• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

4. DISCUSSION

4.5 CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK

The epidermis is a rigid layer of the skin protecting an organism against external insults. It is also the anatomical structure to provide the skin barrier. An alteration of 84

the skin barrier initiates inflammatory processes which may lead to skin diseases. In this thesis it has been investigated how TSLP is regulated either after exposure to external irritants or in AD; a chronic inflammatory skin disease.

The data show that TSLP was rapidly induced in keratinocytes upon irritant exposure. Moreover skin perturbation of different kinds led to TSLP production starting from injury to chemical exposure. These data suggest that TSLP is one of the alarm signals in the skin upon exposure to any trauma. The mechanistic analysis revealed that though exogenous TNF-α was capable of inducing TSLP in vitro or ex vivo, endogenous TNF-α failed to do so. IL-1 a well known responder upon irritation, was partially involved in SDS mediated TSLP production. As the cascade of TSLP regulation and its role in irritation is still not very clear, further extensive work is required to pin point the different factors involved. To this end, skin biopsies and keratinocytes will be treated with different inhibitors or neutralizing antibodies or agonists and their antagonists.

To better understand the role of TNF-α in AD, an allergen dependent mouse dermatitis model was used. It showed an increased AD severity in TNF-/- compared to wt mice. Further analysis of these mice including the skin and serum revealed no major alterations of single cell types or factors except the TSLP expression locally and systemically and increased mast cell numbers in the skin which correlated with the clinical severity. As TNF-/- mice expressed more TSLP, it was important to understand the role of TSLP for the progression of AD. To achieve this goal, anti-TSLP was administered to neutralize the anti-TSLP mediated effects in eczema. Such treated mice showed a pronounced improvement of the AD, including a reduction of the TEWL. These findings indicate that TSLP is most likely a key cytokine in severe AD development under TNF deficiency. These data should be confirmed using TNF

-/-TSLP-/- double knockout mice to prove the role of TSLP in this scenario.

We observed an increase of the mast cell frequency which correlates with the symptom score and TSLP expression. The application of an anti cKit to the TNF -/-mice showed a reduction of eczema severity, indicating that mast cells are involved in AD in this model.

85

As previous data pointed out the role of mast cells in AD progression, the question arose whether mast cells can directly induce TSLP as they are known to produce TSLP210 or whether they can instruct keratinocytes to produce TSLP during AD progression as they are also known to instruct epithelial cells to produce TSLP133. In our hand data from BMcMcs have suggested that mast cells are not able to produce TSLP upon activation with anti IgE in combination with different proinflammatory cytokines. These results suggest that mast cells can instruct KCs to produce TSLP in TNF-/- mice during AD development. To confirm this hypothesis, we stimulated the skin biopsies with mast cell supernatants from stimulated and resting mast cells.

Supernatants from stimulated mast cells show no effect whereas the supernatants from resting mast cells were capable to stimulate the cells from skin biopsies to produce TSLP at significant levels. Next we tried to investigate which mast cell mediator is responsible for the instruction of KCs to produce TSLP. Surprisingly

‘histamine’ the most abundant mast cell mediator was not able to induce TSLP production. By contrast, we detected a significant increase of TSLP expression upon treatment with the mast cell protease “mMCP6”. In the future it needs to be confirmed whether tryptase is the main component of the MC supernatant triggering TSLP production in the skin. Such conformation would be possible if mMCP6-/- mice will be used in further experiments. Finally to confirm that mast cells are playing a role by instructing KCs to produce TSLP in enhancement of AD under TNF deficiency we need to perform the AD patch-model in mMCP6-/-TNF-/-TSLPR-/- triple knockout mice.

Irritation and inflammation of the skin is a complex process including the interplay of resident skin cells like KC and MC. Both TNF-α and TSLP contribute to this interplay in this scenario with a significant extend. Mouse skin models can help to better understand this complex network by applying knockout mice models or targeting key effector mediator in appropriate disease models.

86

REFERENCES

1 Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM. The skin: an indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol 2008; 17: 1063-72.

