• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

The analysis of the impact of promoter region in Cln2 oscillation

3.2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.2.2 The analysis of the impact of promoter region in Cln2 oscillation

In order to understand the contribution of promoter region in oscillation waves of Cln2 we compared the behavior of Cln2 and shlGFP under the control of Cln2 promoter during the cell cycle. NS343-NS346 strains were created at the background of RV1110 (NS343, NS344) and RV1111 (NS345, NS346). In NS343-NS346 yeast strains Cln2 ORF was replaced with shlGFP-13Myc containing the short-half-life GFP (shlGFP) instead of Cln2 region, Sic1_WT or Sic1_9SP (all 9 pairs of TP phosphorylation sites mutated to SP), and 13Myc tag with two strains expressing either the Sic1_WT-13Myc or Sic1_9SP (yeast strains are listed in Table 1).

27

To analyze the phosphorylation of the proteins of interest, SDS-page Western Blot experiments were performed with 6 different strains (The strains are listed in the Supple-mentary Table 1) containing 13Myc tags. The cells were arrested in G1 by α-factor, re-leased after 2-2.5 hours, and collected in the following time points: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 minutes after the release (Fig. 7).

Figure 7 Analysis of the influence of the Cln2 promoter in Cln2 protein levels. Time courses showing different protein levels of cln2::ShlGFP-13MYC; Cln2-13MYC,

Sic1_WT; and Cln2-13MYC, Sic1_9SP with 5 seconds exposure (A) and Cln2-13MYC, Sic1_WT; Cln2-13MYC, Sic1_9SP; at the 30 seconds exposure (B).

(A) Strains containing short-half-life-GFP (shlGFP) under the control of Cln2 promoter show high protein levels at 0 and 10 time points probably due to the longer sequence com-pared to the Cln2. It is clear that the protein levels of strains lacking Cln2_WT are at least 10 times higher compared to the background RV1110 and RV1111 strains at the same 5 seconds exposure.

(B) RV1110 (Cln2-13MYC, Sic1_WT ) strain shows normal Cln2 behavior during the cell cycle. RV1111 demonstrates the loss of protein levels caused by threonine-proline to ser-ine-proline substitution of the Sic1_WT phosphorylation sites.

28

Figure 8. Band intensities of the Cln2 protein region in different mutants. om-parison of protein levels in cln2::ShlGFP-13MYC; 13MYC, Sic1_WT; and Cln2-13MYC, Sic1_9SP.

29

The Cln2 promoter region has SBF and MBF transcription factors which activate the expression of native Cln2 and forming a positive feedback loop for Cln2 expression (Cross and Tinkelenberg, 1991). Cln2 also phosphorylates Sic1 and, therefore, targets it for degradation which leads to Clb5 activation (Schneider et al., 1996). The Cln2 is unable to phosphorylate yeast strain containing Sic1_9SP at the proper cell cycle stage which makes the Clb5 rapid activation impossible. Clb5, in turn, is responsible for Whi5 phosphoryla-tion inhibiting SBF and MBF transcripphosphoryla-tion factors. Our reference strain with Sic1_9SP shows that the promoter activation takes place at much lower rates. Nevertheless, the strains with the Cln2 region replaced by short-half-life-GFP were able to stabilize the pro-tein levels.

30

SUMMARY

The current work can be divided into two parts. In the first part, we generated a set of multisite phosphorylation protein tags based on the Cln2 degron for the regulation of pro-tein expression in yeast cells. Based on the levels of fluorescence of GFP (was used as a reporter) in different strains, we can conclude that our phosphodegron tags can significantly reduce protein expression. Changing the length of the degron tags and the distance between the phosphosites it is possible to achieve the desired protein levels.

In the second part, we wanted to analyze the impact of transcriptional regulation in the oscillation waves of Cln2 protein during the cell cycle. To do that, we compared the behavior of Cln2 and short-half-life-GFP (shlGFP) proteins under the control of Cln2 pro-moter during the cell cycle. Based on the results of the Western blot, we can conclude that the reason for Cln2 cell-cycle oscillations is lying in the protein sequence itself, while pro-moter activity is likely responsible for the synthesis of a sufficient number of transcripts.

