• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

507 Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament · 2. Reihe

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "507 Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament · 2. Reihe"

Copied!
75
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)
(2)

Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament · 2. Reihe

Herausgeber / Editor Jörg Frey (Zürich)

Mitherausgeber/Associate Editors

Markus Bockmuehl (Oxford) · James A. Kelhoffer (Uppsala) Tobias Nicklas (Regensburg) · Janet Spittler (Charlottesville, VA)

J. Ross Wagner (Durham, NC)

507

(3)
(4)

Scott C. Ryan

Divine Conflict and the Divine Warrior

Listening to Romans and Other Jewish Voices

Mohr Siebeck

(5)

Scott C. Ryan, 2003 BA from Gardner-Webb University; 2008 M. Div. and 2009 Th. M. from Duke University Divinity School; 2017 PhD in Religion/Biblical Studies from Baylor Univer- sity; currently serves as Assistant Professor of Religion and Biblical Studies at Claflin Univer- sity in Orangeburg, SC.

ISBN 978-3-16-156501-4 / eISBN 978-3-16-156648-6 DOI 10.1628 / 978-3-16-156648-6

ISSN 0340-9570 / eISSN 2568-7484 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testa- ment, 2. Reihe)

The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie;

detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de.

© 2020 Mohr Siebeck Tübingen, Germany. www.mohrsiebeck.com

This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to repro- ductions, translations and storage and processing in electronic systems.

The book was printed by Laupp & Göbel in Gomaringen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Nädele in Nehren.

Printed in Germany.

(6)

To LeAnne, Asher, Ada, and Jubilee Ὁ δὲ θεὸς τῆς εἰρήνης µετὰ πάντων ὑµῶν, ἀµήν.

“May the God of peace be with you all, amen.”

– Romans 15:33

(7)
(8)

Preface

Preface

This study began as a doctoral dissertation at Baylor University in the Depart- ment of Religion under the supervision of Beverly Roberts Gaventa, which I completed in the summer of 2017. I am deeply grateful to a host of people who participated in various ways in this project and it is an honor to offer my gratitude here. To be sure, any expression of appreciation pales in comparison to the as- sistance and friendship provided by so many.

Beverly Roberts Gaventa kindly agreed to supervise this study and provided consistent guidance and encouragement to me as a student, scholar, and human being along the way. Dr. Gaventa’s reading of the Pauline letters influenced my own well before she arrived at Baylor (just in time to advise this project), but she encouraged me to go where the evidence led and pushed me to become a scholar in my own right. Lidija Novakovic, who served as the second reader, also offered helpful feedback at numerous turns. The other committee members, Todd D.

Still, W. H. Bellinger, Jr., and David Whitford, further assisted me in sharpening the argument and saving me from blunders. Any shortcomings in the work are entirely my own; the positive contributions are due in large part to the help of these fine scholars and teachers. Working with the editors and staff at Mohr Sie- beck has been a delight, as I prepared this piece for publication. In particular, I appreciate the assistance of J. Ross Wagner, Jörg Frey, Katharina Gutekunst, Kendra Mäschke, Elena Müller, Daniela Zeiler, and Karen Donskov Felter.

I am grateful for the resources provided by the Graduate School of Baylor University to complete the doctoral degree, the Baptist College and University Scholars Program at Baylor, and the support of faculty in the Department of Re- ligion. In addition to those named above, a note of thanks is due Mikeal Parsons, Bruce Longenecker, Kelly Iverson, and James Nogalski. I owe a special note of gratitude to Bruce Longenecker for his guidance. I am thankful that I had the opportunity to work as his research and teaching assistant and for his willingness to include me in the planning and teaching of his courses. Before coming to Bay- lor, I had the good fortune of studying with excellent professors at Duke Univer- sity Divinity School, among them Richard Hays, Joel Marcus, and Douglas Campbell, all of whom helped shape me into the reader I am today.

I further benefitted from bright colleagues who consistently encouraged and

challenged me, as well as provided needed distractions at times. My thanks to

Justin King, John Duncan, Lindsey Trozzo, Moon Kwon Chae, Nathaniel Jung-

(9)

Preface

VIII

Chul Lee, David Cramer, Christopher Moore, Anna Sieges Beal, Mike Whiten- ton, Jenny Howell, and Malcolm Foley for travelling along with me and helping bear the load. Myriad other friends offered encouragement from near and far. My sincere thanks to Nick and Virginia Mumejian, Charlie and Lori Baber, Brian Maiers, Josh Parrott, David Elrod, Jonathan Spangler, Andy Byers, and Matt Orth. My lifelong friend, Lane Graham, passed from this life mere months before I completed the project. I deeply regret he is not here to share in the joy of fin- ishing the task, but I am grateful for his kind words along the way. My neighbors, Kyle, Karen, and Sloane Melton, Mike and Joyce Johnson, and Jeremy, Lacey, and Blakely Ballew, welcomed us to Texas with open arms and made our time there a delightful experience.

The feedback offered by fellow students in seminars and colleagues at profes- sional meetings where I presented portions of this research helped me think through the argument and hone my thoughts. The members of my writing group – K. Leigh Greathouse, Elise King, and Karen Melton – also read and com- mented on parts of the study. An expression of gratitude is due to the undergrad- uate and seminary students in my courses at Baylor University the past four years, as well. They showed me much grace as I taught and wrote a monograph for the first time; they also offered a glimpse into how wonderful the teaching life can be.

It may be a strange a thing to mention one’s pet in the acknowledgments of an academic work, but my dog, Jubilee, deserves mention. The writing life can be lonely, but thanks to Jubilee I rarely worked on this monograph alone. Be- cause of her relentless energy, she also prompted me every afternoon to leave the books and computer screen to go out for a run.

I am further grateful for the support of my family over a long educational journey. Making the decision to move away from loved ones to enter a doctoral program was not easy, but LeAnne, my spouse, and I felt encouraged to go where the road took us. My mother- and father-in-law, David and Debra Spruill, made the trek out to visit us on our new turf several times, as did my brother- and sister- in-law and twin nieces, Jason, Cynthia, Evelyn, and Jessica Spruill. My father, mother, and stepfather, Monty Ryan and Kathy and Mike Anderson, helped us in many ways over the course of the journey. To all of you, I am immensely appreciative.

Finally, my partner in life, LeAnne, deserves pride of place. She believed in me throughout this process even when I did not believe in myself. I am forever grateful for the sacrifices she endured and her steady encouragement. I am over- joyed to be on this journey with her. LeAnne, you are indeed resplendent. Our son, Asher, came into the world near the beginning of the writing process. Just after completing the project, we welcomed a baby girl, Ada, to the crew. Always a ball of energy, Asher is constantly on the move and loves stories and books.

Ada is now running all over the house, forming words, and sleeping no better

than her brother did. Watching the two of them grow and develop is a great joy

(10)

IX for me. Neither Asher nor Ada has any idea what a monograph is or the topic of this particular book. The lack of colorful images in the following pages means they are not likely to pick it up any time soon. But I hope one day they come to appreciate this work and I pray they come to understand the importance of think- ing carefully and critically.