2 Oyoshi MK, Murphy GF, Geha RS. Filaggrin-deficient mice exhibit TH17-dominated skin inflammation and permissiveness to epicutaneous sensitization with protein antigen. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124: 485-93, 93 e1.

3 Hanel KH, Cornelissen C, Luscher B et al. Cytokines and the skin barrier.

International journal of molecular sciences 2013; 14: 6720-45.

4 Fuchs E. Skin stem cells: rising to the surface. The Journal of cell biology 2008; 180:

273-84.

5 Kirschner N, Brandner JM. Barriers and more: functions of tight junction proteins in the skin. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012; 1257: 158-66.

6 Hildenbrand M, Rhiemeier V, Hartenstein B et al. Impaired skin regeneration and remodeling after cutaneous injury and chemically induced hyperplasia in taps-transgenic mice. J Invest Dermatol 2010; 130: 1922-30.

7 Madison KC. Barrier function of the skin: "la raison d'etre" of the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 121: 231-41.

8 Richardson M. Understanding the structure and function of the skin. Nursing times 2003; 99: 46-8.

9 Janetta Bensouilah PB. Aromadermatology: Aromatherapy in the Treatment and Care of Common Skin Conditions. 2006.

10 Janetta Bensouilah, Buck P. Aromadermatology: Aromatherapy in the Treatment and Care of Common Skin Conditions. Aromadermatology 2006.

11 Kanitakis J. Anatomy, histology and immunohistochemistry of normal human skin.

European journal of dermatology : EJD 2002; 12: 390-9; quiz 400-1.

12 Bruce Alberts AJ, Julian Lewis, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, and Peter Walter.

Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Science 2002; 4.

13 Flour M. The pathophysiology of vulnerable skin 2009.

14 Nestle FO, Di Meglio P, Qin JZ et al. Skin immune sentinels in health and disease.

Nature reviews. Immunology 2009; 9: 679-91.

15 Angelova-Fischer I, Dapic I, Hoek AK et al. Skin Barrier Integrity and Natural Moisturising Factor Levels After Cumulative Dermal Exposure to Alkaline Agents in Atopic Dermatitis. Acta dermato-venereologica 2014.

16 Vinay Kumar AKA, Jon C. Aster. Robbins Basic Pathology. Elsevier Health Sciences 2012.

17 Le M, Schalkwijk J, Siegenthaler G et al. Changes in keratinocyte differentiation following mild irritation by sodium dodecyl sulphate. Archives of dermatological research 1996; 288: 684-90.

18 Varani J, Perone P, Spahlinger DM et al. Human skin in organ culture and human skin cells (keratinocytes and fibroblasts) in monolayer culture for assessment of chemically induced skin damage. Toxicologic pathology 2007; 35: 693-701.

19 Willis CM, Stephens CJ, Wilkinson JD. Differential patterns of epidermal leukocyte infiltration in patch test reactions to structurally unrelated chemical irritants. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 101: 364-70.

20 Jacobs JJ, Lehe CL, Hasegawa H et al. Skin irritants and contact sensitizers induce Langerhans cell migration and maturation at irritant concentration. Exp Dermatol 2006; 15:

432-40.

21 Escobar-Chavez JJ, Merino-Sanjuan V, Lopez-Cervantes M et al. The tape-stripping technique as a method for drug quantification in skin. Journal of pharmacy &

pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques 2008; 11: 104-30.

87

22 Nickoloff BJ, Naidu Y. Perturbation of epidermal barrier function correlates with initiation of cytokine cascade in human skin. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1994; 30: 535-46.

23 Wilmer JL, Burleson FG, Kayama F et al. Cytokine induction in human epidermal keratinocytes exposed to contact irritants and its relation to chemical-induced inflammation in mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol 1994; 102: 915-22.

24 Usatine RP, Riojas M. Diagnosis and management of contact dermatitis. American family physician 2010; 82: 249-55.

25 Coenraads PJ, Goncalo M. Skin diseases with high public health impact. Contact dermatitis. European journal of dermatology : EJD 2007; 17: 564-5.

