Coapplication experiments with 10 mM glutamate and increasing concentrations of CNQX were performed on GluR2L504Y receptor as a control experiment (Fig.3.7.1 A, B, C and Table 3.7.1) Fig.3.7.1 A shows averaged original current curves from whole-cell patch expressing homomeric glutamate channels from the AMPA-type containing the GluR2L504Y -subunit.
The relative Amplitude (Fig.3.7.1 A , B) was 0.99, 0.98 and 0.82 respectively after coaplication of 10 mM glutamate and 0.001 mM , 0.01 mM and 0.1 mM CNQX. The rAUC was 0.98, 0.98 and 0.71 respectively. The relative time to peak was 1.01, 1.03 and 0.90 respectively. The rCdes was 0.96, 0.96 and 0.74 respectively. As shown in table 3.6.1, all of them have reduced with the increasing concentration of CNQX. The deactivation time (Fig.3.7.A, C) remain unchanged (p = 0.97). And time constant of current decay could be measured as high as 33.68 + 2.50 ms when 0.1 mM CNQX was coapplied. A reopening phenomenon was not observed.
0 0.5 1
0.001 mM CNQX 0.01 mM CNQX 0.1 mM CNQX
rAmp rTTP rAUC rCdes
0 20 40
τdec τB
ms 0 mM CNQX 0.001 mM CNQX 0.01 mM CNQX 0.1 mM CNQX
A
B
C
Results
Table3.7.1 Coapplication of CNQX and glutamate on GluR2L504Y receptor.
CNQX rAmp rTTP rAUC rCdes
0.001 mM 0.99 + 0.01 1.00 + 0.04 0.98 + 0.01 0.96 + 0.01 0.01 mM 0.98 + 0.02 1.02 + 0.02 1.00 + 0.01 0.95 + 0.01 0.1 mM 0.83 + 0.02 0.91 + 0.04 0.73 + 0.01 0.75 + 0.03
p <0.001 0.02 <0.001 <0.001
Results
3.8 Effect of RPR119990 on AMPA-type receptor channels 3.8.1 RPR119990: GluR
2L504Y receptor channels
1. Coapplication of RPR119990 and agonist
0 0.5 1
0.01 mM RPR119990 0.1 mM RPR119990 1 mM RPR119990 rAmp
rTTP rAUC rCdes
0 100 200 300
τdea τB
ms
0 mM RPR119990 0.01 mM RPR119990 0.1 mM RPR119990 1 mM RPR119990
Fig.3.8.1 (A) shows averaged original current curves after 200 ms pulses of 10 mM glutamate or 10 mM glutamate + increasing concentration of RPR119990 (as indicated) applied to GluR2L504Y channels. (B) shows the relative peak current amplitude (■), time to peak (×), rAUC (▲) and relative current amplitude of steady state (○); (C) shows deactivation time (τdec) and time constant of current decay (τB1,2) in the presence of glutamate (as indicated) without or with RPR119990 . The holding potential was -40 mV in all experiments.
A
B
C
Results
0.92, 0.76 and 0.31, respectively. As shown in table 3.8.1, both of them decreased significantly with the increasing concentration of RPR119990. The relative steady state was 0.94, 0.53, 0.08 respectively, decreased more obviously. At the same time, rTTP was 1.01, 0.98, and 1.01 respectively, remain unchanged.
A decrease of time constant of current decay (Fig.3.8.1 A, C), τB, as mono-exponential occurred at coapplication of 10 mM glutamate and 0.1 mM or 1 mM phenobarbital. τB decreased from 306.51 (305.70 + 45.77, n = 5) ms to 82.34 (85.08 + 3.85, n = 4) ms (p = 0.001). The deactivation time constant τdec (Fig.3.8.1 A, C) of 10 mM glutamate without or with 0.01, 0.1, 1 mM RPR119990 were 9.53 (10.87 + 1.51, n = 15), 8.66 (11.11 + 1.71, n = 5), 9.16 (11.17 + 2.44, n = 5), 9.41 (10.09 + 0.52, n = 4) ms respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.98). RPR119990 blocks the GluR2L504Y receptor channels dose-dependently.
Table3.5.1 Coapplication of RPR119990 and glutamate on GluR2L504Y receptor.
