• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

2.5 Game Browsing Damage Survey

2.5.4 Additional Study for “Game Browsing and Plant Reaction”

In order to be able to compare the data of the browsing rate presented in the second NFI with the acceptable browsing rate of individual tree species published in EIBERLE (1985), EIBERLE

and ZEHNDER (1985) and EIBERLE and NIGG (1983; 1987), it was imperative to know what the annually-occurring browsing rate of the terminal shoot was from individual plants. For this, the browsing percentage depended on the reaction of the individual plants (St. John’s shoots, substitute shoots), as well as on the browsing rate of the ungulates during the course of the year.

The annual browsing damage could not be directly interpreted in a large-scale inventory, be-cause the survey lasted from the spring until late fall. Due to the plants’ reaction, it was not possible to clearly allocate the browsing event to a certain year. Additional surveys in the forest, and shoot cutting experiments in the nursery, provided the necessary information to interpret the NFI browsing data.

Experimental Design and Method Field Trial

The additional surveys in the forest were case studies and were not representative of the entire country of Switzerland. The experimental plots were selected based on preceding data analysis of the first NFI. For this trial, all altitudinal vegetation zones (see Chapter 3.1), as well as the five main tree species: spruce, fir, European beech, ash, and maple were present when possible.

In addition to this, a high proportion of plants browsed by deer (Capreolus capreolus or Cervus elaphus) had to occur on these plots. In each experimental plot, 50 plants were selected and permanently marked.

Between 1996 and 1997, all plots were visited three times a year (before the beginning of the growing season, during the growing season, and after the end of the growing season). The young forest growth was examined with respects to browsing events and growth reaction. In addition, the course of growth of selected plants was documented with sketches. With this information it was possible to report about the periodicity of the browsing rate in the summer and the winter months.

The following variables were measured at the field plot:

– The seasonal trend of the browsing situation

– The proportion of browsing damage patterns according to the NFI2 inventory manual (STIERLIN et al. 1994)

– The browsing rate

– The plant reaction typical for the tree species after occurrence of a browsing incident Nursery Experiment

In contrast to the open field trial, the conditions in the nursery experiment, which was started in the spring of 1996, were relatively homogeneous. All plants were planted in identical substrate and were kept under the same climatic conditions. For this experiment 125 plants for each of the 5 main tree species (spruce, fir, European beech, ash, maple) were used from lowland

provenience (Table 1).

As a result of the constant monitoring and care, the plants were not exposed to any excessive stress situations (dryness, too intense solar radiation, etc.). The plants were subjected to one or more winter and summer browsing damages, which were simulated by pruning the shoot.

Pruning took place during the end of March/beginning of April and the end of July/beginning of August. The treatment was limited to pruning of the terminal shoot. The side shoots were not pruned.

Table 1. Type of plants in the nursery experiments.

Type Provenience Age Transplanted

Location Elevation (meters above sea level)

Exposition (year) Yes/No

Spruce Tägerwilen 520 North 2 No

Fir Beinwil/Horben 820 North-east 3 Once

Ash Besenbüren 470 North 1 No

Beech Hirschthal 600 South-west 1 No

Sycamore maple Muri/Maiholz 450 East 1 No

The plants were subjected to the following treatment:

1. No treatment

2. One time pruning of the shoot in the spring of 1996 3. One time pruning of the shoot in the summer of 1996 4. Pruning in the spring of 1996 and in the spring of 1997 5. Pruning in the summer of 1996 and in the summer of 1997

The goal of the pruning experiment, in addition to the field experiment, consisted of obtaining a foundation for the interpretation of the browsing evaluation results for the NFI.

The following quantities were observed:

– The time and frequency of substitute shoots after pruning a shoot – The dependency between plant growth and the treatment

– The frequency of growing St. John’s shoots from intact terminal buds

The statistical design of this experiment (SACHS 1992) was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with five replications.

The measurements in the nursery started before the beginning of the leafing and were usually repeated every three weeks. This ensured that the annual development of the plant growth and the plant reaction after the shoots were pruned could be completely described.

2.5.5 Results

2.5.5.1 The NFI1 Method

Because of its simplicity and low expenditure, the NFI1 method was attractive and should have been preferred; however, it had a significant shortcoming. Using spruce as an example in the pruning experiments (Figure 5) showed that under optimal conditions at the nursery, many of the young trees outgrew the browsing damage very quickly during the growing season. This led to external damage being no longer noticeable (shifting from browsing patterns 2, 4, 7, and 9 to browsing pattern 8). After a browsing event, substitute shoots grew even more quickly from the plants (changing from browsing patterns 2, 4, 7, and 9 to browsing patterns 1, 3, 6, and 10, which were not counted as browsed according to the first NFI method).

