Polarforschung 58 (2/3): 65-76. /988
1.1 Problems in Monographing Antarctic Crustose Lichens
By Hannes Hertel*
Summary: OUf present knowlcdgc01'thc taxonom)' nnd floristics of Antarctic crustosc lichcns is stillpOOl'and unrcfiahlc.forthc following rcasons:
I. lack01'florasund monographs uscful for idcntification of antarctic Iichcns.
2. unavailability01'imponant type collcctions.
3. lack of represemative collcctions. adequate 10 study variability and distribuuon.
4. undcrcstimation of thc cxtcnt01'phcnotypic vmiation cuuscd by various abiotic anel biotic factors such as: phvsical f'actors (light. tcmpcruturc and moisturc conditions. freczc-thaw actions.wind erosion). ehernie al factors (growth sumation in nitrogen-cnrichcd niches. mincral incorporation in lichcns growingon substratas rieh in metals). anima
I
Feeding(in Antarctica by mites). fungul parasitism.andl.,a:~b2n,o~;n;:11:~a:l,'~F':~~;~:;~~~;H'S5. unfurniliarity with known Irom other cool temperate in theworld(Ieadingto thc üc namcs).
In an nppendix morc 100 liehen spccics rcportcdfromAntarctica also occurring in othcr rcgions are
Zusammenfassung: Ursachen unserer derzeit geringen und wenig zuverlässigen systematischen und floristischen Kenntnisse antarktischer Krusten- flechten sind:
I.Mangel an Floren werken und Monographien. die zum Bestimmen antarktischer Flechten hilfreich sein könnten.
2.Unzugänglichkeit wichtigerTypus-Aufsall1!11lungen.
3. Mangel an für das StudiumVOllVariabilität und Verbreitung der Sippen
4. unzureichende Kenntnisse der hohen Modifikabilität dieser Flechten. SIC. physikalische Standortfaktoren (Bclcuchtungs-. Tempcra- tur-,Fcuchtiakcitsvcrhältnissc. Wechselfrost. Windschliff). teils durch chemische Faktoren (Wachsturnsfördcrune an stickstoffreichen Standorten.
Mineralein- und -auflugerungeu bei chalcophilen Flechten). tcils durch Tierfraß (in der Antarktis durch lv1ilben~teils durch Befall mit pilzliehen Parasiten oder durch abnorme Regeneration bewirkt wird.
S.mangelnde Kenntnis der aus" anderen kalttemperierten Regionen unserer Erde bereits bekannten Arten (\\"a~zu zahlreichen überflüssigen Neubeschreibunzen geführt hat).
In einem Anhang werden Über 100 nicht-endemische. aus der Antarktis gemeldete Flechtenarten gelistct. um den hohen Anteil weitverbreiteter Arten dieser Flora zu verdeutlichen.
1. INTRODUCTION
Scientists working on the terrestrial vegetation 01' Antarctica are usually confronted with a flora where lichens playamajor and often dominant rölc. When the c1imate becomes very harsh (as, e.g .. south 01' 75°S). fruticose anel foliose lichens elisappear anel saxicolous crustose species form the main component 01' the liehen vegetation (FRIEDMANN 1982).
Same 75 percent 01' the 13.500 species 01' lichens recognizee! at this time (HAWKSWORTH et al. 1983) are ..crustose lichens" [a biologicaL not a taxonomic group]. These smaillichens e!evelop only a thin, primitively organizee! thallus, which is either completely affixee! to the substratum over the whole lower surface (like a varnish, rarely thicker than 0.4
rnm),or is hie!den in the uppermost layer 01' rock [0.2-1
[-4] mmin ene!olithic calciphi laus lichens (DOPPELBAUR 1959); up to 10
mmin Antarcitc .. cryprocndoliths" (FRIEDMANN 1982)].
Crustose lichens can colonize extreme nival ane!polar habirats. far better than other macroscopically visible plants.
In Antarctica crustose lichens have been faune! as far south as 86°06'S (e.g. Lecidea cancrifonnis"; DODGE ane!
BAKER 1938). in the Alps up to the highest icefree rocks (4810
m;Lecanora polvtropa; SCHLAGINTWEIT 1855). ane! in the Himalayas even up to 7400 m (Carbonea vorticosa and Lecanora polytropa: HERTEL 1977).
None 01' the mountaineers who c1imb the 8000-meter peaks in the Himalayas have yet faune! time 01' interest to look far lichens at these high elevations. It is very likely that no altitue!inal ar southern climatic limit exists 1'01' crustose lichens on earrh. in contrast
tobryophytes, foliose lichens. and vascular plants.
Bryophytes have been collecteel as far south as 84°37'S in Antarctica (Sarconeurnm g/acia/e: KAPPEN 1983).
up to 4230
min the Alps (Grimmia donniana. PITSCHMANN ane! REISIGL 1954. GEISSLER 1982). anel they grow at least at an elevation 01' 6200 m in the Himalayas' (V KOMARKOVA. pers. comm.). Foliose lichens 01'
;' Prof. Dr. Hannes Hertel. Botanische Staatsammlung. Mcnzingcr Straße67,8000MÜnchen 19. Federnl Rcpuhlic01'Germany
=Forful!name (inc1udingaurhorsnamc) sec AppendixI.
, A dense bryophyte vcgctation containing 8 spccics 401'hcpatics is rcported in ahitudes betwecn 5750IIIand6060 111.from hot spots on the Socompa Volcano on the Argentina-Chile (HALLOY 1986).
the genus Umbilicaria, have been collected as far south as 7T55'S in Antarctica (SIPLE 1938), up to 4640 m in the Alps (SCHLAGINTWEIT 1855), and up to 6300 m in the Himalayas (FREY 1936, POELT 1977). Vascular plants reach 68°21'S (Deschampsia antarctica, Anonymous 1985),4270 m (Ranunculus glacialis; PODHORSKY 1939) in the Alps and 6250 m (Arenaria musciformis; PODHORSKY 1939) in the Himalayas.
In spite of their outstanding röle as pioneers in extreme cold deserts, and in spite of the fact that these regions have a small flora relative to temperate regions, our knowledge of the taxonomy and distribution of Antarctic crustose lichens still is very poor and unreliable. It is even extremely difficult to give a realistic assessment of the number of lichens present in Antarctica (Antarctica, circumscribed here in the sense of WACE (1960, 1965), including the Antarctic Continent, the South Shetland Islands, the South Orkney Islands, the South Sandwich Islands, and Bouvet Island). According to DODGE (1974) there are 429 species oflichens (including 317 crustose ones) in Antarctica. This number is, however, as LAMB (1970) has already mentioned, undoubtedly excessive, and 160 species, in my opinion, is a more realistic estimate.
The reason for such a discrepancy - 429 versus 160 species - sterns from the low reliability of data published by some authors active in the flaristics and taxonomy of antarctic lichens. A good example of this situation is represented by a comparison of two recent revisions of Usnea subgen. Neuropogen (a conspicuous frutescent liehen genus, weil known to all terrestrial biologists working in Antarctica). In his liehen flora of the Antarctic Continent DODGE (1974) recognizes no less than 21 different species of Neuropogon in Antarctica. In WALKER's detailed monograph (1985), 17 of these 21 "species" are considered as synonyms. One of the remaining four species was excluded, being based on incorrect identifications (the species in question does not occur on the Antarctic Continent). Although WALKER accepts two additional species not included in DODGE's treatment, even so the total number of species for Antarctica is reduced from 23 to 5. While DODGE postulated all ofhis 21 species to be endemie to Antarctica, WALKER found that none ofthe accepted 5 species is restricted to Antarctica.
I am confident that this reduction in numbers of species, as shown here, can be generalized across all genera (see also "Appendix
II",and it is entirely possible that some 80% of the 149 new species introduced by DODGE (1974), and DODGE and BAKER (1938) and accepted in DODGE's Flora (1974) will turn out to be synonyms.
I am convinced that it requires more experience and knowledge to understand the antarctic lichens than the lichens of any other region, and I believe the following factors account for the difficulties encountered in correctly identifying Antarctic crustose lichens.
