• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

A.4 Discussion

B.4.7 Disturbed semantic networks in schizophrenia?

The contrast scores can be interpreted as a measure of associative strength of objects within super-ordinate categories and as a measure of distinction between the cortical representations of these cat-egories. In the schizophrenic group these measures were significantly reduced, indicating a less dis-tinct cortical organization of the semantic system in schizophrenia. The localization of these differ-ences along the visual ventral stream as the major cortical substrate of object representation further supports this view. The loosening of associative strength within categories was also reflected in the

7 To assess the signal quality, the SNR was computed for each object-specific MNE for each subject. The SNR was defined as the ratio of the root mean square of the time window from 170-210 ms after stimulus onset to the standard deviation of the 100 ms prestimulus baseline. Analysis of variance with the between-factor GROUP indicated that groups did not differ in terms of there SNR (F<1). Additionally, in an identical way the SNR for the time interval

B.4.7 : Discussion - Disturbed semantic networks in schizophrenia?

outcome of the hierarchical clustering where patients showed a less well-defined representation of objects. Categorical representations already develop during infancy (Eimas, 1994) and formation of these categories is based on correlations between attributes of individual objects (Bhatt et al., 2004).

On a cortical level this might correspond to the formation of neural networks by synchronous neural activity through Hebbian learning. As categorical representations are formed long before the onset of schizophrenia, one might wonder about the causes of semantic dysfunction in adult schizophren-ics. Recent views have suggested that schizophrenia may be a disorder of dysfunctional neuroplas-ticity and deficits in GABAergic (Costa et al. 2004), glutamatergic (McCullumsmith et al., 2004), cholinergic (Hyde & Crook, 2001) and dopaminergic (Winterer & Weinberger, 2004) neurotrans-mitter systems involved in neuroplasticity mechanisms have been found in schizophrenia. These deficits might result in the arbitrary spreading of activation within and the formation of disordered semantic neural networks. In that sense, disturbed semantic networks caused by altered neurotrans-mitter systems can be a plausible explanation for the outcome of this study.

92

C : Concluding remarks and outlook - Concluding remarks and outlook

C Concluding remarks and outlook

The present study examined object categorization from a neuroscience perspective. Spatiotemporal correlations and unsupervised clustering were applied to the magnetoencephalographic recordings.

While previous research has shown difference between superordinate categories, this is the first study that reveals associations of exemplars within categories with a clear distinction across super-ordinate categories. It is also noteworthy that the found effects were rather localized and possibly would not have been detected with a less dense array of sensors. The methods used in this study re-quire sufficient spatial resolution, which can only be achieved with high-density recordings. In ad-dition, this study illustrates how methods of analysis that go beyond the traditional approach of comparing mean amplitudes at certain time windows and recording sites, can provide new insights into cognitive mechanisms and their underlying brain architecture.

The possibility to look at categorical organization and associative strengths within semantic net-works is not limited to control subjects and can also be applied to clinical samples. Here, weaker as-sociations were discerned in a group of schizophrenic patients. It is conceivable that in the future di-agnosis and classification of disease will be based less exclusively on ‘surface’ measures and rely more upon direct indices of brain function. Indeed, recent research has shown that abnormal mag-netic brain activity differs between schizophrenic and depressed patients (Wienbruch et al, 2004) and is helpful in distinguishing between schizophrenic subgroups (Fehr et al, 2003). Possible appli-cations of the findings might not be limited to assess the status quo - measuring changes across time could allow to monitor or evaluate therapeutical improvements. Therapeutical approaches should include systematic training of base level concepts to restore their represenation as well as proper medication addressing deficits or imbalances of transmitter that potentially cause the dysfunctions within semantic neural networks.