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

27.03.1996 07.05.1996 30.05.1996 15.07.1996 27.08.1996 03.04.1997 29.05.1997 22.07.1997 11.11.1997

Picture 8 Picture 1, 3, 6, 10 Picture 2, 4, 5, 7, 9

Browsing Browsing

Figure 5. Regeneration of spruce in the nursery after treatment 4 (browsed according to the NFI1:

browsing pattern 2, 4, 5, 7, 9).

The change of the browsing pattern, which represented browsed plants according to the first NFI (browsing pattern 2, 4, 5, 7, 9), to ones that did not count as browsed (browsing pattern 1, 3, 6, 8, 10) only happened during the growing season. The survey method in the first NFI found a large number of browsed plants in the spring and a small number in the fall. The results of the browsing survey according to the first NFI methods were, to a large extent, dependent upon the date the survey was taken and was, therefore, applicable for large-scale inventories in a limited capacity.

The same situation was found for the plants that were studied three times a year within the scope of the field experiment (Figure 6). The first NFI method discovered a high proportion of browsed plants in the spring, and only a small portion in the fall. For assessments before the beginning of the growing season, the results of the first NFI method approached the ones of the annual browsing (browsing rate). Nevertheless, the results of the first NFI methods were a bit smaller, since the summer browsing was not considered.

30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Spring 96 Summer 96 Fall 96 Spring 97 Summer 97 Fall 97

LFI1-Methode Annual browsing

Browsing percentage

Assessment

Figure 6. Annual dependency of the browsing percentage assessed with the NFI1 method. Example:

Spruce in the field experiment.

2.5.5.2 The NFI2 Method

With the browsing evaluation in the second NFI, it was possible to dampen the effects of the annual browsing percentage fluctuations considerably. The result of a browsing survey with the second NFI method was, therefore, less dependent on the date of the survey than in the first NFI (Figure 7).

The NFI2 method did not allow for more precise information regarding the degree of the annual browsing, since backdating did not refer to a constant number of years. The browsing determined with the second NFI method amounted to approximately twice the annual browsing over all tree species. However, depending on the tree species and site, the results differed from this considerably, as was observed with the example of the spruce.

30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Spring 96 Summer 96 Fall 96 Spring 97 Summer 97 Fall 97

LFI2-Methode Annual browsing

Browsing percentage

Assessment

Figure 7. Comparison of the browsing percentages assessed with the NFI2 method with the annual browsing.

Example: Spruce in the field experiment

2.5.6 Conclusions

– The additional analysis confirmed that the methods of evaluating the browsing in the second NFI depended far less on the date of the survey (season). A modification to the second NFI method will be able to not only eliminate the seasonal fluctuations, but to approximate the annual browsing as well.

– Due to its robustness, the method of the browsing evaluation in the second NFI is suited for large-scale monitoring of changes in the browsing rate.

– The browsing that was reported in the second NFI was consistently higher than the annual browsing. For an exact determination of the browsing rate more measurements per year would certainly be needed.

– For the evaluation of the browsing situation, it was not only important to know the browsing incident, but also the reaction potential of the plants. The growth and reaction potential of a plant depended substantially on the plant species as well as the site (climate, altitudinal vegetation zones).

2.5.7 Literature

EAFV1988. Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar. Ergebnisse der Erstaufnahme 1982–1986. Vol. 305, Ber. Eidgenöss. Forsch.anst. Wald Schnee Landsch. Birmensdorf: Eidgenöss. Anst. forst. Vers.wes. in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Bundesamt für Forstwesen und Landschaftsschutz. 375 p.

EIBERLE, K. 1980: Methodische Möglichkeiten zum Verständnis der waldbaulich tragbaren Ver-bissbelastung. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 131 (4):311–326.

EIBERLE, K. 1985: Bergahorn und Esche: Belastungsgrenzen für den Wildverbiss. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes.

136 (10):849–856.

EIBERLE, K.; NIGG, H. 1983: Daten zur tragbaren Verbissbelastung bei der Fichte. Der Schweizer Förster 119 (7/8):368–382.

EIBERLE, K.; NIGG, H. 1987: Grundlagen zur Beurteilung des Wildverbisses im Gebirgswald. Schweiz. Z.

Forstwes. 138 (9):747–785.

EIBERLE, K.; ZEHNDER, U. 1985: Kriterien zur Beurteilung des Wildverbisses bei der Tanne. Schweiz. Z.

Forstwes. 136 (5):399–414.

SACHS, L. 1992. Angewandte Statistik. Anwendung statistischer Methoden. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer STIERLIN, H.R.; BRÄNDLI, U.B.; HEROLD, A.; ZINGGELER, J. 1994. Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar:

Anleitung für die Feldaufnahmen der Erhebung 1993–1995. Birmensdorf: Eidgenöss. Forsch.anst.

Wald Schnee Landsch.

ZINGG, A.; BACHOFEN, H.H. 1988: Schweizerisches Landesforstinventar. Anleitung für die Erstaufnahme 1982–1986. Ber. Eidgenöss. Forsch.anst. Wald Schnee Landsch. 304.