• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Towards Our Common Digital Future

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Towards Our Common Digital Future"

Copied!
486
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Towards Our Common Digital Future

Flagship Report

(2)
(3)

Towards Our Common

Digital Future

(4)

WBGU is an independent, scientific advisory body to the German Federal Government set up in 1992 in the run-up to the Rio Earth Summit. The Council has nine members, appointed for a term of four years by the federal cabinet. The Council is supported by an interministerial committee of the federal government comprising representatives of all ministries and of the federal chancellery. The Council’s principal task is to provide scientifically-based policy advice on global change issues to the German Federal Government.

The Council

• analyses global environment and development problems and reports on these,

• reviews and evaluates national and international research in the field of global change,

• provides early warning of new issue areas,

• identifies gaps in research and initiates new research,

• monitors and assesses national and international policies for sustainable development,

• elaborates recommendations for action,

• raises public awareness and heightens the media profile of global change issues.

WBGU publishes flagship reports every two years, making its own choice of focal themes. In addition, the German government can commission the Council to prepare special reports and policy papers. For more information please visit www.wbgu.de.

The Council Members

Prof Dirk Messner (Chair)

Director of the United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Bonn and Co-Director of the Center for Advanced Studies on Global Cooperation Research, University of Duisburg-Essen

Prof Sabine Schlacke (Chair)

Professor of public law, executive director of the Institute for Environmental Law and Planning Law, University of Münster

Prof Martina Fromhold-Eisebith

Chair of Economic Geography, Department of Geography at RWTH Aachen University

Prof Ulrike Grote

Director of the Institute for Environmental Economics and World Trade at Leibniz University of Hannover and Senior Fellow at Center for Development Research (ZEF), Bonn

Prof Ellen Matthies

Professor for Environmental Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg

Prof Karen Pittel

Director of the ifo Center for Energy, Climate and Resources and Professor of Economics, esp. Energy, Climate and Exhaustible Natural Resources, Faculty of Economics, University of Munich

Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber CBE

Director Emeritus of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)

Prof Ina Schieferdecker

Director of Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems (FOKUS) in Berlin, Professor for Quality Engineering of Open Distributed Systems at TU Berlin and Director of Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society

Prof Uwe Schneidewind

President and Chief Research Executive of the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy;

Professor for Sustainable Transition Management at the University of Wuppertal

(5)

Towards Our Common

Digital Future

(6)

IV

Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek

The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie;

detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de.

ISBN 978-3-946830-03-0

© WBGU Berlin 2019

The reproduction and distribution of original WBGU text material and charts, including extracts, is permitted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the source is acknowledged. Text material and charts from third-party sources are subject to the copyright conditions of the respective sources.

Translation: Bob Culverhouse & Margaret Helliwell, Berlin

The R&D project that generated this report was conducted on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety under grant number 01RIO708A4. Responsibility for the content of this publication rests with the author.

Design: WERNERWERKE GbR, Berlin

Cover photos: © gettyimages: Marcia Straub „An Abstract Image of the Woods“ and Flashpop „Group of children wearing virtual reality headsets“

Production: WBGU Typesetting: WBGU

Printing and binding: Ruksaldruck, Berlin

Recommended citation: WBGU – German Advisory Council on Global Change (2019): Towards Our Common Digital Future. Flagship Report. Berlin: WBGU.

Secretariat Luisenstrasse 46 D-10117 Berlin Germany

Phone: +49 30 26 39 48 0 Email: wbgu@wbgu.de Web: www.wbgu.de Copy deadline: 12.04.2019

Lead authors: Martina Fromhold-Eisebith, Ulrike Grote, Ellen Matthies, Dirk Messner, Karen Pittel, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Ina Schieferdecker, Sabine Schlacke, Uwe Schneidewind

Co-authors: Karoline Augenstein, Robyn Blake-Rath, Katharina Bohnenberger, Agata Bossy, Marcel J.

Dorsch, Marian Feist, Juliana Gärtner, Maja Göpel, Ulrike Jürschik, Karen Krause, Carsten Loose, Reinhard Messerschmidt, Maximilian Müngersdorff, Inge Paulini, Nele Petrusjanz, Johannes Pfeiffer, Benno

Pilardeaux, Teresa Schlüter, Gesa Schöneberg, Astrid Schulz, Benjamin Stephan, Paul Szabo-Müller, Hannah Wallis, Nora Wegener

(7)

V Scientific Staff at the Secretariat

Prof Maja Göpel

(Secretary-General; since September 2017) Dr Inge Paulini

(Secretary-General; until April 2017) Dr Carsten Loose

(Deputy Secretary-General)

Marcel J. Dorsch, MA Dipl.-Päd. (Univ.) (since May 2017)

Dr Reinhard Messerschmidt (since May 2017) Dr Benno Pilardeaux

(Head of Media and Public Relations) Dr Teresa Schlüter (until April 2019) Dipl.-Ing. Dipl.-Jur. Gesa Schöneberg (until August 2017)

Dr Astrid Schulz

Dr Benjamin Stephan (until February 2017)

Administration, Editorial Work and Secretariat Viola Märtin, Dipl.-Kulturarbeiterin (FH)

(Secretariat, Event Management) Mario Rinn, BSc

(System Administration and Graphics) Martina Schneider-Kremer, MA (Publishing Management)

Scientific Staff to the Council Members Dr Karoline Augenstein

(Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy; until May 2017)

Robyn Blake-Rath, MA

(Leibniz University Hannover; since March 2019)

Katharina Bohnenberger, MA

(Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy; since June 2017 until April 2019) Dipl.-Jur. Agata Bossy

(Institute for Environmental Law and Planning Law – IUP, Münster; until April 2017)

Dr Marian Feist

(United Nations University, Bonn; since February 2018)

Juliana Gärtner, MPhil

(Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research – PIK; since February 2017)

Ulrike Jürschik, Dipl.-Jur.

(Institute for Environmental Law and Planning Law – IUP, Münster; since May 2017)

Karen Krause, MSc

(Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg; since April 2019)

Dr Maximilian Müngersdorff

(German Development Institute – DIE, Bonn; until December 2017)

Nele Petrusjanz, MSc

(Leibniz University Hannover; until February 2019) Dr Johannes Pfeiffer

(ifo Center for Energy, Climate and Resources, Munich)

Paul Szabo-Müller, MA

(Department of Geography at RWTH Aachen University)

Dr Hannah Wallis

(Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg; until March 2019)

Nora Wegener, MA

(Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems FOKUS, Berlin; since March 2017)

Council Staff

(8)

VI

The WBGU would like to thank all external experts for their input and valuable assistance. Specifically, the fol- lowing expert reports and statements, which are avail- able on the WBGU website, were integrated into this report:

> Prof Dr Wolfram Burgard (Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous Intelligent Systems, University of Frei- burg): Künstliche Intelligenz, 2018.

> Prof Dr Dr hc mult Niels Birbaumer (Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen): Technologien und Visionen der Mensch-Maschine-Entgrenzung, 2018.

> Prof Dr Jeanette Hofmann (Berlin Social Science Center – WZB): Internet Governance, 2018.

> Dr A. R. Köhler, Jens Gröger and Ran Liu (The Oeko- Institut): Kurzgutachten Energie- und Ressourcen- verbräuche der Digitalisierung, 2018.

> Prof em Dr.-Ing. Dr hc mult Paul J. Kühn (University Stuttgart, Institute of Communication Networks and Computer Engineering – IKR): Informationstechnis- che Gestaltung einer nachhaltigen Digitalisierung, 2018.

> Constanze Kurz and Frank Rieger (Chaos Computer Club – CCC): Netzpolitische Handlungsoptionen für eine nachhaltige Digitalisierung, 2018.

The WBGU received valuable suggestions from hear- ings of experts during its internal conference held in Nauen in May 2018 and during its regular internal meetings: Prof Dr Jeanette Hofmann (Berlin Social Science Center – WZB); Prof Dr Nick Bostrom (Univer- sity of Oxford, Future of Humanity Institute); Prof Dr Sabine Trepte (University of Hohenheim, Media Psychology Department).