PR119990 rAmp rTTP rAUC rCdes n
0.01 mM 0.97 + 0.01 0.97 + 0.03 0.91 + 0.02 0.93 + 0.01 5 0.1 mM 0.93 + 0.03 1.01 + 0.02 0.77 + 0.01 0.56 + 0.08 5 1 mM 0.72+ 0.04 0.99 + 0.01 0.34 + 0.03 0.10 + 0.05 4
p <0.001 0.52 <0.001 <0.001
2. Preincubation of patches with RPR119990
To different between competitive block effect and open-channel block effect we preincubated the patches with increasing concentrations of RPR119990 before applying 10 mM glutamate and the corresponding concentration of RPR119990.
In Fig.3.8.2 an averaged original current curves were shown, which were obtained before and after preincubation whole-cell patch containing the GluR2L504Y subunit with increasing concentration RPR119990. The data from different experiments were showed in Fig.3.8.2 B.
The relative peak current amplitude of preincubation tests with 0.1 nM, 1 nM, 10 nM, and 100 nM RPR119990 were 0.98 (0.99 + 0.03), 0.97 (0.95 + 0.03), 0.82 (0.79 + 0.04), and 0.16 (0.21 + 0.09) respectively, with significant difference (p < 0.001). When 1µM RPR119990 was used, the current was completely blocked.
Compared to the coapplication experiment, the block effect is much stronger in the preincubation experiments. This indicates a competitive block effect.
Results
Fig.3.8.2 (A) shows averaged original current curves before and after 30 s preincubation of wholc-cell patch transfected with
GluR
2L504Y channels with increasing concentration RPR119990 (as indicated). (B) shows the relative peak current amplitude (■) in the presence of glutamate after 30 s preincubation with RPR119990. The holding potential was -40 mV in all experiments. Currents were elicited by 200 ms pulses of 10mM glutamate.3.8.2 RPR119990: GluR
2flipGQ receptor channels
Results
mM glutamate + increasing concentration of RPR119990 (as indicated) applied to GluR2flipGQ channels. (B) shows the relative peak current amplitude (■), time to peak (×) in the presence of glutamate with RPR119990. (C) shows the time constant of current decay (τB) in the presence of glutamate without or with RPR119990. The holding potential was -40 mV in all experiments.
To test the effect of RPR119990 in GluR2flipGQ receptor we measure the currents induced by 10 mM glutamate or 10 mM glutamate + increasing concentrations of RPR119990 (0.01, 0.1 or 1 since 1 mM has significant difference (p = 0.002). The rTTP was 0.99 (1.00 + 0.01), 0.98 (1.00 + 0.02), and 1.00 (0.98 + 0.02) respectively (p = 0.64). The time constant of current decay τB
Results
Fig.3.8.4 (A) shows averaged original current curves before and after 30 s preincubation of whole-cell patch transfected with
GluR
2flipGQ channels with increasing concentration RPR119990 (as indicated). (B) shows the relative peak current amplitude (■) in the presence of glutamate after 30 s. preincubation with RPR119990. The holding potential was -40 mV in all experiments.In the preincubation experiments, The rAmp (Fig.3.8.4) of 10 mM glutamate with 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 mM RPR119990 were 0.85 (0.86 + 0.03), 0.78 (0.82 + 0.04), 0.59 (0.63 + 0.06) and 0.11 (0.13 + 0.03) respectively, with significant difference (p < 0.001). When 1 mM RPR119990 was used, the currents were completely inhibited.
It was apparent that the block effects of RPR119990 on AMPA-type receptor channels were mainly on preincubation experiments. This points to a competitive block mechanism.
Results
Fig.3.9.1 shows the relative peak current amplitude and rAUC in the coapplication experiments of glutamate with different substances in GluR2L504Y receptor.
To compare the block effect among different substances, we used the rAmp and rAUC in coapplication experiments with 10 mM glutamate and 1 mM tested substances (except CNQX with 0.1 mM). As shown in Fig.3.9.1, when the parameter rAUC was compared to other tested drugs, RPR119990 showed the strongest effect, rAUC reached 0.34 + 0.03, and followed by memantine (0.72 + 0.03), riluzole (0.84 + 0.04), minocycline (0.93 + 0.04), phenobarbital (0.97 + 0.03) respectively. Ketamine and valproic acid showed no block effects. When rAmp was used to compare, the tendency is same, but the difference were not so obviously.
The competitive effects of RPR119990 and riluzole must be considered additionally, which make the block effects of those substances much stronger in preincubation experiments. After preincubation with 1 mM riluzole, the rAUC was only 0.14 + 0.03; with 1µM RPR119990 the currents were completely inhibited.
