• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 9

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 9"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Functional Analysis II – Problem sheet 9

Mathematisches Institut der LMU – SS2009 Prof. Dr. P. M¨uller, Dr. A. Michelangeli

Handout: 23.06.2009

Due: Tuesday 30.06.2009 by 1 p.m. in the “Funktionalanalysis II” box Questions and infos: Dr. A. Michelangeli, office B-334, michel@math.lmu.de Grader: Ms. S. Sonner – ¨Ubungen on Wednesdays, 4,30 - 6 p.m., room C-111

Exercise 24. Let ϕ, ψ ∈ S(Rd), the Schwartz space of smooth functions with rapid decrease in dimension d > 1, and let F be the Fourier transform1 on S(Rd). Prove Theorem 2.13, part (g), stated in the class. I.e., prove that F(ϕψ) = (2π)−d/2F(ϕ)∗ F(ψ), that is, the Fourier transform of the (pointwise) product of two Schwartz functions is, up to a pre-factor, the convolution of the Fourier transform of each function. (Compare this statement with the discussion of Exercise 22.)

Exercise 25. Let ϕ∈C0(R), ϕ≡/0. i.e., a non-zero compactly supported smooth function.

Prove that Fϕ, its Fourier transform, cannot have compact support. (Hint: assume by con- tradiction that ξ7→(Fϕ)(ξ) is compactly supported, extend it from ξ∈R toξ∈C and show that you get an holomorphic function. Then. . .)

Exercise 26. Let a > 0. Say in which sense (i.e., as elements of which space) the R R functions

x7→e−a|x|

x7→

r2 π

a a2 +x2

admit Fourier transform and compute it. Verify the Fourier inversion formula in this cases.

1remember that the convention adopted in the class is (Ff)(ξ) = (2π)−d/2R

Rdf(x)e−ixξdx

1

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Applied Automata Theory (WS 2012/2013) Technische Universit¨ at Kaiserslautern.. Exercise

This characterisation of the spectrum of A usually goes under the name of Weyl’s criterion: it says that the points of spec(A) are “almost eigenvalues”.. of A (i.e., Aϕ n ≈ λϕ n

(Hint: the natural way to proceed is to construct explicitly the approximating step function. To this aim, observe that the range of f can be covered by a finite and conveniently

Prove that, due to (∗∗), the limit operator defined in (∗) is unique (i.e., independent of the approximating sequence of simple functions one considers) and (∗∗) holds for

10.4) Prove that the operator-valued function R 3 t 7→ e tA is norm-continuous on R and Lipschitz norm-continuous on any bounded subset of R. Estimate such a constant.. 10.5) Prove

Compare this result to the general statement of the Weyl’s criterion (→ Exercise 3): actually that statement does not exclude that the whole Spec(A), not only Spec ess (A), might

1 This goes beyond the standard example of the Dirac measure, which is singular with respect to the Lebesgue measure, but not continuous (it is a pure point

(Hint: connect this problem with Exercise 19 above and use the thesis stated there. To be sure to have fixed all the details, check the role played in this construction by