• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

3.2 Relations between theta functions

3.2.1 Auxiliary results

Equation (3.1.6) of Section 3.1.2 will be our main tool for the evaluation of the scalar product of theta functions. In this section, we make this formula easier to evaluate by giving some simple lemmas that will be used latter on. Since we have attached a theta function to each essential cusp of a groupΓ⊂Γ2, the next step will be to determine allΓ0 πh

-inequivalent essential cusps. We achieve this in Lemma 3.5. In Lemma 3.6, we work out the summation condition appearing in the formula (3.1.6), then in Lemma 3.7 we deal with some Gauß sums similar to those appearing in the inner sum of (3.1.6) and finally, in Lemma 3.8 we evaluate a Dirichlet series.

For06`6h, let us defineP`as

P`=





1 if`= 0,

R/πh−`R×

if16l6h−1,

1 if`=h.

(3.2.1) Since we assume π 6= λ, we shall assume that the elements of P` are chosen congruent to 1 modulo3. Besides, for a givenm ∈ Rspecified in the context, we shall use the notation xfor a representative of the inverse modulom of an element x coprime with m. Finally, we define Tm = (m1 01)andTm= (10 1m).

Lemma 3.5. A set of essential cusps (not necessarily inequivalent) ofΓ0 πh

is given by 1

α π`ν : α∈ {±1,3},06`6h, ν∈ P`

∪ 1

π`ν −1 : 06`6h, ν∈ P`

. Proof. Let P = ac be a cusp of Γ0 πh

, with a, c ∈ Z[ω], gcd(a, c) = 1. Since 1h01

∈ Γ0 πh

, the cuspP is equivalent to the cusp 1h01

(P) = haa+c, and this allow us to assume that ordπ(c)6h. According to this, we definej=ordπ(c),06j 6h. First of all, we determine the three types of cusps ofΓ0 πh

, and then rule out some of them which are not essential.

Case 1: π|c and λ6 |a. Multiplying by some unit ofZ[ω]if necessary, we assume that a ≡ 1 (modλ2). Letb, d, l such thatad−bcλ2πl = 1, for a parameterl > 0to be chosen latter on.

Then, we remark thatd≡1 (mod 3)and that γ :=

a bλ2πl

c d

∈SL2(R).

Define

3.2 Relations between theta functions

- a representativeαof the class ofcmoduloλ2such thatαis coprime toπ,

- a representativeνof the class ofαcπ−jamoduloπh−jsuch thatν ≡1 (mod 3).

Then

γ T−απjν =

a−αbλ2πl+jν bλ2πl c−αdπjν d

≡ 1 0

0 1

(mod 3),

and c − αdπjν ≡ c −cad (modπh); but c − cad = c(1 −ad) = −bc2λ2πl, and thus ordπ(c−cad) = 2j+l. We now choosel > h−2j and conclude that γ T−απjν ∈ Γ0 πh

. Therefore, we have thatP = ac = γ(∞) = γ T−απjν(Tαπjν(∞))is equivalent toTαπjν(∞) = (α πjν)−1.

Case 2: π|cetλ|a. Multiplying by some unit if necessary, we assume thatc≡1 (mod λ2). Let b, dbe such thatad−bc= 1andd≡1 (mod 3). Then we remark thata−b≡1 (mod 3)and that

γ :=

a b c d

∈SL2(R).

Defineνto be a representative of the class ofc π−jdmoduloπh−j, then γ T−πjν =

a−bπjν b c−dπjν d

≡ 1 b

0 1

(mod 3),

andc−dπjν ≡ 0 (modπh). Letu be the unit ofR representative of the class ofbmodulo3;

thenγ T−πjνT−u ∈Γ0 πh

and thusP =γ(∞) =γ T−πjνT−u(TuTπjν(∞))is equivalent to (πjν)−1+u. Finally we remark thatb ≡ a−1 (mod 3), thus ifais divisible byλ2, we have u=−1, and otherwise (sinceais at least divisible byλ) we haveu=−ωor=−ω2.

Case 3:π6 |candλ6 |a. As before, assumea≡1 (modλ2). Letαbe a representative ofcmodulo 3such thatα is coprime withπ. Considerb, dsuch thatad−bcλ2 = 1and such thatd ≡ αc (modπh). Thend≡1 (mod 3),γ := a bλc d2

∈SL2(R)and γ T−α=

a−bαλ22 c−dα d

∈Γ1, andc−αd≡0 (mod πh). Thusγ T−α ∈Γ0 πh

andP =γ(∞) =γ T−α(Tα(∞))is equiva-lent to α1.