26 Nosbaum A, Vocanson M, Rozieres A et al. Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.

European journal of dermatology : EJD 2009; 19: 325-32.

27 Slodownik D, Lee A, Nixon R. Irritant contact dermatitis: a review. The Australasian journal of dermatology 2008; 49: 1-9; quiz 10-1.

28 Dhingra N, Gulati N, Guttman-Yassky E. Mechanisms of contact sensitization offer insights into the role of barrier defects vs. intrinsic immune abnormalities as drivers of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133: 2311-4.

29 Vocanson M, Hennino A, Chavagnac C et al. Contribution of CD4(+ )and CD8(+) T-cells in contact hypersensitivity and allergic contact dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2005; 1: 75-86.

30 Khuntia A, Baldwin J. Contact Dermatitis. 2004.

31 Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. The New England journal of medicine 2008; 358: 1483-94. 32 Leung DY, Boguniewicz M, Howell MD et al. New insights into atopic dermatitis. The Journal of clinical investigation 2004; 113: 651-7.

33 Worm M, Forschner K, Lee HH et al. Frequency of atopic dermatitis and relevance of food allergy in adults in Germany. Acta dermato-venereologica 2006; 86: 119-22.

34 Wuthrich B, Cozzio A, Roll A et al. Atopic eczema: genetics or environment? Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM 2007; 14: 195-201.

35 Maintz L, Novak N. Getting more and more complex: the pathophysiology of atopic eczema. European journal of dermatology : EJD 2007; 17: 267-83.

36 Oyoshi MK, He R, Kumar L et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms in atopic dermatitis. Advances in immunology 2009; 102: 135-226.

37 Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Annals of dermatology 2010; 22: 125-37.

38 Ong PY. New insights in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Pediatric research 2014; 75: 171-5.

39 Kuo IH, Yoshida T, De Benedetto A et al. The cutaneous innate immune response in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 131: 266-78.

40 Chan LS. Atopic dermatitis in 2008. Current directions in autoimmunity 2008; 10: 76-118.

41 Bohme M, Soderhall C, Kull I et al. Filaggrin mutations increase the risk for persistent dry skin and eczema independent of sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: 1153-5. 42 Howell MD, Kim BE, Gao P et al. Cytokine modulation of atopic dermatitis filaggrin skin expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120: 150-5.

43 Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Carlsen BC et al. A possible association between a dysfunctional skin barrier (filaggrin null-mutation status) and diabetes: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open 2011; 1: e000062.

44 Brandt EB, Sivaprasad U. Th2 Cytokines and Atopic Dermatitis. Journal of clinical &

cellular immunology 2011; 2.

45 Darsow U, Forer I, Ring J. Allergen-specific immunotherapy in atopic eczema.

Current allergy and asthma reports 2011; 11: 277-83.

88

46 Jin H, He R, Oyoshi M et al. Animal models of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 31-40.

47 Gittler JK, Shemer A, Suarez-Farinas M et al. Progressive activation of T(H)2/T(H)22 cytokines and selective epidermal proteins characterizes acute and chronic atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 130: 1344-54.

48 Nakajima S, Kitoh A, Egawa G et al. IL-17A as an inducer for Th2 immune responses in murine atopic dermatitis models. J Invest Dermatol 2014; 134: 2122-30.

49 Yoo J, Omori M, Gyarmati D et al. Spontaneous atopic dermatitis in mice expressing an inducible thymic stromal lymphopoietin transgene specifically in the skin. J Exp Med 2005; 202: 541-9.

50 Li M, Hener P, Zhang Z et al. Topical vitamin D3 and low-calcemic analogs induce thymic stromal lymphopoietin in mouse keratinocytes and trigger an atopic dermatitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 11736-41.

51 Briot A, Deraison C, Lacroix M et al. Kallikrein 5 induces atopic dermatitis-like lesions through PAR2-mediated thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression in Netherton syndrome. J Exp Med 2009; 206: 1135-47.