During the hearing of experts on the ‘Relationship between Humans and Machine’ (‘Verhältnis Mensch–

Maschine’) held on 18 October 2018, the WBGU had the opportunity to exchange views with: Dr Aljoscha Burchardt (German Research Center for Artificial Intel- ligence – DFKI, Member of the Enquete-Commission on Artificial Intelligence of the German Parliament) and Dr Jan Alexandersson (German Research Center for Artifi- cial Intelligence – DFKI, CEO Startup ‘ki elements’).

The topic of this flagship report was examined in greater depth during the expert discussion on ‘Digitali- zation’ with representatives of the research community that was held on 14 December 2017 in Berlin:

Dr Christian Anton (Leopoldina); Dr Stefan Brandt

(Futurium); Prof Dr Martin Grötschel (Berlin-Branden- burg Academy of Sciences and Humanities – BBAW); Dr Rüdiger Haum (Futurium); Dr Karl Eugen Huthmacher (BMBF); Dr Susanne Kadner (acatech); Prof Dr Paul J.

Kühn (University of Stuttgart); Dr Ulf Lange (BMBF);

Prof Dr Armin Reller (University of Augsburg); Dr Christoph Revermann (Office of Technology Assess- ment at the German Bundestag – TAB); Prof Dr Jürgen Roßmann (RWTH Aachen); Dr Stefan Schneider (BMBF).

The event entitled ‘WBGU Discussions: the Good Digital Life – the Environmental Perspective’ (‘WBGU im Gespräch: Gut Leben Digital – die Umweltperspek- tive’) on 16 March 2018 also served to gain a more profound understanding of the topic: Dr Harald Bajorat (BMU); Dr Stefan Bergheim (Center for Societal Pro- gress); Hubertus Drinkuth ( Systain Consulting); Vivian Frick, MSc ( Institute for Ecological Economy Research – IÖW); Walter Kahlenborn (adelphi); Kai Kallweit ( Bitkom); Michael Marten (BMU); Dr Carsten Neßhöver (German Advisory Council on the Environment – SRU);

Nilgün Parker (BMU); Vera Scholz (German Society for International Cooperation – GIZ); Philipp Sommer (Environmental Action Germany); Max Thinius ( Futurologist); Charlotte von Möllendorff (NABU); Dr Ulf Lange (BMBF).

Thanks are also due to the panellists of the WBGU panel discussion on ‘Digitalization and sustainability – What kind of future do we want?’ (‘Digitalisierung und Nachhaltigkeit – Welche Zukunft wollen wir gestalten?’) on 20 June 2018: Markus Beckedahl (netzpolitik.org);

Joana Breidenbach (betterplace.org); Christian Kulick ( Bitkom); Prof Dr Judith Simon ( University of Hamburg).

Sascha Wolff and Susanne Mira chaired the World Café on ‘The Digitalized Anthropocene’ (‘Das digitalisi- erte Anthropozän’) on 20 June 2018, sharing reflec- tions and insights on digitalization with their guests:

Klaus Milke (Germanwatch); Prof Dr Sabine Trepte (University of Hohenheim, Department of Media Psychology); Prof Dr Katharina Zweig ( Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Algorithm Accountability Lab).

We would also like to thank the participants in the WBGU's Panel on ‘Digitalization as a lever for the vision of a sustainable EU’ (‘Digitalisierung als Hebel für die Vision einer nachhaltigen EU’), which was held

Acknowledgments

(9)

VII ference of the network of European Environment and

Sustainable Development Advisory Councils (EEAC):

Dieter Janecek (MdB, German Bundestag); Dr Harry Lehmann (German Environment Agency – UBA); Max Thinius (Futurologist).

The colloquium ‘Fragility and autonomy of technical systems’ (‘Fragilität und Autonomie technischer Sys- teme’) held on 19 October 2018, organized by the WBGU together with INFRANEU, also provided valua- ble results and food for thought: Staatssekretär a.D.

Ulrich Arndt (INFRANEU-Hauptverband); Arslan Brömme (Vattenfall); Rudolf Gurland (T-Systems Inter- national, Telekom Security); Oliver Haase ( Berliner Stadtreinigung – BSR); Hermann Kühne (Berliner Was- serbetriebe – BWB); Friedrich- Wilhelm Menge ( Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe – BVG); Andrea Pieper (GASAG); Ingo Schwarzer ( Deutsche Bahn, DB Systel); Jens Wiesner (Federal Office for Information Security – BSI).

Furthermore, the WBGU wishes to thank all those who provided valuable support through discussions, comments contributions, advice, research, and peer reviews of individual parts of this report: Dipl.-Math.

Thilo Ernst, Dipl.-Ing. Karsten Isakovic, M. Sc. Fabian Kirstein, Dipl.-Inf. Nadja Menz, Prof Dr rer nat Adrian Paschke, Dipl.-Inf. Jaroslav Svacina, Dipl.-Ing. Jens Tiemann and Dipl.-Phys. Stephan Waßerroth (Fraun- hofer Institute for Open Communication Systems – FOKUS); Dr Benjamin Stephan (Greenpeace Germany);

Dr Mandy Singer-Brodowski ( Institut Futur); Adrian Heilmann, Dr Frank Hellmann, Claudia Köhler, Aylin Mengi, Julia Stanoeva and Amelie Thürmer ( Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research – PIK); Dr Daniel Voelsen ( German Institute for International and Security Affairs – SWP); Dr Diana Serbanescu and Dr Stefan Ullrich (Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society); Dr Holger Berg and Dr Henning Wilts ( Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy; Division ‘Circular Economy’).

(10)
(11)

IX

Contents

Council Staff . . . . V Acknowledgments . . . VI Boxes . . . XIX Tables . . . XXII Figures . . . XXIII Acronyms and Abbreviations . . . XXV

1 Introduction . . . 27

2 Sustainability in the Age of Digitalization . . . 31

2 .1 A comprehensive understanding of transformation must take the megatrend of digitalization into account . . . .31

2.1.1 Digitalization poses fundamental challenges to the Great Transformation towards Sustainability . . . 33

2.1.2 Combining our thinking on digitalization and the Great Transformation directs attention towards human beings themselves . . . 33

2 .2 The WBGU’s normative compass in the Digital Age . . . .35

2.2.1 Sustaining the natural life-support systems . . . 35

2.2.1.1 Planetary guardrails for global environmental change . . . 35

2.2.1.2 Local environmental problems . . . 37

2.2.2 Inclusion – the basis for a good life . . . 38

2.2.2.1 Substantive inclusion as a basic category . . . 38

2.2.2.2 Economic inclusion instead of exclusion . . . 39

2.2.2.3 Political inclusion as a democratic basis . . . 39

2.2.3 Eigenart as a foundation for self-effective individuals and societies capable of transformation . . . 40

2.2.3.1 Eigenart as a guiding concept for the protection of individual freedom of development . . . 40

2.2.3.2 Eigenart as a socio-political guiding principle . . . 41

2 .3 Dignity as the starting point and target vision of the normative compass . . . .41

2.3.1 Dignity as a highly controversial topic in the Digital Age . . . 41

2.3.2 Two key aspects of dignity: protection against objectification and substantive individual rights . . . 42

2 .4 Conclusions . . . .44

3 Understanding the Digital Age . . . 47

3 .1 Development leading up to the Digital Age . . . .47

3.1.1 Humankind and its development as the starting point . . . 47

3.1.2 The road to a digitally networked society in the Anthropocene . . . 48

3.1.2.1 From the first computers to the digital network . . . 49

3.1.2.2 Origin and expansion of social platforms . . . 50

(12)