Case 4:π6 |candλ|a. Assumec≡ −1 (mod λ2). Letαbe a representative of−amodulo3, and considerb, dsuch thatadπhλ2−bc= 1. Thenb≡1 (mod 3),γ := ac dπhbλ2

∈SL2(R)and γS =

b −a dπhλ2 −c

≡ 1 α

0 1

(mod 3).

Finally,P =γST−α(TαS(∞))is equivalent toα.

Define the setC = {±1,±ω,±ω2,±λ,3} of representatives modulo3. From the previous discussion, we conclude that a cuspP belongs to one of the following types:

type 1, ifP ∼ απ1`ν, with06`6h−1,ν ∈ P`, andα∈ C, (case 1 and case 3), type 2, ifP ∼u+π1`ν, with06`6h−1,ν∈ P`andu∈ {−1,−ω,−ω2}(case 2), 92

type 3, ifP ∼α, withα∈ {±λ,3}(case 4).

We now have to specify which of these cusps are essential. Recall that σ−1(∞) is an essen-tial cusp ifκ(γσ) = 1, for all γσ ∈ Γσ; we saw in Lemma 3.1 that such γσ can be written as By periodicity we have

c2λσ (see Theorem 2.1 of Chapter 2), we obtain

c2λσ which, by reciprocity law, amounts to

λ 1+3πjνr(1+πjνu)

3 = 1, and by the complementary reci-procity law, we need1 +u=x1+ωx2, withx1 ≡0 (mod 3); among the set−1,−ω,−ω2, only u=−1satisfies this condition.

Ifσ−1(∞)is of type 3, i.e.σ−1 = α1 0−1

To finish the proof of Lemma 3.5, we merely have to notice that the only essential cusp of the third type, namelyP = 3, is equivalent to the cuspP = 0, which correspond to the cusp of second type(π`ν)−1−1for`= 0.

3.2 Relations between theta functions

After having determined the set of essential cusps of the groupΓ0 πh

= Γ1∩Γ0 πh , and before coming back to our initial problem, i.e. to work out the scalar product of two theta functions, let us define some new notations. To any parameterξ = (`, ν) with0 6 ` 6 handν ∈ P` (as defined in (3.2.1)), correspond four essential cusps as defined in Lemma 3.6, and associated to them four theta functions, namely

θαξ :=θσ, where σ=

1 0 απ`ν 1

, forα∈ {±1,3} (3.2.3) and

θξ0 :=θσ, where σ=

1 −1 π`ν 1

1 0

απ`ν 1

. (3.2.4)

Therefore, a generating system of the spaceΘ πh

is given by V

πh

:=

θξ, θ−ξ, θ, θ0ξ : ξ= (`, ν)with06`6handν ∈ P` .

The method for extracting a basis from this set is to come to simple relations between theta func-tions, using the formula (3.1.6) of Section 3.1.2. This will be achieved in various steps; at the present, we give some useful results that we shall apply in the next section. We have seen that the latticeΛσassociated to the cuspσ−1(∞)only depends on ordπ(c(σ)). In particular, it is the same for all four theta functions attached to some couple(`, ν) in (3.2.3) and (3.2.4). More precisely, we showed in Lemma 3.1 of Section 3.1 thatΛ`= 3πMax(0,h−2`)R.

Lemma 3.6. Letα1, α2 ∈ {±1,3},`1, `2 ∈Zsuch that0 6`1, `2 6h, andν1 ∈ P`1, ν2 ∈ P`2. Assume that`1 6`2. Then

(i) hθα

1π`1ν1, θα2π`2ν2i = Ress=4/3 X0

c≡α2−α1(3)

N(c)−s X(∗)

d(Λ`2c) d≡1 (3)

c d

3

! ,

(ii) hθπ`1ν1, θ0π`1ν1i = Ress=4/3 X0

c≡1 (3)

N(c)−s X(∗)

d`1c) d≡−1 (3)

c d

3

! ,

where(∗)means

c6≡α2d,

if`1=`2 = 0, and otherwise, i.e. (`1`2)6= (0,0),(∗)means the conditions

ordπ(c)>`1 and dα2ν2π`2−`1 −dα1ν1 ≡cπ−`1 (modπmin(`1,h−`1)).