Reference
Discussion
1. Minocycline
Three effects of this substance were observed on AMPA-type receptor channels with the patch clamp technique in our experiments. On the one hand, it acts as an open-channel blocker on GluR2L504Y, on the other hand, it has potentiating effect on GluR2flipGQ. As we know, these effects have not been reported so far.
The block effect of minocycline can only be observed in coapplication measurements, not after preincubation of minocycline. This can be explained with an open-channel block effect. That means the block will be effective only after the channels open and can be proved by applying pulses of agonist and blocker together. It is characterized by a decrease of the time constant of current decay in fast application experiments104, 105, which is also shown in this experiment.
Dose-dependent increasing reopening currents, which were registrated after removing application pulse due to an open-channel block mechanism. The reason for reopening currents can be explained by fast unbinding of blocker from the open state of the receptor after removing agonist and open-channel blocker, because the channel will stay for a short time in the open state before becoming deactivated.
The potentiating effect of minocycline on AMPA-type receptor channels is out of expects. It was reported that some positive allosteric modulators improve performance of rats in the Morris water maze106. Also improvement of delayed recall in aged humans106, and gained special attention107 were reported. Currently, allosteric potentiators of AMPA receptors are divided into three groups according to structure107: the benzoylpiperidine-related potentiators (e.g., aniracetam, ampakines such as 1-BCP, CX-516), the thiazide-related potentiators (e.g., cyclothiazide, IDRA-21108) and PEPA (4-[2-(phenylsulphonylamino) ethylthio]- 2, 6- difluorophenoxya- cetamide50, 109). Among them, the strongest is cyclothiazide (CTZ), which has following effects: a fast block of
Reference
The potentiation effect of minocycline is different compared to that of CTZ. CTZ potentiated the AMPA current with increasing efficacy as the duration of CTZ preincubation was increased.
When AMPA and CTZ were applied simultaneously, the time to peak did not change significantly, indicating that the desensitization induced by AMPA developed faster than the potentiating action of CTZ. But the potentiation effect of minocycline is stronger when it was coapplicated with glutamate than in the condition of preincubation. This proved that, the potentiating effect of minocycline shows a modulatory effect only in the opened channel. Probably, this interaction might take place after binding of the agonist to the receptor.
After coapplication of minocycline and 10 mM glutamate the
τ
des was not significantly changed, but the extent of desensitization. This suggests that the principal mechanism which might be explained by potentiating effect of minocycline on AMPA-type receptors is caused by the attenuating extent of receptor desensitization. The same effect on AMPA-type receptor was reported when the test drug PEPA107 was used. This is different from cyclothiazide, which abolished the receptor’s desensitization;and different from aniracetam, which modulates both the onset and extent of desensitization in AMPA-type receptor107.
The open-channel block effect and potentiation effect seems to be paradox. The explanation could be that the potentiation is depended from receptor desensitization, which exists in GluR2flipGQ and which is more effective than the open-channel block effect. Therefore only the potentiation effect could the oberserved when the desensitizing receptor GluR2flipGQ was used. While GluR2L504Y receptors show no desensitization, only the open-channel block was observed in the respective experiments.
Recent studies have shown that minocycline is protective in different models of both acute and chronic neurodegeneration. It delayed disease onset and dose-dependently extended the survival of ALS mice (transgenic mice with the G93A human SOD1 mutation)70,71. Minocycline prevents glutamate-induced apoptosis in cerebellar granule neurons (CGNs)111. The mechanism of action is under investigation. With the patch clamp technique, we demonstrated an open-channel blockade of AMPA channels and a potentiating effect by minocycline, but both at very high concentration levels. The neuroprotective effects of minocycline might not be attributable to a direct effect on AMPA receptor channels. While the concentration of minocycline for open-channel block and potentiation is higher (≥ 1 mM) than the necessary concentration for neuroprotective effect (10–100 µM minocycline for regulations of p38 and Akt pathways111, 200 µM for inhibition of cytochrome C release in isolated brain mitochondria 71, 20 nM for inhibited microglial proliferation68) the role of the direct channel effects for neuroprotection has to be further characterized.
Reference
2 Riluzole
Our study shows that riluzole is able to modulate the AMPA receptors in a dose-dependent manner, showing two mechanism of action: competitive block and open-channel block.
In human GluR2flipGQ receptor, the effect of riluzole was only significant when the patches were preincubated with riluzole. In the non-desensitizing GluR2L504Y receptor, the effect was stronger when patches were preincubated, compared to single coapplication. When patches were preincubated with riluzole, the peak amplitude and rAUC were both reduced in a dose-dependent manner; the time to peak was prolonged at the same time. These are a typical competitive block effects.