D : References

D References

1. Adams J, Faux SF, Nestor PG, Shenton ME, Marcy B, Smith S, McCarley RW: ERP abnormali-ties during semantic processing in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1993; 10:247-57

2. Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, D'Esposito M: An area within human ventral cortex sensitive to "build-ing" stimuli: evidence and implications. Neuron 1998, 21:373-83

3. Aloia MS, Gourovitch ML, Missar D, Pickar D, Weinberger DR, Goldberg TE: Cognitive sub-strates of thought disorder, II: specifying a candidate cognitive mechanism. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1677-84

4. Andreasen NC, Arndt S, Miller D, Flaum M, Nopoulos P: Correlational studies of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms:

an overview and update. Psychopathology 1995; 28:7-17

5. Andreasen NC, Olsen S: Negative v positive schizophrenia. Definition and validation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982; 39:789-94

6. Armstrong SL, Gleitman LR, Gleitman H: What some concepts might not be. Cognition 1983;

13:263-308

7. Arndt S, Alliger RJ, Andreasen NC: The distinction of positive and negative symptoms. The fail-ure of a two-dimensional model. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 158:317-22

8. Assal G, Favre C, Anderes JP: [Nonrecognition of familiar animals by a farmer. Zooagnosia or prosopagnosia for animals] Rev Neurol (Paris) 1984; 140:580-4

9. Baaré WF, Hulshoff Pol HE, Hijman R, Mali WP, Viergever MA, Kahn RS: Volumetric analysis of frontal lobe regions in schizophrenia: relation to cognitive function and symptomatology. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 45:1597-605

10.Barch DM, Cohen JD, Servan-Schreiber D, Steingard S, Cohen JD, Steinhauer SD, van Kam-men DP: Semantic priming in schizophrenia: an examination of spreading activation using word pronunciation and multiple SOAs. J Abnorm Psychol 1996; 105:592-601

11.Barlow HB: Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? Percep-tion 1972; 1:371-94

12.Barta PE, Pearlson GD, Brill LB, Royall R, McGilchrist IK, Pulver AE, Powers RE, Casanova MF, Tien AY, Frangou S, Petty RG: Planum temporale asymmetry reversal in schizophrenia:

replication and relationship to gray matter abnormalities. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:661-7 13.Barta PE, Pearlson GD, Powers RE, Richards SS, Tune LE: Auditory hallucinations and smaller

superior temporal gyral volume in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1990; , 147:1457-62 14.Barton JJ: Disorders of face perception and recognition. Neurol Clin 2003; 21:521-48

15.Basso A, Capitani E, Laiacona M: Progressive language impairment without dementia: a case with isolated category specific semantic defect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988; 51:1201-7 16.Bebbington PE, Kuipers L: Non-physical treatment of the psychoses. Br Med Bull 1987;

43:704-17

17.Bentin S, McCarthy G, Perez E, Puce A, Allison T: Electrophysiological studies of face percep-94

D : References

tion in humans J Cogn Neurosci 1996; 8:551-65

18.Berg P, Scherg M: A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroen-cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 90:229-41

19.Berlim MT, Mattevi BS, Belmonte-de-Abreu P, Crow TJ: The etiology of schizophrenia and the origin of language: overview of a theory. Compr Psychiatry 2003; 44:7-14

20.Bertero M, DeMol C, Pike ER: Linear inverse problems with discrete data: II - Stability and reg-ularization. Inverse Problems 1988; 4:573-94

21.Bhatt RS, Wilk A, Hill D, Rovee-Collier C: Correlated attributes and categorization in the first half-year of life. Dev Psychobiol 2004; 44:103-15

22.Bilder RM, Wu H, Bogerts B, Degreef G, Ashtari M, Alvir JM, Snyder PJ, Lieberman JA: Ab-sence of regional hemispheric volume asymmetries in first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychia-try 1994; 151:1437-47

23.Bleuler E: Dementia Praecox oder die Gruppe der Schizophrenien. Leipzig, Deuticke, 1911 24.Bobes MA, Lei ZX, Ibáñez S, Yi H, Valdes-Sosa M: Semantic matching of pictures in

schizophrenia: a cross-cultural ERP study. Biol Psychiatry 1996; , 40:189-202

25.Bogerts B, Ashtari M, Degreef G, Alvir JM, Bilder RM, Lieberman JA: Reduced temporal lim-bic structure volumes on magnetic resonance images in first episode schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 1990; 35:1-13

26.Booth MC, Rolls ET: View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferi-or tempinferi-oral visual cinferi-ortex.

