• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Emergent Brain Patterns

Im Dokument AI Critique (Seite 52-56)

Throughout much of the twentieth century, brainwaves were believed to be su-perfluous, like the sound an engine makes without contributing to the operation of the engine. Now we must consider that these waves may be a type of emergent program for organizing the actions of neurons. In thorough reviews of the lit-erature, Kelso et al. (1991), Uhlhaas et al. (2009) and De Assis (2015) report that many neuroscientists understand the mechanisms underlying working memory and attention in terms of emergent brain waves that synchronize distant neurons, creating virtual neuronal assemblies (De Assis, 2015; Postle, 2006). It appears that waves may provide “the ‘contexts’ for the ‘content’ carried by networks of princi-pal cells” and “the precise temporal structure necessary for ensembles of neurons to perform specific functions, including sensory binding and memory formation”

(Buzsáki & Chrobak, 1995). In addition, emergent wave patterns may also define what data gets attention, that is, consciousness (see Thompson & Varela, 2001), which, in turn, affects further sensory processing.

This signal propagation theory of learning, using self-organizing signs (not codes), may help explain how people are able to form and use fluid adaptable cat-egories and deal with complex changing environments. Local fluctuations allow stochastic resonance (as with the Ls and ╚s), the similarity and proximity of possi-ble states, which in turn allows sameness to spread, instant organization. Natural selection cannot “see” to select these local interactions (it does not need to since these interactions just flow spontaneously to the lowest energy state). What can be selected for fitness are the effects of the global patterns that emerge from the local interactions (Cf. Rocha, 1998).2

No Artificial Neural Networks or Deep Learning networks are designed to im-itate the fluid interplay between self-organization and natural selection. AI de-signers are more committed to strictly selectionist, aka connectionist, approaches.

Although learning can be accomplished this way, it produces automatons, as does standardized curriculums and relentless testing, reward and punishment.

Even with the latest celebrated update (Levis-Kraus, 2016), Google Translate is still bad with puns, jokes and poetry. Psychologists Jung-Beeman et al. (2004) suggest that insight—understanding literary themes and metaphors and getting jokes—requires synchronizing distant brain areas instantly via gamma waves.

To design computers that can get allusive language, that understand people, one might need a more fluid medium for traveling waves to emerge. Atomic switch networks as per Stieg et al. (2014) seem promising; they have been used to create emergent patterns that imitate simple natural systems. Experimental chemical 2 Likewise, contrary to the selfish gene hypothesis, natural selection cannot “see” the genes per se

only their products.

reaction-diffusion computers have been around for more than a decade (Ad-amatsky et al., 2005), but although they create emergent patterns, they do away with more permanent connections. Our brains seem to use both.

Maybe we will eventually use reaction-diffusion to create more humanoid AI, but we already have eight billion human computers coupled together on the Inter-net, like so many neurons ready to organize. The potential for spectacular evolu-tion of knowledge is at our finger tips, if only we were in control of AI algorithms rather than controlled by them. With more information about the nature of AI compared to BI, we could make better choices with regard to how little or much we are willing to let AI think for us.

References

Adamatzky, A., Costello, B., & Asai, T. (2005): Reaction-diffusion computers. Am-sterdam: Elsevier.

Alexander, V. N. & Grimes, V. A. (2017): Fluid biosemiotic mechanisms underlie subconscious habits. Biosemiotics, 10(3), 337-353.

Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L. (2016): Machine  Bias. ProPublica.

Retrieved from http://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assess-ments-in-criminal-sentencing (accessed July 9, 2019)

Copeland, J. (2004): The essential Turing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Assis, L. (2015): Neural binding, consciousness, and mental disorder: Complex-ity as a common element. Journal for Neurocognitive Research, 57(3-4), 110-121.

Favareau, D. (2009): Essential readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary.

Amsterdam: Springer.

Gilbert, C. & Sigman, M. (2007): Brain states: Top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron, 54(5), 677-696.

Harvey, J. (2013): Sensory perception: Lessons from synesthesia: Using synesthesia to inform the under- standing of sensory perception. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 86(2), 203-216.