52 Gutermuth J, Ollert M, Ring J et al. Mouse models of atopic eczema critically evaluated. International archives of allergy and immunology 2004; 135: 262-76.

53 Spergel JM, Mizoguchi E, Oettgen H et al. Roles of TH1 and TH2 cytokines in a murine model of allergic dermatitis. The Journal of clinical investigation 1999; 103: 1103-11.

54 Niebuhr M, Werfel T. Innate immunity, allergy and atopic dermatitis. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology 2010; 10: 463-8.

55 Eckert RL, Rorke EA. Molecular biology of keratinocyte differentiation. Environmental health perspectives 1989; 80: 109-16.

56 Barker JN, Mitra RS, Griffiths CE et al. Keratinocytes as initiators of inflammation.

Lancet 1991; 337: 211-4.

57 Palmer CN, Irvine AD, Terron-Kwiatkowski A et al. Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nature genetics 2006; 38: 441-6.

58 De Benedetto A, Rafaels NM, McGirt LY et al. Tight junction defects in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127: 773-86 e1-7.

59 Gittler JK, Krueger JG, Guttman-Yassky E. Atopic dermatitis results in intrinsic barrier and immune abnormalities: implications for contact dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013;

131: 300-13.

60 He R, Geha RS. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1183: 13-24.

61 Hoefakker S, Caubo M, van 't Erve EH et al. In vivo cytokine profiles in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Contact dermatitis 1995; 33: 258-66.

62 Wood LC, Elias PM, Calhoun C et al. Barrier disruption stimulates interleukin-1 alpha expression and release from a pre-formed pool in murine epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 1996; 106: 397-403.

63 Smith HR, Basketter DA, McFadden JP. Irritant dermatitis, irritancy and its role in allergic contact dermatitis. Clinical and experimental dermatology 2002; 27: 138-46.

64 Grangsjo A, Leijon-Kuligowski A, Torma H et al. Different pathways in irritant contact eczema? Early differences in the epidermal elemental content and expression of cytokines after application of 2 different irritants. Contact dermatitis 1996; 35: 355-60.

65 de Jongh CM, Lutter R, Verberk MM et al. Differential cytokine expression in skin after single and repeated irritation by sodium lauryl sulphate. Exp Dermatol 2007; 16: 1032-40. 66 McKenzie RC, Sauder DN. The role of keratinocyte cytokines in inflammation and immunity. J Invest Dermatol 1990; 95: 105S-7S.

67 Lee HY, Stieger M, Yawalkar N et al. Cytokines and chemokines in irritant contact dermatitis. Mediators of inflammation 2013; 2013: 916497.

68 Leung DY, Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet 2003; 361: 151-60.

89

69 Kasraie S, Werfel T. Role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis.

Mediators of inflammation 2013; 2013: 942375.

70 Irvine AD, McLean WH. Breaking the (un)sound barrier: filaggrin is a major gene for atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126: 1200-2.

71 Akdis CA, Akdis M, Bieber T et al. Diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adults: European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/PRACTALL Consensus Report. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 118: 152-69.

72 Ong PY, Leung DY. Atopic dermatitis. Clinical allergy and immunology 2002; 16: 355-79. 73 de Koning HD, Kamsteeg M, Rodijk-Olthuis D et al. Epidermal expression of host response genes upon skin barrier disruption in normal skin and uninvolved skin of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131: 263-6.

74 Jessup HK, Brewer AW, Omori M et al. Intradermal administration of thymic stromal lymphopoietin induces a T cell- and eosinophil-dependent systemic Th2 inflammatory response. J Immunol 2008; 181: 4311-9.

75 Nedospasov SA, Hirt B, Shakhov AN et al. The genes for tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) and lymphotoxin (TNF-beta) are tandemly arranged on chromosome 17 of the mouse. Nucleic acids research 1986; 14: 7713-25.

