• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

2014 – Time for a new policy of co-operation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "2014 – Time for a new policy of co-operation"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

of 13 January 2014

By Imme Scholz,

German Development Institute /

Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)

2014 – Time for a new

policy of co-operation

(2)

2014 – Time for a new policy of co-operation

Bonn, 13 January 2014. At the turn of the year the newspapers carried thought-provoking articles:

where people get the courage from to set off on a new path and how difficult it is to draw lessons for the future from failure. Thinking of what is ahead of us in the new year, I think that these are the right subjects: we also need the courage to follow new paths and the ability to learn from the mistakes of the past when determining a new global agenda, to be in place as of 2016. This post-2015 agenda is not only of urgent priority for development policy in the next two years, it also provides the German govern- ment with the opportunity to fulfil an international leadership role and give a push to international co- operation in a range of political fields.

Courage to follow new paths

The post-2015 agenda aims to build upon the suc- cesses of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). It is difficult to furnish scientific proof for the links between the MDGs and poverty reduction.

However, there is no doubt that the MDGs have reinforced joint action in North and South, including financial commitment, to improving the living con- ditions of people.

This is encouraging and helps us move towards broader horizons: because whilst the eight MDGs focused primarily on improving living conditions in developing countries, the post-2015 agenda looks towards universal goals for sustainable develop- ment, which should guide both domestic policies and global co-operation of all UN member states.

The aim is no longer just development co-operation between north and south, or aid from rich countries to poor ones, but national and international joint action to achieve common goals: the reduction of poverty and inequality, protection of the climate and biodiversity, sustainable energy for all, food security, peace and security.

Learning from mistakes

The experience of the MDGs has also shown us how difficult it is to make progress in reducing maternal mortality or hunger. Solutions in these areas can only be found through effective co-ordination be- tween various political bodies - and they must have the highest political priority. To ensure that mothers no longer die during childbirth it is not only neces- sary to improve healthcare and roads, but also the nutrition, education and political participation of women. Who exactly suffers from hunger and why – this needs to be analysed and understood in order to

increase the availability of food in the countryside and reduce losses incurred during storage and trans- port, as well as increasing purchasing power in the towns.

Making progress in these areas therefore requires more than quantified goals and specific deadlines. It means experimenting with new policies that enable integrated action. Successes and failures need to be monitored and understood in order to advance.

What needs to be done

Development co-operation has successfully tested models of co-operation, the transfer of capital, knowledge and expertise in many areas. This wealth of experience can also be valuable when implement- ing the post-2015 agenda.

However, we should be clear that more is at stake in the future: securing the prosperity of current and future generations is a task that calls for clear politi- cal focus and a renewed comprehension of our in- ternational relations and co-operation with partner countries. One example for this is the expansion of the G8 to the G20.

For domestic policies, too, there are new tasks to face. Climate change and food security, for example, call for a new quality of co-operation between de- partments and between state and private actors in Germany. The objective is no longer one of avoiding negative side effects in adjoining policy areas, but to develop complementary strategies for common goals, and to use the diverse expertise and instru- ments in a targeted manner.

These parallel domestic and international challenges will need to be mastered in the next two years, be- fore the adoption of the post-2015 agenda.

In many industrialised, emerging and developing countries specific initiatives are being developed to face the new global challenges. The willingness and interest in co-operating with Germany is consider- able. However, thus far our co-operation instru- ments have not been aimed at achieving co- operation between all interested countries, as they are designed for either north-south transfer (Green Climate Fund) or co-operation on an equal footing between industrialised countries (e.g. in the research co-operation projects in which large emerging coun- tries are also increasingly participating with their own funds). It is therefore also necessary to use the post-2015 process for a reform of the instruments of international co-operation, in order to open it up for reciprocal co-operation processes.

© German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) The Current Column, 13 January 2014

www.die-gdi.de | www.facebook.com/DIE.Bonn | https://plus.google.com/ | www.youtube.com/DIEnewsflash

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The PCU’s work covers three main areas: democratization and good governance; rule of law and human rights; and a cross-dimensional programme comprising economic, environmental

ecfr/59June 2012www.ecfr.euThe case for co-operaTion in crisis managemenT Among members of the European Council on Foreign Relations are former prime ministers, presidents,

This report assesses freedom of the media, implementation of applicable legal framework which provides for freedom of expression and of the media, access to information,

54. Since most of the DPA’s work takes place in or for the benefit of developing countries and is related to ongoing political processes to promote critical stability for

The ICTY verdicts in three separate cases were inter- preted in the public discourse of the region as responsible for ending reconciliation, strengthening

It is obvious that from the angle of “ordinary citizens” in South East Europe, the issue of implementing conditions set by the EU and their overall at- titude towards EU and

The transport and logistics sector accounts for approxima- Lithuania has adopted a double-track policy with regard to Belarus; it maintains and develops economic co-operation and

Within NATO, countries work together on international operations (Sweden and Finland, Norway and Latvia, and Denmark and Estonia co-operate in Af- ghanistan, while Denmark, Norway