In the coapplication experiments with GluR2L504Y receptors, at high concentration range of blocker (1 mM and 3 mM), riluzole showed a block effect, which was characterized with a increase rate of current decay with increasing concentrations105. Reopening currents after the coapplication of glutamate with 3 mM riluzole points to an open-channel block mechanism.
The block effect of riluzole on AMPA-type receptor channels has been reported. A reduction of kainate-induced currents in spinal motor neurons in the presence of riluzole with IC50 value of 1.54 µM76 was described. This concentration could be arrived clinically (under the use of riluzole 50 mg twice daily, the peak serum concentration of riluzole is 0.99 + 0.85 µM (0.1-6.6 µM)112).
But experiments with rat cortical neurons in primary culture revealed that riluzole decreased kainate-induced currents dose-dependently with IC50 101 µM77, and in another study it was reported that riluzole inhibits kainic acid-evoked responses in oocytes expression AMPA receptors with IC50 of 167 µM113. Those were more comparable to our results. In our experiments with GluR2flipGQ, after preincubation with the lowest concentration of riluzole (0.1 mM), the rAMP and rAUC was 0.68 and 0.72, respectively. In experiments with GluR2L504Y, a significant reduction of the rAUC was observed when ≥ 0.1 mM riluzole was applied via preincubation. The difference might arise from the different receptor subtype and agonist which was used in the
Reference
preincubation experiments. This suggestion could be excluded by our experiments: in our experiments with both GluR2flipGQ and GluR2L504Y receptors, the block effects were more efficient after preincubation. This points out the dominant competitive block effect of riluzole compared to the mild non-competitive block effect.
Riluzole has been the first compound that showed a therapeutic effect in the treatment of ALS2, 73. A neuroprotective effect has been shown in vivo and in vitro114, 115. Many mechanisms of action have been suggested: antagonism of neuronal glutamatergic transmission brought about by influencing different pre- and postsynaptic processes of glutamate transmission116, inhibit
glutamate release, attenuate excitatory amino acid receptor activation, and decrease excitability of the postsynaptic cell membrane75, 117, decrease voltage-dependent sodium channels118, 119,
dose-dependently inhibited noninactivating (persistent) Na+ current (INa,p) up to a complete blocking of the current119, interact with potassium channels120, decrease kainate induced currents in cortical neurons77, modulate small and large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels121, and potentiate postsynaptic-aminobutyric acid (GABA) responses78. Its effect may be multifactor.
Among them, the influence on glutamatergic action is currently favored as explanation of neuroprotection, in which the directly effect on AMPA-type receptor channels may be also a factor.
3. Memantine
Our study shows that memantine acted dose-dependently on AMPA-type receptor channels as an open-channel blocker.
The block effect of memantine was observed in the coapplication experiments with non-disensitisizing GluR2L504Y and human GluR2flipGQ receptor. Both experiments showed
τ
Bat coapplication 1 mM memantine is lower than that of 0.1 mM, which means a increase rate of current decay--an effect of open-channel block105. The reopening phenomenon was also observed after the pulse of coapplication glutamate with 1 mM memantine. In the preincubation experiments with both receptors, the block effect was also observed, but not stronger than that in the coapplication experiments. This excludes competitive block effect.
It was reported that memantine (10–100 µM) had no effect on whole-cell inward currents (from cultured superior collicular and hippocampal neurons) to AMPA and kainate82, 122. This was accord with our result. But at high concentration (1 mM on human GluR2flipGQ receptor) it works as an open-channel blocker. On GluR2L504Y the block effect was observed since 0.1 mM
Reference
memantine were used. This due to a higher sensitivity of memantine to the GluR2L504Y receptor.
Memantine has been widely used for the treatment of dementia with excellent safety and efficacy profiles81, which antagonized NMDA receptor-mediated inward currents in a use and strongly voltage-dependent manner with IC50 of 1–3 µM (at -100 to -70 mV). It was reported that
memantine protected cultured cortical neurons from the toxic effects of glutamate (100 µM for 20 h) with an IC50 of 1.4 µM82, and prolongs survival in an ALS mouse model83. But both the two concentrations are obviously lower than it can act on AMPA-type receptor channels. With daily doses between 5 and 30 mg the serum levels of memantine range from 0.025 to 0.529 µM123. In rats by acute i.p. administration of memantine 5–10 mg/kg leads to plasma levels of 1.0–3.2 µM124. These means that 0.1 mM or 1 mM concentrations memantine are too difficult to be reached in vitro, even memantine has excellent safety84. So the open-channel block effect of memantine on AMPA-type receptor channels is unlikely to be of therapeutic relevance.