2. DIFFICULTIES IN IDENTIFYING ANTARCTIC CRUSTOSE LICHENS 2.1. Lack 01 modern floras and monographs
2.1.1. F I
0ras
Modern (post-1950) liehen floras which include relatively accurate keys to crustose lichens exist for only a few European regions: Western Europe (CLAUZADE and ROUX 1985), France (OZENDA and CLAUZADE 1970), S. W. Gerrnany (WIRTH 1980), Poland (NOWAK and TOBOLEWSKI 1975, NOWAK 1983), Ukraine (OXNER 1956, OXNER 1968). The liehen flora for the Soviet Union is not yet complete; five volumes published so far (KOPACZEVSKJA et al. 1971, OXNER 1974, BLUM et al. 1975, KOPACZEVSKAJA et al. 1977, GOLUB- KOVA et al. 1978). Crustose lichens of extra-European regions are very incompletely known, and for this reason treatments for the floras of Israel (GALUN 1970), Saudi Arabia (ABU-ZINADA et al. 1986), and New Zealand (GALLOWAY 1985) should be considered as first steps toward a better knowledge rather than a reliable means for identifying species of difficult genera such as Candelariella, Caloplaca, Lecanora or Lecidea.
DODGE's 'Lichen Flora of the Antarctic Continent and Adjacent Islands' (1974) is not a flora in the true sense where one can find help in identifying plants. REDON's (1985) account of the lichens of the Antarctic peninsular region ("Liquenes Antärcticos") is of relatively little help in deterrnining most crustose genera (except for Buellia and Verrucaria, where he follows LAMB 1948a, and LAMB 1968).
Not a flora, but a valuable aid for identification of various groups of lichens are the keys by POELT (1969) and
POELT and VEZDA (1977, 1981), although the large, difficult genera of crustose lichens (e.g. Acarospora,
Bacidia, Bue/lia, Cladonia, l.ercmora, Lecidea. vernuaria) are omitted or only partly included.
2.1.2. C h eck 1 ist
SAmong various recent checklisrs, SANTESSON's (1984) critical. highly reliable and informative (also key to literature) list of the lichens of Sweden ancl Norway is of great value to all who are working on lichens of cool temporare ancl cold climates, both in the Norhern and Southern hernisphere, because ofthe high number ofbipolar and widespread lichen species in Scandinavia.
2.1.3. Mono g ra p
hs
The number of monographs relevant to Antarctic lichens is still very smal1. There are worldwide monographs for Acarospora (MAGNUSSON 1929 - out of date), Cladonia (VAINIO 1887-1897 - out of date), Ochrolechia (VERSEGHY 1962 - out of date), Plucopsis (LAMB 1947). Spliaerophonts (OHLSSON 1974), Stercocaulon (LAMB 1977, LAMB 1978), ancl Usnca subgen. Neuropogon (WALKER 1985). For none ofthe large genera of erustose lichens (e.g. Buellia, Caloplaca. l.ccanora, Lecidea. . . ) are there comparable monographs. Spccies of Buellia and Rinodina from the Antaretic Peninsula arc trcated by LAMB (1968): a prelirninary key for the saxicolous species of Leeidea sensu ZAHLBRUCKNER in
thesubantarctic region (including
afew species from Antarctica) is provided by HERTEL (1984).
2.2. Unavailabilitv oftvpe collections
Type materials of the more than 150 species of crustose antarctic lichens described by OOOGE and coworkers were not deposited in public herbaria, as indicated in publications, but kept in private herbann. For example, according to DODGE and BAKER (1938: 517), type specimens of 66 new lichens species described from Marie Byrd Land and King Edward VII Land should have been deposited in the herbarium of the Missouri Botanical Garden
01'in the Uni ted Stares National Herbarium in Washington (where the MO collection was latertransferred).
In fact these specimens were incorporated in DOOGE's private collcction. which was recently transferred to Farlow Herbarium (FH) and is now finally available for loan and study.
A number of HUFs type specimens (HUE described more than 70 species of crustose lichens from Antarctica) seem to have been lost or misplaced (I was unable to trace these samples at Paris in 1987), although LAMB was able to locate so me in the 1950's.
2.3. Lack ofadequate collectious
Adistressing1y high percentage of lichens collected in Antarctica is sterile, badly developed, or damaged. Usually the specimens are very small (sometimes a few badly developed ascocarps only), much too small to tell anything about the variability of characters.
Tiny and inconspicuous species are extremly under-represented in collections from Antarctica, for many of the specimens wcre collected by geologists
01'amateurs.
Because of the general difficulties in determining Antarctic lichens, most of the existing liehen collections from Antarctica lie unstudied and undetermined. Therefore, monographers interested in the material of a particular genus have to visit the herbaria in queston to find and select specimens.
2.4. Underestimation ofthe extcnt ofphenotypic varianon
As SANTESSON (1952) has so apt1y pointed out, for a lang time many lichenologists practised a kind of
taxonomy best described as .Jndividuum descriptions". Describing a single individual specimen or a small group
of specimens does not take into account the normal variability and plasticity of any species, which may sometimes
be extremely high. As POELT (1973) srates, phenotypes of a single species growing in different habitats can
sometimes appear so unlike that it calls for detailed analysis and long experience to recognize them as
representatives of one and the same taxon. However, increasing attention has been paid to variability and
modification in reeent years. WEBER
(1962)ancl POELT
(1973)have summarized the existing knowledgc. and some monographcrs have devotcd special chapters to the
problern(e.g. HERTEL
1967,KILIAS
1981,SCHWAB
1986,
WUNDER
1974).Experience in arctic, alpine anclsubantarctic regions. as weIl as expcrienee from a careful study of large numbers of specimens from cool temperate and cold regions of the northern and southern hcmisphere, rather than field work in Antarcrica. has made me familiar with the high rate of obviously environmentally inducedmodifications in crustose lichens. Because of the more extreme and hostile environment in many parts of Antarcrica, an even lugher degree of modification should be cxpecred for lichens in Antarctica: FILSON (e.g.
1982)has drawn attention to this problern.
A nurnber of abiotic and biotic factors are responsible for this high variability, as pointec1 out by WEBER
(1962)ancl POELT
(1973),Before going into details, it should be mentioned that in various cases of obviously cnvironmcntally altered liehen specimens, we are not able to explain which panicular factors have caused the alteration. Often a cornbination of factors acting simultaneously or successivcly may be responsible for the modification in qucstion (see also WUNDER
1974).2.4.
l.P h y s i c
'I1 fa c tor s . e, g.: 1 i g h
t .t e m per a t u re. m 0 ist u
rc,fr e c z e - t h a w a c
tio n , wind erosion
Shaded andlight-exposed thalli often differ considerably in thallus colour, Light exposed parts of the thallus are usually more intensely colonred.
Specimens of certain spccies (e.g, Leeidee lapicidai colleeted at high elevation in the Alps
01'in corresponding parts of the Arctic usually devclop
'Imuch rnore conspicuous black prothallus than specimens growing under more temperate conditions do or tend to develop a thallus with isolared areolae or small groups of areoles on a more or less conrinuous black pro thallus (as e.g. in some specimens of Rhizocarpon superficialei. [The ability to form a black prothallus seerns to be
'Igenetically controlled character, but the degree of manifestation of this structure is environmentally conrrolled.] One might speculate that the black surface of the prorhallus will absorb more solar radiation and so elevate thallus tempcrature and (as long as water is available) assimilation rate.