X

3.1.3 Economic development towards the Digital Age . . . 51

3.1.4 Conclusions: the Digital Age is emerging . . . 55

3 .2 Selected basic terms and functions of digitalization . . . .56

3.2.1 Features and basic functions of digital sociotechnical solutions . . . 56

3.2.2 Data, metadata, data catalogues and data rooms . . . 59

3.2.3 A brief introduction to algorithms, computability and heuristics . . . 61

3.2.4 A brief history of automation and artificial intelligence . . . 61

3.2.5 Algorithm-based systems in the societal context . . . 62

3.2.6 Quantum computing as a future computer generation . . . 63

3.2.7 Conclusions: digitalization in a nutshell . . . 65

3 .3 Key technologies of digitalization (also) in the sustainability context . . . .65

3.3.1 Internet of Things . . . 66

3.3.2 Big data . . . 68

3.3.3 Artificial intelligence . . . 71

3.3.4 Cybersecurity . . . 75

3.3.5 Other relevant technologies . . . 78

3.3.5.1 Monitoring and modelling . . . 78

3.3.5.2 Augmented and virtual realities . . . 79

3.3.5.3 Robotics . . . 81

3.3.5.4 3D printing and additive manufacturing . . . 82

3.3.5.5 Blockchain and distributed-ledger technology . . . 83

3.3.6 Conclusions: key technologies must be shaped with sustainability in mind . . . 86

3 .4 Core characteristics of the Digital Age . . . .86

3.4.1 Interconnectedness . . . 86

3.4.2 Cognition . . . 87

3.4.3 Autonomy . . . 88

3.4.4 Virtuality . . . 89

3.4.5 Knowledge explosion . . . 89

3.4.6 Conclusions: the digitalized technosphere as a central building block of society . . . 90

3 .5 Changes in key areas of life in the Digital Age . . . .90

3.5.1 Digitalization and the Earth system perspective . . . 90

3.5.2 Digitalization and the reconfiguration of the market and the economy . . . 91

3.5.3 Digitalization and the change of societal order . . . 93

3.5.4 Digitalization on and in humans . . . 94

3.5.5 Digitalization of human-made technological systems . . . 95

3.5.6 Conclusions: Understanding and accepting formative tasks . . . 96

3 .6 The Digital Age and sustainability from the perspective of international organizations . 96 3.6.1 Selected reports . . . 96

3.6.2 Key messages and recommendations of the reports . . . 97

3.6.3 Selected charters . . . 101

3.6.4 Conclusions: Contours of a landscape of recommendations. . . 105

3 .7 Conclusions . . . .107

4 Actor Constellations in the Digital Transformation . . . . 109

4 .1 Transformative change as a formative task . . . .109

4 .2 Actors in the Digital Age between power and impotence . . . .112

4.2.1 The ability to act and the formative capacity of individuals in the Digital Age . . . 113

4.2.1.1 Loss of sovereignty and violations of privacy as risks for users . . . 113

4.2.1.2 Users and prosumers as creative enablers of change . . . 114

4.2.1.3 Citizens as digitally supported actors of change . . . 114

(13)

XI 4.2.1.4 The risk of discrimination if citizens are excluded from digital

technology . . . 115

4.2.1.5 Interim conclusion. . . 115

4.2.2 Enterprises between market concentration and competition . . . 115

4.2.2.1 Enterprises as actors in digital change: market disruptions . . . 116

4.2.2.2 Companies as digital pioneers of sustainable change? . . . 117

4.2.2.3 Challenges: new path dependencies and the societal power of businesses to shape the future . . . 118

4.2.2.4 Interim conclusion. . . 121

4.2.3 Civil society between emancipation and paralysis . . . 121

4.2.3.1 Civil-society commitment to sustainability . . . 121

4.2.3.2 Digitalization and civil-society action and organization . . . 123

4.2.3.3 Civil society as a driver of transformation in the Digital Age . . . 124

4.2.4 Tech-Communities – new pioneers of change? . . . 124

4.2.4.1 Value inscriptions in technology . . . 124

4.2.4.2 Ethical discourses in tech-communities . . . 125

4.2.4.3 Interim conclusion. . . 125

4.2.5 Cities and municipalities between technology sovereignty and technology dependence . . . 126

4.2.5.1 Global technology providers: a new challenge for city governments . . . 126

4.2.5.2 Effective local governments . . . 126

4.2.5.3 The digital municipality and the Transformation towards Sustainability . . . 127

4.2.6 States between power and loss of sovereignty . . . 127

4.2.6.1 State capacity to act under the pressure of economically driven deterritorialization . . . 127

4.2.6.2 Ways to strengthen the state’s ability to act sustainably . . . 129

4.2.6.3 Untapped formative potential of states . . . 130

4.2.7 Transnational actors between world society and fragmentation? . . . 130

4.2.7.1 Transnationalization of sustainability policy and digitalization . . . 131

4.2.7.2 Transnational organizations in the management of digital infrastructures . . . 133

4.2.7.3 Interim conclusion. . . 135

4.2.8 International organizations as actors in sustainability governance . . . 135

4.2.8.1 International organizations and sustainable digitalization . . . 136

4.2.8.2 Changing role and function of international organizations . . . 136

4 .3 Use windows of opportunity for sustainability transformation . . . .137

4.3.1 New options and change alliances . . . 137

4.3.2 Shadows of the past: path dependencies perpetuate destructive growth paths . . . 138

4.3.3 Digitalization itself creates power alliances and barriers against sustainability transformations . . . 139

4.3.4 Conclusions . . . 141

5 Arenas of Digital Change . . . . 143

5 .1 Introduction . . . .143

5 .2 Sustainable economic activity and the environment . . . .146

5.2.1 Sustainable Industry 4.0 and the circular economy – how digitalization is changing industrial metabolism . . . 146

5.2.1.1 Context: digitalization as a driver of an eco-industrial turnaround? . . . 146

5.2.1.2 Changing material requirements through digital devices and infrastructures . . . 146

5.2.1.3 More efficient production processes through Industry 4.0 and a digitally coordinated circular economy . . . 147

(14)

XII

5.2.1.4 Conclusions: What can digitalization do for the global transformation

of industrial metabolism? . . . 148

5.2.2 New forms of digital economy: approaches to sustainable economic activity in the Digital Age . . . 150

5.2.2.1 Re-embedding as a challenge of sustainable economic activity . . . 151

5.2.2.2 Sustainable digital entrepreneurship . . . 151

5.2.2.3 Platform cooperatives as a special expression of collective entrepreneurship . . . 152

5.2.2.4 Sharing economy between the classical and the collective economy . . . 152

5.2.2.5 Collaborative forms of production: prosumers and commons-based peer production . . . 154

5.2.2.6 Conclusions . . . 156

5.2.3 Digitalization of consumption and sustainable consumer behaviour: promotion of solidarity-based lifestyles . . . 156