Cereb Cortex 1998; 8:510-23

27.Buchanan RW, Vladar K, Barta PE, Pearlson GD: Structural evaluation of the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1049-55

28.Buchsbaum MS, Yang S, Hazlett E, Siegel BV, Germans M, Haznedar M, O'Flaithbheartaigh S, Wei T, Silverman J, Siever LJ: Ventricular volume and asymmetry in schizotypal personality dis-order and schizophrenia assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. Schizophr Res 1997;

27:45-53

29.Buckley PF: Structural brain imaging in schizophrenia. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1998; 21:77-92 30.Callaway EM: Local circuits in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Annu Rev

Neu-rosci 1998; 21:47-74

31.Cannon TD, van Erp TG, Huttunen M, Lönnqvist J, Salonen O, Valanne L, Poutanen VP, Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG, Gur RE, Yan M: Regional gray matter, white matter, and cere-brospinal fluid distributions in schizophrenic patients, their siblings, and controls. Arch Gen Psy-chiatry 1998; 55:1084-91

32.Cappa SF, Frugoni M, Pasquali P, Perani D, Zorat F: Category-specific naming impairments for artefacts: a new case. Neurocase 1998a; 4:391-397

33.Cappa SF, Perani D, Schnur T, Tettamanti M, Fazio F: The effects of semantic category and knowledge type on lexical-semantic access: a PET study. Neuroimage 1998b; 8:350-9

34.Caramazza A: The interpretation of semantic category-specific deficits: what do they reveal about the organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain? Neurocase 1998; 4:265-72

35.Caramazza A, Shelton JR: Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain the

animate-inani-D : References

mate distinction. J Cogn Neurosci 1998; 10:1-34

36.Caramazza A, Mahon B: The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from catego-ry-specific semantic deficits. Trends Cogn Sci 2003; 7:354-361

37.Chakos MH, Lieberman JA, Bilder RM, Borenstein M, Lerner G, Bogerts B, Wu, H., Kinon B, Ashtari M: Increase in caudate nuclei volumes of first-episode schizophrenic patients taking an-tipsychotic drugs. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151:1430-6

38.Chao LL, Martin A, Haxby JV: Are face-responsive regions selective only for faces? Neurore-port 1999a; 10:2945-50

39.Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A: Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiv-ing and knowperceiv-ing about objects. Nat Neurosci 1999b; 2:913-9

40.Chao LL, Martin A: Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neu-roimage 2000; 12:478-84

41.Chao LL, Weisberg J, Martin A: Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cereb Cortex 2002; 12:545-51

42.Chapin K, McCown J, Vann L, Kenney D, Youssef I: Activation and facilitation in the lexicon of schizophrenics. Schizophr Res 1992; 6:251-5

43.Chua SE, McKenna PJ: Schizophrenia--a brain disease? A critical review of structural and func-tional cerebral abnormality in the disorder. Br J Psychiatry 1995; 166:563-82

44.Chua SE, Sharma T, Takei N, Murray RM, Woodruff PW: A magnetic resonance imaging study of corpus callosum size in familial schizophrenic subjects, their relatives, and normal controls.

Schizophr Res 2000; 41:397-403

45.Cohen JD, Barch DM, Carter C, Servan-Schreiber D: Context-processing deficits in schizophre-nia: converging evidence from three theoretically motivated cognitive tasks. J Abnorm Psychol 1999; 108:120-33

46.Condray R, Steinhauer SR, Cohen JD, van Kammen DP, Kasparek A: Modulation of language processing in schizophrenia: effects of context and haloperidol on the event-related potential.