While such conspicuous ancl enlarged prothalli are sometimes found in crustose species collected in the more humid maritime parts of Antarctica, this phenomenon secms to be rarer in dry continental parts of Antarctica. The majority of species there show well-developed, thicker epilithic or even substipitate or stipitate thalli (HALE
1987),My observations however, are so far based only on herbarium specimens (and not on population studies in the field). Interpretation of specimens in the laboratory is often distorred by alterations caused by wind erosion
('I
specimen which scems to c1eveloponly traces of an epilithic thallus may, in reality, produce a well-developed epilithic thallus which subsequently becomes more
01'less totally eroded). Population studies in the field, or at least much richer collections than are presently available, are neccessary to understand the extent of this kind of variability. It is difficult to decide whether a species such as
Car!Jol1ea 1'orlie05a,which usually has a strongly reduced epilithic thallus when growing in alpine and nival belts ofthe Alps, Himalayas or in the Arctic, developes a distinct stipitate epilithic thallus when growing in the cleserts of Antarctica, or whether two closely related but genetically distinct species
(Carbollea \'Orticosa, Cal'bollea capslI!ala)are involved. This is the kind of problem which is extremely difficult to answer in lichenology.
Freeze-thaw action probably favours pulvinate thallus surface, als FILSON
(1982)suggested.
Especially in regions such as continental Antarctica or the Himalaya above
7000m altitude (KUHLE
1986),where snow permanently clrifts around (because the temperature necessary for f01'l11ing ice or firn cannot be
reacbed), very slow-growing crustose lichens suffer severely from the strong abrasive action of snow crystals and
sand. Unusual alterations in gross morphological characters are therefore common in continental Antarctica,
2.4.2. C he m i c a I fa c tor s
As WEBER (1962) points out. stimulation of growth is wcll known in lichens from nitrogen-enriched sites (e.g.
ornithocoprophilous lichens). Crustose lichens are more luxuriant and usually develop thick, sometimcs almest squamulose thalli. However. only a small number of species in genera such as Buellia, Candclariclla. Caloplaca.
Lecanora, Lccidella. and Rinodina tolerate high nitrogen enrichment. In cases where maeroscopie thallus characters appear to have taxonomic significance, luxuriant modifications may be troublesomc. An example is Lecidella inamoena. normally an enelolithic speeies. In the Arctic this taxen was elescribed as .Lecidella endoli-thea' (the enelolithic growth form) anel as .Lecidea spitsbergensis" (a specimen with a well devcloped epilithic thallus). Although it is not mentioneel on the Iabel that Leeidea spitsbergensis was collected near a seabird colony (unfortunately ecological data are rarely giveu on specimens labels), I am almost certain that these two taxa are no more than ecotypes of one anel the sarne species. However, it is still not clear whether the very similar eu-thalline Leeidee alaiensis. elescribeel from the Alai mountains in central Asia, is a disrinct taxon or not.
It is well known that sorne crustose lichens telerate high levels ofheavy metals toxic to most organisms, Leea-nara vinetorum has a copper content of 0.5% of the dry weight of the liehen (POELT and HUNECK 1968); Leeidee lapicida
(=Leeidea theiodes) up to 5.3% Cu dry wt. (PURVIS 1984); Acarospora sinopica up to 6.5% Fe elry wt (LANGE anel ZIEGLER 1963). Lecidca theiodes is, as PURVIS (1984) points out, a modifieation of Lecidea lactea (which is, as suggested by SCHWAB (1986). a chemotype of Lecidea Iapicidai. The characteristic anomalous green coloration of the thallus of Lecidea theiodes, which led SOMMERFELT to describe a new species, is caused by crystals of a eopper-norstictic acid complex. as it is in two other yellow-green species elescribed from cupriferous rocks: Acarospora isortoqucnsis, and Acarospora undata, wh ich were found to be modifications of Acarospora smaragdula (PURVIS et a1. 1985. PURVIS et al. 1987).
Lichens growing on weathered, iron-rieh rocks often show a rusty coloration, caused most likely by iron oxide.
As for the lecideoid lichens, SCHWAB (1986) has rccently shown that aside from a number of species with constantly rust-coloured thalli (e.g. Tremolccia atratai. most rust-coloured lichens described are modifications of whitish
01'grcyish species (this was suspected by various lichcnologists. e.g. WEBER 1962).
Ochraceous pigmented moelifications seem to be restriored to cool anel humid climates, and thus so they are very common in the subantarctic islands, known also from maritime Antarctica, but not yet from Continental Antarctica.
2.4.3. Bio t i c fa c tor s , s u c h a s a n i mal fee d i n g an d fun g a l p a
ras i t i s m In ternperate climates. damage to thalli and/or ascocarps caused
bypredation
bysmall animals, e.g. caterpillars (RAMBOLD 1985), snails (SCHADE 1933, SCHADE 1956). colembolans and mites (GERSON anel SEAWARD 1977), plays a significant role in the moelification of lichens. In many especially eutrophie habitats of temperate Europe, for example, it is sometimes quite elifficult to find any undamaged thalli of certain speeies (POELT 1973).
We usually elo not know what kind of animal causeel the darnage. except in freshly damageel thalli where, for example, radula tracks on cortex and medulla of the liehen can be ciearly observed. Gross morphological characters (type of thallus areolation, shape of ascoearps) may be strongly altered.
Hymenia, structures rich in protein, often become selectively eaten. In lichens with carbonizeel excipular strucrures (as in species of e.g. Bue/lia, Car!Jonea. Carillaria. Porpidia, Rhizocarpon) this type of dal11age l11ay lead to apothecia which seem to have eleveloped very prominent anel often narrow margins anel flat
01'concave eliscs.
Another example of a misunderstood feeding elamage form is ,,Lecida c)'closora". a lichen characterized by roundish soredia, which are in reality the basal parts of the apothecia of PO/pidia zeoroides, totally eaten away (HERTEL 1967).
I have had no personal experience on whether animal predation of lichens plays a significant role in the
l110dification of crustose lichens in Antarctica. However. LAMB (1968) found "elamage by mites (AcarinicJae)
with subsequent abnormalities in regeneration" .significant for the understanding of polymorphie variation in
species of Buellia in the Antaretic Peninsula. Most high latitude parts of Antarctica are too colel to support any
invertebrates.
Worldwide there arc some 500 species offungal parasites on Iichens, belonging mainly to the Ascomyeotina and Imperfect Fungi, Some fungal infections eause descolorations or gall-like structures. and massive infeetions may suppress development of ascocarps or ascospores of the host liehen. Ascocarps of the parasite grow on a sterile thallus and the whole system then is often misunderstood as a "normal liehen". In this way HUE (1915) described Charcotia as a new genus of Umbilicariaceae in Antarctica, based on material of Umbilicaria antarctica parasitized by a species of Scutula (LAMB 1948b). 111e"antarctic genus Lethariopsis" is based on some rather old speeimens of Usnea antarctica with a few minute fruiting individuals of a Caloplaca species epiphytically attached to them (LAMB 1948b). Similar misinterpretations will probably be found.
Endohymenial parasites are sometimes reduced to ascogenous hyphae and asci, which occupay the aseocarps of the host, surrounded by the host paraphyses. Combinations of asci and spores of the hymenial parasite Arthonia intexta and the ascocarps and thalli ofthe hostLecidella have been described nine times as species new to science (HERTEL 1969).
Little is yet known of liehen parasites and their mcdifying influence on host lichens in Antarctica.
2.4.4. Ab n
0r mal re gen e rat ion
The ability to regenerate damaged structures is well developed in crustose lichens. However, the resulting regenerated thalli or ascoearps may differ considerably in morphology frorn the undamaged species.
Carbonized structures may develop around damaged tissues. An example is the subantaretic liehen Lecidea lygomma, wh ich forms remarkable blaek rings around the apotheeia (HERTEL 1984). This charaeter was so eonstant throughout the large populations I studied on the Prince Edward Islands that I became convineed it was a good taxonomie eharaeter. I used it to establish a new genus Zosterodiscus (HERTEL 1984). However, after later studying New Zealand populations, I concluded that this eharacter is not constant and therefore the carbonized rings must be environmentally, not genetically induced structures (HERTEL 1987b).
Regeneration of hymenia may lead to a gyrodisc (HERTEL 1967, KILIAS 1981) and umbonate ascocarp.
However, not only gross morphological, but also intemal anatomieal eharaeters may be altered by damage and subsequent regeneration. Normally greenish or green-blaek epihymenia may become brown (SCHWAB 1986).