5.2.3.1 Digitalized consumption for sustaining natural life-support systems . . . 157

5.2.3.2 From sustaining the natural life-support systems to the concept of solidarity-based quality of life . . . 162

5.2.3.3 Opportunities and risks of digitalized consumption for inclusion and Eigenart . . . 162

Topic box 5.2-1 FinTech in the context of sustainable financing . . . 160

5.2.4 Sustainability in online commerce: status quo and prospects . . . 163

5.2.4.1 Role and growth of online commerce . . . 163

5.2.4.2 Environmental impact of online commerce. . . 164

5.2.4.3 Social effects. . . 167

5.2.4.4 Conclusions . . . 168

5.2.5 Digitalization: from the electronic waste problem to a solution for the circular economy? . . . 168

5.2.5.1 Electronic waste in the context of the circular economy . . . 168

5.2.5.2 Digital technologies as a cause of the global e-waste problem . . . 169

5.2.5.4 Conclusions . . . 173

5.2.6 Digitalization for climate-change mitigation and the energy transformation . . . 174

5.2.6.1 Use digital technologies for the energy transformation . . . 175

5.2.6.2 Use digital technologies to overcome energy poverty in developing countries . . . 175

5.2.6.3 Contain the demand for energy generated by digitalization . . . 177

5.2.6.4 Risks of a digitalized energy system: resilience and privacy . . . 179

5.2.6.5 Conclusions . . . 180

5.2.7 ‘Smart city’: sustainable urban development with digitalization? . . . 180

5.2.7.1 Sustainable urban development in the Digital Age: challenges . . . 180

5.2.7.2 Smart city: concept, application examples, distribution and drivers . . . 180

5.2.7.3 Selected areas of tension in digitally supported urban development . . . 182

5.2.7.4 Digital sovereignty and the ‘right to the city’ . . . 185

5.2.7.5 Conclusions . . . 186

5.2.8 Sustainable urban mobility in the Digital Age . . . 187

5.2.8.1 Guiding concept of a sustainable urban mobility turnaround . . . 187

5.2.8.2 Elements of the digital mobility turnaround . . . 187

5.2.8.3 Status quo and challenges of sustainable digital mobility in urban areas . . 189

5.2.8.4 Conclusions: Setting parameters for a sustainable digital mobility turnaround in the urban environment . . . 190

5.2.9 Precision agriculture: the next step towards industrialized agriculture? . . . 193

5.2.9.1 The context: global, sustainable land use . . . 193

5.2.9.2 Precision agriculture: methods, dissemination and potential . . . 194

5.2.9.3 Efficiency versus sustainability . . . 195

5.2.9.4 Conclusions . . . 196

(15)

XIII

5.2.10 Digitalization in agriculture in developing countries . . . 198

5.2.10.1 Access to innovative digital technologies . . . 198

5.2.10.2 Access to production-related information and agricultural advisory services . . . 198

5.2.10.3 Access to weather information and disaster preparedness . . . 199

5.2.10.4 Access to market and price information . . . 200

5.2.10.5 Access to land and capital . . . 200

5.2.10.6 Conclusions . . . 200

5.2.11 Digitally enhanced monitoring of ecosystems and biodiversity . . . 200

5.2.11.1 The biodiversity crisis . . . 200

5.2.11.2 Improved knowledge through digitally enhanced monitoring . . . 201

5.2.11.3 Techniques and examples . . . 201

5.2.11.4 Risks .. . . 204

5.2.11.5 Conclusions . . . 205

5 .3 People and society . . . .206

5.3.1 Digitalization as an opportunity to promote a collective global awareness of sustainable development . . . 206

5.3.1.1 Raising awareness through digitalization . . . 206

5.3.1.2 The individual and the cosmopolitan society: can digitalization promote empathy and solidarity? . . . 207

5.3.1.3 Digital participation and networking to make changes in consumption styles possible in everyday life . . . 209

5.3.1.4 Conclusions . . . 209

5.3.2 Digitalization and public discourse: the end of rational argumentation or the chance of a global agora? . . . 210

5.3.2.1 The digitalized agora – structural changes in public discourse in the digital space . . . 211

5.3.2.2 Empowerment of, and threats to, individual inclusion in public communication . . . 213

5.3.2.3 The digital agora between concentration of power and the public interest . . . 214

5.3.2.4 Conclusions: the impact of the digital structural change in the public sphere on democratic processes . . . 215

5.3.3 Challenges of the scoring society . . . 217

5.3.3.1 Global trends in the application of scoring methods . . . 218

5.3.3.2 Necessary debates . . . 220

5.3.3.3 Conclusions . . . 222

5.3.4 From education for digitalization and sustainable development to future-proof education . . . 222

5.3.4.1 Assessment – today’s education for digitalization . . . 224

Topic box 5.3-1 Digitalization: risk or opportunity for the enforcement of environmental law? 223 5.3.4.2 Future-proof education as a driver of the Great Transformation . . . 224

5.3.4.3 Use education to offset negative effects in the Digital Age . . . 225

5.3.4.4 Use digitalization to promote a solidarity-based quality of life, inclusion and Eigenart . . . .226

5.3.4.5 Future-proof education: protect human dignity and master societal challenges collectively . . . 228

5.3.5 Public-service ICT as part of basic public services . . . 229

5.3.5.1 Public-service ICT to reduce the digital divide . . . 230

5.3.5.2 Options for the realization of public-service ICT . . . 230

5.3.5.3 Approaches to the further development of public-service ICT . . . 234

5.3.6 Digital technology as a gender bender? . . . 234

5.3.6.1 Exclusion from the digital sphere: gender-specific access barriers . . . 235

(16)

XIV

5.3.6.2 Still a male domain: gender aspects in the design of technical systems . . . 235

5.3.6.3 Anti-discrimination work using algorithm-based systems? . . . 237

5.3.6.4 Digital experimental spaces for gender equality and diversity . . . 238

5.3.7 Digital self-tracking: between empowerment and loss of control . . . 238

5.3.7.1 Digital self-tracking and the data generated . . . 238

5.3.7.2 Does digital self-tracking of health strengthen or weaken individual self-determination? . . . 239

Topic box 5.3-2 The technologization of the human being . . . 242

5.3.8 International division of labour and digitalization: consequences for developing countries and emerging economies . . . 243

5.3.8.1 Starting position: advances in development during the second wave of globalization . . . 243

5.3.8.2 Changing value chains through digitalization. . . 244

5.3.8.3 The changing international division of labour: from the analogue to the digital workbench? . . . 246

5.3.8.4 Conclusions . . . 249

5.3.9 Sustainable working environments of the future. . . 249

5.3.9.1 Automation and employment . . . 250

5.3.9.2 Distribution implications . . . 250

5.3.9.3 Social security systems and income distribution mechanisms . . . 252

5.3.9.4 Guiding concepts for sustainable work in the future . . . 253

5.3.9.5 Conclusions . . . 256

5.3.10 Digital commons . . . 256

5.3.10.1 Digital commons as a key instrument for the digital common good . . . 256

5.3.10.2 Open education . . . 257

5.3.10.3 Free knowledge . . . 257

5.3.10.4 Open data . . . 258

5.3.10.5 Digitized cultural and natural heritage . . . 259

5 .4 Conclusions . . . .261

6 Blueprints of the Future and Visions on Digitalization and Sustainability . . . . 265

6 .1 Utopian vision of a digitalized sustainability society . . . .266

6 .2 Dystopian vision on the risks of digitalization for sustainability . . . .270

6 .3 Synopsis: Comparison of visionary future hopes and risks . . . .276

6 .4 Conclusions . . . .276

7 Digitalization and Sustainability – Synthesis . . . . 283

7 .1 Three Dynamics of the Digital Age . . . .283

7 .2 First Dynamic: use digitalization for sustainability . . . .287

7 .3 Second Dynamic: Sustainable digitalized societies – anticipate and shape fundamental changes . . . .291

7 .4 Third Dynamic: The future of Homo sapiens – discourses . . . .297

7 .5 Conclusions: Place digitalization at the service of global sustainability . . . .301

8 Global Governance for the Transformation towards Sustainability in the Digital Age . . . . 305

8 .1 Approaches to the governance of digitalization at the global level . . . .306

8.1.1 Private-sector development as a starting point for global digital policy . . . 306

8.1.2 UN conferences and processes . . . 307

8.1.3 UN agencies, UN programmes, UN special rapporteurs and high-level advisory groups . . . 308

(17)

XV

8.1.4 Initiatives in the World Bank, G20, WTO and OECD . . . 308

8.1.5 Initiatives in public-private partnership . . . 309

8.1.6 EU’s strategies for sustainability and digitalization . . . 310

8.1.7 Conclusions . . . 312

8 .2 Potential benefits and risks of digitalization for global sustainability goals . . . .312

8.2.1 Digitalization and the Sustainable Development Goals . . . 312

8.2.2 Climate policy in the Digital Age . . . 313

8.2.3 Global biodiversity policy in the Digital Age . . . 320

8 .3 New global areas for cooperation beyond the 2030 Agenda . . . .321

8.3.1 Protection of individual privacy . . . 322

8.3.1.1 Status quo of the global protection of individual privacy . . . 323

8.3.1.2 Ensuring the enforcement of privacy protection . . . 324

8.3.1.3 Cooperation to ensure privacy: a United Nations Privacy Convention . . . 324

8.3.2 Preserving and extending inclusion in the Digital Age . . . 324

8.3.3 Preserving human decision-making sovereignty . . . 326

8.3.4 Protection of unique human characteristics in the human-machine relationship . . . 327

8 .4 Elements for the sustainable shaping of the Digital Age at the global level . . . .328