Preface

(11)
(12)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Preface ... VII

Abbreviations ... XIX

Chapter 1: Introduction ...1

A. Framing the Dialogue ...4

B. The Divine Warrior in the Pauline Letters in Recent Study ...7

C. Methodological Approach ... 19

D. Outline of the Argument ... 22

Chapter 2: The Divine Warrior in Israel’s Texts ... 23

A. The Pattern of Divine Conflict ... 23

B. The Divine Warrior and the Deliverance of Israel in Exodus 14–15 ... 26

I. Exodus 14: “The Lord Shall Fight for You”... 26

II. Exodus 15:1–18: A Song of Praise for God’s Deliverance ... 28

III. Summary of the Divine Warrior in Exodus 14–15 ... 32

C. The Divine Warrior in Amos ... 32

I. Amos 1–3: God Roars in Judgment ... 33

1. Oracles Against the Nations ... 33

2. Judgment Against Judah and Israel ... 34

3. The Rhetorical Trap in Amos 1:2–3:8 ... 36

II. Amos 3:9–9:10: The Weapons of the Divine Warrior ... 36

1. Foreign Invaders, Drought, Pestilence, and the Sword ... 37

(13)

Table of Contents

XII

2. A Hymn Fragment in 4:13 ... 38

3. The Divine Warrior’s Fire and a Hymn Fragment in 5:8–9 ... 39

4. The Divine Warrior’s Mobility and a Hymn Fragment in 9:5–6 ... 40

III. Amos 9:11–15: A Final Vision of Restoration ... 42

IV. Summary of the Divine Warrior in Amos... 43

D. The Divine Warrior in Ezekiel ... 43

I. Ezekiel 1:4–3:11: The Divine Warrior and the Call of the Prophet ... 44

1. The Storm, the Throne, and the Power of God ... 44

2. The Rebellious House of Israel and the Sentinel ... 46

II. Ezekiel 4:1–5:17: YHWH’s Arsenal ... 47

1. The Siege of Jerusalem ... 47

2. Famine, Pestilence, Wild Animals, and the Sword ... 48

III. Ezekiel 11:1–21: Judgment and Restoration ... 49

IV. Ezekiel 20:1–44: With a Mighty Hand ... 50

V. Ezekiel 35–36: Doom for Edom and Restoration for Israel ... 51

1. An Oracle Against Mount Seir ... 51

2. Blessing, Renewal, and Recreation in Israel ... 52

VI. Ezekiel 38:1–39:20: The Eschatological Battle ... 53

1. A Note on the Placement of Ezekiel 34–37 and 38–39 ... 53

2. An Oracle Against Gog ... 54

3. Gog’s Defeat and Burial ... 56

4. The Restoration of Israel ... 58

VII. Summary of the Divine Warrior in Ezekiel ... 59

E. The Divine Warrior in Daniel 7–12 ... 60

I. Daniel 7: The Four Beasts and the Everlasting Kingdom ... 61

1. Beasts from the Sea and the Ancient of Days ... 62

2. The Interpretation of the Four Beasts ... 64

II. Daniel 8: The Ram, the Goat, and the Prince of Princes... 65

1. The Ram and the Goat ... 65

2. The Interpretation of the Ram and the Goat ... 66

III. Daniel 9: Daniel’s Prayer and the Decreed End ... 68

1. “All Israel Has Sinned” ... 68

2. “Until the Decreed End” ... 69

IV. Daniel 10–12: The End of Days ... 70

1. Conflicts Below and Conflicts Above ... 71

2. Earthly Conflicts and the Time of the End ... 73

3. The Promise of Resurrection ... 74

V. Summary of the Divine Warrior in Daniel 7–12 ... 75

(14)

XIII F. Conclusions on the Divine Warrior in Exodus 14–15, Amos, Ezekiel,

and Daniel 7–12 ... 76

Chapter 3: The Divine Warrior in Isaiah ... 78

A. Isaiah 1–2: God’s Judgment and the Glorified Jerusalem ... 79

I. The Lawsuit Against God’s Rebellious Children ... 79

II. Glorified Jerusalem ... 80

B. Isaiah 7–10: The Divine Warrior’s Weapons ... 82

I. Tools of Wrath ... 82

II. Hope for Restoration ... 83

C. Isaiah 11–12: God’s Agent and the Promised Restoration ... 85

I. A Shoot from the Stump of Jesse ... 85

II. Ruler of Gentiles ... 86

D. Isaiah 13–14: The March of the Divine Warrior ... 87

I. Commander of Armies ... 87

II. Cosmic King ... 89

E. Isaiah 24–27: The “Little Apocalypse” ... 90

I. A Lament Over Jerusalem ... 90

II. God’s Eschatological Victory ... 91

III. The Restoration of Israel ... 94

F. Isaiah 33–35: God’s Deliverance and Israel’s Return to Zion ... 95

I. A Call for Mercy ... 95

II. Judgment of the Nations and Israel’s Return ... 96

G. Isaiah 42–43: God’s Servant and a New Exodus ... 97

I. The Servant... 97

II. A Hymn of Praise for Deliverance ... 97

III. A New Exodus ... 98

Table of Contents

(15)

Table of Contents

XIV

H. Isaiah 44:24–45:25: The Lord’s Anointed Redeems Israel ... 99

I. Cyrus, The Anointed One ... 99

II. YHWH, Commander of Armies ... 100

I. Isaiah 51:1–52:12: YHWH’s Defeat of Enemies ... 101

I. The Victory Over Rahab ... 101

II. A New Exodus and God’s Reign in Zion ... 102

J. Isaiah 59–60: The Divine Warrior Will Banish Ungodliness ... 103

I. The Indictment Against Israel ... 104

II. Israel’s Confession and the Divine Warrior’s Response ... 104

III. A Song of Victory ... 106

K. Summary of the Divine Warrior in Isaiah ... 106

Chapter 4: The Divine Warrior in Other Ancient Literature ... 108

A. The Divine Warrior in 1 Enoch 1–11 and 37–71 ... 108

I. 1 Enoch 1–11: The Great Day of Judgment ... 110

1. The Righteous and the Wicked ... 110

2. The Watchers and the Judgment of the Most High ... 113

II. 1 Enoch 37–71: The Parables of Enoch ... 115

1. Sinners, Watchers, and Death ... 116

2. The Son of Man and the Eschatological Battle ... 118

III. Summary of the Divine Warrior in the Book of the Watchers and the Parables of Enoch ... 121

B. The Divine Warrior in Psalms of Solomon ... 121

I. Psalms of Solomon 1–2: Judgment, Discipline, and Restoration ... 122

II. Psalm of Solomon 8: Discipline and Restoration for Israel ... 124

III. Psalm of Solomon 13: The Right Hand of the Lord ... 125

IV. Psalm of Solomon 17: The Lord Messiah ... 127

V. Summary of the Divine Warrior in Psalms of Solomon ... 129

(16)

XV

C. The Divine Warrior in Wisdom of Solomon... 130

I. Wisdom of Solomon 1:1–6:11: Eschatological Reversal and the Divine Warrior ... 131

1. The Ungodly, the Righteous, and Death ... 131

2. The Eschatological Vision and the Divine Warrior ... 133

II. Wisdom of Solomon 10–19: History and Judgment ... 136

1. The Foolishness of Idolatry and the Hand of God ... 136

2. “You Have Authority Over Life and Death” ... 137

III. Summary of the Divine Warrior in Wisdom of Solomon ... 140

D. The Divine Warrior in the War Scroll (1QM) ... 141

I. Cosmic Battle in the War Scroll ... 142

II. Instructions for War ... 143

1. Trumpets and Standards ... 144

2. War Poems ... 145

III. The Final Battle ... 147

IV. Summary of the Divine Warrior in the War Scroll ... 148

E. The Divine Warrior in 4 Ezra ... 149

I. 4 Ezra 3:1–9:25: The Wisdom Debate ... 150

1. Three Dialogues ... 150

II. 4 Ezra 9:26–13:58: Ezra’s Visions ... 152

1. The Woman ... 152

2. The Eagle ... 153

3. The Man from the Sea ... 155

III. Summary of the Divine Warrior in 4 Ezra ... 156

F. Taking Stock: Reflections on the Divine Warrior in the Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, and Other Ancient Jewish Literature ... 157

Chapter 5: Sin, Death, and the Divine Warrior in Romans 5–8 ... 160

A. Romans 5–6: The Language of Conflict and God’s Contested Lordship .... 161

I. Ungodly, Weak, and Sinful Enemies ... 161

II. The Reign of Sin and Death ... 164

III. Who is the Cosmic King? ... 165

Table of Contents

IV. Sin as Slave Master ... 168

(17)

