• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Stock Price Reaction to Earnings Information

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Stock Price Reaction to Earnings Information"

Copied!
20
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Studienreihe der Stiftung Kreditwirtschaft an der Universität Hohenheim

Verlag Wissenschaft & Praxis

Matthias Johannsen

Stock Price Reaction to

Earnings Information

(2)

Stock Price Reaction to Earnings Information

(3)

Studienreihe der Stiftung Kreditwirtschaft an der Universität Hohenheim

Herausgeber:

Prof. Dr. Joh. Heinr. v. Stein

Band 47

(4)

Matthias Johannsen

Stock Price Reaction to Earnings Information

Verlag Wissenschaft & Praxis

(5)

Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek

Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar.

ISBN 978-3-89673-481-5

© Verlag Wissenschaft & Praxis Dr. Brauner GmbH 2010 D-75447 Sternenfels, Nußbaumweg 6 Tel. +49 7045 930093 Fax +49 7045 930094

verlagwp@t-online.de www.verlagwp.de

Alle Rechte vorbehalten

Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt.

Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des Verlages unzulässig und strafbar. Das gilt ins- besondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen.

Printed in Germany

(6)

TABLE OF CONTENTS 5

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ... 5

Tables... 8

Figures ... 9

Appendices ... 10

Abbreviations and Variables... 11

1. Problem outline ... 17

2. Investigation of the post-earnings-announcement drift in Germany .... 21

2.1 Introduction... 21

2.2 Current state of academic discussion... 22

2.2.1The concept of market efficiency ... 22

2.2.2The post-earnings-announcement drift ... 22

2.2.2.1Implications for market efficiency ... 22

2.2.2.2Summary of evidence ... 23

2.2.3 Existing explanations for the post-earnings-announcement drift... 26

2.2.4Commentary on existing explanations... 27

2.3 Research design ... 29

2.3.1Research methodology... 29

2.3.2 Considered variables for a risk-based investigation ... 33

2.3.3Hypotheses development ... 36

2.4 Sample construction... 37

2.4.1Data collection ... 37

2.4.2Variable computation... 37

2.4.2.1Unexpected earnings... 37

2.4.2.2Unexpected earnings portfolio formation... 40

2.4.2.3Risk-related variables ... 41

2.4.2.4Abnormal returns ... 43

2.5 Data analysis ... 45

2.5.1Investigation of hypothesis 1 ... 45

2.5.1.1 Cumulative abnormal returns of unexpected earnings portfolios... 45

2.5.1.2 Significance tests of the cumulative abnormal returns... 50

2.5.2Investigation of hypothesis 2 ... 58

(7)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

6

2.5.3Investigation of hypothesis 3 ... 60

2.5.3.1Analysis of covariance... 61

2.5.3.2 Sub-samples based on size and book-to-market ratio ... 66

2.6 Conclusion ... 72

3. Investigation of the capital market reaction to earnings management .... 75

3.1 Introduction... 75

3.2 Current state of academic discussion... 76

3.2.1General concept of earnings management... 76

3.2.2Incentives of earnings management... 77

3.2.2.1Types of incentives ... 77

3.2.2.2 Incentives of opportunistic earnings management ... 78

3.2.2.3Incentives of informative earnings management... 81

3.2.3Capital market reaction to earnings management... 82

3.2.3.1Concealing effect of earnings management... 82

3.2.3.2Informative effect of earnings management... 83

3.2.4Summary ... 84

3.3 Research design ... 84

3.3.1Theoretical considerations ... 84

3.3.2Hypotheses development ... 86

3.3.3Research methodology... 88

3.4 Sample construction... 90

3.4.1Data collection ... 90

3.4.2Variable computation... 91

3.4.2.1Earnings management variables ... 91

3.4.2.1.1 Different approaches to measure earnings management ... 91

3.4.2.1.2 Comment on the different approaches ... 95

3.4.2.1.3 Used measures of earnings management ... 98

3.4.2.2Earnings informativeness variables ... 100

3.4.2.3Control variables... 107

3.4.2.4Absolute cumulative abnormal returns... 109

3.5 Data analysis ... 111

3.5.1Correlations among key variables ... 111

3.5.2Investigation of hypotheses 1 and 2... 113

3.5.3Investigation of hypothesis 3 ... 118

3.5.3.1Hypothesis tests ... 118

3.5.3.2Fixed effects panel regressions... 123

3.6 Conclusion ... 134

(8)