8.4.1 Economic paradigm as a strong lever . . . 329

8.4.1.1 Guiding principles and performance indicators of an ‘empty’ and a ‘full’ world . . . 330

8.4.1.2 Towards a new (economic) guiding principle of digitalization . . . 331

8.4.1.3 New hybrid forms of economic activity . . . 331

8.4.2 Principles and instruments of environmental law in the context of digitalization . . . 332

8.4.2.1 The precautionary principle . . . 332

8.4.2.2 The polluter pays principle . . . 333

8.4.2.3 The cooperation principle . . . 333

8.4.2.4 The integration principle . . . 333

8.4.3 Readjustment of sustainability governance 30 years after the Earth Summit of Rio de Janeiro . . . 334

8.4.4 Governance gap: adequate institutional capacities for new challenges . . . 334

8.4.5 A binding framework under international law: the optimum solution . . . 335

8.4.6 Role of science . . . 335

8 .5 The EU as a pioneer in the integration of sustainability and digitalization . . . .335

8.5.1 Appeal and political feasibility of a European model . . . 336

8.5.2 Setting the course for EU’s political priorities, strategies and programmes . . . 337

8 .6 On the need for a charter for a sustainable Digital Age . . . .338

9 Recommendations for Action . . . . 341

9 .1 Use digitalization for the 2030 Agenda and the Transformation towards Sustainability . . . .347

9.1.1 Digitalization and sustaining the natural life- support systems . . . 347

9.1.1.1 Promote decarbonization and climate protection in the energy sector, avoid rebound effects . . . 349

9.1.1.2 Use the circular economy to improve resource efficiency and avoid electronic waste . . . 350

9.1.1.3 Ensure sustainable land use and ecosystem protection . . . 350

9.1.1.4 Promote global environmental awareness and sustainable consumption through digitalization . . . 351

9.1.1.5 Involve companies in designing a digitalized, sustainable future economy . . . 351

9.1.2 Poverty reduction and inclusive development . . . 352

(18)

XVI

9.1.2.1 Strengthen the analogue basis . . . 353

9.1.2.2 Improve development cooperation and planning with digital technologies . . . 353

9.1.2.3 Gear the digitalization of cities to sustainability and inclusiveness . . . 353

9.1.2.4 Embed the use of digital technologies into sustainable and inclusive mobility strategies. . . 354

9.1.3 Work in the future and reducing inequality. . . 355

9.1.3.1 Discuss work in the future as a sustainability task . . . 355

9.1.3.2 Secure and promote social standards in occupational health and safety . . . 356

9.1.3.3 Monitor and improve the functioning of labour markets . . . 356

9.1.3.4 Develop and comprehensively test new distribution mechanisms . . . 357

9.1.3.5 International division of labour: prepare for structural change . . . 357

9.1.4 Knowledge, education and digital literacy . . . 357

9.1.4.1 Plan education for the digitalized sustainability society at an early stage . . 358

9.1.4.2 Negotiate a Future Education Pact . . . 358

9.1.4.3 Take education seriously as an investment in the future . . . 358

9.1.4.4 Provide prominent support for the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development . . . 359

9.1.4.5 Understand and organize knowledge as an integral part of shaping the future . . . 359

9 .2 Digital revolution brings new sustainability challenges . . . .359

9.2.1 Big data and privacy . . . 359

9.2.1.1 Strengthen public- and private-sector responsibility for privacy protection . . . 360

9.2.1.2 Create international protection of privacy law at the UN level . . . 360

9.2.1.3 Shape the digital structural transformation of the public sphere in a way that is innovative and oriented towards the common good . . . 361

9.2.2 Fragility and autonomy of technical systems . . . 361

9.2.2.1 Security of digitalization as a prerequisite for the Transformation towards Sustainability . . . 361

9.2.2.2 Use of automated decisions . . . 362

9.2.3 Economic and political power shifts . . . 363

9.2.3.1 Create public-service ICT infrastructures and digital commons . . . 363

9.2.3.2 Reform tax and contribution systems . . . 364

9.2.3.3 Forestall monopolization tendencies and strengthen competition on digitalized markets . . . 366

9 .3 World order of the Digital Age . . . .367

9.3.1 Global governance for sustainably shaping the Digital Age . . . 367

9.3.1.1 Call a UN summit on ‘Sustainability in the Digital Age’ . . . 367

9.3.1.2 Ensure that the issue of digitalization is well anchored in the UN system. . 369

9.3.1.3 International legal framework as an indispensable element . . . 369

9.3.1.4 Appoint a scientific panel on digitalization and sustainability . . . 370

9.3.2 The EU as a pioneer of a digitalized sustainability society . . . 370

9.3.2.1 Setting the course for the digitalized sustainability society . . . 370

9.3.2.2 Enhance data protection and ethics in technology design as a competitive and locational advantage . . . 371

9.3.3 Actor constellations for digitalized sustainability societies . . . 372

9.3.3.1 Develop civil-society networks for individual and public-interest concerns . . . 372

9.3.3.2 Win over tech-communities as allies for the Transformation towards Sustainability . . . 372

9.3.3.3 Mainstream technical knowledge and modernize state institutions . . . 372

(19)

XVII 9.3.3.4 Use the resources of transnational and international organizations for

sustainability . . . 373

9 .4 New normative questions – the future of Homo sapiens . . . .373

9.4.1 Brain-computer interfaces: incorporate data protection and shut-down options . . . . 373

9.4.2 Licensing standards and ‘early warning systems’ in the field of human-machine interaction . . . 374

9.4.3 Continuously adapt our understanding of the relationship between humans, machines and the environment . . . 374

9.4.4 Create effective and inclusive discourse arenas . . . 374

10 Research Recommendations . . . . 377

10 .1 Overarching research priorities . . . .378

10 .2 Research structures – transformation research and transformative research in the Digital Age . . . .379

10.2.1 Extend research programmes and strategies at the interface between digitalization and sustainability . . . 379

10.2.1.1 Horizon Europe: centrally enshrine digitalized sustainability in Europe . . . 380

10.2.1.2 Future Earth: extend sustainability research in the direction of digitalization . . . 381

10.2.1.3 High-Tech Strategy 2025: bring digitalization and sustainability together . 381 10.2.1.4 FONA4: create link with digitalization . . . 382

10.2.1.5 German Federal Government’s Energy Research Programme: strengthen sustainability impacts and the international perspective . . . 382

10.2.2 Recommendations to existing actors in the science system . . . 383

10.2.2.1 DFG: set up a permanent Senate Commission on Sustainability in Digitalization Research . . . 383

10.2.2.2 Universities and colleges: formulate and develop guidelines . . . 383

10.2.2.3 Academies of science: intensify references to sustainability . . . 383

10.2.2.4 Business: integrate ethics and sustainability aspects into in-house corporate R&D . . . 384

10.2.3 Establish research institute(s) on the fundamental issues of digitalized sustainability . . . 384

10.2.3.1 New research institutes at non-university research institutions . . . 384

10.2.3.2 Implement initiative for a new Max Planck Institute for ‘Geo- anthropology’ . . . 385

10.2.4 Further develop the science system and establish new forms of cooperation between science and society . . . 385

10.2.4.1 Open scientific structures for the joint production of knowledge . . . 385

10.2.4.2 Digitally supported science in and with the public – from local to global . . 386

10.2.4.3 Digitally supported transdisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity for solving societal challenges . . . 386

10.2.4.4 Organize a relevant proportion of research in an inter- and transdisciplinary way and integrate epistemology more closely into scientific training . . . 386