Table of Contents

XVI

B. Romans 7: Sin Takes Captive the Law ... 171

I. Martial Language in Romans 7:7–25 ... 171

II. Bodily Members, Weapons, and Sin ... 174

C. God’s War Against Sin and Death in Romans 5–8 ... 177

I. Christ’s Death on Behalf of the Ungodly ... 177

II. Jesus Christ as God’s Agent ... 179

III. Creation and Cosmic Conflict ... 181

IV. Not Sparing and Handing Over the Son ... 183

1. “Not Sparing” the Son ... 184

2. “Handing Over” the Son ... 186

V. Psalm 43:23 LXX in Romans 8:36 ... 188

VI. Peace ... 190

D. Romans 6:11–14 and 13:11–14: Let Not Sin Reign ... 192

I. A Call to the Divine Warrior ... 192

II. Participants in the Ongoing Battle ... 194

E. Conclusions on Romans 5–8 ... 196

Chapter 6: The Divine Warrior in the Wider Context of Romans ... 198

A. Righteousness and Wrath: The Divine Warrior in Romans 1–3 ... 198

I. God’s Saving Righteousness Revealed ... 199

II. Habakkuk 2:4b LXX in Romans 1:17 ... 202

III. God’s Wrath Revealed ... 207

IV. Wisdom of Solomon 13–16 and Romans 1:18–32 ... 210

1. Parallels Between Wisdom of Solomon 13–16 and Romans 1:18–32 ... 211

2. “Handing Over” Humanity ... 213

V. Springing the Rhetorical Trap ... 215

1. God’s Wrath Against All ... 216

2. Romans 1–2 and Amos 1–2: Ensnaring the Ἄνθρωπος ... 217

(18)

XVII

B. The Deliverer Will Come: The Divine Warrior in Romans 9–11 ... 219

I. A Word on the Argumentative Strategy in Romans 9–11 ... 220

II. All Israel Will Be Saved ... 224

1. Isaiah 59:20–21a LXX and Isaiah 27:9 LXX in Romans 11:26–27 ... 224

2. The Deliverer Will Come from Zion ... 227

3. Romans 11:32: Confining All, Showing Mercy to All ... 228

C. Crushing Satan Underfoot: The Divine Warrior in Romans 16:20a ... 230

I. Romans 16:17–20 an Interpolation? ... 231

II. Genesis 3:15 and Romans 16:20a ... 233

III. The Divine Warrior and the Defeat of Enemies ... 235

1. Psalm 73 LXX, Isaiah 24–27, Daniel 7, Psalm 109 LXX, and Romans 16:20a ...235

2. The Lord Who Crushes: Exodus 15:3, Isaiah 42:13, 1 Maccabees 3:22–23, and Romans 16:20a ...238

III. Crushing Underfoot ... 239

D. Conclusions on the Divine Warrior in Romans 1–3; 9–11; and 16:20a .... 240

Chapter 7: Conclusions ... 242

A. Summary of the Argument ... 242

B. Paul’s Divine Warrior in Romans ... 246

C. Avenues for Further Research ... 247

Bibliography ... 249

Index of References ... 273 Index of Modern Authors ...3 05 Index of Subjects ...3 11

Table of Contents

(19)
(20)

List of Abbreviations

Abbreviations of ancient Near Eastern, biblical, Jewish, and Christian literature,

academic journals, and monograph series follow the style indicated in The SBL

Handbook of Style: For Biblical Studies and Related Disciplines, 2nd ed. (At-

lanta: SBL Press, 2014). Abbreviations of classical Greek and Roman literature

follow the style indicated in The Oxford Classical Dictionary, ed. Simon Horn-

blower, Antony Spawforth, and Esther Eidinow, 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford Uni-

versity Press, 2012).

(21)
(22)

Chapter 1

Introduction

Introduction

This wide and universal theater Presents more woeful pageants than the scene Wherein we play in.

– William Shakespeare, As You Like It1

“Aslan a man!” said Mr. Beaver sternly. “Certainly not. I tell you he is the King of the wood and the son of the great Emperor-beyond-the-Sea. Don’t you know who is the King of Beasts?

Aslan is a lion – the Lion, the great Lion.”

“Ooh!” said Susan, “I’d thought he was a man. Is he – quite safe? I shall feel rather nervous about meeting a lion.”

“That you will, dearie, and no mistake,” said Mrs. Beaver; “if there’s anyone who can appear before Aslan without their knees knocking, they’re braver than most or else just silly.”

“Then he isn’t safe?” said Lucy.

“Safe?” said Mr. Beaver; “don’t you hear what Mrs. Beaver tells you? Who said anything about safe? ‘Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.”

– C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe2

In the exchange in the epigraph above, Susan and Lucy Pevensie inquire about the strange land of Narnia they entered through a wardrobe along with their sib- lings. The sons of Adam and daughters of Eve, as the children are called in this new world, now discover that Narnia is a very different place from the one they left; it is a mystical world populated by talking animals that fell into the grip of the White Witch. Harnessing her Deep Magic, the Witch subdued the inhabitants of Narnia and cast a spell over the land so that it is always winter but never Christmas. At the Beavers’ home, the Pevensies learn that Aslan – the King, the Lord of the wood – though long absent has returned to Narnia. Mr. Beaver ex- plains that Aslan is the one the old rhyme claims will right every wrong, bring sorrows to an end at the sound of his roar, melt winter with the mere bearing of his teeth, and bring about spring again. The Beavers later point out this king is both “good and terrible at the same time.”

3

While Aslan ushers in the longed-for restoration, he does so by wielding great power in rescuing the land and its den- izens from the self-proclaimed queen. “Safe? … Who said anything about safe?

1 William Shakespeare, As You Like It (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), Act 2, Scene 7.

2 C.S. Lewis, The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (New York: HarperCollins, 1950), 80.

3 Ibid., 126.

(23)

Chapter 1: Introduction

2

‘Course he isn’t safe,” claims Mr. Beaver. “But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.’”

4

This conversation among the characters in Lewis’s tale echoes a prominent theme found in a number of texts from the Jewish Scriptures and the Second Temple period and beyond;

5

that is, the idea that Israel’s deity will arrive and fight on behalf of God’s chosen people to bring about restoration.

6

Take, for in- stance, the oracle found in Isa 59. In the first part of the chapter, the prophet laments that among the people no one righteous can be found, justice no longer dwells in their midst, and deliverance remains at a distance (vv. 4, 9, 14). They stand in need of divine help – a need Isaiah promises God will meet with judg- ment and restoration (Isa 59:16–21). The Lord sees there is no one to intervene, responds by putting on righteousness as a breastplate and salvation as a helmet, and arrives like “a violent stream” to repay enemies (vv. 16–20).

7

Isaiah’s image of the deity in the accoutrements of battle offers one expression of the hope that permeates the theological reflections of ancient Jewish people.

Indeed, the promise that God will restore rightful kingship, eradicate evil, and rescue Israel serves as a staple in the repertoire of theological expression in the ancient Jewish imagination to such a degree that in Tremper Longman’s assess- ment the divine warrior motif can be called “pervasive.”

8

Longman notes that while the image of God as a warrior cannot be claimed to be “the central concept of the Scriptures or the key to OT and NT theology,” it nonetheless remains a theme employed by authors “from Genesis to Revelation.”

9

Similarly, in Patrick D. Miller’s words, “From beginning to end this theme (i.e., the divine warrior)

4 Ibid., 80.

5 When creating the fictional world of Narnia and making Aslan a lion, Lewis imagined what the God of the biblical texts might look like and what form the deity might take in a land of animals, according to Paul Ford. Lewis also patterned the seven-book series of The Chroni- cles of Narnia on what he saw as the overarching narrative in the biblical canon (see Paul Ford, Companion to Narnia: Revised Edition [San Francisco: HarperCollins, 2005], 6).

6 The “conflict” topos in which a warrior deity battles with enemies appears in numerous ancient religions in addition to Judaism. See, for example, Anzu, the Enuma Elish, the Aššur version of the Enuma Elish, and the Ba‘lu Cycle. For an analysis of the conflict myth in these texts, see Debra Scoggins Ballentine, The Conflict Myth and the Biblical Tradition (Oxford:

Oxford University Press, 2015), 22–72; cf. Michael Fishbane, Biblical Myth and Rabbinic Mythmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003). In the following pages, I adopt Ballen- tine’s practice of referring to these ancient texts using transliterated titles.