TABLE OF CONTENTS 7

4. Summary ... 137

4.1 Main results... 137

4.2 Implications for market participants ... 138

4.3 Implications for accounting standard setters ... 139

4.4 Implications for future research... 139

References ... 141

Appendices ... 155

(9)

TABLES

8

Tables

Table I: Summary of studies related to the post-earnings-

announcement drift... 25

Table II: T-tests for CAR and CAR differences of the SUE and SRM deciles ... 52

Table III: Estimations for duration and magnitude of the post-earnings- announcement drift... 57

Table IV: Relationship between unexpected earnings and risk-related variables ... 58

Table V: Analysis of covariance of cumulative abnormal returns ... 61

Table VI: Trading strategy returns for size and book-to-market sub-samples ... 67

Table VII: Descriptive statistics and average firm size within sub-samples.... 70

Table VIII: Studies related to earnings management... 80

Table IX: Studies related to pricing of informativeness... 86

Table X: Earnings management incentives variables ... 101

Table XI: Computation of indicator variables... 103

Table XII: Factor loadings obtained from principal component analysis ... 104

Table XIII: Computation of earnings informativeness measure INFO_PCA.. 105

Table XIV: Cluster centroids of k-means cluster analysis... 106

Table XV: Key variables... 111

Table XVI: Correlations among key variables... 112

Table XVII: Investigation of hypotheses 1 and 2... 114

Table XVIII: Investigation of hypothesis 3 ... 119

Table XIX: Fixed effects panel regressions ... 127

(10)

FIGURES 9

Figures

Figure I: Timing of the event study ... 30

Figure II: Structure of the analysis of cumulative abnormal returns ... 32

Figure III: Post-earnings-announcement drift ... 46

Figure IV: Post-earnings-announcement drift, anticipation effect ... 48

Figure V: Post-earnings-announcement drift after succeeding announcement... 49

Figure VI: Separation of sample into sub-samples... 89

Figure VII: Separation of sample to investigate hypotheses 1 and 2... 114

Figure VIII: Separation of sample to investigate hypothesis 3 ... 119

(11)

APPENDICES

10

Appendices

Appendix I: Distribution of event dates in a random sub-sample... 155

Appendix II: T-tests for CAR of SUE and SRM deciles... 156

Appendix III: Analysis of covariance, long event windows... 159

Appendix IV: Distribution of event dates in random sub-sample ... 160

Appendix V: Random effects panel regressions... 162

(12)

ABBREVIATIONS AND VARIABLES 11

Abbreviations and Variables

α = population regression slope coefficient

A = abnormal returns

a = estimated sample regression slope coefficient

abs. = absolute

ACT = total current assets

AktG = Aktiengesetz, German Stock Corporation Act APT = Arbitrage Pricing Theory

) (•

AR = autoregressive regression specification

ARCH Test = Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Test

AT = total assets

ATGLNZ = Z-value of natural logarithm of the gross total assets growth rate

avg. = average

β = in regression: population slope coefficient

= in CAPM: market beta

βˆ = estimator for regression slope coefficient b = estimated sample regressions slope coefficient

ME

BE = ratio of the book value of common equity to the market value of common equity

c = regression intercept

CAPM = Capital Asset Pricing Model CAR = cumulative abnormal returns

CDAX = index of all German shares in the Prime Standard and General Standard of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange CEO = chief executive officer

CEQ = cash and cash equivalents

CEQGZ = Z-value of cash and cash equivalents growth rate CFO = cash flow from operating activities

CSE = book value of common shareholders’ equity

CSEGZ = Z-value of book value of common equity growth rate

(13)

ABBREVIATIONS AND VARIABLES

12

Δ = difference of first order

δ = decision function in a statistical decision problem

D = binary variable

d = decision in a statistical decision problem DEP = depreciation, amortization and depletion

df = degrees of freedom

diff. = difference

DST = short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt

DT = total debt

ε = regression residual

[ ]

E = expectation operator

EBIT = earnings before interest and taxes

ed. = editor

EMGMT = earnings management measure DAC

EMGMT_ = earnings management measure based on discretionary accruals EPS = earnings per share

EstG = Einkommensteuergesetz, German Income Tax Law et al. = et alii, et aliae, and others

et seq. = et sequens, and the following page et seqq. = et sequentes, and the following pages

exp = exponentiation with respect to the base e EUR = Euro currency

EXTRZ = extreme financial performance measure F = risk factor in multifactor model of APT

= F-statistic

γˆ = coefficient estimates in Hausman test )

(•

G = function taking on values strictly between zero and one GAAP = generally accepted accounting principles