Moreover, the first condition is an equality, i.e.ordπ(c) =`1, in the case where`1< `2. Proof. Letσ−1(∞)andτ−1(∞)be two essential cusps. We start by proving that

κ σ−1 a bc d τ

= c

d

3. 94

The computation of the Kubota symbol is easy, since one can assume (see Lemma 3.5) thatσ, τ ∈

This proves the result about the Kubota symbol. We now have to interpret the summation condition in (3.1.6).

Letc6= 0, and(d, c) = 1. Writeβiiνi, fori= 1,2and look at the formula (3.1.6). In (i) the condition on(c, d)is

1 0

3.2 Relations between theta functions

Similarly, in (ii)the condition is 1 0

β1π`1 1

a b c d

1 0

−β1π`1 1

1 1 0 1

∈Γ0

πh

, i.e.

a−bβ1π`1 b+a−bβ1π`1

c+aβ1π`1−dβ1π`1−bβ12π2`1 d+bβ1π`1 +c+aβ1π`1 −dβ1π`1 −bβ12π2`1

∈Γ0 πh

, i.e.





a b c d

0 −1 1 −1

(mod 3) c+aβ1π`1 −dβ1π`1 −bβ12π2`1 ≡0 (modπh)

.

Thus(c, d)has to satisfyc ≡ α2−α1 (mod 3)andd ≡ 1 (mod 3), in the case (i), orc ≡ 1 (mod 3)and d ≡ −1 (mod 3), in the case (ii). Since gcd(π,3) = 1, the chinese remainder theorem asserts that we only have to study the congruence condition moduloπh. Leta0, b0such thata0d−b0c= 1. Then(a, b)is of the form(a0+kc, b0+kd), and we ask if there existsksuch that

c+a0β1π`1−dβ2π`2−b0β1β2π`1+`2 +kβ1π`1(c−dβ2π`2)≡0 (modπh). (3.2.5) This is the equation in case(ii), but forβ12and`1=`2, this corresponds to case(i).

If`1=`2= 0, this equation has a solution if and only ifc−dβ26≡0 (modπ), i.e.c6≡α2d (modπ), becauseP`1 =P`2 ={1}).

If(`1, `2)6= (0,0), we see from (3.2.5) thatc≡0 (mod π`1), and (3.2.5) becomes

−`1 +a0β1−dβ2π`2−`1−b0β1β2π`2+kβ1π`1(cπ−`1 −dβ2π`2−`1)≡0 (modπh−`1).

(3.2.6) We remark that if `1 < `2, thencπ−`1(1 +kβ1π`1) +a0β1 ≡ 0 (mod π), what shows that ordπ(c) =`1, since otherwiseπ|a0, what contradictsa0d−b0c= 1.

Now (3.2.6) impliescπ−`1 +a0β1−dβ2π`2−`1 ≡0 (mod πmin(`1,h−`1)), and we claim that this is sufficient to prove the existence ofk. Actually, if`1< `2, thenπdividesdβ2π`2−`1 but not cπ−`1, thuscπ−`1 −dβ2π`2−`1 is invertible, and if`1 =`2>0, thenπ|c, thusa0d≡1 (mod π) anda0β1 6≡0 (mod π), and in view ofcπ−`1 +a0β1−dβ2π`2−`1 ≡0 (mod πmin(`1,h−`1))we also getcπ−`1 −dβ2π`2−`1 6≡0 (mod π).

We are now interested in the Gauß sum relative to the integer3πεc with some extra congruence conditions.

Lemma 3.7. Letc ∈ R and definec0 = cN(λ)−ordλ(c)π−ordπ(c). Letk, ε ∈ Zwithk > 1and ε>0. Letα∈ {0,±1}, and letv∈Rbe some integer.

Ifc≡0 (mod 3)andα6= 0, then 96

(i) X

For the first factor, we use the reciprocity law, and for the second, the hypothesisi>2allows us to use the consequence of the complementary reciprocity law. We obtain that

X

3.2 Relations between theta functions

We conclude the proof of(iii)and(iv)as we concluded the proof of(i)and(ii).

Letf ∈ R be an integer and letχ be a primitive character modulof. The Dirichlet series associated toχis

L(χ, s) = Y

Proof. Since we take the sum over thec ≡1 (mod 3), we can write them asc = m ππ , and the lemma is proved.