7 All translations of biblical texts are my own unless otherwise noted.

8 “The Divine Warrior: The New Testament Use of an Old Testament Motif,” WTJ 44 (1982): 290–307, 306.

9 Ibid. (emphasis original); see also Longman and Daniel G. Reid, God Is a Warrior, SOTBT (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995), 13, where they refer to the divine warrior motif as

“one of the most pervasive of all biblical themes.”

(24)

Introduction

3 in various forms and within various ramifications comes to the fore… Wherever one turns one encounters [it].”

10

Scholars of the New Testament have noted the ways in which first century CE writers utilize and transform themes related to Israel’s divine conflict traditions,

11

most notably in the Johannine Apocalypse, Paul’s first letter to the Thessaloni- ans, and the letter to the Ephesians.

12

Yet in spite of interest in the apocalyptic tenor of Paul’s letter to the Romans, along with inquiries into his understanding of the “principalities and powers” (1 Cor 15:24; Rom 8:35–39; cf. Eph 6:12; Col 1:16; 2:10, 15),

13

few readers of the Pauline texts have examined the possibility

10 The Divine Warrior in Early Israel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973), 17.

11 Following Stephen B. Chapman’s suggestion, I use the phrase “divine war” rather than

“holy war.” In his words, “The expressions ‘Yahweh war’ and ‘divine war’ not only elude the web of common assumptions relating to ‘holy war,’ they also have the benefit of remaining closer to the idiom of the Old Testament itself” (“Martial Memory, Peaceable Vision: Divine War in the Old Testament” in Holy War in the Bible: Christian Morality and an Old Testament Problem, eds. Heath A. Thomas, Jeremy Evans, and Paul Copan [Downers Grove: IVP Aca- demic, 2013], 47–67, 51).

12 See, e.g., Rev 6:12–17; 11:15–19; 12; 13; 14:14–20; 19–21; 1 Thess 4:16–17; 5:1–11;

Eph 6:10–20.

13 Myriad publications address this topic in the Pauline letters. See Otto Everling, Die Pau- linische Angelologie und Dämonologie: Ein Biblisch-theologischer Versuch (Göttingen:

Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1888); Hermann Gunkel, The Influence of the Holy Spirit: The Pop- ular View of the Apostolic Age and the Teaching of the Apostle (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979 [German original 1888]); Wilhelm Bousset, The Antichrist Legend: A Chapter in Jewish and Christian Folklore, AARTTS 24 (Atlanta: Scholars, 1999 [German original 1895]); idem, Die Religion des Judentums im neutestamentlichen Zeitalter (Berlin: Verlag von Reuther und Reichard, 1906); Adolf Deissmann, Bible Studies: Contributions, Chiefly from Papyri and In- scriptions, to the History of Language, the Literature, and the Religion of Hellenistic Judaism and Primitive Christianity (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1903 [German original 1895]); F.C. Cony- beare, “Christian Demonology II,” JQR 9 (1897): 59–114; H.St.J. Thackery, The Relation of St. Paul to Contemporary Jewish Thought (New York: Macmillan, 1900); Martin Dibelius, Die Geisterwelt im Glauben des Paulus (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1909); Edward Langton, The Angel Teaching of the New Testament (London: J. Clark, 1938); Karl Barth, Rechtfertigung und Recht: Christengemeinde und Bürgergemeinde (Zürich: EVZ-Verlag, 1938); Visser’t Hooft, Kingship of Christ: An Interpretation of Recent European Theology (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1948); Oscar Cullmann, Christus und Zeit: Die urchristliche Zeit- und Geschichtsauffassung (Zollikon: Evangelischer Verlag, 1946); James S. Stewart, “On a Neglected Emphasis in New Testament Theology,” SJT 4.3 (1951): 292–301; G.H.C. Mac- gregor, “Principalities and Powers: The Cosmic Background of St. Paul’s Thought,” NTS 1.1 (1954): 17–28; G.B. Caird, Principalities and Powers: A Study in Pauline Theology (Oxford:

Clarendon, 1956); Clinton E. Arnold, Powers of Darkness: Principalities and Powers in Paul’s Letters (Downers Grove: Intervarsity, 1992); Walter Wink, Naming the Powers: The Language of Power in the New Testament (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984); idem, Unmasking the Powers:

The Invisible Forces that Determine Human Existence (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986); idem, Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination (Philadelphia:

(25)

Chapter 1: Introduction

4

that the cosmic conflict in Romans signals the apostle’s adaptation of the ubiq- uitous Jewish divine conflict motifs – specifically the image of God as a warrior – found in the Hebrew Bible, Septuagint (LXX), and other pieces of ancient Jew- ish literature. In this study, my aim will be to investigate the use of the image of God as divine warrior in ancient Jewish literature and Paul’s letter to the Romans.

I will conduct this inquiry by placing the apostle’s letter in conversation with the literary works of his Jewish predecessors and near contemporaries.

A. Framing the Dialogue

A. Framing the Dialogue

As a first century Jew, the apostle Paul was heir to conceptions of God as a war- ring deity, as found in a number of sources both prior to and roughly coeval with his letter-writing career. To be sure, Paul reads Israel’s texts in light of the Christ- event and transforms traditional motifs in significant ways in an attempt to make sense of a world now transformed by the cross and resurrection.

14

This being the case, in order to investigate Romans from the angle of Jewish divine war tradi- tions, the following study will focus on three primary questions: (1) As one op- erating within a Jewish framework, did Paul utilize divine conflict motifs when articulating his gospel to Roman communities? (2) If he did employ these im- ages, how did he reshape and transform them when compared to other docu- ments? (3) Finally, in what ways might an analysis of divine conflict motifs in ancient Jewish texts illumine an understanding of Paul’s argument in Romans?

Two points justify an investigation of the divine warrior in Romans and other literature. First, according to most academic reconstructions of Paul’s life and mission, his letter to Roman communities stands among the latest of his extant writings. Among Paul’s purposes in penning this missive, the apostle appears keen to articulate his rendition of the gospel promised through the prophets “in the holy scriptures” (Rom 1:1–3).

15

As Paul plans to take the collection to Jeru- salem and then to advance his missionary endeavors to Spain (Rom 15:22–29),

Fortress, 1986); idem, The Powers that Be: Theology for a New Millennium (New York: Dou- bleday, 1998); Kabiro wa Gatumu, The Pauline Concept of Supernatural Powers: A Reading from the African Worldview, PBM (Colorado Springs: Paternoster, 2008); Guy Williams, The Spirit World in the Letters of Paul the Apostle: A Critical Examination of the Role of Spiritual Beings in the Authentic Pauline Epistles (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009); Robert Ewusie Moses, Practices of Power: Revisiting the Principalities and Powers in the Pauline Letters (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014).

14 On this point, see Francis Watson, Paul and the Hermeneutics of Faith (London: T&T Clark, 2004), 5.

15 Much controversy surrounds Paul’s precise motive for composing Romans. See the dis- cussions on the occasion and purpose in Karl P. Donfried, ed., The Romans Debate, rev. ed.

(Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1991); Alexander J.M Wedderburn, The Reasons for Ro- mans, SNTW (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1988). In my view, Paul likely has multiple motives for

(26)

A. Framing the Dialogue

5 he reflects on God’s action on behalf of humanity in the Christ-event, including the promise to save all Israel and incorporate the Gentiles. He sends the letter ahead of his arrival in the city of Rome with the hope of gaining the support of communities there. Although no less contingent than his other letters, we have in this text an advanced stage of the apostle’s theologizing.

16

Thus, given that Romans presents a more robust rendition of Paul’s gospel, it offers an opportune text with which to test the thesis that Paul, like other Jews of his day, knew and utilized the image of God as a warrior.