Further research of this subject will help to reveal the exact mechanism by which the inter-action between transcriptional and translational regulation of Cln2 oscillations occurs during the cell cycle.

31

REFERENCES

Lubischer, J. L. (2007). The Cell Cycle, Principles of Control. David O. Morgan.

Integrative and Comparative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icm066 Pines, J. (1995). Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases: A biochemical view. In

Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3080697

Reed, S. I., & Wittenberg, C. (1990). Mitotic role for the Cdc28 protein kinase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.15.5697

Hao, B., Zheng, N., Schulman, B. A., Wu, G., Miller, J. J., Pagano, M., & Pavletich, N. P.

(2005). Structural basis of the Cks1-dependent recognition of p27 Kip1 by the SCF Skp2 ubiquitin ligase. Molecular Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.09.003 Kõivomägi, M., Örd, M., Iofik, A., Valk, E., Venta, R., Faustova, I., Kivi, R., Balog, E. R.

M., Rubin, S. M., & Loog, M. (2013). Multisite phosphorylation networks as signal processors for Cdk1. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2706

Reynard, G. J., Reynolds, W., Verma, R., & Deshaies, R. J. (2000). Cks1 Is Required for G1Cyclin–Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activity in Budding Yeast. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.20.16.5858-5864.2000

Nasmyth, K. (1993). Control of the yeast cell cycle by the Cdc28 protein kinase. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-0674(93)90099-C

Kobayashi, H., Stewart, E., Poon, R., Adamczewski, J. P., Gannon, J., & Hunt, T. (1992).

Identification of the domains in cyclin A required for binding to, and activation of, p34cdc2 and p32cdk2 protein kinase subunits. Molecular Biology of the Cell.

https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.3.11.1279

Andrews, B. J., & Herskowitz, I. (1989). The yeast SWI4 protein contains a motif present in developmental regulators and is part of a complex involved in cell-cycle-dependent transcription. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/342830a0

Stuart, D., & Wittenberg, C. (1994). Cell cycle-dependent transcription of CLN2 is

conferred by multiple distinct cis-acting regulatory elements. Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.7.4788

Schneider, B. L., Yang, Q. H., & Futcher, A. B. (1996). Linkage of replication to start by the Cdk inhibitor Sic1. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5261.560

Schwob, E., & Nasmyth, K. (1993). CLB5 and CLB6, a new pair of B cyclins involved in DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes and Development.

https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.7.7a.1160

32

Harris, M. R., Lee, D., Farmer, S., Lowndes, N. F., & de Bruin, R. A. M. (2013). Binding Specificity of the G1/S Transcriptional Regulators in Budding Yeast. PLoS ONE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061059

Moffat, J., & Andrews, B. (2004). Late-G1 cyclin-CDK activity is essential for control of cell morphogenesis in budding yeast. Nature Cell Biology.

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1078

Cooper, G. M. (2000a). The Central Role of Enzymes as Biological Catalysts. The Cell: A Molecular Approach.

Cooper, G. (2000b). Cell Proliferation in Development and Differentiation. The Cell: A Molecular Approach.

Barral, Y., Jentsch, S., & Mann, C. (1995). G1 cyclin turnover and nutrient uptake are controlled by a common pathway in yeast. Genes and Development.

https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.9.4.399

Henchoz, S., Chi, Y., Catarin, B., Herskowitz, I., Deshaies, R. J., & Peter, M. (1997).

Phosphorylation- and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the cyclin- dependent kinase inhibitor Far1p in budding yeast. Genes and Development.

https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.22.3046

Rogers, S., Wells, R., & Rechsteiner, M. (1986). Amino acid sequences common to rapidly degraded proteins: The PEST hypothesis. Science.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2876518

Salama, S. R., Hendricks, K. B., & Thorner, J. (1994). G1 cyclin degradation: the PEST motif of yeast Cln2 is necessary, but not sufficient, for rapid protein turnover.

