• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

3. CO-PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN AND ELECTRICITY FROM COAL WITH CO 2

3.1.2. Estimation of hydrogen production costs

Here we present the estimated hydrogen production costs of the hydrogen production technologies described above. Our calculation is based on system characteristics derived from several literature sources (see data in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 for details) under a common set of assumptions, thus obtaining mean values and ranges for the production costs.

Table 1 summarizes the performance, investment costs and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs of the hydrogen production technologies analyzed in this report2. Costs are given in US dollars for the year 2000. Figure 5 presents the investment costs of these technologies as a function of hydrogen production capacities.

Table 1: Summary of the performance, investments costs and O&M costs of the hydrogen production technologies from several literature sources. This table also contains our estimation of hydrogen production costs.

Technology name

a This is the capacity range of hydrogen plants whose cost data are available in this report.

b The feedstock ratio is defined as: [the energy content [the energy content (HHV basis) of feedstock input to the process]/[(HHV basis) of product (hydrogen)]

c The electricity output ratio is defined as: [the net electricity output]/[the energy content (HHV basis) of product (hydrogen)]. Negative figures, which are indicated by ( ), mean that external input of electricity is needed.

2Unless specified otherwise, all monetary values are expressed in constant 2000 US dollars and all energy

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

1.0 10.0 100.0

Hydrogen Capacity (million Nm3-H2/day) Total Capital Costs (US$/Nm3 -H2/day)

NG PSA NG PSA w/CO2 Coal PSA Coal PSA w/CO2 Coal Mem w/CO2

Figure 5: Investment costs per daily production capacity of hydrogen as a function of hydrogen daily capacities for alternative hydrogen production technologies (see Appendix 1 and 2 for a detailed list of sources).

Table 2 shows the common set of assumptions used here to derive hydrogen production cost estimates. The hydrogen production cost of the technologies reported in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 was calculated using these assumptions, based on its efficiency, capital cost and O&M cost. All calculations in this report are based on higher heating values (HHV).

Table 2: Assumptions for calculation of hydrogen production costs.

Natural gas price 3.1 US$(2000)/GJ (HHV basis) Coal price 1.3 US$(2000)/GJ (HHV basis)

Annual capital charge rate 0.15 annual interest rate 14%, plant life 20 years Capacity factor 0.90 for gas-fired plants

0.80 for coal-fired plants

Electricity price 40 US$ mills (2000) /kWh for purchasing and selling CO2 disposal cost 5.0 US$(2000)/tCO2

Notice that in the two system configurations examined here, a small amount of electricity is produced and we assume it to be sold to the network. However, the amount is so small that we distinguish these systems from co-production cases which will be analyzed below in section 3.2. The price of purchased electricity is assumed to be equal to that of sold electricity. The value assumed here is 40 US$ mills per kilowatt- hour (mills/kWh). The same electricity price is assumed for the cases with carbon capture.

Under our assumptions, the CO2 that is separated from the hydrogen plant is compressed to supercritical pressures for pipeline transportation. We include the costs of CO2 compression as well as CO2 capture into the plant investment costs. In the cases where CO2 compression is not taken into account in the literature, investment costs and electricity consumption were adjusted according to the assumptions described in the footnote of Appendix 1.

Following Kreutz et al. (2002), it is assumed that the costs of CO2 transport and storage are 5 US$/tCO2, which corresponds to a 100-km pipeline and a 2-km deep injection well. This aggregate estimate is in line with the ranges reported by Freund et al. (2003), who give 1-3 US$/tCO2 as a plausible range for costs of storing CO2 in deep saline aquifers or depleted oil/gas fields and a likely range of 1-3 US$/tCO2/100 km for transportation of captured CO2

from sources to reservoirs. It should be noticed that many uncertainties still exist regarding these figures.

Figure 6 presents the resulting estimates for hydrogen production costs. The ranges reflect the dispersion of estimates in the literature and dots in the middle of the bars present the average values. As mentioned above, these costs include CO2 compression, transportation and storage for the cases with CO2 capture. Figure 7 presents a more detailed breakdown of these cost estimates, where the average values of investment costs, O&M costs, efficiencies, CO2 capture efficiencies were used for this calculation. Notice that the costs for electricity presented in Figure 7 represent the net difference of electricity consumed and generated by the process. As mentioned above, in coal-based cases, a small amount of excess electricity is produced and sold to the network.

As illustrated in these figures, steam reforming of natural gas still constitutes the most cost-effective pathway for hydrogen production. However, coal gasification could also be an attractive possibility. Under the assumptions here, the cost of hydrogen production from coal gasification using the conventional PSA system would be approximately 7 US$/GJ (HHV). Including CO2 capture will increase the costs to approximately 9 US$/GJ (HHV).

The membrane-based system already including carbon capture could provide somewhat lower production costs at about 7.5 US$/GJ (HHV).

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0

NG PSA NG PSA

w/CO2

Coal PSA Coal PSA w/CO2

Coal Mem w/CO2

Hydrogen Production Cost (US$/GJ-H2)

Figure 6: Estimated production costs of hydrogen by the alternative hydrogen production systems with and without CO2 capture. The ranges reflect the dispersion of estimates in the literature and dots in the middle of the bars present the average values. For the case with CO2 capture, costs of CO2 compression, transportation and storage are included.

-2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0

NG PSA NG PSA

w/CO2

Coal PSA Coal PSA w/CO2

Coal Mem w/CO2

Hydrogen Production Costs (US$/GJ) CO2 disposal

O&M Electricity Feedstock Investment

Figure 7: Hydrogen production costs breakdown, for alternative hydrogen production systems from natural gas and coal, with and without CO2 capture. They are disaggregated into investment costs, feed stock costs, electricity costs (or revenue by selling residual electricity), O&M costs and CO2 disposal costs, which include CO2 transportation and storage costs.