• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Description Logic

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Description Logic"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Faculty of Computer Science Institute of Theoretical Computer Science, Chair of Automata Theory

Description Logic

Winter Semester 2017/18

Exercise Sheet 6 21st November 2017

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Franz Baader, Dr.-Ing. Stefan Borgwardt

Exercise 6.1 We consider the tableau algorithmconsistent(T,A)for acyclic TBoxes T, which is obtained from consistent(A) by adding the ≡1-rule and the ≡2-rule for unfolding T. Prove that consistent(T,A)is a decision procedure for consistency ofALC-knowledge bases with acyclic TBoxes.

Exercise 6.2 Use the tableau algorithmconsistent(T,A)for acyclic TBoxes to determine whether the subsumption

¬(∀r.A)u ∀r.CvT ∀r.E holds w.r.t. the acyclic TBox

T ={C≡(∃r.¬B)u ¬A, D≡ ∃r.B, E≡ ¬(∃r.A)u ∃r.D}.

1

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Gabriele R¨ oger (University of Basel) Theory of Computer Science April 26, 2021 5 /

Gabriele R¨ oger (University of Basel) Theory of Computer Science April 8, 2019 2 / 21?.

Prove with a direct proof: for all finite sets S, the power set P(S) has cardinality 2

If you need a considerably larger amount of steps, rethink your solution and try to find an easier proof.. The solution of part (b) may help you identify the requirements

(a) Transform the following formula into CNF by applying the equivalence rules shown in

Additionaly specify the set of free variables of ϕ

You may use all syntactic sugar introduced in

Which of the following expressions are syntactically correct formulas or terms for the following signature S. Analyse also all subformulas and