Molecular and Cellular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.14.12.7953

Halter, M., Tona, A., Bhadriraju, K., Plant, A. L., & Elliott, J. T. (2007). Automated live cell imaging of green fluorescent protein degradation in individual fibroblasts. Cytom-etry Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20461

Jiang, X., Coffino, P., & Li, X. (2004). Development of a method for screening short-lived proteins using green fluorescent protein. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r81

Janke, C., Magiera, M. M., Rathfelder, N., Taxis, C., Reber, S., Maekawa, H., Moreno-Borchart, A., Doenges, G., Schwob, E., Schiebel, E., & Knop, M. (2004). A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: New fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1142 Bähler, J., Wu, J. Q., Longtine, M. S., Shah, N. G., McKenzie, A., Steever, A. B., Wach,

A., Philippsen, P., & Pringle, J. R. (1998). Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<943::AID-YEA292>3.0.CO;2-Y

33

Lõoke, M., Kristjuhan, K., & Kristjuhan, A. (2011). Extraction of genomic DNA from yeasts for PCR-based applications. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/000113672

Rychlik, W., Spencer, W. J., & Rhoads, R. E. (1990). Optimization of the annealing temperature for DNA amplification in vitro; Nucleic Acids Research.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.21.6409

Cross, F. R., & Tinkelenberg, A. H. (1991). A potential positive feedback loop controlling CLN1 and CLN2 gene expression at the start of the yeast cell cycle. Cell.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90394-E

34

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Table 1. Yeast strains

NS228 was used as a background strain (ordered from EuroScarf): CEN.PK-2-1C:

MATa ura3-52 trp1-289 leu2-3,112 his3∆ can1∆::cas9-natNT2.

Genotype Short description/transfor-mation

Constitutive expression of

EGFP fused with

NES/CRISPR-Cas9 mediated integration of a PCR fragment

Nastassia

35

NS292

pADH1-GFP-NES-4A-KanMX

Based on NS229, transformed using PCR product from

Based on RV1110 Nastassia Shtaida

RV1110 Cln2-13MYC, Sic1_WT Rainis

Venta

RV1111

Cln2-13MYC-Sic1_9SP

Based on RV1110

36

Table 2. Plasmids used as PCR templates to amplify fragments for yeast trans-formation

Description: Strain:

Pri-mers (F/R):

Refer-ence:

pNS89 Cln2_5WT-15aa NS274, NS275 4731/4826

This study

pNS100 Cln2_5WT-12aa NS295 4731/4826

pNS101 Cln2_5WT-15aa NS267 4731/4826

pNS102 Cln2_5WT-18aa NS296 4731/4826

pNS103 Cln2_4WT-12aa NS348 4732/4826

pNS105 Cln2_4WT-18aa NS349 4732/4826

pNS108 Cln2_5WT-KKKK NS284, NS285 4724/4729 pNS109 Cln2_4WT-KKKK NS286, NS287 4719/4729

Table 3. Primers, used in this work.

Primer Sequence Tm (°C)

37

38

Non-exclusive licence to reproduce thesis and make thesis public

I, Daniel Shmidt, (author’s name)

1. herewith grant the University of Tartu a free permit (non-exclusive licence) to:

1.1. reproduce, for the purpose of preservation, including for adding to the DSpace digital archives until the expiry of the term of copyright, and

1.2. make available to the public via the web environment of the University of Tartu, includ-ing via the DSpace digital archives, under the Creative Commons licence CC BY NC ND 3.0, which allows, by giving appropriate credit to the author, to reproduce, distribute the work and communicate it to the public, and prohibits the creation of derivative works and any commercial use of the work from 23/06/2023 until the expiry of the term of copyright,

The impact of Cln2 degron and Cln2 promoter on protein expression levels (title of thesis)

supervised by Nastassia Shtaida, PhD

(supervisor’s name)

2. I am aware of the fact that the author retains the rights specified in p. 1.

3. I certify that granting the non-exclusive licence does not infringe other persons’

intellectual property rights or rights arising from the personal data protection legislation.

Daniel Shmidt 23/06/2020