76 Wajant H, Pfizenmaier K, Scheurich P. Tumor necrosis factor signaling. Cell death and differentiation 2003; 10: 45-65.

77 Palladino MA, Bahjat FR, Theodorakis EA et al. Anti-TNF-alpha therapies: the next generation. Nature reviews. Drug discovery 2003; 2: 736-46.

78 Bradley JR. TNF-mediated inflammatory disease. The Journal of pathology 2008;

214: 149-60.

79 Eigler A, Sinha B, Hartmann G et al. Taming TNF: strategies to restrain this proinflammatory cytokine. Immunology today 1997; 18: 487-92.

80 Kruglov AA, Kuchmiy A, Grivennikov SI et al. Physiological functions of tumor necrosis factor and the consequences of its pathologic overexpression or blockade: mouse models. Cytokine & growth factor reviews 2008; 19: 231-44.

81 Taylor PC, Feldmann M. Anti-TNF biologic agents: still the therapy of choice for rheumatoid arthritis. Nature reviews. Rheumatology 2009; 5: 578-82.

82 Lewis RW, McCall JC, Botham PA et al. Investigation of TNF-alpha release as a measure of skin irritancy. Toxicol In Vitro 1993; 7: 393-5.

83 Liao F, Rabin RL, Smith CS et al. CC-chemokine receptor 6 is expressed on diverse memory subsets of T cells and determines responsiveness to macrophage inflammatory protein 3 alpha. J Immunol 1999; 162: 186-94.

84 Corsini E, Terzoli A, Bruccoleri A et al. Induction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in vivo by a skin irritant, tributyltin, through activation of transcription factors: its pharmacological modulation by anti-inflammatory drugs. J Invest Dermatol 1997; 108: 892-6.

85 Piguet PF, Grau GE, Hauser C et al. Tumor necrosis factor is a critical mediator in hapten induced irritant and contact hypersensitivity reactions. J Exp Med 1991; 173: 673-9.

86 Takahashi T, Sasaki Y, Hama K et al. Production of IL-4, IL-2, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha by peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci 1992; 3: 172-80.

87 Poulsen LK, Bindslev-Jensen C, Diamant M et al. Biomolecular regulation of the IgE immune response III. Cytokine profiles in atopic dermatitis, inhalant allergy and non-allergic donors. Cytokine 1996; 8: 651-7.

88 Jeong CW, Ahn KS, Rho NK et al. Differential in vivo cytokine mRNA expression in lesional skin of intrinsic vs. extrinsic atopic dermatitis patients using semiquantitative RT-PCR. Clin Exp Allergy 2003; 33: 1717-24.

90

89 Nomura I, Goleva E, Howell MD et al. Cytokine milieu of atopic dermatitis, as compared to psoriasis, skin prevents induction of innate immune response genes. J Immunol 2003; 171: 3262-9.

90 Lee HH, Song IH, Friedrich M et al. Cutaneous side-effects in patients with rheumatic diseases during application of tumour necrosis factor-alpha antagonists. The British journal of dermatology 2007; 156: 486-91.

91 Esmailzadeh A, Yousefi P, Farhi D et al. Predictive factors of eczema-like eruptions among patients without cutaneous psoriasis receiving infliximab: a cohort study of 92 patients. Dermatology 2009; 219: 263-7.

92 Rashmi Sharma CLS. TNF-alpha inhibitors: Current indications. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine 2007; 11: 139-48

93 Chen X, Baumel M, Mannel DN et al. Interaction of TNF with TNF receptor type 2 promotes expansion and function of mouse CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol 2007; 179: 154-61.

94 Kassiotis G, Kollias G. Uncoupling the proinflammatory from the immunosuppressive properties of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) at the p55 TNF receptor level: implications for pathogenesis and therapy of autoimmune demyelination. J Exp Med 2001; 193: 427-34.

95 Noti M, Corazza N, Mueller C et al. TNF suppresses acute intestinal inflammation by inducing local glucocorticoid synthesis. J Exp Med 2010; 207: 1057-66.