As a second point, the collocation of conflict language in this particular letter

opens up the possibility that Paul may be working with the trope of divine con- flict. Romans takes the reader deep into the apostle’s conceptions of the cosmic

scope of Sin, Death, and salvation.17 In the wake of Ernst Käsemann’s claim that apocalyptic is “the mother of all Christian theology,”18 a number of scholars in- vestigated the influence of Jewish apocalyptic thinking on early Christian au- thors.19 As advocates of this line of interpretation contend, Romans 5–8 evinces

penning the missive: gaining favor with those in Rome and requesting their assistance in sup- port of his missionary endeavors to Spain (Rom 1:8–15; 15:23–32); addressing theological and ethical issues within the church, of which he has some knowledge (e.g., Rom 12–15, esp. 14:1–

15:13); and introducing himself and his apostolic calling to Roman communities and preaching his gospel to those communities ahead of his arrival (Rom 1:1–15; 15:14–32).

16 On this point, see J. Ross Wagner, Heralds of the Good News: Isaiah and Paul ‘In Con- cert’ in the Letter to the Romans, NovTSup 101 (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 3–5. As Wagner notes,

“Romans is clearly not an exercise in systematic theology, but a contingent response to partic- ular churches in specific historical circumstances; at the same time, the letter does represent the fruit of many years of deliberate and intense theological reflection in the service of mission”

(3n.12).

17 As will be evident in later parts of this study, I capitalize “Sin” and “Death” to signal that Paul conceives of these entities as powers.

18 “Die Anfänge christlicher Theologie,” ZThK 57.2 (1960): 165–85, 180.

19 See, e.g., Ernst Käsemann, Commentary on Romans (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980); J.

Christiaan Beker, Paul the Apostle: The Triumph of God in Life and Thought (Philadelphia:

Fortress, 1980); idem, Paul’s Apocalyptic Gospel (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982); J. Louis Martyn, Galatians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, AB33A (New York: Doubleday, 1997); idem, Theological Issues in the Letters of Paul (Nashville: Abingdon, 1997); Martinus C. de Boer, The Defeat of Death: Apocalyptic in 1 Corinthians 15 and Romans 5, JSNTSup 22 (Sheffield: JSOT, 1988); idem, Galatians: A Commentary, NTL (Louisville:

Westminster John Knox, 2011); Bruce W. Longenecker, The Triumph of Abraham’s God: The Transformation of Identity in Galatians (Nashville: Abingdon, 1998); Beverly Roberts Gaventa, “Interpreting the Death of Jesus Apocalyptically: Reconsidering Romans 8:32” in Jesus and Paul Reconnected: Fresh Pathways into an Old Debate, ed. Todd D. Still (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007), 125–45; idem, Our Mother Saint Paul (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2007); idem, “Neither Height Nor Depth: Discerning the Cosmology of Romans,” SJT 64.3 (2011): 265–78.

(27)

Chapter 1: Introduction

6

an apocalyptic drama set in a “wide and universal theater.”

20

Sin (ἁµαρτία) and Death (θάνατος) amount to usurpers of God’s intentions, “entering” (εἰσῆλθεν, 5:12) the cosmos through Adam and dominating humanity.

21

God’s contested lordship and sovereignty over the world thus serves as a fun- damental issue for Paul.

22

As a result of the enslavement Sin and Death inflict, the present life becomes a reflection of “the cosmic contention for the lordship of the world.”

23

Paul highlights the conflict between God and suprahuman ene- mies most notably in Rom 5–8.

24

In response to the human plight, Paul indicates that God engages in battle with these oppressive forces in order to reclaim crea- tion – both human and non-human – from subjection to Sin and Death via the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ (Rom 5:10–11; 6:8–11, 14, 17–23;

8:1–4, 32).

25

A few authors have suggested the apostle uses divine war images in Romans.

For instance, in a recent essay, Beverly Roberts Gaventa analyzes what she calls the rhetoric of violence in the letter, cataloguing the language related to warfare, slavery, and state power.

26

As a result of her analysis, she speculates the use of this terminology may indicate the apostle’s adaptation of the divine warrior tra- dition.

27

Michael Thate makes a similar observation in his essay on Rom 16:20, where Paul promises his audience “the God of peace quickly will crush Satan

20 I am borrowing here the words of Shakespeare, As You Like It, Act 2, Scene 7, noted at the beginning of the chapter.

21 See de Boer, Defeat, 147; Gaventa, “Height Nor Depth,” 270.

22 Ernst Käsemann, “On the Subject of Primitive Christian Apocalyptic” in New Testament Questions of Today, trans. W.J. Montague (London: SCM, 1969), 108–37, 136. As Käsemann points out, a human being in Paul’s worldview “is always a specific piece of the world and therefore becomes what in the last resort he [or she] is by determination from outside, i.e. by the power which takes possession of him [or her] and the lordship to which he [or she] surren- ders” (ibid.).

23 Ibid. See further, Alexandra R. Brown, The Cross and Human Transformation: Paul’s Apocalyptic Word in 1 Corinthians (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1995), 4–6.

24 For a discussion of conflict language in Rom 5–8, see Gaventa, “Height Nor Depth,” 270–

78.

25 As Martinus C. de Boer notes, Paul speaks of Sin and Death in this letter as alien intruders and in ways similar to his talk of Satan, evil angels, and demons elsewhere in his other texts (“Paul’s Mythologizing Program in Romans 5–8” in Apocalyptic Paul: Cosmos and Anthropos in Romans 5–8, ed. Beverly Roberts Gaventa [Waco: Baylor University Press, 2013], 1–20, 13–14; see also idem, Defeat, 179; Dibelius, Geisterwelt, 119).

26 “The Rhetoric of Violence and the God of Peace in Paul’s Letter to the Romans” in Paul, John, and Apocalyptic Eschatology: Studies in Honour of Martinus C. de Boer, eds. Jan Krans, L.J. Lietaert Peerbolte, Peter-Ben Smit, and Arie W. Zwiep, NovTSup 149 (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 61–75.

27 Ibid., 69, 72. Cf. Peter W. Macky, “Crushing Satan Underfoot (Roman 16:20): Paul’s Last Battle Story as True Myth,” Proceedings: EGL & MWBS 13 (1993): 121–33.

(28)

B. The Divine Warrior in the Pauline Letters in Recent Study

7 under your feet.”

28

Thate notes that God’s “active defeat of Satan” in this verse recalls the Jewish divine warrior motif.

29

These scholarly forays provide a plat- form from which to develop further the idea in Romans. Although previous stud- ies point to thematic correspondences between the Pauline texts and Jewish di- vine war traditions (see below), to date a full exploration of this thesis remains to be conducted. Analysis of Romans vis-à-vis other Jewish texts will reveal that Israel’s hope in an eschatological warrior deity provides a helpful background for the formation of Paul’s “apocalyptic grammar,”

30

which he modifies in light of his theologizing on the Christ-event when writing to Roman communities.

B. The Divine Warrior in the Pauline Letters in Recent Study

B. The Divine Warrior in the Pauline Letters in Recent Study

Studies on the myth of divine conflict in ancient Near Eastern texts and the Jew- ish Scriptures date back at least to the pioneering works of Julius Wellhausen, Hermann Gunkel, and Friedrich Schwally near the turn of the twentieth cen- tury.

31

Henning Fredriksson offered one of the earliest analyses of the image of God as divine warrior in the Hebrew Bible, investigating the instances in which YHWH appears in war-like conflicts.

32

Gerhard von Rad also produced a study on the concept of Israelite holy war that spurred a number of other investiga- tions.

33

28 “Paul at the Ball: Ecclesia Victor and the Cosmic Defeat of Personified Evil in Romans 16:20” in Paul’s World, ed. Stanley E. Porter, Pauline Studies 4 (Boston: Brill, 2008), 151–69.

Thate looks at the interpretive tradition of Gen 3:15, its intertextual relation to Rom 16:20, and Paul’s use of the tradition.