Hebb, D.O. (1949): The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E.M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Aradmbel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., Reber, P. J., & Kounios, J. (2004): Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLOS Biology 2(4), 500-510.

Keller, E. F. (2002). The century of the gene. Cambridge: Harvard UP.

Kelso, J., Bressler, S.L., Buchanan, S., DeGuzman, G.C., Ding, M., Fuchs, A., &

Holroydet, T. (1991). A phase transition in human brain and behavior. Physics Letters A 169(3), 134-144.

Konkel, F. (2016): The CIA says it can predict social unrest as early as 3 to 5 days out.

Defense One. Retrieved from http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2016/10/

cia-says-it-can-predict-social-unrest-early-3-5-days-out/132121 (accessed July 9, 2019)

Kwet, M. (2018): Break the hold of digital colonialism, Mail & Guardian. 29 Jun 2018.

Retrieved from https://mg.co.za/article/2018-06-29-00-break-the-hold-of-digi tal-colonialism (accessed July 9, 2019)

Le, Q. V., Ranzato, M., Monga, R., & Ng, A. Y. (2013): Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning. Edinburgh.

Levi-Kraus, G. (2016): The great A.I. awakening.New York Times Magazine. 14 Dec.

Margulis L. & Sagan, D. (2002): Acquiring genomes: A Theory of the origin of species.

New York: Basic Books.

Noble, D. (2016): Dance to the tune of life: Biological relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Postle, B. (2006): Memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuros-cience 139(1), 23-38.

Prigogine, I., Nicolis, G. & Babloyantz, A. (1972): Thermodynamics of evolution.

The functional order maintained within living systems seems to defy the Sec-ond Law; nonequilibrium thermodynamics describes how such systems come to terms with entropy. Physics Today 25(11), 23.

Raspopovic, J., Marcon, L., Russo, L, & Sharpe, J. (2014): Digit patterning is con-trolled by a Bmp-Sox9-Wnt Turing network modulated by morphogen gradi ents. Science 345(6196), 566-570.

Reid, R. G. B. (2007): Biological emergences: Evolution by natural experiment. Cam-bridge: MIT Press.

Rocha, L. M. (1998): Selected self-organization and the semiotics of evolutionary systems. Evolutionary systems: Biological and epistemological perspectives on se-lection and self-organization. S. Salthe, G. Van de Vijver, and M. Delpos (Eds.).

Kluwer Academic Publishers; 341-358.

Shapiro, J. (2011): Evolution: A view from the 21st century. FT Press.

Sheth, R., Marcon, L., Bastida, M. F., Junco, M., Quintana, L., Dahn, R., Kmita, M., Sharpe, J. & Ros, M. (2012): Hox genes regulate digit patterning by controlling the wavelength of a Turing-type mechanism. Science 338(6113), 1476-1480.

Stieg, A., Avizienis, A., Sillin, H., Aguilera, R, Shieh, H.-H., Marin-Olmos, C., Sandouk, E., Aono, M. Gimzewski, J. (2014): Self-organization and emergence of dynamical structures in neuromorphic atomic switch networks. Memristor Networks. A. Adamatsky and L, Chua (Eds.) New York and London: Springer;

173-209.

Thompson, D. W. (1942): On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, E., Varela, F. (2001): Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and con-sciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(10), 418-425.

Turing, A. (1952a): The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 237(641), 37-72.

Turing, A. (1952b): Letter to Norman Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.turing archive.org/viewer/?id=167&title=1a (accessed July 9, 2019)

Turing, A., Wardlaw, C. (1952): A diffusion reaction theory of morphogenesis in plants. Retrieved from http://www.turingarchive.org/browse.php/C/7 (ac-cessed July 9, 2019)

Uhlhaas, P., Pipa, G., Lima, B., Melloni, L., Neuenschwander, S., Nikolic, D & Sin-ger, W. (2009): Neural synchrony in cortical networks: history, concept and current status. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 3(17), 1-19.

Waddington, C. (1940): Organisers and Genes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Touch-Tone Dialing, the Rise of the Call Center Industry

Im Dokument AI Critique (Seite 52-56)