10.2.4.5 To influence public discourse more strongly, provide third-party funding and expand the freedom of researchers . . . 387

10 .3 Research recommendations on content . . . .387

10.3.1 Research on digitalization for sustainability . . . 387

10.3.1.1 Research on the ecological footprint of digital solutions and the recycling of products, components and raw materials . . . 387

10.3.1.2 Digitalization as a key factor in decarbonization . . . 390

(20)

XVIII

10.3.1.3 Sustainable Industry 4.0 and resource-conserving industrial

metabolism . . . 390

10.3.1.4 Research on digitalization for global food security and nature conservation . . . 391

10.3.1.5 Use digitalization for sustainable urban development . . . 391

10.3.1.6 New development models for developing countries and emerging economies . . . 391

10.3.2 Research for digitalized sustainability societies . . . 392

10.3.2.1 Work in the future: develop new forms of inclusion . . . 392

10.3.2.2 Develop financing concepts for the state and social systems . . . 392

10.3.2.3 Research on the design of human-machine interactions . . . 392

10.3.2.4 Technical and experimental impact assessment for dealing with major uncertainties . . . 393

10.3.2.5 Research on sustainable handling of data . . . 393

10.3.2.6 Research on social platforms . . . 393

10.3.2.7 Educational research on empowering the individual in a digitalized sustainability society . . . 394

10.3.3 Research on the future of Homo sapiens . . . 394

10.3.3.1 Digital anthropology: how is the idea of what it means to be human changing? . . . 394

10.3.3.2 Research the effects of digitalization on cognition, emotion and social life . . . 394

10.3.3.3 Exploring the future of human civilization . . . 395

11 References . . . . 397

12 Glossary . . . . 449

(21)

XIX

Boxes

Box 1 Arenas of digital change . . . 14

Box 2.1-1 Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development . . . 32

Box 2.1.1-1 Ethics of technology and responsible computer science . . . 34

Box 2.1.1-2 Transcending humankind? Concepts of humankind in trans- and posthumanism . . . 36

Box 2.2.1-1 Planetary guardrails . . . 38

Box 2.2.2-1 Basic human capabilities . . . 39

Box 2.3-1 Human dignity in Germany’s Basic Law . . . 43

Box 2.3.2-1 Human beings as subjects and objects in the human sciences: tensions and educational potential . . . 44

Box 3.2.3-1 Uncomputable problems . . . 62

Box 3.2.5-1 Overview of current rules and regulations on the use of AI and algorithm-based systems . . . 64

Box 3.3-1 Humanization and misleading use of language . . . 70

Box 3.3.3-1 Turing test and ELIZA . . . 72

Box 3.3.3-2 Possible applications and limitations of AI and deep learning . . . 74

Box 3.3.4-1 Cryptography . . . 77

Box 3.3.5-1 Typology of the term ‘robot’ . . . 81

Box 3.3.5-2 Drones – robotics in the air. . . 82

Box 3.3.5-3 Bitcoin . . . 84

Box 3.6-1 Ten examples of reports on digitalization and sustainability published between 2016 and 2018 by international organizations . . . 97

Box 4.2.2-1 Economies of scale and network effects . . . 117

Box 4.2.2-2 Taxation of corporate profits and reform options . . . 122

Box 4.2.6-1 Unprecedented state measures: The German Network Enforcement Act and the French Act to Combat Manipulated Information on the Internet . . . 128

Box 4.2.6-2 China’s social credit system . . . 130

Box 4.2.6-3 The EU Basic Data Protection Regulation as the EU’s approach to shaping digitalization . . . 132

Box 4.2.7-1 The ICANN as a transnational player in internet governance . . . 134

Box 4.3.1-1 Institutionalize the tech communities’ sense of responsibility for sustainable development. . . 138

Box 4.3.3-1 Decision-making sovereignty in core societal areas . . . 140

Box 5.2.1-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘ Industrial metabolism’ . . . 149

Box 5.2.1-2 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Industrial metabolism’ . . . 150

Box 5.2.2-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘New forms of digital economy’ . . . 155

Box 5.2.2-2 Research recommendations for the arena ‘New forms of digital economy’ . . . 156

Box 5.2.3-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘ Digitalization of consumption and sustainable consumer behaviour’ . . . 158

Box 5.2.3-2 Research recommendations on the arena ‘ Digitalization of consumption and sustainable consumer behaviour’ . . . 159

Box 5.2.4-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘ Sustainability in online commerce’ . . . 166

Box 5.2.4-2 Research recommendations on the arena ‘ Sustainability in online commerce’ . . . 167

(22)

XX

Box 5.2.5-1 Obsolescence as a cause of the short lifespans of electrical appliances in the

Digital Age . . . 170 Box 5.2.5-2 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘ Electronic waste and the circular

economy’ . . . 172 Box 5.2.5-3 Research recommendations on the arena ‘ Electronic waste and the circular

economy’ . . . 173 Box 5.2.6-1 The conflicting priorities between ‘negative emissions’ and synthetic fuels . . . 176 Box 5.2.6-2 Recommendations for action for the arena ‘Digitalization for climate-change

mitigation and the energy transformation’ . . . 178 Box 5.2.6-3 Research recommendations for the arena ‘ Digitalization for climate-change

mitigation and the energy transformation’ . . . 179 Box 5.2.7-1 Excursus: the Indian Smart Cities Mission – example of the challenges in a

developing country . . . 182 Box 5.2.7-2 Excursus: The right to the city . . . 183 Box 5.2.7-3 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Smart city and sustainable urban

development’ . . . 184 Box 5.2.7-4 Research recommendations for the arena ‘Smart city and sustainable urban

development’ . . . 185 Box 5.2.8-1 London Congestion Charge . . . 188 Box 5.2.8-2 China’s digital mobility turnaround – a model (not only) for developing countries

and emerging economies? . . . 191 Box 5.2.8-3 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘ Sustainable urban mobility’ . . . 192 Box 5.2.8-4 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Sustainable urban mobility’ . . . 193 Box 5.2.9-1 Precision animal husbandry . . . 194 Box 5.2.9-2 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Precision agriculture’ . . . 196 Box 5.2.9-3 Research recommendations for the arena ‘Precision agriculture’ . . . 197 Box 5.2.10-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Agriculture in developing countries’ . . . 199 Box 5.2.10-2 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Agriculture in developing countries’ . . . 199 Box 5.2.11-1 Environmental crime and its prevention using digital technologies . . . 202 Box 5.2.11-2 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Monitoring ecosystems and

biodiversity’ . . . 204 Box 5.2.11-3 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Monitoring ecosystems and

biodiversity’ . . . 205 Box 5.3.1-1 Digitalization to enable virtual contact with nature – IPGarten: “your own

garden just a mouse click away” . . . 208 Box 5.3.1-2 Digitalization for citizen sensing . . . 209 Box 5.3.1-3 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Promotion of a collective global

awareness’ . . . 210 Box 5.3.1-4 Research recommendations for the arena ‘Promotion of a collective global

awareness’ . . . 210 Box 5.3.2-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Digitalization and public discourse’ . . . 216 Box 5.3.2-2 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Digitalization and public discourse’ . . . 217 Box 5.3.3-1 Definitions of scoring and distinctions between terms . . . 218 Box 5.3.3-2 Expansion of data availability and the data trade . . . 219 Box 5.3.3-3 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Scoring society’ . . . 221 Box 5.3.3-4 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Scoring society’ . . . 221 Box 5.3.4-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Future-proof education’ . . . 227 Box 5.3.4-2 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Future-proof education’ . . . 228 Box 5.3.5-1 Public-service platforms – approaches for a European and global digital

public sphere . . . 231 Box 5.3.5-2 Broadband coverage by international comparison – examples . . . 232 Box 5.3.5-3 Further development of public-service ICT in the EU: Next Generation Internet

programme . . . 232 Box 5.3.5-4 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Public-service ICT’ . . . 233

(23)