29 Ibid., 160 (emphasis original).

30 I am borrowing Beker’s phrase here from Paul the Apostle, xx.

31 See Wellhausen, Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israel, 3rd ed. (Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1885); Gunkel, Schöpfung und Chaos in Urzeit und Endzeit: Eine religiongeschichtliche Untersuchung über Gen. 1 und Ap. Jon 12 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1895);

Schwally, Der heilige Krieg im alten Israel, Semitische Kriegsaltertümer 1 (Leipzig: Dieterich, 1901). For a discussion of these texts and others up to the publication of Gerhard von Rad’s Holy War in Ancient Israel, see Ben C. Ollenburger, “Introduction: Gerhard von Rad’s Theory of Holy War,” in Gerhard von Rad, Holy War in Ancient Israel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991), 1–34.

32 Jahwe als Krieger: Studien zum alttestamentlichen Gottesbild (Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup, 1945); see further Ollenburger, “Introduction,” 11.

33Der Heilige Krieg im alten Israel (Zürich: Zwingli-Verlag, 1951). In the intervening years, scholars called into question von Rad’s amphictyony model of warfare and the claim of Israel’s uniqueness in the ancient Near East. See, for instance, Manfred Weippert, “‘Heiliger Krieg’ in Israel und Assyrien: Kritische Anmerkungen zu Gerhard von Rads Konzept des

‘Heiligen Krieges im alten Israel,’” ZAW 84.4 (1972): 460–93; and Gwilym H. Jones, “Holy War or Yahweh War,” VT 25.3 (1975): 642–58. For a detailed review of research from 1990–

(29)

Chapter 1: Introduction

8

In subsequent years notable pieces of research appeared in print. Frank Moore Cross rooted the mythological combat and divine warrior imagery found in He- brew poetry in the Canaanite Ba‘lu epics.

34

Cross’s student, Patrick D. Miller, produced a diachronic approach to cosmic war and the divine warrior, tracking the image of the march of YHWH as a warring deity from Israel’s poetic texts (Deut 33:2–5, 26–29; Judg 5; Ps 68; Exod 15; Hab 3:3–15; 2 Sam 22:7–18; Josh 10:12–13) through early prose (Josh 5:13–15; Gen 23:3–5; 2 Sam 5:22–25) and prophetic traditions (2 Kgs 6:15–19; 7:6; Isa 13:1–5; Joel 4:9–12; Isa 40:26;

45:12; Zech 14).

35

Paul D. Hanson’s work on Jewish apocalyptic eschatology also includes analysis of divine warrior themes.

36

Hanson argues for a movement from “prophetic eschatology” to the emergence of “apocalyptic eschatology” in Second Isaiah (Isa 40–55), which is further developed in Third Isaiah (Isa 56–

66) and Zechariah.

37

In both prophetic and apocalyptic eschatology, the emphasis on God’s restoration of “a holy community in a glorified Zion” remains constant;

however, emphasis on the cosmic dimensions of Israel’s conflict myths and the revival of divine warrior images from Israel’s early literature provide significant developments within the movement.

38

2010, see Charles Trimm, “Recent Research on Warfare in the Old Testament,” CBR 10.2:

171–216.

34 Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel (Cam- bridge: Harvard University Press, 1973); idem, “The Divine Warrior in Early Israel’s Cult,” in Biblical Motifs: Origins and Transformation, ed. Alexander Altmann, Studies and Texts 3 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966), 11–30.

35 The Divine Warrior in Early Israel, HSM 5 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973); see also, idem, “El the Warrior,” HTR 60.4 (1967): 411–31; idem, “The Divine Council and the Prophetic Call to War,” VT 18.1 (1968): 100–07; idem, “Cosmology and World Order in the Old Testament: The Divine Council as Cosmic-Political Symbol,” HBT 9.2 (1987): 53–

78.

36 The Dawn of Apocalyptic: The Historical and Sociological Roots of Jewish Apocalyptic Eschatology, rev. ed. (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979).

37 Hanson defines “prophetic eschatology” as “a religious perspective which focuses on the prophetic announcement to the nation of the divine plans for Israel and the world which the prophet has witnessed unfolding in the divine council and which he translates into the terms of plain history, real politics, and human instrumentality; that is, the prophet interprets for the king and the people how the plans of the divine council will be effected within the context of their nation’s history and the history of the world” (ibid., 11). He defines “apocalyptic eschatology”

as “a religious perspective which focuses on the disclosure (usually esoteric in nature) to the elect of the cosmic vision of Yahweh’s sovereignty – especially as it relates to his acting to deliver the faithful – which disclosure the visionaries have largely ceased to translate into the terms of plain history, real politics, and human instrumentality due to a pessimistic view of reality growing out of the bleak post-exilic conditions within which those associated with the visionaries found themselves” (ibid., 11–12).

38 Ibid., 12. For a review of scholarship, see Trimm, “Recent Research,” 171–216. For ad- ditional studies that address related themes, see Fritz Stolz, Jahwes und Israels Kriege:

(30)

B. The Divine Warrior in the Pauline Letters in Recent Study

9 Bringing the findings to bear on New Testament documents progressed slowly. Adela Yarbro Collins produced the first monograph on the use of the combat myth in the New Testament with a focus on Revelation.

39

She contends the author of the Johannine Apocalypse did not create his literary metaphors, but adopted motifs from Israel’s traditions, which had “a long history and a rich va- riety of connotations and associations.”

40

In her view, Revelation evinces close affinities to the “mythic pattern of combat which was widespread in the ancient Near East and the Classical world” – a pattern that “depicts a struggle between two divine beings and their allies for universal kingship.”

41

In an article published in 1982, Tremper Longman explored the use of divine war motifs in the New Testament, marking one of the first attempts to highlight these themes in the Pauline letters.

42

Longman claims readers of the New Testa- ment “only implicitly recognized” the presence of these images until this point.

43

Finding evidence of these motifs in a number of places, Longman categorizes his

Kriegstheorien und Kriegserfahrungen im Glauben des Alten Israel, ATANT 60 (Zürich: The- ologischer Verlag, 1972); Millard C. Lind, Yahweh is a Warrior: The Theology of Warfare in Ancient Israel (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1980); Lois Barrett, The Way God Fights: War and Peace in the Old Testament, PJS 1 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1987); T.R. Hobbs, A Time for War:

A Study of Warfare in the Old Testament, OTS 3 (Wilmington: Michael Glazer, 1989); Thomas B. Dozeman, God at War: Power in the Exodus Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996); Jerome F.D. Creach, Violence in Scripture, Interpretation: Resources for the Use of Scripture in the Church (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2013); Brad E. Kelle, Frank Ritchel Ames, and Jacob L. Wright, eds., Warfare, Ritual, and Symbol in Biblical and Modern Contexts, AIL 18 (Atlanta: SBL, 2014); Charlie Trimm, “Yahweh Fights for Them”: The Di- vine Warrior in the Exodus Narrative, Gorgias Biblical Studies 58 (Piscataway: Gorgias, 2014).

39 The Combat Myth in the Book of Revelation, HDR 9 (Missoula: Scholars, 1976); idem, The Apocalypse (Wilmington: Michael Glazer, 1979); see also Richard Bauckham, The Climax of Prophecy: Studies in the Book of Revelation (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1993); Roy R. Mill- house, “Re-Imaging the Warrior: Divine Warrior Imagery in the Book of Revelation” (Ph.D.

diss., Baylor University, 2012).

40 Ibid., 57.

41 Ibid.

42 “Divine Warrior,” 290–307. For other studies on divine war from Longman, see “Psalm 98: A Divine Warrior Victory Song,” JETS 27.3 (1984): 267–74; “The Form and Message of Nahum: Preaching from a Prophet of Doom,” RTJ 1 (1985): 13–24; “‘Holy War’ and the Uni- versal God: Reading the Old Testament Holy War Texts in a Biblical-Theological and Post- colonial Setting,” in After Imperialism: Christian Identity in China and the Global Evangelical Movement, ed. Richard R. Cook and David W. Pao (Eugene: Pickwick, 2011), 96–111.

43 Ibid., 291. He points to the following works that “implicitly recognized” these images at the time of his publication: Paul Minear, I Saw a New Earth (Washington: Corpus Books, 1968); J. Massyngberde Ford, Revelation, AB 38 (Garden City: Doubleday, 1975); Collins, Combat Myth; idem, Apocalypse.