GoB = Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Buchführung, German principles of proper accounting

(14)

ABBREVIATIONS AND VARIABLES 13

H = hypothesis

HGB = Handelsgesetzbuch, German Commercial Code

HML = book-to-market variable in Fama/French Three-Factor Model i = cross-sectional identification index

IFRS = International Financial Reporting Standards INC = reported earnings (net income)

INFO = earnings management informativeness measure CL

INFO_ = earnings management informativeness measure based on cluster analysis

PCA

INFO_ = earnings management informativeness measure based on prince- pal component analysis

IPO = initial public offering

j = identification index

k = identification index

) ˆ(

λ = estimated inverse Mills ratio LCT = total current liabilities

LEVGZ = Z-value of leverage growth rate, where leverage is measured as the debt to assets ratio

LM-Test = Lagrange Multiplier Test

m = binary variable indicating the observability of the dependent variable

ME = market value of common equity

MOMENTUM = returns between 8 and 2 months prior to earnings announcement

υ = integration variable

n = sample size

NDAC = non-discretionary accruals

no. = number

Ω = parameter space of the parameter Q

OI = operating income

OLS = ordinary least squares )

(x

Φ = standard normal cumulative distribution function )

φ(x = the standard normal density function

(15)

ABBREVIATIONS AND VARIABLES

14

( )

P = probability

p = in statistical tests: probability

= in references: page

PAD = post-earnings-announcement drift

PC = principal component from principal component analysis PCA = principal component analysis

par. = paragraph

lim

p = probability limit

PPE = gross property, plant and equipment PRC = provisions for risks and charges

( )

ψ = reward function in a statistical decision problem Q = parameter in a statistical decision problem q = outcome of the parameter Q

ρ = correlation coefficient

R2 = coefficient of determination Rf = risk-free interest rate

Rm = return on the market portfolio Rp = return on a portfolio of stocks

r = raw stock return

rE = equity cost of capital

RE = residual earnings

REC = net receivables

σ = standard deviation

σˆ = estimator for population standard deviation

s = sample standard deviation

SALES = sales revenues

SDSALESAT = standard deviation of the sales to assets ratio SMB = size variable in Fama/French Three-Factor Model SRM = security return model unexpected earnings SUE = standardized unexpected earnings

(16)

ABBREVIATIONS AND VARIABLES 15

τ = range of event window event period

t = time period (year, month, day) in statistical tests: t-statistic T = number of time periods in a panel regression

TAC = total accruals

ü = time de-meaned panel regression residual

UK = United Kingdom

US = United States

V = random variable in a statistical decision problem v = outcome of the random variable V

vol. = volume

w = measurement error

WCP = working capital

x = explanatory variable in regression x = vector of explanatory variables y = in regression: dependent variable

= in figures: time period (year) yˆ = fitted regression values

Z = in statistical tests: Z-statistic in variable computation:

Z-transformation z = variable of interest

(17)
(18)

PROBLEM OUTLINE 17

1. Problem outline

This work investigates the reaction of capital market participants to information contained in financial statements of public limited companies. Demand for such capital market research originates from several sources. Kothari (2001: 106 et seqq.) names fundamental firm valuation, the role of accounting numbers in con- tracts as well as in the political process and tests of market efficiency as the main sources of demand.

Investors and creditors are interested in the value of a firm to make lending and investment decisions. Their use of information contained in financial statements is an important part of the markets dynamics which drive the price of a security to its fair value, that is, to the expected present value of the future cash flows to which the security entitles its holder. Empirical capital market research in this context helps the investors to spot mispriced securities and make profitable in- vestments. The legal environment in which a firm operates is determined in the political process and shaped by policy makers. In Germany, disclosure standards for example are set by law in the German Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch, HGB, §§ 238 – 315a). The policy makers aim to determine disclosure require- ments in order to satisfy the information interests of the company, its sharehold- ers, its creditors, its employees as well as those of potential investors or the gen- eral public. Empirical capital market research in accounting assists the standard setter in ascertaining whether the stated objectives are met and whether proposed new standards can be expected to serve their purpose. For example, value rele- vance of earnings numbers is seen as an objective of disclosure, and value rele- vance studies are aimed at testing this property of earnings numbers. The ques- tion of market efficiency is of great relevance to all market participants since se- curity prices determine the allocation of wealth between the related parties.1 The present work can be placed in the context of shareholder and investor de- mand for empirical capital market research. It investigates how market partici- pants react to financial statement information. In particular, it examines in two event studies how stock prices are influenced by earnings numbers. Model devel- opment as well as implications for disclosure standards are not topics of the analysis. Verrecchia (2001) reviews the underlying theory and Holthausen/Watts (2001) present an overview of research regarding the value relevance of reported earnings in the context of accounting standard setting.