In regenerated hymenia there may be a greater degree of branching and anastomosing of paraphyses, usually
'Igood taxonomie eharacter at the genus level, than in undamaged ones (KILIAS 1981, SCHWAB 1986). SCHWAB (1986 p. 278) mentions that the width of exeipular hyphae (usually a good taxonomie eharaeter) may also be altered by darnage and regeneration in Porpidia.
Development as well as regeneration are very slow processes in Antaretica. So a new wave of damage often may occur before an earlier damage is regenerated. In this way very strange thallus and ascocarp struetures may develop.
It is usually easy for plant collectors to deeide whether a flowering plant is well developed, an extreme shade form, variously damaged (e.
g,leaves damaged by insects, or stunted by fungal parasites), without flowers or fruits, or represents the remains of aplant eaten by grazing animals. In all these cases a good trained collector would do his best to find additional, better developed speeimens.
Analogous kinds of damage obviously oecur in lichens. However, in these cases it is often diffieult to recognize whether there is any damage at all and what the nature of it is,
The extreme variability of morphological characters, eombined with our present inability to eulture these extremly
slow-growing, saxieolous, crustose lichens, makes it very difficult to deeide whether two similar looking
specimens are either merely eeotypes of one and the same taxon or are genetically different.
2.5. Lack offamiliarity with Arctic and Alpine lichens
The degree of endemism among Antarctic crustose lichens in apparently very much overestimated. According to DODGE (1974), nearly all (97%) of the lichens found in Antarctica are claimed to be endemie. I consider 20%
endemie species to be a much more realistic estimate. The reminder of the species have abipolar
01'otherwise wide distribution. In "Appendix H", I have tried to summarize the non-endemie species in the Antarctic liehen flora, as far as I could determine (the list, based on literature available to me, is undoubtedly incomplete). There are 69 species wh ich may be increase when genera such as Aearospora, Bacida, Buellia, Catillaria, Caloplaca, Lecanora, Leeidea, Rhizocarpon and others are monographed on a geographically wide base. Lichenological research in Antarctica started very late, and most of bipolar or widespread species were described much earlier, often in the 18th and 19th centuries, from the N0I1hem Hemisphere, mainly from Central Europe and Scandinavia.
Therefore, a profound and detailed knowledge of these floras is an absolute prerequisite when monographing Antarctic crustose lichens
01'describing new species.
It is usually taken for granted that there is a sharp contrast between the liehen floras of the humid and perhumid subantarctic regions (Tasmania, New Zealand, W. Patagonia, Falkland Islands, South Georgia, Tristan da Cunha, Gough, Prince Edward Islands, Crozet Island, Kerguelen, Macquarie Island), and Antarctica. Appendix H lists 38 southern hemisphere liehen species which share a distribution in both maritime Antarctica (South Orkneys, South Shetlands, Antarctic Peninsula) and subant-arctic regions. This is not particularly surprising, for in subantartic regions there may be habitats (such as at higher altitudes on mountains) where microclimatic situations correspond to macroclimatic conditions in maritime Antarctica.
Although Antarctica is geologically very old, and was formerly apart of Gond wanaland, the opportunities for survival of Gondwanan floral elements are extremely limited due to the heavy glaciation which began at least 20 million years BP (RAVEN and AXELROD 1974). In the lecideoid lichens there seem to be no genera truly endemie to the Antarctic continent, in contrast to subantarctic regions (HERTEL 1987a).
There is no doubt that there are endemie crustose species in continental Antarctica (among the lecideoid species, Leeidea cancriformis, widespread and common in continental Antarctica, seems to be a good example). However, as in the Arctic, endemie species are often a minority among the more aggressive, widespread orcophytes, which recolonized the polar areas after Pleistocene glaciations by means of long distance dispers al.
One ofthe fascinating goals of liehen systematics is to clarify the origin of the Antarctic liehen flora, its diversity and relationships. We urgently need reliable identifications, and specialists who not only study Antarctic lichens exclusively but are also familiar with all other species described from various cold areas. Last but not least, we need more extensive collections from all ice-free parts of Antarctica made by trained lichenologists.
3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to express my sincere thanks to a number of colleagues who provided me with various informations or who made available rare literature: Dr. Vera KOMARKOVA (Boulder, Colorado), Dr. O. BREUSS (Wien), Prof.
Dr. W. FREY (Berlin), MI'. P. JACOBSEN (Kiel), Prof. Dr.
L.KAPPEN (Kiel), MI'. G. RAMBOLD (München), D1'. R. LEWIS SMITH (Cambridge), Prof. Dr. J. POELT (Graz), MI'. F. SCHUHWERK (Regensburg), and Dr.
O. VITIKAINEN (Helsinki). Dr. D. GALLOWAY (London) and Dr. M. E. HALE jr, (Washington) kindly revised
the English text.
Appendix I
Index of Latin names mentioned in the text
Acarospora Massai.
Acarospora isonoqucnsisAlstrup Acarospnra sinopica (Wahlcnh.) Kocrb.
Acarospora sntaragdula (Wahlcnb.) Massal.
Acaraspora undata Clauzadc. Roux ct Wirth Arenario tnuscifannisWall.
Arthonia intextaAlmqu.
BnctliaDNol.
CandelaricttaMüll.Arg.
Carbonca capsulata(Dodgc) Haie Carbonca vonicasa (Flk.) Hertel CharcotiaHue
CtodinaNyl.
Cia doniaHill.cx Web. in \Vi211.
Desclunnpsia antarcticaDes,,~-
Grinnnia donnianaSm.
Lccanorapolytropo(Hoffrn.) Rabenh.
Lccanora vinctonnn Poet!ctHuneck Lecidca ataicnsisVain.
Leeiden cancnfonnis Dodgc ct Bakcr Leeiden cvclosora Lettau Lccidea cndolithcoLVIH!e
Lccidca lacteaSchac~.-- LeeidenIapicida (Ach.) Ach.
Leeiden lyrzOinmaNyl.
Lecidca senst! Zahlbr.
l.ccidca
1J:;';;:;:':;"~~;;;:l:~J!.
LecideatJj
Lecidcita inamoena(Müll.Are..)Hertel Lethanopsis Zahlbr. ~ OchrolcchiaMassai.
Placopsis gelida (Nyl.) Linds.
POJ7Jidia zeoroides (Anzi ) Knoph ct Hertel RanuncnlnsgtacialisL.
Rhizocarpon snperficialc (Schacr.}Vnin.
Rinodina (Ach.) S.F.Gray
Sarconcnntm glaciale (C. Müll.I CarcI.clBryhn ScutulaTut.
SphaerophotusPers.
Stereocanion Hoffm.
Tremolccia atrata (Ach.) Hertel Umhilicaria antarcticaFrcyetlVI. Lamb Usnea antarctica DR.
UsncaP. Brownc cx Adans. subgcn. Neuronagon (Nccs ctFlot.)Jatta Zosterodiscus Hertel .
Appendix 11
67
· 69 69 69 69 .66 .70 . 66.68.69 67 68 . 65.68
· 70
· 67
· 67 66 65
· 65 .69 69.7() 65.71 69 69
· 69 . 68.69
· 70
· 67
· 69 .69 .69
· 70 67
· 67 .69
· 66
· 68 67.68 65
· 70 .67 .67 69
· 65
· 70
· 66 .70
This list ineludes a large number of non-endemie liehen speeies which oeeur in Antaretiea and in other parts of the world, Although most of the information is based on literature only, only those records are included, whieh scem to mc to be reliable. Usually only the more reeent literature eitations are included.