Biol Psychiatry 1999; 45:1336-55

47.Condray R, Siegle GJ, Cohen JD, van Kammen DP, Steinhauer, SR: Automatic activation of the semantic network in schizophrenia: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54:1134-48

48.Corey-Bloom J, Jernigan T, Archibald S, Harris MJ, Jeste DV: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in late-life schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:447-9

49.Corson PW, Nopoulos P, Miller DD, Arndt S, Andreasen NC: Change in basal ganglia volume over 2 years in patients with schizophrenia: typical versus atypical neuroleptics. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:1200-4

50.Corson PW, O'Leary DS, Miller del D, Andreasen NC: The effects of neuroleptic medications on basal ganglia blood flow in schizophreniform disorders: a comparison between the neurolep-tic-naïve and medicated states. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 52:855-62

51.Craik F, Lockhart R: Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1972; 11:671–84

52.Crick F, Jones E: Backwardness of human neuroanatomy. Nature 1993; 361:109-10

96

D : References

53.Crow TJ: Schizophrenia as failure of hemispheric dominance for language. Trends Neurosci 1997; 20:339-43

54.Crow TJ: Schizophrenia as a transcallosal misconnection syndrome. Schizophr Res 1998;

30:111-4

55.Cuesta MJ, Peralta V, Gil P, Artamendi, M: Psychopathological dimensions in first-episode psy-choses. From the trunk to the branches and leaves. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2003;

253:73-9

56.Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Tranel D, Hichwa RD, Damasio AR: A neural basis for lexical re-trieval. Nature 1996; 380:499-505

57.Dean P: Effects of inferotemporal lesions on the behavior of monkeys. Psychol Bull 1976;

83:41-71

58.Dehaene S: Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing in the normal human brain. Neuroreport 1995; 6:2153-7

59.DeLisi LE, Hoff AL, Kushner M, Degreef G: Increased prevalence of cavum septum pellucidum in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 1993; 50:193-9

60.DeLisi LE, Sakuma M, Tew W, Kushner M, Hoff AL, Grimson R: Schizophrenia as a chronic active brain process: a study of progressive brain structural change subsequent to the onset of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 1997; 74:129-40

61.DeLisi LE, Sakuma M, Ge S, Kushner M: Association of brain structural change with the hetero-geneous course of schizophrenia from early childhood through five years subsequent to a first hospitalization. Psychiatry Res 1998; 84:75-88

62.DeLisi LE, Sakuma M, Maurizio AM, Relja M, Hoff AL: Cerebral ventricular change over the first 10 years after the onset of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2004; 130:57-70

63.Delorme A, Richard G, Fabre-Thorpe M: Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans. Vision Res 2000; 40:2187-200

64.Delorme A, Rousselet GA, Macé MJ, FabreThorpe M: Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004;

19:103-13

65.DeRenzi E, Lucchelli F: Are semantic systems separately represented in the brain? The case of living category impairment. Cortex 1994; 30:3-25

66.Desimone R: Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys. J Cogn Neurosci 1991;

3:1-8

67.Desimone R, Gross CG: Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Res 1979;

178:363-80

68.Desimone R, Albright TD, Gross CG & Bruce C: Stimulus-selective properties of inferior tem-poral neurons in the macaque. J Neurosci 1984; 4:2051-62

69.Devlin JT, Russell RP, Davis MH, Price CJ, Moss HE, Fadili MJ, Tyler LK: Is there an anatomi-cal basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40:54-75

70.Dilling H, Mombour W, Schmidt MH: Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen.

