V. Anhang
V.II Details zur Studienqualitätsbewertung
62
63
Tabelle 15: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017a) der Studie von Ahern et al. (2016)
Ahern et al. (2016) Yes No Unclear
1. Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population?
2. Were study participants sampled in an appropriate way?
3. Was the sample size adequate?
4. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
5. Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?
6. Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition?
7. Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants?
8. Was there appropriate statistical analysis?
9. Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 8 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 89 %
64
Tabelle 16: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017a) der Studie von Faller et al. (2003)
Faller er al. (2003) Yes No Unclear
1. Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population?
2. Were study participants sampled in an appropriate way?
3. Was the sample size adequate?
4. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
5. Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?
6. Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition?
7. Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants?
8. Was there appropriate statistical analysis?
9. Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 8 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 89 %
65
Tabelle 17: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017a) der Studie von Fang et al. (2018)
Fang et al. (2018) Yes No Unclear
1. Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population?
2. Were study participants sampled in an appropriate way?
3. Was the sample size adequate?
4. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
5. Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?
6. Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition?
7. Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants?
8. Was there appropriate statistical analysis?
9. Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 8 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 89 %
66
Tabelle 18: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017a) der Studie von Liao et al. (2012)
Liao et al. (2012) Yes No Unclear
1. Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population?
2. Were study participants sampled in an appropriate way?
3. Was the sample size adequate?
4. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
5. Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?
6. Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition?
7. Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants?
8. Was there appropriate statistical analysis?
9. Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 8 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 89 %
67
Tabelle 19: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017a) der Studie von Schmid-Büchi et al. (2013)
Schmid-Büchi et al. (2013) Yes No Unclear
1. Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population?
2. Were study participants sampled in an appropriate way?
3. Was the sample size adequate?
4. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
5. Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?
6. Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition?
7. Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants?
8. Was there appropriate statistical analysis?
9. Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 8 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 89 %
68
Tabelle 20: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017b) der Studie von Anarado et al. (2015)
Anarado et al. (2015) Yes No Unclear
1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 9 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 90 %
69
Tabelle 21: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017b) der Studie von Boman et al. (1997)
Boman et al. (1997) Yes No Unclear
1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 8 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 80 %
70
Tabelle 22: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017b) der Studie von Klungrit et al. (2019)
Klungrit et al. (2019) Yes No Unclear
1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 9 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 90 %
71
Tabelle 23: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017b) der Studie von Landmark et al. (2008)
Landmark et al. (2008) Yes No Unclear
1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 9 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 90 %
72
Tabelle 24: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017b) der Studie von Llewellyn et al. (2019)
Llewellyn et al. (2019) Yes No Unclear
1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 9 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 90 %
73
Tabelle 25: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017b) der Studie von Remmers et al. (2010)
Remmers et al. (2010) Yes No Unclear
1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 9 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 90 %
74
Tabelle 26: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017b) der Studie von Stephens et al. (2008)
Stephens et al. (2008) Yes No Unclear
1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 8 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 80 %
75
Tabelle 27: Qualitätsbewertung (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017a, Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017b) der Studie von Lindop und Cannon (2001)
Studie von Lindop und Cannon (2001) Yes No Unclear
1. Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology?
2. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives?
3. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data?
4. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data?
5. Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results?
6. Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically?
7. Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed?
8. Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented?
9. Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body?
10. Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
11. Was the sample frame appropriate to address the target population?
12. Were study participants sampled in an appropriate way?
13. Was the sample size adequate?
14. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
15. Was the data analysis conducted with sufficient coverage of the identified sample?
16. Were valid methods used for the identification of the condition?
17. Was the condition measured in a standard, reliable way for all participants?
18. Was there appropriate statistical analysis?
19. Was the response rate adequate, and if not, was the low response rate managed appropriately?
Gesamtpunkteanzahl: 16 Qualitätsbeurteilung: 84 %
76