A. Bipolar and widespreadliehen species in Antaretiea
J.Acarosporachlorophana (Wahlcnb. in Ach.) Massal. (0VSTEDAL 1983)
nigricans(Ach.)Ny!. (LAMB 1964. SMITH 1972, ALLlSON and srvJITH 1973) 3. Bacidia trachona (Ach.) Lettau (0VSTEDAL I 986a)
4. Bryocauton chalvheifonnis (Ach.) Kärnef[=Alectosia chalvbcifonnis Ach.) (LAj'vIB 1964. SMITH 1972. ALLISON ct SMITH 1973) 5. Bucllia coniops (WahJenb. in Ach.) Th. Fr. (LAMB 1968,SlvIITH 1972)
6. Bucllia papitlara(Sommcrf.) Tuck. (LAMB 1968)
7. Buellia punctata (Hoffm.) Massal. (LAlvIB 1968.Si\'rITH 1972)
8. Caioplaca citnna (Haffm.) Th. Fr.[=Ca/oplaca mawsonii (Dodge) Dodge] (FILSON 1974a and 1974b. KASHIWADANI 1979) 9. Caloptaca jungcnnanniae(Vahl)TI1.Fr. (0VSTEDAL 1986a)
10. Catoplacatetraspora(NyI.) Oliv.(1.POEL"L pers. comm.l 11. Caloplaca tiroticnsis Zahlbr.{J.POELT,pers. comm.}
12. Candcknielta vitellina (Hoffm.) Müll. Ar2. (BOWRA el al. 1966.SMITH 1972)
13. Carbonca vorticosa (Flk.) Hertel {=Leci(/ca vorticosa (Flk.) Koerb.j (HERTEL 1984, HERTEL1985')
14. Cladina mitis (Sandst.) Hustich[=Cladonia nntis Sandst..=Cladonia lacvignta sensu DODGE 1974] (AHTI and KASHIWADANI 1984) 15. Cladina rangifcrina(L.)Ny\.[=Cktdonia rangifcsina(L.)Nyl..=Cladonia vicariaR. Sant.] (AHTI 196 L SMITH 1972. AHTI 1984, HUNECK
et al. 1986)
16. Cladoniofurcata(Huds.) Schrad. (LINDSAY 1975')
17. Cladoniogrocilis(L.)Willd. [:=Cladonia propogulifera(Vaiuio )Dcdge](AHTI 1980. HUNECK el al.1986) 18. Cladonio plcurota(Rk.) Schacr. (VAINIO 1903, LINDSA'{ ]975)
19. Cladoniapvvidara(L.)Hoffm.(VAINIO 1903. DARBISHlRE 1911. LINDSAY 1975. J()RGENSEN 1936)
20. Coclocoulon acnleattnn(Schreb.) Link (Schreh.) Ach.] (LAiVlB 1964. Sl'vfJTH 1972. KARNEFELT 1986) 21.COCIOCOlllollnnuicaunn(Ach.)Kämcf. llIuricara(Ach.) Ach.](K/\RNEFELT 1986)
22. Cvstocoleuscbcncus(Dillw.lThwaites (LINDSAY 1971 b. SMITH 1972. SrvliTH and CORNER 1973. J0RGENSEN . 19X6)
23. Dennatocarpon intcstuufonnefKocrb.} Hasse (LAivIB 1948a)
24. FansoldiadissifJahilis(Ny!.) I-ICrlel[=LcridcaslIhllllCSCCIISNyL] (HERTEL 1984) 25. HvpogvntniaIlIgubris(Pers.) Krog (LlNDSAY 1974. EUX 1979. REDON 1985)
26.l.ccanora potvtropa(I--loffm.) Rabcnh. (DARBlSHIRE 1912. LONGTON ct HOLDGATE 1979) 27. Lecidcaatrobrnnnea(Ram.)Schacr.[=Lccidca racovitzacDodge] (I-1ERTEL 1984) 28. Lecirtca lapicrda(Ach.)Ach.f=LccidcantpicidaVain.] (HERTEL 1984. HERTEL ] 985) 29. Lecidello carpatlncaKoerb. (HERTEL incd.}
30. Lccidctto inamoena(Mtill.Arg.) Hertel (HERTEL ined.) 31. Lccidelio stigmatca(Ach.)Hertel and Lcuckert (HERTEL ined.) 32. Lenraria ncglcctaVain. (KAPPEN 19851
33.Mossatonoiacarnosa(Dicks.)Kocrb.(LAMB 1959. UNDSAY 1975, J0RGENSEN 1986
34. Ochrolrchiajrigida(Sw.)Lyngc(LlNDSAY 1971c, SMITH 1972.sxtrn: andCORNER 197J. REDON 1985) 35. Octnolrchia pa relkt(L.)Massal. l:=Ochrotcctua cnnarctica(Mull. Arg.) Darb.] (SivIITH 1972. 0VSTEDAL 1986b) 36. Pannaria hooked(Borr. es: Sm.) Nvl. (LINDSAY 1974. REDON 1985, J0RGENSEN 1986)
37. Pannclia saxantis(L.)Ach. [:=Parinclia ac('rmtaHue]
rsxirru
1972. UNDSAY 1973a. StvnTH and CORNER 1973, UNOSA)' 1975) 38.Peltigemdtdactyia(Wirh.) Laundon l-Pettigcra spuria(Ach.) OC] (UNDSAY 1971a, S.ivliTH and CORNER 1973. UNDSAY 1975,VITIKAINEN 1987 in lit.)
39. Pettigere nqescens(Weis) Humb.!917a. SivlI1'H 1972. ALLISON er SMlTI-I 1973. LINDSAY ] 975. VITIKA1NEN 1987 in lil.) 40. Phaconhi:a nintbosa(Fr.)Mayrh. c! Poelt[=Rinodina nimbosa(Fr.)Th. Fr.J (LAtvlB 1968)
41. Phvsciacacsio(Hoffrn.) Fürnrohr [:=PW"IIIe!lo("orcyiOoelge ct Bakcr.>PannctiajolinstoniiDodgc.=Partnetto variolosaDodge et Bakcr] (SMI1'H 1972. FILSON 1974a. NAKANISHI and KASH1\VADANI ]976)
42. dubia(Horfm.jLeuau(NAKAN1SHIandKASHIWADANI 1976, J0RGENSEN 1986 43. muscigena(Ach.)Poch (S1\·1I1'H 1972. KAPPEN ]985, REOON 1985)
44. Psendephebc minuscu!a(Arnold} Brodo ct Hawksw.f=/vtcctona tnnntscu!a(Arnold) Dcgcl.ieAtcctotia antarcticaDodgc ct BakcL:=Atcctotia bifonnis(Vain.I Dodge.>Alcctona cangesta(Zahlbr.) Dodge](LAivlB 1964. KASHIWADANI 1970. BRODOandHAWKSWORTI-j 1977) 45. Psettdcphcbc pubcsccns(L.)Brodo et Hawksw. [=Alcctoriapubcscens(L.) R. Howe. :=Atcctona intricataHuc.:=:AtectonalIigcrrimaHue ]
(LAMB1964,HAWKSWORTII1972.SMITH1972)
46.PSOJ"OlIW hYPllol"IIJII(Vahl)S. F. Grayl-PsorotnatnvantiiDodge.=PsoromaialhnanniiDodge] (SMITH 1972, HENSSEN Cl RENNER 1981.
J0RGENSEN1986)
47. RhizocarpongcographiCil/1I(L.)Oe.
rsxnru
1972. ALLISON er Si'vIITI-l1973. Sj'vIlTH ct CORNER 1973. REDON 1985, HUNECKct al. 1986.0VSTEDAL1986a.0VSTEDAL19X6b)
48. Rhizocarpon supcrjicralc(Schaer.) Vain.[=Rliisocarpon adarcnsc(Darb.) ;V1. LAj'vlB.:=Rhizocarpon barilochcnscRas ..=Buclliaaustro-gcorgica MUll. Arg.,:=BuclliaflavoplonaDarb..=Buctlia supcrboDarb..=Bncttia tristisDarb..=Buellia variabilisDarb.] (RUNEi'vIARK 1956.
SMITH1972)
49. Rltizoplaca mclanoplultaltna(DC) Leuck. ct Pocltl-Omphalodina exulans(Th.Fr.) Dodge] (FILSON 1974b, FILSON 1975c, 0VSTEDAL 1986b)
50. Rmodinan!iracCOhl"!lIIlImDoelgeelBaker[=Rillodil/a arc!wcoidesH. i\'1agn.] (LAiVlB 1968. KASHIWADANlI970. F!LSON 1975a) 51.RillOdillotw:täcca(Wahlenb.) Koerb. (LAMB 1968, 0VSTEOAL 1986b)
51.Splwerophoms g{oboslIs(Huels.) Vain. (LlNDSAY 1971a. Sj\lITH 1972. SMlTH anel CORNER 1973, HUNECK er a1. 1986) 53.Spnras!afia tesflldillca(Ach.) MassaI. (HERTEL ined.)