(31)

Chapter 1: Introduction

10

findings according to “eschatological passages” and “non-eschatological pas- sages” in which authors of early Christian documents adapt imagery associated with God’s warring activity.

Among the eschatological passages, he proposes four themes writers of New Testament texts utilize: (1) The Day of Yahweh (1 Thess 5:1–10; 2 Pet 3:10; 1 Cor 1:8; 5:5; 2 Cor 1:14; Phil 1:6, 10; 2:16); (2) Jesus Christ as Cloud Rider (Matt 24; 26; Mark 13; Luke 21; 1 Thess 4:16–17; Rev 1:7); (3) Christ as the Divine Warrior (Rev 6:12–17; 11:15–19; 13; 14:14–20; 19–21); and (4) A New Song as a victory shout (Rev 5:9–14; 14:1–5). Among the non-eschatological texts, he relates two themes: (1) Holy war as a conceptual background to Christ’s death and resurrection (Col 2:13–15; Eph 1:19–23; Heb 2:8);

44

and (2) The Di- vine Warrior and the Christian struggle (Eph 6:10–20). Longman’s division be- tween eschatological and non-eschatological texts set a heuristic paradigm that subsequent writers emphasize. Readers of the Pauline letters tend to highlight the apostle’s application of divine conflict motifs in the past defeat of suprahuman powers in the cross of Christ as well as the present spiritual battle in the life of communities.

In The God Who Fights, Charles Sherlock analyzes texts in the Hebrew Bible and New Testament that exhibit military metaphors when describing God’s ac- tions.

45

According to Sherlock, he intends to trace “the formation and develop- ment of the complex of ideas associated with the concept of God as warrior in the scriptures.”

46

Covering an impressive breadth of material from Exodus to the early church, he demonstrates that the use of martial imagery is “a ubiquitous theme” in ancient Jewish and early Christian literature.

47

On one hand, authors depict God as a warrior in the roles of defender and protector of God’s people;

on the other hand, authors depict God as adversary and enemy at times.

48

Sherlock sees this dual depiction not only in the Hebrew Scriptures, but also in the New Testament. He claims the “war-tradition” provides foundational im- ages for understanding Jesus Christ’s work as victor on the cross. The Gospels and letters of the New Testament repeat the pattern of victory through suffering

44 Longman also notes the reversal of expectations of Jesus as Messiah in the Gospels. In reference to John’s expectations in Luke 7 (cf. John 18:11), he writes, “Thus Jesus’ first coming was not in the role of the Divine Warrior of the Consummation as John expected. However, Jesus does wage war during his earthly ministry – a war which culminates on the cross. Jesus’

Holy War is different from the Holy War of Israel. While the latter, at the Lord’s command, directed their warfare against earthly enemies, Jesus struggled with the forces, the powers and principalities, which stand behind sinful mankind (cf. his miracles and healings)” (ibid., 303).

45 The God Who Fights: The War Tradition in Holy Scripture, RSCT 6 (Lewiston: Edward Mellen, 1993).

46 Ibid., 1.

47 Ibid., 241.

48 Ibid., 1.

(32)

Index of References

Hebrew Bible and Septuagint

10:21 – 23 226 11:1 – 12:32 139 12:17 80

12:33 103

12:41 80 12:51 80 13:17 – 22 103

13:20 27

13:21 63

13:21 – 22 34

14 – 15 22 – 23, 25 – 28, 30 – 32, 35, 76, 83, 98, 111, 135, 140, 157, 163, 193, 201, 14 24226, 29, 32, 139, 157 14:1 – 2 103

14:2 27

14:5 – 9 26

14:9 27

14:10 – 12 26

14:13 29

14:13 – 14 27 – 28 14:14 27

14:16 83

14:19 – 20 27, 103, 226 14:21 27

14:24 – 25 27 14:25 27 14:26 – 27 27 14:27 – 28 27 14:30 – 31 28

14:30 174

14:31 68

15 8, 28, 32, 50, 87, 98, 110, 140, 157, 187 – 88, 204

15:1 28 – 29, 35

15:1 – 3 29

15:1 – 12 28 Genesis

2 – 3 164

3 132, 233

3:1 – 13 234

3:14 234

3:15 7, 233 – 35

3:16 – 24 234

3:17 182

4:17 – 18 108 5:18 – 19 108 5:21 – 24 108, 133 5:24 108

6 – 9 137

6:1 – 4 113

6:4 113

21:22 80 22 184 22:2 184

22:16 184

23:3 – 5 8

Exodus 21, 134, 138 – 39

1:22 139

2:23 – 25 26

3:1 – 22 34

3:7 – 12 26

3:12 48

3:19 26

4:8 – 9 48

5:19 – 21 26 – 27

6:1 26 – 27, 68

6:1 – 13 27

6:6 27, 68

6:26 80

7:4 80 7:18 102 7:21 102 8:10 102

(33)

Index of References

274

16:23 135

19:10 – 22 57

21 216

21:2 187

21:34 187

21:21 – 31 35 24 111

26:10 34

31:28 29

32:4 187

33:1 80

Deuteronomy 1:8 187 1:21 187 1:27 187

2:14 29

2:16 29

2:21 35

2:24 187

2:30 187

2:31 187

2:33 187

2:36 187

3:2 187

3:3 187

4:24 34

4:34 50

5:15 50 5:22 – 27 34 7:2 187

7:16 184

7:23 187

7:24 187

8:5 126

9:3 34

11 138

13:16 96

20:2 – 5 145

20:9 80

20:13 187

20:20 187 21:10 187 24:17 – 19 146

26:8 50

28 50 28:7 187 28:15 – 68 68

28:49 155

15:1 – 18 26, 28, 32, 38, 176

15:2 29, 238

15:3 29 – 30, 98, 238 15:4 – 10 30

15:6 68

15:7 119

15:8 45

15:9 31

15:9 – 10 31 15:10 31, 45, 119 15:11 – 12 31

15:12 68, 204

15:13 28

15:13 – 16 31 15:14 – 16 28, 31

15:16 31, 68

15:17 31, 42

15:17 – 18 28

15:18 31, 102

15:20 – 21 28 15:21 28

16 138

19:16 – 20 34

19:16 63

19:19 155

22:20 96

23:27 27

23:31 187

24:11 57

24:17 34

34 216

Leviticus

10:2 34

25 – 26 69

26:27 – 45 68 Numbers

1 100

1:3 80

1:52 80

2:3 80

2:4 80 6:24 – 26 112

10:9 145

10:14 80 11:1 – 14 138

11:1 – 3 34

15:21 68

(34)

Index of References

275

24:8 35, 187

24:10 187 24:11 187 Judges

4:15 27

5 8, 28, 204

5:4 – 5 28

5:12 88 5:20 – 21 135

5:20 135

5:26 – 28 84

6:17 48

6:27 88

11:27 88 1 Samuel

1:3 80

1:11 80 4:4 80 7:10 27 10:1 48

11:11 87 – 88

15:2 80

15:3 184

17:33 29

21:6 87 – 88

24:10 184 2 Samuel

2:15 100 5:2 100 5:22 – 25 8

6:2 80

6:12 – 15 13

10:16 100

18:5 184 21:7 184 22:7 – 18 8

22:9 155

22:15 27 1 Kings

8 68

8:47 68

18 – 19 34

2 Kings

1:9 – 16 34

28:64 – 67 50

30 50

30:1 – 6 50

31:4 35

31:5 187

32 222

32:8 – 9 71

32:21 222

32:30 187, 214

32:35 247

33 110 – 11

33:1 110

33:2 – 5 8, 87

33:2 110 – 11

33:3 110

33:6 – 25 110

33:26 – 29 8, 87, 110, 170, 176, 204 33:26 – 25 110

33:26 45, 110, 155

33:27 110

33:28 111

Joshua

1 – 24 35

2:14 187 2:24 187

3:5 87 – 88

4:13 80

5:4 29

5:6 29

5:13 – 15 8, 72, 87 5:14 72 5:15 72

6:1 229

6:2 187, 229

6:16 187

7:7 187 8:18 187 10:8 187 10:10 27 10:12 – 13 8 10:12 187

10:19 187

10:30 187

10:32 187

10:35 187

11:6 187

11:8 187 21:44 187

(35)

