• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

We say “No” to the NATO exercise and “Yes” to peace, détente and disarma- ment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "We say “No” to the NATO exercise and “Yes” to peace, détente and disarma- ment"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

DGB resolution against the NATO “DEFENDER 2020" exercise in Europe

We say “No” to the NATO exercise and “Yes” to peace, détente and disarma- ment

Branded “DEFENDER 2020”, NATO is planning one of the largest land forces exercises seen in Europe since the end of the Cold War. Scheduled for April and May, the exercise aims to demonstrate a) NATO’s strategic readiness, testing its ability to rapidly deploy armoured US brigades to the Russian border in an emergency; and b) NATO’s military supremacy.

The trade unions take the view that, instead of such confrontation, the focus should be on détente and a relation- ship of cooperation with Russia. The 1990 Charter of Paris proclaimed the end of the era of confrontation and di- vision in Europe. Doubtlessly, the outbreak of war in Ukraine demonstrated how far we have since moved away from this far-reaching aspiration. At the same time, however, the Charter was signed by all European states, Rus- sia, the US and Canada jointly proclaiming: “We declare that, henceforth, our relations will be founded on respect and co-operation”. This joint commitment still stands and must once again become the prime focus of interna- tional relations – on the part of both NATO and Russia.

As trade unions, we stand up for the interests of all workers. Having learned our lesson from the horrors of two World Wars, we are committed to a “Never again!” position. This is why the DGB is so actively engaged – whether at German, European or international level – in maintaining peace and preventing armed conflicts and wars.

Climate change, digitalisation and globalisation are causing profound changes in the world of work and in society in general. In Germany, Europe and the whole world, considerable financial support is needed for investment and social security measures enabling workers to face up to these challenges. At the same time however, NATO states are working towards boosting military spending, bringing it up to 2% of GDP. As these resources would thereby no longer be available for the urgently needed investments in the future, the DGB is very much opposed to NATO’s 2- percent target. We need détente, not an arms race!

The 1990 Two-plus-Four Agreement, the basis for German reunification, clearly states that “only peace will ema- nate from German soil”. A fundamental pillar of the German constitution (the Grundgesetz), this must also be a fundamental principle of German and European politics.

We call for:

– An end to the policy of confrontation! Germany must stand up for this, also vis-à-vis its NATO allies!

– Conflict prevention, a policy of détente and political solutions to conflicts instead of military confrontation!

– Détente, not an arms race! Investments in the future instead of an arms race!

V.i.S.d.P.: Reiner Hoffmann, Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund, Henriette-Herz-Platz 2, 10178 Berlin

Background: The NATO’s “DEFENDER 2020” exercise:

37,000 soldiers from 18 NATO states are scheduled to take part in the exercise from April to May. The transport of 20,000 US troops and tons of military equipment across the Atlantic and the whole of Europe to the Russian border will set the seal on a new dimension of military activities. With Hamburg, Bremerhaven and Nordenham at the receiving end of the trans-Atlantic shipments and with the coordination provided by NATO’s new Joint Support and Enabling Command (JSEC) in Ulm, Germany will have a key role to play. Apart from the German army (the Bundeswehr), considerable police support, whether provided by the federal police or the police forces of Germany’s federal states, will be needed to guard the deployment by road and rail, as well as having to control possible demonstrations against the exercise.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

As well as being a key proponent of the NATO response thus far, the Obama Administration has taken additional military measures intended to reassure Central and Eastern

In the context of possible Russian provocation in the breakaway Georgian republics of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM), and

272 May 2014 ISPSW Strategy Series: Focus on Defense and International Security?. Are the Russian Armed Forces a Threat

My name is Dr Patricia Lewis, I am the research director here for international security, and it’s my great honour and privilege to introduce to you today Mr Franco Frattini who

Participants at the Conference included commanders, deputies and representatives from NATO countries’ national parachute formations (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain,

in sum, Russia’s direct role vis-à-vis afghanistan is very limited and confined to some economic cooperation, providing some support in arms, equipment and

NATO provided airlifts to the AU Mission in Sudan (AMIS), and supported the AU Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) 13 ; it also offers assessment regarding the operational

Overall, this means that NATO policy toward Syria should not aim at prioritizing a humani- tarian purpose – which remains the concern of the UN, not NATO – or