96 Friend SL, Hosier S, Nelson A et al. A thymic stromal cell line supports in vitro development of surface IgM+ B cells and produces a novel growth factor affecting B and T lineage cells. Experimental hematology 1994; 22: 321-8.

97 Sims JE, Williams DE, Morrissey PJ et al. Molecular cloning and biological characterization of a novel murine lymphoid growth factor. J Exp Med 2000; 192: 671-80.

98 Pandey A, Ozaki K, Baumann H et al. Cloning of a receptor subunit required for signaling by thymic stromal lymphopoietin. Nat Immunol 2000; 1: 59-64.

99 Park LS, Martin U, Garka K et al. Cloning of the murine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) receptor: Formation of a functional heteromeric complex requires interleukin 7 receptor. J Exp Med 2000; 192: 659-70.

100 Quentmeier H, Drexler HG, Fleckenstein D et al. Cloning of human thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and signaling mechanisms leading to proliferation. Leukemia 2001;

15: 1286-92.

101 Reche PA, Soumelis V, Gorman DM et al. Human thymic stromal lymphopoietin preferentially stimulates myeloid cells. J Immunol 2001; 167: 336-43.

102 Rimoldi M, Chieppa M, Salucci V et al. Intestinal immune homeostasis is regulated by the crosstalk between epithelial cells and dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 507-14.

103 Soumelis V, Reche PA, Kanzler H et al. Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP. Nat Immunol 2002; 3: 673-80.

104 Watanabe N, Wang YH, Lee HK et al. Hassall's corpuscles instruct dendritic cells to induce CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in human thymus. Nature 2005; 436: 1181-5.

105 Isaksen DE, Baumann H, Trobridge PA et al. Requirement for stat5 in thymic stromal lymphopoietin-mediated signal transduction. J Immunol 1999; 163: 5971-7.

106 Arima K, Watanabe N, Hanabuchi S et al. Distinct signal codes generate dendritic cell functional plasticity. Science signaling 2010; 3: ra4.

107 Wohlmann A, Sebastian K, Borowski A et al. Signal transduction by the atopy-associated human thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) receptor depends on Janus kinase function. Biological chemistry 2010; 391: 181-6.

108 Zhong J, Kim MS, Chaerkady R et al. TSLP signaling network revealed by SILAC-based phosphoproteomics. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP 2012; 11: M112 017764.

109 Taylor BC, Zaph C, Troy AE et al. TSLP regulates intestinal immunity and inflammation in mouse models of helminth infection and colitis. J Exp Med 2009; 206: 655-67.

91

110 Olkhanud PB, Rochman Y, Bodogai M et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is a key mediator of breast cancer progression. J Immunol 2011; 186: 5656-62.

111 Roan F, Bell BD, Stoklasek TA et al. The multiple facets of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) during allergic inflammation and beyond. Journal of leukocyte biology 2012; 91: 877-86.

112 West EE, Kashyap M, Leonard WJ. TSLP: A Key Regulator of Asthma Pathogenesis.

Drug discovery today. Disease mechanisms 2012; 9.

113 Zhou B, Comeau MR, De Smedt T et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin as a key initiator of allergic airway inflammation in mice. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 1047-53.

114 Al-Shami A, Spolski R, Kelly J et al. A role for TSLP in the development of inflammation in an asthma model. J Exp Med 2005; 202: 829-39.

115 He R, Oyoshi MK, Garibyan L et al. TSLP acts on infiltrating effector T cells to drive allergic skin inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 11875-80.

116 Elias PM. Stratum corneum defensive functions: an integrated view. J Invest Dermatol 2005; 125: 183-200.

117 Angelova-Fischer I, Fernandez IM, Donnadieu MH et al. Injury to the stratum corneum induces in vivo expression of human thymic stromal lymphopoietin in the

117 Angelova-Fischer I, Fernandez IM, Donnadieu MH et al. Injury to the stratum corneum induces in vivo expression of human thymic stromal lymphopoietin in the