XXI Box 5.3.5-5 Research recommendations on the arena ‘ Public-service ICT’ . . . 233

Box 5.3.6-1 Digital divides and online discrimination . . . 235 Box 5.3.6-2 Overcoming the binary understanding of biological and social gender as a

global challenge . . . 236 Box 5.3.6-3 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘ Digital technology as a gender bender?’ . . . 237 Box 5.3.6-4 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Digital technology as a gender bender?’ . . . 237 Box 5.3.7-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Digital self-tracking’ . . . 240 Box 5.3.7-2 Research recommendations on the arena ‘Digital self-tracking’ . . . 241 Box 5.3.8-1 Digital labour platforms . . . 246 Box 5.3.8-2 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘International division of labour’ . . . 247 Box 5.3.8-3 Research recommendations on the arena ‘International division of labour’ . . . 248 Box 5.3.9-1 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Sustainable working environments

of the future’ . . . 254 Box 5.3.9-2 Recommendations for research on the arena ‘Sustainable working environments

of the future’ . . . 255 Box 5.3.10-1 Licensing models . . . 258 Box 5.3.10-2 The digitized cultural heritage Europeana . . . 259 Box 5.3.10-3 Recommendations for action on the arena ‘Digital commons’ . . . 260 Box 5.3.10-4 Recommendations for research on the arena ‘Digital commons’ . . . 260 Box 7.3-1 Avoiding systemic risks in the Digital Age . . . 293 Box 7.3-2 Strengthen humaneness as a humanistic digital project . . . 294 Box 7.5-1 Education for future-proof societies . . . 302 Box 8.2.3-1 Current challenge of biodiversity policy: digital sequence information . . . 322 Box 8.4-1 The digital economy as a subject of global governance . . . 329 Box 9-1 Arenas of digital change . . . 344 Box 9.1-1 Recommendations on digitalization and sustainability in specialist literature . . . 348 Box 9.3.1-1 ‘Our Common Digital Future’ – A Draft Charter for a Sustainable Digital Age . . . 368 Box 9.3-1 Avoiding systemic risks in the Digital Age . . . 370 Box 10.3-1 WBGU analysis of research and recommen dations on artificial intelligence . . . 388 Box 10.3-2 Arenas of digital change . . . 390 Box 10.3.2-1 Real-world laboratories . . . 393

(24)

XXII

Tables

Table 2.1.2-1 Typology of present-day humanisms . . . 36 Table 3.1.3-1 The ten largest companies in the world by market capitalization in 2009 and 2018. . . . 55 Table 3.6.2-1 Key policy levers to promote widespread digital benefits and inclusion . . . 100 Table 3.6.3-1 Overview of selected charters for the Digital Age . . . 102 Table 5.1-1 Connections between the 2030 Agenda's sustainability goals (SDGs) and the arenas

of digital change . . . 144 Table 5.2.2-1 Differentiation between sharing approaches according to their degree of

commercialization . . . 153 Table 5.2.7-1 Typical dimensions of smart-city concepts and their possible links to the SDGs . . . 181 Table 5.3.8-1 Estimates of the employment effects of automation in developing countries and

emerging economies . . . 245 Table 6.3-1 Synoptic comparison of utopian and dystopian visions of the future . . . 278 Table 8.2.1-1 The WBGU’s assessment of selected potential benefits and risks of digitalization in

achieving the UN’s sustainable development goals (SDGs) . . . 314 Table 10.2-1 Further development of the German research system to meet the challenges of

digital transformation in the Anthropocene . . . 380

(25)

XXIII Figure 1-1 Overview of the topics covered in the flagship report . . . 28

Figure 2.3-1 Normative compass for the Great Transformation towards Sustainability in a

digitalized society . . . 42 Figure 3.1.3-1 Internet users as a percentage of the total population . . . 50 Figure 3.1.3-2 Development of the number of mobile phone contracts per 100 inhabitants . . . 51 Figure 3.1.3-3 Development of the percentages of households with internet access and computers

in industrialized countries and developing countries . . . 52 Figure 3.1.3-4 Number of transistors per CPU and technology node generation, memory costs

per gigabyte . . . 53 Figure 3.1.3-5 Comparison of (consumer) price developments . . . 53 Figure 3.1.3-6 ICT sector’s value-added as a percentage of total value-added in various OECD

countries . . . 54 Figure 3.2.1-1 Types of software-based systems . . . 57 Figure 3.2.1-2 The actors of a networked software-based system in the development and usage context . . . 58 Figure 3.2.1-3 Basic functions of digital systems in their temporal and future development . . . 59 Figure 3.2.1-4 Human-machine interaction . . . 60 Figure 3.2.5-1 Elements of an algorithm-based system . . . 63 Figure 3.3-1 The main current digital technologies that are changing the technical system . . . 66 Figure 3.3.3-1 Overview of the four core opportunities offered by AI, four corresponding risks,

and the opportunity cost of underusing AI . . . 75 Figure 3.4-1 Core characteristics of the Digital Age . . . 87 Figure 3.5-1 The key areas of civilization influenced by digitalization: the Earth system, the

economy, society, people and technology . . . 90 Figure 3.6.2-1 Access to mobile phones and the internet by population and by country . . . 98 Figure 3.6.2-2 Why digital dividends are not spreading rapidly – and what can be done . . . 99 Figure 4.1-1 Multi-level perspective on transformation processe . . . 111 Figure 4.1-2 Phases and core processes of transformative change . . . 112 Figure 4.2-1 Key actor groups in the Digital Age . . . 114 Figure 5.2.2-1 Disembedding mechanisms and their non-sustainable consequences . . . 151 Figure 5.2.3-1 Digitalized consumption and sustainable consumer behaviour . . . 157 Figure 5.2.4-1 Environmental effects of B2C online commerce . . . 165 Figure 5.2.11-1 Overview of digitally enhanced techniques for monitoring ecosystems and

biodiversity . . . 203 Figure 5.3.2-1 Inflation-adjusted advertising revenues of US newspapers since 1950 in US$

billions (print and online) . . . 211 Figure 5.3.2-2 Comparison of the processes of two types of media intermediaries . . . 212 Figure 5.3.3-1 Credit-score-based decision-making . . . 218 Figure 5.3.3-2 Schematic diagram showing the application of credit scores using information

that would not intuitively be associated with creditworthiness . . . 220 Figure 5.3.4-1 From Education for Sustainable Development and Digitalization . . . 225 Figure 7.1-1 Three Dynamics of the Digital Age . . . 284

Figures

(26)

XXIV

Figure 7.2-1 Compliance with planetary guard rails and securing social cohesion . . . 290 Figure 8.3.1-1 Overview of data-protection laws worldwide . . . 323 Figure 8.4.1-1 Extended guiding principles for digitalization that is geared towards the global

common good. . . . 330 Figure 8.4.1-2 Moving towards hybrid forms of a sustainable digital economy . . . 331 Figure 9-1 Three Dynamics of the Digital Age . . . 342 Figure 10.2.1-1 Three pillars of Horizon Europe . . . 381 Figure 10.3-1 Growth in the number of publications on AI compared to computer science

and publications as a whole . . . 388 Figure 10.3-2 Number of scientific publications on AI . . . 389

(27)

XXV acatech Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften

German National Academy of Science and Engineering ACM Association for Computing Machinery

ADM Algorithmic Decision Making AGI Artificial General Intelligence AI Artificial Intelligence

AIIB Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank APC Association for Progressive Communications

AR Augmented Reality

ASIC Application-Specific Integrated Circuit B2B Business-to-Business B2C Business-to-Consumer

BCI Brain Computer Interface

BECCS Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage BGBl Bundesgesetzblatt

BMBF Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

BMU Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit

German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety BMWi Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie

German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy BNE Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung

BRICS Association of five major emerging national economies:

Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa

BSI Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik German Federal Office for Information Security C2C Consumer-to-Consumer

CA Capability Approach

CAPS Collective Awareness Platforms for Sustainability and Collective Action (EU Project) CAVs Connected Autonomous Vehicles

CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CDP Carbon Disclosure Project

CFR Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora

CO2 Carbon dioxide

CPU Central Processing Unit

CRISPR Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats CSER Corporate Socio-Environmental Responsibility

DAC Direct Air Capture

DART 2020 Deutsche Antibiotika-Resistenzstrategie DC Development Cooperation

DNS Domain Name System

Acronyms and Abbreviations

(28)

XXVI

DRM Digital Rights Management DSI Digital Sequence Information EBV Essential Biodiversity Variables ECOSOC Economic and Social Council (UN) EEG Electroencephalography

EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative EMAS Eco-Management and Audit Scheme

EOSC European Open Science Cloud (European Commission) EPOS European Public Open Spaces

EU European Union

FabLab Fabrication Laboratory

FAIR Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and thus Reusable (GO FAIR Initiative) FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (UN)

FIfF Forum InformatikerInnen für Frieden und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung Forum of Computer Scientists and IT Professionals for Peace and Social Responsibility FONA Rahmenprogramm Forschung für nachhaltige Entwicklung (BMBF)

Framework Programme ‘Research for Sustainable Development’

FSC Forest Stewardship Council

GAFAM Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft GDPR General Data Protection Regulation (EU)

GEO BON Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Networks GG Grundgesetz

Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany GPU Graphics Processing Unit

HLPF High-level Political Forum (ECOSOC) HOCHN Nachhaltigkeit an Hochschulen (BMBF) HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol

ICANN Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers ICT Information and Communications Technology

IDM Information Delivery Manual IDS Intrusion Detection System IEA International Energy Agency

IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IGF Internet Governance Forum (UN)

INDC Intended Nationally Determined Contributions IoT Internet of Things

IPBES Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (UNEP, UNESCO, FAO and UNDP)

IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (WMO, UNEP) IRENA International Renewable Energy Agency

ISO International Organization for Standardization ISSC International Social Science Council (UNESCO) IT Information Technology

ITU International Telecommunication Union LDCs Least Developed Countries

MaaS Mobility as a Service

NAZCA Non-state Actor Zone for Climate Action (UN) NDB New Development Bank (BRICS)

NetzDG Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz German Network Enforcement Act NFC Near-Field Communication NGO Non-governmental Organization

NNMI National Network for Manufacturing Innovation

OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

(29)

XXVII OER Open Educational Resources

OZG Onlinezugangsgesetz Online Access Act (Germany) PAN Personal Area Networks R&D Research and Development

REDD+ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UNFCCC) RFID Radiofrequency Identification

RGGI Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (USA) RRI Responsible Research and Innovation SDGs Sustainable Development Goals (UN)

SHS Solar Home Systems

SMEs Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

STEM Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics TCP/IP Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol UAS Unmanned Aerial System

UAV Unmanned Aerial Vehicles UDP User Datagram Protocol

UN United Nations

UNCCD United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification UNCED United Nations Conference on Environment and Development UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNDP United Nations Development Programme

UNEP United Nations Environment Programme

UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UNGIS United Nations Group on the Information Society

UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund VPN Virtual Private Network

VR Virtual Reality

W-LAN Wireless Local Area Network

WAN Wide Area Networks

WBGU Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen German Advisory Council on Global Change

WCMC World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP) WHO World Health Organization

WTO World Trade Organization

WSIS World Summit on the Information Society

WWW World Wide Web

(30)
(31)

1

‘Digitalization’ is often described as a huge upheaval facing our societies to which we must adapt. The WBGU opposes this interpretation, saying that digitalization must be shaped in such a way that it can serve as a lever and support for the Great Transformation towards Sus- tainability, and can be synchronized with it. The WBGU understands digitalization broadly as the development and application of digital and digitalized technologies that augment and dovetail with all other technologies and methods. It has a profound effect on all economic, social and societal systems and is developing an ever greater transformative force. This in turn is increasingly having a fundamental impact on people, societies and the planet itself and must therefore be managed accord- ingly. Just as in 1987 the Brundtland Report entitled

‘Our Common Future’ outlined the concept of Sustain- able Development, the WBGU’s report entitled ‘Towards Our Common Digital Future’ sketches the concept of a digitalized sustainability society.

This report represents the greatest challenge the WBGU has taken on since it was founded in the Rio year 1992 – intellectually, politically and ethically. The WBGU is expanding the scope of its analysis beyond its core area of expertise, because the future fate of the planetary environment will depend massively on the progress of the digital revolution. The WBGU is getting involved in a societal discourse that is becoming increasingly hectic because it is about global innovation leadership in the 21st century. The WBGU is also trying to find answers to core questions – questions about the medium-term future, indeed even about the sheer sur- vival of the Anthropos on Earth. Sustainability trans- formation can only succeed if the digital upheavals can be successfully geared towards sustainability. Other- wise, digitalization threatens to act as a ‘fire accelerant’, exacerbating growth patterns that breach the planetary guard rails. Sustainability pioneers must seize the opportunities offered by digitalization and, at the same time, contain its risks. If those who are attempting to advance sustainability transformations ignore or neglect the dynamics of digitalization, the Great Trans- formation towards Sustainability will fall by the way-

side. The WBGU therefore advocates the continuation and acceleration of the Great Transformation by digital means. In addition, it is becoming clear that digitaliza- tion is going to change our societies so profoundly that our understanding of sustainability will also have to evolve in radical, new directions. The WBGU reveals possible directions for the next generation of sustain- ability paradigms and goes far beyond the perspectives of the 2030 Agenda.

Putting such an epochal watershed in the history of humankind into perspective, while at the same time providing practical advice for policy-makers, is ambi- tious and fraught with tension. Yet even if some assess- ments of these fundamental changes should be mis- taken, this can still be useful in throwing some light on the paths that should now be quickly pursued by more knowledgeable people.

In a sense this is a warning: this WBGU report attempts to take a holistic approach to digitalization in the context of the sustainable development of our civili- zation, which is under threat from many sides – an approach that has been missing up to now. Such a huge aspiration can only be realized – if at all – with weak- nesses, generalizations and omissions. This report should be read accordingly.

However, in order to facilitate a favourable and pro- ductive reception, the structure of this WBGU report also deviates from the norm: this time, the actual sum- mary is preceded by a narrative essay, which attempts not only to sketch out the report’s train of thought, but also to indicate the immense thematic landscape, which, in addition to balmy lowlands and emerging new realms of possibility for sustainability reforms, also includes some deep abysses. On this terrain, the narrative deals with the digital possibilities for, and risks to, preserving what evolution had yielded until the Earth’s entry into the Anthropocene period, and with the conceivable creation of new digital entities or even the possible substitution of human intelligence by machine intelli- gence. This is followed by a summary of the report’s key messages, the individual chapters and recommenda- tions for action and research.

Summary

Abbildung

Table 5.1-1 shows the relationship between the are- are-nas and Topic boxes and the 2030 Agenda’s 17 SDGs

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Thousands of initiatives are contributing inspiring, creative, and necessary solu - tions to urgent global issues such as climate change, migration, urbanization, and the need

To promote teachers ’ digital competence in teaching and learning, in this study we organised a digital pedagogy training that focused on the use of digital assessment tools with

It will have to incorporate the analysis of algorithms underlying computation, the understanding of the micro-archival temporal regime, and the understanding of the

Over the next couple of weeks, the Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-14) – the ITU’s highest decision- making body – will discuss the organisation’s role in shaping

Norman Schwarzkopf justified this action on the basis that “there was a great deal of military equipment” and that the Iraqi soldiers fleeing were not “a bunch of

At the upcoming October Council, European leaders should recognise the crucial role that digital technologies have to play in Europe’s future, consider that the

Abstract: The SSEDIC (“Scoping the Single European Digital Identity Community”) thematic network has concluded an intensive 3-year consultation period together with over 200

It formulates goals and principles for protecting human dignity, the natural life­support systems, inclusion in and access to digital and digitalized infrastructures