• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Effective model for heavy meson diffusion

4.3 Meson diffusion at strong and weak coupling

4.3.1 Effective model for heavy meson diffusion

We make use of a model for heavy mesons and their interaction with the quark-gluon plasma, which was introduced in ref. 144. This effective model

describes the interaction with the medium by a dipole approximation. It relies on the large mass of the meson relative to the external momenta of the gauge fields,i. e.the momentum scale given by the temperature of the medium, but does not rely on the smallness of the coupling constant. It was used previously to make a good estimate for the binding ofJ/ψto nuclei[144].

Because the model does not rely on the weakness of the coupling constant, we can make use of it in both the strong and weak coupling regime. At weak coupling we will refer to results from perturbation theory, while the results at strong coupling can be calculated from holographic duals. Since the exact dual to QCD is not known, we once more have to be satisfied with results for N = 4 SYM theory. Therefore, we have to rephrase the model in terms of supersymmetric fields.

Diffusion in largeNQCD

The heavy meson field φdescribes a scalar meson which has a fixed four-velocityuµ = (γ, γv). Then the effective Lagrangian for this meson field interacting with the gauge fields is[144]

Leff=−φiu·∂φ+ cE

N2φOEφ+ cB

N2φOBφ, (4.79)

where we refer to the last two terms as theinteraction LagrangianLint, and OE =−1

2FµσaFσνauµuν, (4.80)

OB=−1

2FµσaFσνauµuν +1

4FσβaFσβa. (4.81)

Here,F is the non-Abelian field strength of QCD, with Greek lettersµ, ν, . . . as Lorentz indices and gauge indexa, ThecEandcBare matching coefficients (polarizabilities) to be determined from the QCD dynamics of the heavy quark-antiquark pair. In inserting a factor of1/N2 into the effective Lagrangian we have anticipated that the couplings of the heavy meson to the field strengths are suppressed byN2in the largeN limit.

In the rest frame of a heavy quark bound state withu= (1,0)the operators OE andOBsimplify to

OE = 1

2Ea·Ea, (4.82)

OB= 1

2Ba·Ba, (4.83)

whereEaandBaare the color electric and magnetic fields. If the constituents of the dipole are non-relativistic it is expected that the magnetic polarizability cBis of orderO(v2)relative to the electric polarizability. For heavy quarks, wherecB is neglected, and largeN these matching coefficients were computed by Peskin[145, 146],

cE = 28π

3B, cB = 0. (4.84)

HereΛB:= 1/a0 = (mq/2)CFαsis the inverse Bohr radius of the mesonic bound state. It is finite at largeN since withCF 'N/2and finiteλwe have ΛB =mqλ/(16π).

The effective Lagrangian can be used to calculate the in-medium mass shift.

We will do so in the subsequent by simply consulting first order perturbation theory which says that

δM =hHinti=− hLinti. (4.85)

Translating the model toN = 4Super Yang-Mills theory

Our aim is to calculate the heavy meson diffusion coefficient from gauge/gravity duality. Subsequent to this subsection we explain the Langevin dynamics we use to describe this process, it requires the calculation of the two-point corre-lators as well as of the associated polarizabilitiescE andcB. Because we do not now the gravity dual to QCD we translate the effective meson model to N = 4Super Yang-Mills theory, our standard toy model.

The formalism inN = 4 SU(N)Super Yang-Mills theory is not different from the one we introduced in the preceding section. In general all operators in N = 4SYM which are scalars under under Lorentz transformations andSU(4) R-charge rotations will couple to the meson at some order. The contribution of higher dimensional operators is suppressed by powers of the temperature to the inverse size of the meson. The lowest dimension operator which could couple to the heavy meson field isOX2 = TrXiXi, whereXi denotes the scalar fields of the theory. However, the anomalous dimension of this operator is not protected, and the prediction of the supergravity description ofN = 4 SYM is that these operators decouple in a strong coupling limit[8]. The lowest dimension gauge invariant local operators which are singlets underSU(4)and which have protected anomalous dimension are the stress tensorTµν which couples to the graviton, and minus the Lagrangian OF2 = −LN=4, which couples to the dilaton. (Since we can add a total derivative to the Lagrangian, the operator−Lis ambiguous. The precise form of the operator coupling to the dilaton is given in ref. 147. We neglect this ambiguity here.) There also is the operatorOF?F = TrFµν?Fµν+. . ., which couples to the axion. An interaction involvingOF?F breaksCP-symmetry, which is a symmetry of the Lagrangian of theN = 2hypermultiplet of theN = 4SYM gauge theory.

