as models in
biomedical research and toxicology testing. Vet Pathol 49: 344–56.
Vamathevan JJ, Hall MD, Hasan S, Woollard PM, Xu M, Yang Y, Li X, Wang X, Kenny S, Brown JR, et al. 2013. Minipig and beagle animal model genomes aid species selection in pharmaceutical discovery and development. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 270: 149–157.
Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, Jordan T, Shakir K, Roazen D, Thibault J, et al. 2013. From FastQ Data to High-Confidence Variant Calls: The Genome Analysis Toolkit Best Practices Pipeline. In Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, p. 11.10.1-11.10.33, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Wright S. 1922. Coefficients of Inbreeding and Relationship. Am Nat 56: 330–338.
Supplementary Material
Accessible through: https://figshare.com/s/228890c2f2675409d6cd
Supplementary table 5.1: Genome wide FST (upper triangle) and Reynolds distance (lower triangle)
Supplementary table 5.2: Number of SNPs significant at 5% Bonferroni corrected significance level in F-Test
Supplementary table 5.3: Functional annotation of SNPs oppositely fixed between one unit and a distant pool from another unit
Supplementary table 5.4: Functional annotation of SNPs dependent on the FST value between two units