4. Ketamine
Our study shows that ketamine, at as high as 1 mM concentration, has no effect on AMPA-type receptor channels.
Both in GluR2L504Y and GluR2flipGQ receptor channels the amplitude, area and time to peak of currents remain unchanged after the use of 1 mM ketamine. More than 1 mM ketamine we have not used, because anaesthetic plasma concentration of ketamine was 9.3 ± 0.8 µmol/l125 only.
Neuroprotection by ketamine has been described in a variety of different experimental settings, including transient focal and global, as well as permanent ischemia, traumatic brain injury, and in-vitro hypoxia/ischemia86. As a well known open-channel blocker of NMDA receptor, 0.1µM or 1.0µM ketamine soon produced a pronounced reduction in the frequency of NMDA channel opening. A recent in-vitro study126 showed that 100 µM ketamine during or after 1 h of ischemic injury protected the cellular integrity in striatal slice cultures, although it did not affect
Reference
In the coapplication experiments with GluR2L504Y receptors, with increasing concentration, phenobarbital showed a block effect, which was characterized with an obviously reduced current of steady-state and rAUC, a decrease of peak current before desensitization, and an increasing reopening currents amplitude after the coapplication of glutamate with Phenobarbital. These might be explained with mechanism of open-channel block. But the value of time constant of current decay does not change during experiments, which is argument against open-channel block.
Additionally, the block effect of phenobarbital was more effective in preincubation experiments than in coapplication experiments. Both, the peak amplitude and the rAUC, were reduced in dose-dependent manner; the time to peak was prolonged at the same time. These results implicated an additional competitive block effect.
The block effect of barbiturates on AMPA-type receptor channels has been reported, while there is no consistent hypothesis on the molecular mechanism. A study in cultured cortical neurons revealed that the inhibition of AMPA-type receptor channels by pentobarbital is use-dependent, an effect interpreted as being consistent with an open-channel block mechanism127. However, another study suggests that pentobarbital does not act as an open-channel blocker of AMPA-type receptor channels128. Rather, the sensitivity, use dependence, and trapping of inhibition by pentobarbital are determined by AMPA-type receptor channels desensitization128. From our results, the block mechanism of Phenobarbital on AMPA-type receptor seems to be mainly an open-channel block while there is an additional competitive block effect, too.
As a traditional barbiturate type drug, phenobarbital has been widely used for its sedative, anesthetic, and anticonvulsant properties. It was reported that pre-treatment with phenobarbital results in a behavioral neuroprotection against kainic acid-induced neurotoxicity in animal models of toxic brain damage. Daily phenobarbital treatment (20 mg/kg i.p.) initiated 45 minutes prior to the kainic acid injection blocked the kainic acid-induced deficits in acquisition learning89. In our experiments, phenobarbital could block AMPA-type receptor channels, but at very high
concentrations beyond clinically reached plasma levels. The concentration range for the block effect is according to the results of pentobarbital application on AMPA receptors from GluR2 null allele (-/-) neurons129, which are relatively insensitive to pentobarbital inhibition129. It was reported that recombinant receptors that lack the GluR2 subunit130 or its Q/R edited site131 demonstrate a fivefold to 10-fold reduced sensitivity to pentobarbital, respectively. In our experiments, we used the GluR2L504Y, which is also calcium permeable, which could be the reason why it seems to be insensitive to phenobarbital. Normally, the anticonvulsant therapeutic serum levels of phenobarbital is 10-40 µg/ml132,133. If there is an interaction on AMPA-type receptor with edited GluR2 subunit in this concentration range needs to be clarified in further
Reference
studies.
6. Valproic acid
Our study shows that valproic acid has no direct effect on AMPA-type receptor channels.
In GluR2L504Y receptor channels, the current amplitude, area under the current curve and time to peak were not influenced when 30 mM valproic acid were coapplied or after preincubation with 1 mM valproic acid. Considering the antiepileptic therapeutic serum levels of 50-100 µg/ml134, 135, further concentrations were not tested in our experiments.
Neuroprotection by valproic acid has been described. It is known to protect spinal motoneurons against death from glutamate toxicity in vitro. Furthermore, valproic acid can significantly prolong
Neuroprotection by valproic acid has been described. It is known to protect spinal motoneurons against death from glutamate toxicity in vitro. Furthermore, valproic acid can significantly prolong