54.Sferco('{/lIlolI alp,-mllliLau!". (SivIITH 1972. ALLISON ct SMITHJ973. LAi'VIB1977) 55.Slcrcocalilol/ \"('S/f\'iallll/JIPers. (LAi\tIB 1977 - 79'11'S~)
56.Tephmme/a atm(I-Iuels.) Hafellner Lecallora a/ra(Huels.) Ach.] (VA1Nl0 1903, SivliTH 1972, ALLlSON Cl Si\1ITI-l 1973) 57.Trel/lolicia atrata(Ach.) Hertel[= i:mCt.](SivIiTH 1972. SMITH allel CORNER 1973. HERTEL 1984. HERI'EL
58.UlI1hilicaria aprillaNy!.[=UlI1hilicaria spol1giosaDodge el Baker, Umhilicaria all/arclica var. suh\'iridis Frey et M. LA!\·IB.UlIIlnlrcoriasm·i,·,i, Llano. Gyrophora kOi"Olkcl'ic:ii Golubkova] (GOLUBKOVA anel SAVICZ 1966, LINDSAY 197Ib, FlLSON 1975b, FlLSON198/) 59.UlIlhilicaria dccllssar(l(ViiI.) Zahlbr.[=Ulllbi!icaria c-rill1iaHue, Umhilicaria pal"l"lIla Huc. Umbilicaria mgosa Doclge ct Baker, UlI1hilicaria
ccrchr~t"ormisDodgc et Bake!". Ulllhilicana patenfol"lnis Doclge et Baker. Ulllhilicaria hU!1fcri Dodgc. Umbiticaria suhcachrtt"orlllis Dodgc.
OJllplwlodisc/ls dcc/lssar/isvar. !or!HOSIIS Llano. Ulllhiticaria Iciocmpa val'. nana Vainio. Dcrllla!isclIfllllwlI"So/li Oodge (LINDSAY 1969.
KASHIWADANI1970,SMITH1972,FILSON 1975c.HUNECK clal. 1986.FILSON1987) 60.Ulllhilicariapropa/;lIlffcra Llano (TOPHAl--il el a1. SEAWARD el a1. 1983. FlLSON 1987)
61.USl1ca sphoce/(l/oR. Br. USllca frigidaDodge cl Baker.= laxissillloDodge.=USI1CO picala(lvI. Lamb) Dodge. := USJ/C(l scahridilla (1....1.Lamb) Doelge.= slllplw}"c(l Th.FI:,?:= [/.1'11('(1s/rialaZnmmulo in Oodge,=USllca suhpolaris(lvI. Lamb) Dodge] (LA MB 1964.
WALKER1985)
62.\'crl"/rcaria ccuthocmpaWahlenb. (LAlVIB 1948a, SMITH ]972) 63.\icrrltcaria !II(fHI"(lWahlcnb. (VAINIO 1903, Si\-HTH
64.\hnrcaria microspo/"oaucl. nonNyl.(LAi\-'lB 1948a sub microsporaNy!.'. SAN1'ESSON 1984) 65.Fcrl"/rcaria 1/IucosaWahlenb. (SANTESSON ]938. LAivIB 1948a. 0VSTEDAL 1986b)
66.Xal1t!lol"i(lUlndetwia(L.)Th. Fr,[=Polycaliliolla com{{igeraHue. Xalllhoria alllorelica (Vain.) Dodge cl Baker] (LAMB 1948b. SMlTH 1971.
LlNDSAY1975.J0RGENSEN1986)
67.Xamhoria clegall.\"(Link) Th. Fr.[=Gasparrillia {{//slrogeorgicaDodge,
=
Gaspani/lia cirrinaDodge, := Gasparrillia harrisso/lii Dodge, :=Polycaulionia johllstol/iiOodge,
=
Polycalllio/lia pu!l'iJ/ataDodgc et Bakc!"' := Po{ycou!ionia .\parsa Dodge et Bake!"' := Ca!op{aca.\J)({IX[(Oodge et Baker) J. ivfUlTay var.latespora J. Murray] (FlLSON 1966, LINDSAY 1972b, Si'vlITH 1972. UNDSAY 1975. FILS ON 1975c.
LlNDSAY1977.FILSON 1984)
68.Xallt!wria parieti!w(L.)Behr. (KASHIWADANI 1979)
B. Species known!rom bOlh AllIarclica (md SuballIarclic regions
69.Bacidia tubaculmaDarb. (0VSTEDAL 1986b)
70.BlIe{!ia anisolJlcraVain. (LAMB 1968, LINDSAY 1973b. 0VSTEDAL 1986) 71.BlIet!ia augllstaVain. (LA.1\·18 1968. LINDSAY 1973b)
71.BlIclliafa{klandicaDarb. (DARBISHIRE 1912. 0VSTEOAL 1986b) 73.Bllc!lia isa!Jcllilla(Hlle) Darb. (LAMB 1968, LINOSAY 1973b) 74.Bucllia {atc!l1argillataDarb. (LA MB 1968. UNOSAY 1973b)
75.BHcllia IlIc{anosto{a(Hlle) Darb. (LAMB 1968. LINDSA\{ 1973b, 0VSTEDAI. 1986b) 76.Bucllia i"IISSO(Hue) Darb. (LAMB 1968. SivIITH 1972, LINDSAY 1973b, 0VSTEDAL 1986b) 77.CalojJ/a("(f cirrochmoidcs(Vain.) Zahlbr. (SMITH 1972. LINDSAY 1976. 0VSTEDAL 1986b) 78. CalojJ{aca rcgalÜ(Vain.) Zahlbr. (SMITH 1972, POEL1' ct PELLETER 1984. HUNECK ct aL 1986) 79. CalojJ{(f("(fsublohl/lata(Ny!.)Zahlbr. (SAN1'ESSON 1944. SivHTH ]971, REDON 1985. 0VSTEDAL 1986)
80. Cladina pycnoclada(Pcrs.) Leight.[=Cfadoniapycnoclada (Pcrs.) Ny!.] (HUNECK er al. 1986) 8 I. Coelocauton cpiphorcttunt (Ny!.) Kärnef (LAMB 1964, SMITH 1972. KARNEFELT 1986)