Thus interactions involvingOF?F can be neglected.

Summarizing the preceding discussion, we find that the effective La-grangian describing the interactions of a heavy meson coupling to the operators in the field theory is

Leff= −φ(t,x)iu·∂φ(t,x) + cT

N2 φ(t,x)OT φ(t,x) + cF

N2φ(t,x)OF2φ(t,x), (4.86) which is a linear perturbation ofN = 4Super Yang-Mills theory. The two

composite operators in theinteraction LagrangianLintare OT =Tµνuµuν

v=0

= T00, (4.87)

OF2 =FµνFνµ. (4.88)

They account for the interaction of the mesons with the background. In gauge/gravity duality the modification of the Lagrangian described byOT is achieved by considering theAdS-Schwarzschild black hole background where hOF2i = 0. On the other hand, a finitehOF2i 6= 0is dual to a non-trivial dilaton flow described by Liu and Tseytlin in ref. 143. Details follow below.

The polarization coefficients cT andcF will be determined below from meson mass shifts in gauge/gravity duality. This requires breaking some of the supersymmetry. We work in the linearized limit of small contributions fromOT andOF2. This allows to investigate the effects of finite temperature and background gauge fields separately. Additionally, this justifies the use of first order perturbation theory to compute the meson mass shifts in the medium as above by setting δM = − hLinti. For the contribution of the energy-momentum tensor, this is achieved by switching on the temperature.

Then, the mass shift of the meson is given by expectation value of the stress tensor. Again we consider the rest frame of the mesons,

δM =−cT

N2 T00

, (4.89)

In contrast, for the meson response tohOF2ithe mass shift of a heavy meson is given by

δM =−cF

N2hOF2i. (4.90)

Langevin dynamics

We now turn to the kinetics of the slow moving heavy meson with massM in the medium. The kinetic energyEkin =pv/2of the meson can be assumed to be of order of the temperatureT of the medium, such thatpv ≈T. With p=M vwe can estimate the velocity and momentum to be

p≈√

M T , v≈ rT

M . (4.91)

For time scales which are long compared to medium correlations, we expect that the kinetics of the meson can be modeled as Brownian motion and can be described by Langevin equations. These are valid for times which are long compared to the inverse temperature but short compared to the lifetime of the quasi-particle state. We model viscous force and random kicks in spatial directionsxiby

dpi

dt =ξi(t)−ηDpi,

ξi(t)ξj(t0)

=κ δijδ(t−t0). (4.92)

Here,ξiis a component of the random forceξwith second momentκandηD

is the drag coefficient. The solution forpi(t)is given by pi(t) =

t

Z

−∞

dt0eηD(t−t0)ξi(t0), (4.93) supposed thatηDt1[148]. This allows to relate the drag and fluctuation by

3M T = p2

=

0

Z

−∞

dt1dt2 eηD(t1+t2)i(t2i(t2)i= 3κ 2ηD

. (4.94) This leads to the Einstein relation

ηD = κ

2M T . (4.95)

One of the aims of this section is the calculation of the diffusion coefficients ηDorκ, equivalently. From(4.92)we can obtain these coefficients once we know the microscopical phenomenological force

Fi(t) = dpi

dt (4.96)

acting on the quasiparticle state. We can then compare the response of the Langevin process(4.92)to the microscopic theory(4.96). Over a time interval

∆twhich is long compared to medium correlations but short compared to the time scale of equilibration we can neglect the drag, which is small for the heavy meson withηD1/M. Since the considered time interval is long compared to medium correlations we can however equate the stochastic process, the random kicksξ, to the microscopic theory. We average (4.92)

Z

∆t

dt Z

dt0

ξi(t)ξj(t0)

= ∆t κ δij

= Z

∆t

dt Z

dt0

Fi(t)Fj(t0) .