ICD-10 Kapitel V (F). Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien. Bern, Huber, 1991

D : References

71.Downing PE, Jiang Y, Shuman M, Kanwisher N: A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 2001; 293:2470-3

72.Drevets WC, Videen TO, Price JL, Preskorn SH, Carmichael ST, Raichle ME: A functional anatomical study of unipolar depression. J Neurosci 1992; 12:3628-41

73.DSM-IV. Diagnostisches und Statistisches Manual Psychischer Störungen DSM-IV. Deutsche Bearbeitung von Saß H, Wittchen HU, Zaudig M. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1996

74.Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork, DG: Pattern classification, 2nd ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2000 75.Eimas PD: Categorization in early infancy and the continuity of development. Cognition 1994;

50:83-93

76.Epstein R, Kanwisher N: A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998;

392:598-601

77.Farah MJ, Wallace MA: Semantically-bounded anomia: implications for the neural implementa-tion of naming. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30:609-21

78.Fehr T,Kissler J,Wienbruch J, Moratti S, Elbert T, Watzl H, Rockstroh B: Source distribution of neuromagntic slow-wave activity in schizophrenic patients – effects of activation. Schiz Res 2003; 63:63-71

79.Feinstein A, Goldberg TE, Nowlin B, Weinberger DR: Types and characteristics of remote memory impairment in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1998; 30:155-63

80.Fender DH: Source localization of brain electrical activity, in Methods of analysis of brain elec-trical and magnetic signals: EEG handbook (rev. series).Edited by Gevins AS, Remond A. New York, Elsevier, 1987, pp 355-403

81.Fitzgerald D, Lucas S, Redoblado MA, Winter V, Brennan J, Anderson J, Harris A: Cognitive functioning in young people with first episode psychosis: relationship to diagnosis and clinical characteristics. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2004; 38:501-10

82.Flaum M, O'Leary DS, Swayze VW, Miller DD, Arndt S, Andreasen NC: Symptom dimensions and brain morphology in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. J Psychiatr Res 1995;

29:261-76

83.Forde EME, Humphreys GW: Category-specific recognition impairments: a review of important case studies and influential theories. Aphasiology 1999; 13:169-93

84.Foxe JJ, Doniger GM, Javitt DC: Early visual processing deficits in schizophrenia: impaired P1 generation revealed by high-density electrical mapping. Neuroreport 2001; 12:3815-20

85.Frederikse M, Lu A, Aylward E, Barta P, Sharma T, Pearlson G: Sex differences in inferior pari-etal lobule volume in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:422-7

86.Freedman DJ, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, Miller EK: Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 2001; 291:312-6

87.Fromm-Reichmann F: Notes on the development of treatment of schizophrenics by psychoana-lytic psychotherapy. Psychiatry 1948; 11:263-73

88.Fujita I, Tanaka K, Ito M, Cheng K: Columns for visual features of objects in monkey infer-otemporal cortex. Nature 1992; 360:343-6

89.Funnell E, Sheridan J: Categories of knowledge? Unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things. Neurocase 1992; 2:461-74

98

D : References

90.Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Moylan J, Anderson, AW, Skudlarski P, Gore, JC: Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Biol 1997;

7:645-51

91.Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC: Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2:568-73 92.Gauthier I, Skudlarski P, Gore JC & Anderson AW: Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain

areas involved in face recognition. Nat Neurosci 2000a; 3:191-7

93.Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Moylan J, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC: Does visual subordinate-level categorization engage the functionally-defined fusiform face area? Cogn Neuropsychol 2000b; 17:143-63

94.Gerlach C, Law I, Gade A, Paulson OB: Perceptual differentiation and category effects in nor-mal object recognition: a PET study. Brain 1999; 122:2159-70

95.Gerlach C, Law I, Gade A, Paulson OB: Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38:1693-703

96.Giedd JN, Jeffries NO, Blumenthal J, Castellanos FX, Vaituzis AC, Fernandez T, Hamburger SD, Liu H, Nelson J, Bedwell J, Tran L, Lenane M, Nicolson R, Rapoport JL: Childhood-onset schizophrenia: progressive brain changes during adolescence. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46:892-8 97.Gil-da-Costa R, Braun A, Lopes M, Hauser MD, Carson RE, Herscovitch P, Martin A: Toward

an evolutionary perspective on conceptual representation: species-specific calls activate visual and affective processing systems in the macaque. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:17516-21 98.Goldberg TE, Aloia MS, Gourovitch ML, Missar D, Pickar D, Weinberger DR: Cognitive

sub-strates of thought disorder, I: the semantic system. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:1671-6