82. Haematonnna erythronnna(Nyl.) Zahlbr. [=Lepraria pallidostrcnninec Vain..
=
LcccnoraorosthcoidesVain.] (FOLLMANN and REDON 1971, SMITH 1972. SMITH and CORNER 1973. FOLLMANN and RUDOLPH 1979. HUNECK et al. 1986)83. Hinumtormia lugulnis(Hue) M. Lamb (LAMB 1964, SMITH 1972. LINDSAY 1975, HUNECK et al. 1986) 84. Huea austroshctlandica(Zahlbr.) Dodge (LlNDSAY 1974)
85. Lecania gerlachei (Vain.} Darb. (0VSTEDAL 1986b)
86. l.eptogium pubcrulnmHue (SMITH 1972, LlNDSAY 1975, REDON 1985, 10RGENSEN 1986) 87. Notolecidea subcontinua(Nyl.) Hertel[=Leeidee subcontinunNyl.] (HERTEL 1987a) 88. Pannaria dichroa(Hook. et Tay!.) Cromb. (10RGENSEN 1986)
89.Parmelia ger/acheiZahlbr. (LINDSAY I973a. LINDSAY 1975) 90. Pannelia usliuaiensis Zahlbr. (LINDSAY I973a, LlNDSAY 1975)
9I.Placopsis contonuplicataM. Lamb (LAMB 1947, SMITH!972, 0VSTEDAL 1987b) 92.Psoroma cinncnnomcnmMalme (LINDSAY 1974. REDON 1985)
93. Psoroma tcnucHenssen (HENSSEN ct RENNER 1981)
94.Ramalina terehrataHook. f. et Tay!. (LAMB 1964. SMITH 1972. LINDSAY 1975, REDON 1985, HUNECK et a!. 1986) 95. Rinodina dcccptionisM. Lamb (LAMB 1968, LINDSAY 1973b, 0VSTEDAL I 986b)
96. Rinodinapctennannii(Hue) Darb. (LAMB 1968. SMITH 1972. LINDSAY 1973b) 97. Staurothole gelida(Hook.f. et Tay!.) M. Lamb (LAMB 1948a, REDON 1985) 98. Stercocaulan antarcticumVain. (LAMB 1977)
99. Stercocaulan glahrum(Mül!. Arg.) Vain. (LINDSAY 1975, LAMB 1977, HUNECK er al. 1986, 10GENSEN 1986) 100. Usnca (Neuropogon} acromelanaStirt. (LA MB 1964, WALKER 1985)
101. Usnea (NewopogoJl) antorctica DR.[=USI/ea crassaZammuto in Dodge,=Usnea crombieiDodgc,=Usnea jloriformisDodge,=Usnea granutifera(Vain.) Moryka,
=
Usnca propogullferaDodgc,=Usnea psendofntticosaZammuto in Dodge,=Usnea pustulataDodge,?= Usnea subjoveolata Dodge,?=
Usnea subpapillata Dodge] (CAMB 1964, GOLUBKOVA and SAVICZ 1970, SMITH 1972. WALKER 1985. HUNECKctal. 1986)102. UsneatNcuropogon}aurantiaca-atra}(Jacq.) BOf)'[=Usnea auranüacaMotyka.=Usnea fascicüaTorrey,
=
Usnea melaxanthaAch, ?=Usnea sip!eiZammuto in Dodge] (LAMB 1964. SMITH 1972. WALKER 1985)103. Usnea (Ncuropogon} subantarcticaF.],Walker (WALKER 1985) 104. Vermcariae/acop/acaVain. (SMITH 1972, 0VSTEDAL 1986b)
105. Vermcaria tesseIatu/aNyl. (LAMB 1948a, SM1TH 1972, 0VSTEDAL 1986b) 106. ZahlhrucknereIIa patagonicaHenssen (HENSSEN 1977)
Refcrences
Abu - Z i n a da,A.H., Ha w k s w0rth , D.L. .B0k h a r y, H.A.(1986): The LichensofSaudi Arabia. with akeyto thc species reported.
- Arab Gulf1.Sci. Res., Special Pub!. 2: I-55.
A h t i , T. (1961): Taxonomie studies on rcindccr lichens(Cladonia,subgenusCtadinai. - Ann. Bot. Soc. zool.-bot. Fenn, ..Vanamo" 32(1):1-160 +12 plates.
A h ti .T.(1980): Taxonomie revision of Cladonia gracilis and its allies. - Ann. Bol. Fennici 17: 195-243.
A h ti ,T.(1984): The status of Cladina as a genus segregated from Cladonia. - Beih. Nova Hedwigia 79: 25-61.
A h t i ,T. & K a s h iwa d a ni ,H. (1984): The liehen genera Cladia. Cladina and C/adonia in southern Chile. - In: Inoue, H. (cd.) Cryptogams in Southcrn Chile, 125-15 I, Tokyo.
Anonymous (1985): Antarctica - Great storics from the frozen continent. - Sydney, London, New York, Montreal, Cape Town(byRcaders Digest).
320 pp.
Allis o n ,1.S.& S mit h . R.I. L. (1973): The vegetation of Elephant Island. South Shctland Islands. - Brit. Antarct. Survey BuH. 33 34:
185-212.
BI um, O. B.. Dom b r0v s k a y a , A. V., In a s h villi ,C. N.. Pi t e r ans. A. V., Rom s ,E.G. S a v i c z,V.P. (1975):
Handbook of the lichens of the U.S.S.R. 3. Caliciaceae - Gyalectaceae. - 275 pp., Leningrad.
B0w r a , G. T., Hol d g a t e , M. \V., Ti I b ro0k .P. 1. (1966): Biological investigations in Tortanfiella and central Heimefrontfjella.- Brit. Aruarct. Survey BuH. 9: 63-70.
B rod0,I.M.& Ha w k s w0r t h , D.L. (\977): A/ectoria and allied genera in North America. - Opera Botanica 42: 1-164.
CI a u z ade, G.& R0u x , C. (\ 985): Likenoj de okcidenta Europo.lllustrita determinlibro.v-s-Bull. Soc. Bot. Centre-Oucst. Nov.Scr., 7: 1-893.
Dar bis hir e , O.V. (1912): The lichens ofthe Swedish Antarctic Expedition. - Wiss. Ergeb. Schwed. Südpolarexpedition 4(11): 1-74.
D0d g c C. W. (1974): Lichen flora of thc antarctic continent and adjacent islands [,,1973"] - 399 pp., Canaan (New Harnpshirc).
D0d g e .C.W.& Ba k er, G.E.(1938): Botany of Second Byrd Antarctic Expedition. II. Lichens and liehen parasites. - Ann. Missouri Bot.
Garden 25: 515-718.
D0P P e l ball r . H. W. (1959): Studien zur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte einiger endolithischer pyrenokarper Flechten. - Planta 53:
246-292.
EI i x , J. A. (1979): A taxonomie revision of the lichen genus H.)Jmgynlllia in Australasia. - Brunonia 2: 175-245.
F i Iso n ,R. B. (1966): The lichens and mosses ofMacRobertson Land. - Australian and New Zealand Antarctie Research Expedition (A.N.A.R.E.) Sei. Rep. SeLB(ll).Bot. 82: 1-169.
F i Iso n , R. B. (1974a): Stu(lies in antarctic lichensI:Notes on Ca/opfaca citrinCI(Hoffm.) Th. Fr. andPhyscia caesia(Hoffm.) Hampe. - Muelleria 3: 1-8.
F i Iso n. R. B. (1974b): Studies in Antarctic lichens II: Lichens from the Windmill Islands, Wilkes Land. - Muelleria 3: 9-36.
F i Iso n •R.B.(1975a): Studies in antarctic lichens BI: Notes on Rinodi//a o/iraccohnlllllea Dodgc&Baker, from the Antarctic and moss-inhabiting speciesof Rinodilla from other parts ofthe world. - Muelleria 3: 117-121.
F i Iso n, R.B.(1975b): Studics in antarctic lichens IV: Notes on Umbi/icaria aprina Ny!. - Muelleria 3: 130-140.
F i 1 s0n. R. B. (1975c): Studics in antarctic lichens V: Lichenes antarctici exsiccati, fascicle I, with additional notes on the taxonomy of each species.-Muelleria3: 146-158.
F i Iso n,R. B. (1982): Lichens of continental Antarctica. - loum.Hattori Bot. Lab. 53: 357-360.
F i Iso n,R. B. (1984): XantllOria e/egans and its synonyms in Antarctica. - Lichenologist 16: 311-312.
F i 1s0n, R. B. (1987): Studies in antarctic lichens VI: Furlher notes on Umbiliearia. - Muelleria 6: 335-347.
F oll man n,& Red0n .J. (1971): Zur Identität der antarktischen Krustenflechte Lecanora orostfleoides Wain. - Philippia 1: 98-100.
F0l1 man n, G.& Ru d0I p h, E. D. (1979): HaematoJllflla cl)'thromma (Ny!.) Zahlbr. in der Antarktis. - Willdenowia 6: 13-16.
Fr i e dm an n, E. I. (1982): Endolilhie microorganisms in the Antarctic Cold desert. - Science 215: 1045-1053.
Fr e y, E. (1936): Die geographische Verbreitung der Umbilicarien und einiger alpiner Flechten. - Ber. Schweizer Botan. Ges. 46: 412---444.
Ga ll0\Vay, D. (1985): Flora of New Zealand. Lichens. - 662 pp., Wellington.