Index of References

276

13:1 – 3 LXX 36

13:7 227

14:1 – 3 36

17 LXX 45, 155, 183, 193 17:1 LXX 45, 63

17:2 LXX 45

17:5 – 7 LXX 189

17:6 LXX 45

17:8 LXX 45

17:9 – 11 LXX 45, 63 17:12 – 15 LXX 45, 183 17:16 – 19 LXX 45, 63 17:50 LXX 189

18 45, 155, 183, 193

18:1 45, 63

18:2 45 18:5 – 7 189

18:6 45

18:9 – 11 45, 63

18:9 155

18:12 – 15 45, 183

18:15 27, 45

18:16 – 19 45, 63

21:24 194

23:5 – 6 57

29 31

31:1 201

31:2 LXX 201

33:6 – 7 31

33:20 205

34:4 – 10 194 34:26 – 28 194

37 66, 193

43 LXX 189

43:2 LXX 188 43:3 – 4 LXX 189 43:5 LXX 189 43:23 – 26 LXX 189 43:23 LXX 188

44 66, 193

46 89

46:4 57

46:7 57

47:12 – 13 194 48 87

60 175

64 175

65 31

65:4 – 5 194 2:42 142

6:15 – 19 8

18:35 71

25:1 123

1 Chronicles

1:3 108

12:7 69

36:18 – 21 69 2 Chronicles

6:37 68

36:17 184

Nehemiah

9:12 – 19 34

10:30 68

Esther

9:2 142

Job1:6 34

3:8 93, 235

18 64, 92, 118, 167, 204 18:11 – 14 92, 166

26:1 – 4 201

26:12 101

26:13 102

40 – 41 31

40:25 93, 235

42:10 42 Psalms

2 74, 118 – 19, 156, 168

2:1 – 2 155

2:2 119

2:9 128

5 175

5:12 194

7 194

7:6 193

7:7 193

7:10 193

8:7 167, 182, 237

9 175

9:11 – 12 194 9:18 – 19 194

10 66, 193

(36)

Index of References

277

89:47 34

90:13 LXX 235

91:13 235

93 3, 89

93:1 – 5 82

95:11 – 12 194

96:7 194

97 LXX 200, 240, 244 97:1 – 2 LXX 201 97:1 LXX 103 97:2 LXX 201

97:3 155

97:6 – 8 194

98 200

98:1 – 2 201

98:1 68, 103

98:2 201

98:4 – 9 13

104 13

104:1 – 3 45, 63, 155

104:2 93, 235

104:5 – 9 82

104:32 155

109 LXX 235, 237 109:1 LXX 237 109:2 – 6 LXX 227 109:2 LXX 227 109:5 LXX 237 109:6 LXX 237

110 17, 118, 168, 235 110:1 LXX 167, 188, 237 110:2 – 6 227 110:2 227

114 LXX 189

114:3 LXX 189

115 189

115:1 189

115:5 – 7 212

116:3 189

117:6 LXX 189

118:6 189

121:7 193

124 64, 118

124:2 – 5 82

124:3 92, 166

136:12 50

143:11 201

144:6 27

149:1 – 4 194 65:5 – 8 LXX 82

65:6 – 9 82

65:8 57

67 194

67:2 – 4 193

68 8

68:4 63

68:5 45, 155

69 64, 92, 118, 167, 175, 204 69:1 – 2 92, 166

69:15 92, 166

71:15 LXX 201 72 85 72:15 201

73 66, 193

73 LXX 235 – 36 73:12 LXX 235 73:13 – 14 LXX 235 73:13 LXX 235 – 36 73:14 LXX 238 73:18 – 23 LXX 236

74 66, 93 – 94, 193, 235 – 36 74:12 – 17 31

74:12 93, 235

74:13 – 14 94, 235 74:13 123, 186, 235 74:14 93, 236, 238 74:18 – 23 94, 236 77:50 185 78 17

79 56, 66, 175, 193

79:6 69

80 175 82 175

83 175

84:11 LXX 115 85 175 85:11 115

86 175

87:7 101 88 175 88:10 – 15 LXX 102, 201

89 17, 167

89:6 – 15 31 89:8 – 10 LXX 82 89:9 – 14 101, 201 89:9 – 11 82, 101

89:10 102

89:26 167

(37)

Index of References

278

9:11 – 12 64, 82

10 82 – 83, 85

10:5 82

10:6 83, 236

10:12 83

10:14 83

10:15 83

10:16 81, 83

10:17 – 19 83 10:20 – 27 163 10:22 – 23 221 10:22 221

10:24 83

10:25 83

10:26 83

10:27 – 32 84, 87

10:27 83

10:28 – 32 83 – 84

10:28 83

10:31 84

10:32 84

10:33 – 34 84 10:33 81, 84, 87

10:34 87

11 – 12 85, 87, 163, 191, 235 11 86, 95, 107, 127 – 28,

155 – 59, 179, 243 11:1 – 16 85, 176

11:1 – 10 85 11:1 – 9 85, 155, 236 11:1 – 5 118, 168, 180

11:1 – 2 85

11:1 84, 87

11:2 – 9 54

11:2 85, 119, 155

11:3 – 5 85, 155

11:4 – 5 86

11:4 18, 85, 120, 128, 146, 155, 168

11:6 – 16 180

11:6 86

11:6 – 7 86

11:6 – 9 155 – 56

11:9 86

11:10 – 16 85 – 86

11:10 85, 193

11:11 – 16 85

11:11 68

11:12 86, 156

Isaiah 21 – 22, 78, 112, 242 1 – 39 78 – 79

1 – 2 67, 79, 88, 127, 235 1:1 – 23 163

1:1 79

1:2 – 31 81

1:2 79

1:4 – 5 79

1:4 79, 111

1:7 – 8 64, 79

1:9 79, 221

1:16 – 17 80

1:20 79

1:21 104 1:24 – 28 80, 191 1:24 – 25 79

1:24 80, 104

1:25 – 26 81 1:25 81 1:26 – 28 81

1:26 81, 104

2 812:2 – 4 81, 191, 247 2:2 81

2:3 81, 227

2:4 33, 81, 88

3:1 81

5 – 6 54

5:1 – 7 94

5:24 111 5:25 – 29 38

6 44, 118

6:5 81

6:6 – 7 34

7 – 10 67, 82 – 83, 163 7:11 48

7:17 82 7:18 – 19 82 7:18 82

7:20 48, 82

7:21 – 22 82 7:23 – 25 82

8 828:5 82

8:7 82 8:11 – 15 82 8:17 – 18 205

9:5 – 6 54

9:7 – 10:4 38

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The account of the footwashing in the Fourth Gospel exhibits a unique incident of Jesus voluntarily washing the feet of his disciples, an action which has no prop- er parallel

At the beginning of the twentieth century (in 1905) the American Rabbi, scholar, and one of the editors of The Jewish Encyclopedia, Kaufmann Kohler, understood the Fourth

das Motiv der Liebe Gottes zur Welt (Joh 3,16f.) als eine interpretatorische Leitinstanz johanneischen Denkens versteht, so ist die Schärfe mancher dualistischer Motive zu

Hamerton-Kelly, in his monograph on the concepts of pre- existence in the NT, examined all the passages formerly invoked in support of wisdom christology and a number of others

Hays's Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul 11 In his work, Hays drawing on the literary notion of intertextuality (esp. that of metalepsis) reads Paul's letters as

This research project attempts to explore the hypothesis that the Johannine Christology in the prologue of the Fourth Gospel is developed on the basis of the biblical and early

Indeed, I do not think I do this movement an injus- tice when I describe it as the last (and, in many ways, the greatest) achievement of American 'neo-orthodoxy.' The one thing

Elsewhere in Syria, the Assad regime’s forces accelerated their attacks on rebel groups such as the Syrian Revolutionary Front and the Islamic Front, indirectly benefitting from the