(4.97)

In a rotationally invariant medium we have fori=j κ= 1

3 Z

dt hFj(t)Fj(0)i. (4.98)

We now identify the force with the negative of the gradient of the potential V that we read off from the Lagrangian or our theory, i. e. the interaction LagrangianV =−Lint. For the case of QCD with onlyOE switched on we get

F(t) = Z

d3x φ(t,x) cE

N2∇OE(t,x)φ(t,x), (4.99)

which is the usual form of a dipole force averaged over the wave function of the meson.

In our caseκis a constant in space and time,i. e.we consider situations with constant diffusion parameters in a homogeneous medium, for instance slight deviations from equilibrium. From the point of view of a more general description in Fourier space withκ(ω)we therefore are only interested in the hydrodynamic limit ofω→0. The fluctuation dissipation theorem relates the spectrum of(4.98)(with the specified time order of operators) to the imaginary part of the retarded force-force correlation functionGR ∝ hFj(t)Fj(0)ion the right hand side. In the hydrodynamic limit we get

κ=−1 3 lim

ω→0

2T

ω ImGR(ω), (4.100)

where the full form of the retarded correlator is GR=−i

Z

dt e+iωtθ(t)h[Fj(t),Fj(0)]i. (4.101) Integrating out the heavy meson field as discussed in detail in ref. 99, which treated the heavy quark case, we obtain a formula for the momentum diffusion coefficient

κ= 1 3

c2E N4

Z d3q (2π)3 q2

−2T

ω ImGR(ω,q)

, (4.102)

with the retardedOEOE correlator given by GR(ω,q) =−i

Z

d4x e+iωt−iq·xθ(t)h[OE(t,0),OE(0,0)]i . (4.103) We can understand this result with simple kinetic theory. Examining the Langevin dynamics we see that3κis the mean squared momentum transfer to the meson per unit time. The factor of three arises from the number of spatial dimensions. In perturbation theory this momentum transfer is easily computed by weighting the square of the transferred momentum of each scattering with the transition rate for any gluon in the bath to scatter with the heavy quark,

3κ=

Z d3p (2π)32Ep

d3p0

(2π)32Ep0 |M|2 np(1 +np0)q2(2π)3δ3(q−p+p0). (4.104) Here,pis the spatial momentum of the incoming gluon,p0is the momentum of the outgoing gluon andqis the momentum transferq=p−p0, and|M|2is the gluon meson scattering amplitude computed with the effective Lagrangian in(4.79)and weighted by the appropriate momentum distributionsnof the incoming and outgoing gluons,

|M|2= c2E

N2ω4 1 + cos2pp0)

. (4.105)

Alternatively (as detailed in appendix A of ref. 2), we can simply evaluate the imaginary part of the retarded amplitude written in(4.102)to obtain the same result.

InN = 4theory the generalized force is given by F(t) =−

Z

d3x φ(t,x)∇cT

N2OT(t,x) + cF

N2 OF2(t,x)+

φ(t,x) (4.106) which results in a momentum broadening

κ=−1 3 lim

ω→0

Z d3q (2π)3q22T

ω c2T

N4ImGRT(ω,q) + c2F

N4ImGRF(ω,q)

, (4.107) where the retarded correlators at vanishing velocity are

GRT T =−i Z

d4x e+iωt−iq·xθ(t)

T00(t,x),T00(0,0)

, (4.108) GRF F =−i

Z

d4x e+iωt−iq·xθ(t)h[OF2(t,x),OF2(0,0)]i. (4.109) In writing (4.107)we have implicitly assumed that there is no cross term betweenOF2 andOT. In the gauge/gravity duality this is reflected in the fact that at tree level in supergravity δg00δ2(x)SsugraδΦ(y) = 0.