• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

C) Repetitive elements

7. Conclusion

The genome is subject to many regulatory mechanisms, of which methylation is only one. This work serves to show that significant differences exist between closely related organisms, and that sex is one of the determining factors in every organisms particular methylation pattern. We also see that same genes are differently methylated in different organs. Organs are collections of many different cell populations, and greater exactness could be achieved by isolating homogeneous cell populations, which is technically challenging. We also know at this point that DNA methylation pattern of an individual changes during its life. To determine these dynamics, a work of much larger scale is required, involving greater numbers of individuals, DNA from more than one time point in their lives and, as said before, more exact isolation of cell populations. This shall also require methods capable of analyzing multiple CpG sites rapidly and from lesser DNA amounts. The complexity of the problem is further shown by the fact that sex specific methylation results could not be reproduced in another mice population – but were still reproducible in the tissue samples used in the original work. This shows that methylation patterns are possibly dependent on the environmental influences, seasonal variability and other factors. The first group of mice were raised in August/September, the second in December/January; though conditions were close, they may have not been fully identical. The exact CO2 concentration used to kill the mice to harvest tissue samples was not measured; the pathological anaerobic metabolism prior to stop of vital functions may have been different in both groups; exposure to CO2 results in a decrease in alpha-ketoglutarate, which is a cofactor in transforming methylcytosine into 5-carboxylcytosine; between these are the oxidation products which are the intermediate steps in demethylation process. Thus, different levels of CO2 could possibly have caused different methylation product concentration in tissues with active circulation, such as spleen and brain. The SIRPH technique used was very accurate and sensitive, but covered only few methylated spots in the genome. A technique capable of broader analysis and a larger cohort of experimental animals would be needed to visualize broader and general patterns of methylation.

101

Tables

1. Tab. 1: Bisulfite amplification primers... 47

2. Tab. 2: SNuPE reaction primers... 50

3. Tab. 3: HPLC elution gradient and temperature conditions... 52

4. Tab. 4: Primers used for RNA expression analysis... 54

5. Tab. 5: Level of methylation in spleen, lung and skin tissue samples.. 62

6. Tab. 6: Level of methylation in brain, bone marrow, and testicular

tissue samples ……….. 63

7. Tab. 7: Level of methylation in tongue, skeletal muscle, and heart

muscular tissue samples ………. 64

8. Tab. 8: Alpha actin methylation data………. 108-116

9 Tab. 9: Snrpn D1 methylation data……… 117-125

10 Tab. 10: IAP methylation data………. 126-134

11 Tab. 11: Line 1 methylation data………. 135-143

12 Tab. 12: Long intronic transcript methylation data……… 144-152

13. Tab. 13: Myosin methylation data……… 153-161

14. Tab. 14: Paternally expressed gene 3 methylation data………….. 162-170

102

15 Tab 15 and 16: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue, male bone marrow... 172

16. Tab. 17 and 18: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

female bone marrow………... 173

17 Tab.19 and 20: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

male brain……… 174

18 Tab. 21 and 22: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

female brain………. 175

19 Tab. 23 and 24: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

male heart……… 176

20 Tab. 25 and 26: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

female heart………. 177

21 Tab. 27 and 28: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

male lungs……… 178

22 Tab. 29 and 30: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue ,

female lungs………. 179

23 Tab. 31 and 32: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

male skeletal muscle……….. 180

24 Tab. 32 and 34: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue, female skeletal muscle………... 181

25 Tab. 35 and 36: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

male skin……….. 182

103

26 Tab. 37 and 38: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

female skin……… 183

27 Tab. 39 and 40: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

male spleen……… 184

28 Tab. 41 and 42: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

female spleen……… 185

28 Tab. 43 and 44: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

male tongue……… 186

29 Tab. 45 and 46: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

female tongue………. 187

30 Tab. 47 and 48: Methylation correlation between different loci within one tissue,

testes……… 188

104

Figures

1. Fig. 1: Adenosylmethionine synthesis scheme... 14

2. Fig. 2: DNA bases, minor base methylated cytosine and its overall

quantity in the genome………..……….... 18

3. Fig. 3: Mechanism of DNA methylation pattern inheritance... 20

4. Fig. 4: DNA rendered expressionally inactive by methylation... 22

5. Fig. 5: Myosin light chain exon 1, sequence before and after bisulfite

processing……….. 30

6. Fig. 6: Fragment of alpha actin gene, sequence before and after

bisulfite processing………... 32

7. Fig. 7: Fragment of paternally expressed gene 3, sequence before

and after bisulfite processing……….……… 34

8. Fig. 8: Snrpn fragment, sequence before and after bisulfite processing… 36

9. Fig. 9: Mouse partial Kcnq gene intron 1, sequence before and

after bisulfite processing………... 37

10. Fig. 10: Mouse LINE-1 repetitive element, sequence before and after

bisulfite processing……… 39

11. Fig. 11: Intracisternal A particle, sequence before and after

bisulfite processing………. 41

105

12. Fig. 12: Bisulfite conversion scheme………. 44

13. Fig. 13: Scheme of the SNuPE product quantification

using HPLC………. 53

14 Fig. 14: Scheme of the SNuPE product quantification using

HPLC with two primers………. 53

15 Fig. 15: Sample of genomic DNA analysis, electrophoresis on

agarose based gel ... 56

16. Fig. 16: Gel analysis of bisulfite amplification product ... 57

17. Fig. 17: HPLC chromatogram samples... 59

18. Fig. 18: Methylation variability at specific loci, alpha actin………… 65 19. Fig. 19: Methylation variability at specific loci, myosin light chain… 66 20. Fig. 20: Methylation variability at specific loci, paternally

expressed gene 3………. 67

21. Fig. 21: Methylation variability at specific loci, Snrpn-D1………… 68

22. Fig. 22: Methylation variability at specific loci, LIT1………. 69

23. Fig. 23: Methylation variability at specific loci, IAP……… 70

24. Fig. 24: Methylation variability at specific loci, LINE-1………. 71

25. Fig. 25: Relative RNA expression intensity in a given tissue for

alpha actin………... 72

106

26. Fig. 26: Relative RNA expression intensity in a given tissue

for myosin light chain... 74

27. Figures 27-36, correlation scatter plots……… 76-80

28 Fig. 37: Location of LIT1 within KvLQT1... 93

107