99.Goldstein JM, Goodman JM, Seidman LJ, Kennedy DN, Makris N, Lee H, Tourville J, Caviness VS, Faraone SV, Tsuang MT: Cortical abnormalities in schizophrenia identified by structural magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999; 56:537-47

100.Goodale MA, Milner AD: Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 1992; 15:20-5

101.Goodale MA, Humphrey GK: The objects of action and perception. Cognition 1998;

67:181-207

102.Goodale MA, Westwood DA: An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cor-tical pathways for perception and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004; 14:203-11

103.Goodman LA, Kruskal WH: Measures of Association for Cross Classification. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1979

104.Goren CC, Sarty M, Wu PY: Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics 1975; 56:544-9

105.Gorno-Tempini ML, Price CJ. Identification of famous faces and buildings: a functional neu-roimaging study of semantically unique items. Brain 2001; 124:2087-97

106.Grabowski TJ, Damasio H, Damasio AR: Premotor and prefrontal correlates of category-relat-ed lexical retrieval. Neuroimage 1998; 7:232-43

107.Gratton G, Fabiani M, Elbert T, Rockstroh B: Seeing right through you: applications of optical imaging to the study of the human brain. Psychophysiology 2003; 40:487-91

D : References

108.Greenhouse SW, Geisser S: On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959;

24:95-111

109.Grill-Spector K: The neural basis of object perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003; 13:159-66 110.Grill-Spector K, Knouf N, Kanwisher N: The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not

generic within-category identification. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7:555-62

111.Gross CG, Rocha-Miranda CE, Bender DB: Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cor-tex of the Macaque. J Neurophysiol 1972; 35:96-111

112.Grossman M, Smith EE, Koenig P, Glosser G, DeVita C, Moore P, McMillan C: The neural ba-sis for categorization in semantic memory. Neuroimage 2002; 17:1549-61

113.Gur RE, Pearlson GD: Neuroimaging in schizophrenia research. Schizophr Bull 1993;

19:337-53

114.Gur RE, Cowell P, Turetsky BI, Gallacher F, Cannon T, Bilker W, Gur RC: A follow-up mag-netic resonance imaging study of schizophrenia. Relationship of neuroanatomical changes to clin-ical and neurobehavioral measures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55:145-52

115.Gur RE, Turetsky BI, Cowell PE, Finkelman C, Maany V, Grossman RI, Arnold SE, Bilker WB, Gur RC: Temporolimbic volume reductions in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;

57:769-75

116.Gurvits TV, Shenton ME, Hokama H, Ohta H, Lasko NB, Gilbertson MW, Orr SP, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, McCarley RW, Pitman RK: Magnetic resonance imaging study of hippocampal vol-ume in chronic, combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1996; 40:1091-9 117.Halgren E, Raij T, Marinkovic K, Jousmäki V, Hari R: Cognitive response profile of the human

fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10:69-81

118.Haug JO: Pneumoencephalographic studies in mental disease. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1962;

38(Suppl 165):1-104

119.Hauk O: Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage 2004; 21:1612-21

120.Hauk O, Pulvermüller F: Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 2004; 21:191-201

121.Hawkins KA, Hoffman RE, Quinlan DM, Rakfeldt J, Docherty NM, Sledge WH: Cognition, negative symptoms, and diagnosis: a comparison of schizophrenic, bipolar, and control samples.

121.Hawkins KA, Hoffman RE, Quinlan DM, Rakfeldt J, Docherty NM, Sledge WH: Cognition, negative symptoms, and diagnosis: a comparison of schizophrenic, bipolar, and control samples.