Looking from the perspective of shareholders and investors, earnings numbers are central for the determination of the fair value of a share. Net earnings (after interest payments) represent that portion of the value generated over the respec-

1 A definition of market efficiency is given in section 2.2.1.

(19)

PROBLEM OUTLINE

18

tive period to which shareholders are entitled.2 For this reason earnings numbers attract so much attention in firm valuations. Penman (2004: 121) notes that earn- ings as the result of accrual accounting can in principle capture value added in operations which cash flows cannot. Accruals are non-cash measures of value used in accrual accounting to match the value outflows with the corresponding value inflows. At the same time, due to the discretion required for the estimation of certain accruals, they are often used as instruments for earnings management activities (Kothari 2001: 161). Therefore, the effect of those accruals on the in- formativeness of earnings is open.

This work explores these issues and is structured in two main parts. The first part studies the share price reactions to earnings announcements, and in the second part the share price reaction to earnings management is examined. The literature shows that in opposition to Fama’s (1970, 1991) definition of an efficient market as one in which “security prices reflect all available information” stock price re- actions to earnings announcements take place only gradually. This phenomenon has become known as the post-earnings-announcement drift (PAD). The first part of this work tests for the existence of the drift on the German stock market and scrutinizes the explanatory power of several risk-related variables regarding the drift.

In the second part the effect of earnings management on the informativeness of earnings is examined. As the “purposeful intervention in the external financial reporting process with the intent of obtaining some private gain” (Schipper 1989:

92), earnings management is a relevant factor influencing the informativeness of earnings, which is defined as the degree to which current earnings indicate future earnings. Guay/Kothari/Watts (1996: 83) distinguish between opportunistic earn- ings management and informative earnings management to achieve a more reli- able measure of firm performance. Based on this concept, it is tested whether capital market participants combine earnings management and earnings informa- tiveness information to discriminate between opportunistic and informative earn- ings management.

Following innovations of this work contribute to the research. Testing for the ex- istence of the post-earnings-announcement drift on the German stock market and investigating the effect of risk-related variables regarding the drift produces out- of-sample evidence with respect to studies based on data from the US stock mar- kets. Incorporating a wide range of risk-related variables, which have not been examined simultaneously in previous research, allows of testing their incremental explanatory power. Further, the use of an analysis of covariance in addition to significance tests of a drift-based trading strategy increases the robustness of the findings. Regarding the return reaction to earnings management, the chosen re-

2 Since dividends are paid out immediately, they do not contribute to the value of a share.

(20)

PROBLEM OUTLINE 19

search approach is innovative. Two multivariate measures of the informativeness of earnings management are developed. Additionally, a research design is se- lected which allows testing of whether market participants combine earnings management and earnings informativeness information to discriminate between opportunistic and informative earnings management.

The remainder of this work is structured as follows. Chapter 2 investigates the post-earnings-announcement drift and chapter 3 examines the capital market re- action to earnings management. These two chapters are structured in the same pattern. Following an introduction in the respective first section, the current state of the academic discussion is summarized in the second sections. The research design and the development of the hypotheses to be tested are described in the third sections. The following fourth sections are concerned with the data collec- tion and the computation of the employed variables. In the respective fifth sec- tion, the results of the data analysis are discussed and each chapter terminates with a conclusion as the sixth section. A general summary is given in chapter 4.

References and appendices are included in the last two parts of the work.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

A deeper look into customer discrimination by Burdekin and Idson (1991) reveals that not only is higher attendance associated with increases in the percentage of white players on a

Hence, if users exchange their own ratings whenever they consume the same item, the set of users from whom opinions are collected and thus are available in the local graph is

We call days with a large number of competing announcements “high-news days,” as opposed to “low-news days.” We find that investors’ announcement date re- actions to earnings

Вважаємо, що основними чинниками сезонності показників дохідності на вітчизняному фондовому ринку є: циклічність розвитку окремих галузей господарства і

predictions that causes itself to become true due to investors’ belief, experience and their analysis of historical data on realized rates of return during the former

Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Taxation and the Earnings of Husbands

Lin (2006) did a research to test the effect of audit committee existence with earning management shows a negative effect, means audit committee can reduce earnings management

130 Prior literature examining determinants on share price performance around M&A transactions provides insights into potential determinants of accruals manipulation (e.g.,