• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

View of Symplectic Repository Tools: Deposit Lifecycle with Interchangeable Repositories

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Aktie "View of Symplectic Repository Tools: Deposit Lifecycle with Interchangeable Repositories"

Copied!
18
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Symplectic Repository Tools

For DSpace and Fedora

(2)

Motivation: Commercial

 Integrate our publications management system (Symplectic  Elements) with DSpace and Fedora  Provide support for full repository item lifecycle management  Meet the specific requirements of our clients who are also DSpace  or Fedora users

(3)

Motivation: Community

 Current deposit client approaches require that content be stored  outside the repository in an organised and well managed way prior  to deposit; but this is what repositories are designed for!  Current deposit client approaches require the end user to assert that  a work is "finished";  but this may not always be possible!

(4)

4 barriers to deposit

A repository? – I'm  afraid I don't know  much about that

(5)

4 barriers to deposit

?

The existence  and role of the  repository It's not part of my day­to­ day working practices, so  why would I remember to  use it?

(6)

4 Barriers to deposit

?

Yet another  system to  remember to use I have to fill in these  metadata forms?  This is  taking too long... The existence  and role of the  repository

(7)

4 barriers to deposit

?

These copyright conditions  make me uncertain what the  right thing to do is ... The existence  and role of the  repository

©

Yet another  system to  remember to use Manual metadata entry

(8)

4 barriers to deposit

The existence  and role of the  repository

©

Yet another  system to  remember to use Manual metadata entry Lack of clarity  around  copyright

(9)

Symplectic Elements with Repository Tools

Elements Sherpa Romeo

(10)

S y m p le c t ic E le m e n t s File deposit Get Record File deposit File delete HTTP POST ATOM + SWORD ATOM HTTP POST ATOM + SWORD HTTP DELETE Create Retrieve Update Delete

(11)

Elements ATOM DSpace Fedora ­ Collection Community/Collection ­

Publication Feed Item Object ­ ­ Bundle ­

Metadata Record Entry Bitstream Datastream

(12)

Lifecycle Workflows

Workspace Workflow Archive

deposit approve

return

WF1 WF2 WF3

Client Lock Service Lock Visible

licensed publish

(13)

Lifecycle Workflows

Workspace Workflow Archive

deposit approve

return

WF1 WF2 WF3

Client Lock Service Lock Visible

licensed publish

update file uploads

(14)

Implementation considerations

? Are metadata updates archivally significant? ? Are file deletes on archived files 'rapid takedown' requests? ? Does the repository actually require rights to store the metadata? ? Is it possible to completely remove content files? ? When should new versions of eprints be created?

(15)

[see video]

(16)

4 barriers to deposit … removed?

The existence  and role of the  repository

©

Yet another  system to  remember to use Manual metadata entry Lack of clarity  around  copyright Integrated into a widely  used institutional  system Automatically  acquired Clear guidance  from Romeo in  UI No knowledge  required

(17)

 Seamless repository integration with Symplectic Elements (a research  management system)  Uses open standards (HTTP, AtomPub, SWORD)  Feeding back the results of our work to SWORD  Reduces barriers to deposit, increasing throughput to the repository  More accurately reflects requirements for the constantly changing state of the  information environment

Conclusions

(18)

Richard Jones

richard@symplectic.co.uk

http://www.symplectic.co.uk/products/repository­tools.html

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Growth predictions Tools Budget Approach to planning Policies Management and reporting Repository mission Future plans Content profile Services and support Storage...

In response to the multifarious requirements of the MPS stakeholders within the fields of research, library and IT much emphasis has been put on the possibility of

 Future repository of the Max Planck Society for managing, disseminating and re-using publications and research data  eSciDoc..  Joint activity of Max Planck Digital Library

Adopting this approach, the Indiana University Digital Library Program has been able to easily adapt existing tools to use controlled vocabularies and to better take advantage of

More information was provided at a talk at last year’s Fedora User Group Meeting, at OR09 http://hdl.handle.net/1853/28530..

Workflows are also published to a Project Trident server store, and workflows may execute on the Project Trident server, on a High Performance Computing (HPC) cluster, over

– Deposit data and metadata into a data archive to preserve and publish research data. Data Curation Add-in for

We now have a flexible platform that makes it easy to add new ways of ingesting and exposing our data, as well as improving the presentation of the content within the ROAR