74
G alu n , I\'L (1970): The lichens01'Israel. - 1!6 pp ..+30 plates, Jerusalem.
Gei s sie r P.(1982): Alpine communities. -In: Smith.A.1.E. (ed.): Bryophyte ecology:167-189, London, New York.
Ger s0n ,U. & Se a ward . M. R, D. (1977): Liehen-invenebrate associations. - In: Senward. M,R.D. (ed.): Lichen ecology: 69-119.
London. New York,San Francisco.
Go l u b k0va , N, S. & S a vicr ,V P. (1966): Lichenes familiac Umbilicariaceae c parte orientali Anrarctidae. - Novit. Syst. Plant. Non Vascul. 257-263.
Goi u b k0v a N. S.& S a v i cr .V P.(1970): Species familiae Usneaccac in Antarctica oricntali. - Novit. Syst. Plant Non Vascul. 211-220.
GoI u bk0v a . N.S..S a vic z,V P.&T ras s , H. H. (1978): Handbock ofthe lichens ofthe U.S.S.R. 5. Cladoniaceac - Acarosporaceae.
- 304 pp. Leningrad.
Ha k u 1 i n e n . R. (1954): Die FlcchtcnaattunaCandclanella MÜller Arzoviensis, mit besonderer Berücksichtiaunz ihres Auftretens und ihrer Verbreitung in Fennoskandicn. -'"'Ann. Bot. Soc. Zool. BotFenni~ae'Vanamo ' 27(3): 1-127. ~ ~
Hai e , M. E. (1987): Epilithic lichens in the Beacon sandstone formation, Victoria Land, Anrarctica. -- Lichenclogist 19: 269-287.
Halloy, S t. (1986): The highest bryophyte taxocenes on earth? - The Bryological Times. 37: 6---7.
Ha w k s w0I't h . D.L. (1972): Regional studies in Aleetario (Lichenes) 11. The British spccies. - Lichenclogist 5: 181-261.
Hawk sw0r t h , D.L. .S u tto n ,B.c.,A ins w0rth , G. C. (1983): Ainsworth&Bisby's dictionary ofthe fungi (including the lichcns).
Seventh editicn. - 445 pp .. Kew (Surrey).
He n s s c n . A. (1977): The genus Zahlbruckncrella. - Lichenclogist 9: 17--46.
He n s sen . A.& Ren n er, B. (1981): Studios in thc liehen aenus Psorama I: Psoroma t('lIlIe and Psoroma cinnamomeum. - Mycotaxon 13:
433-449. ~
Her t c I H. (1967): Revision einiger calciphiler Formenkreise der Flechtengattung Lecidea. - Bcih. Nova Hedwigia 24: 1-174.
Be r tel,H.(1969):AtthoniaintcxtaAlmqu., ein vielfach verkannter fruchtkörperloser Flechtenparasit. - Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 82: 209-220.
Be r tel, H. (1977): Gesteinsbewohnende Arten der Sammclzattuna Leeidee (Lichenes) aus Zentral-, Ost- und Südasien. Eine erste Übersicht. -
Khumbu Himal6(3): 145-378. ~ ~
Her tel H. (1984): Über saxicole. lecideoide Flechten der Subantarktis. - Bcih. Nova Hedwigia 79: 339---499.
Her tel, H. (1985): New, or little-known New Zealand lecideoid lichens. - Mitt. Botan. Staatssammlung München 21: 301-337.
Her tel, H. (1987a): Progress a probrems in taxonomy of Antarctic saxicolous lecideoid lichcns. - Bibliotheca Lichcnol. 25: 219-242.
Her tel. H. (1987b): Bemerkenswerte Funde südhemisphärischer, saxicolcr Arten der Sarnmclgattung«Lccidea». - Mitt.Bot. Staatssammlung München 23: 321-340.
H u e. M. (1915): Lichens. - Deuxieme Expedition Anrarctique Franceise (1908-1910) comandcc par le Dr. Jean 013rco1. - Sei Nat. Docum.
Sei.. 202 pp-. Paris.
H une c k . S.. S a ins b u r y. M., R i c kar d , T M. A.. Lew isS mit h . R. I.(1986): Ecological and chcmical investigarions of the lichcns from South Georgia and thc maritime Antarctic. - Journ. Hattori Bol. Lab. 56: 461--480.
J (}r gen sen.P. M. (1986): Macrolichens of Bouvetcya. - Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 185: 23-34.
K ä r n e fe I t.1.(1986): The generaBryocaulon, Coeiocaulon and Comicuiaria and formerly associated taxa. - Opera Botanica 86: 1-90.
Kap p e n .L (1983): Anpassungen von Pflanzen an kalte Extremstandorte. - Bcr. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 96: 87-101.
Kap p e n ,L (1985): Vegetation and ecology of ice-free areas01'northem Vicroria Land, Antarctica. L The liehen vcgctation of Birthday Ridge and an inland mountain. - Polar Biol. 4: 213-225.
K a s h i w a dani ,H. (1970): Lichens of thc Prince Olav Coast. Antarcrica. - lA RE Scientific Rcports, Ser.E, 30: 1-2 L
K a5hi\v a d a ni .H. (1979): Additional notes on lichensofthe Prince Olav Coast, Antarctica. - Mem. National InsL Polar Research (Tokyo), Special Issue11:42-46.
K i I i a s. H. ([981): Revision gesteinsbewohnender Sippen der Flechtengattung Catillaria MassaI. in Europa (Lecanorales. Lecideaceae). - Herzogia 5: 209-448.
Kopaczcvskaja E. G.. ivlakarevicz, M. E, Oxner,M.F.Rassadina, K. A. (1971): Handbook ofthe lichens oftheU.S.S.R..
1. Pertusariaceae, Lecanoraceae and Panneliaeeae. - 410 pp., Leningrad.
K0pa c z e v s k aj a. E. G.. M a kare v i c z, M. F.& 0 x Tl er, A. N. (1977): Handbook ofthe lichens ofthe U.S.S.R., 4. Verrucariaceae - Piloearpaceae. - 343 pp., Leningrad.
Kuh 1e . M. (1986): Die Vergletscherung Tibets und die Entstehung von Eiszeiten.~Spektrum Wissenschaften 9/1986: 42-54.
La m b. L M. (1947): A monograph of the lichen genus Placopsis NyL - LiHoa 13: 151-288.
LaInb. L M. (1948a): Antarctic PyreTlocarp Lichens.~"Discovery"' Rcp. 25:1~30.
L a m b. L i'v1. (1948b): Ne\\', rare or intcresting lichens from the southcrn hemisphere1.- Lilloa 14: 203-25 L
La m b. L M. (1959): La vegetacion Iiquenica de los Parques Nationales Patag6nicos. - Anal. Parques Nationales (Buenos Aires). 7: 1-188 U95n·
La m b,1.M. (1964): Antarctic Lichens L The genera USllea, Ramalina, HimantorJnia, Alectoria, ComiclI[(fria. - Brit. Antarct. Survey, Sci. Rep.
38: 1-70+IX plates.
La mb, L M. (1968): Antarctic Lichens 11.The genera Bueliia and RiJlodilla. With an ontogenetic section by A. HENSSEN. -Brit. Antarct. Survey.
Sei. Rep. 61: I~129+XVI plates.
La mb L M. (1970): Anlarctic terrestrial plants und theirecology. -In: Holdgate. M.\V(cd.) Antarctic ecology, 2: 733-751, London.
LaInb . L M. (1977):Aconspectus of the lichen genus Stcreocauloll (Schreb.) Hoffm. -loum. Hattori Bot Lab. 43: 191-355.
La mb. L M. (1978): Keys to the species of the lichen genus Stereocallio/l (Schreb.) Hoffm. - loum. HaHori Bol. Lab. 44:209~250.
La n g e, O.L. & Z i e g I er, H.(1963): Der Schwermetallgehalt von Rechten aus dem Acarosporetum sinopicae auf Erzschlackenhalden des Harzes.I.Eisen und Kupfer. - Mitt. Roristisch-Soziolog. Arbeitsgemeinschaft (Stolzcnau), N.F.,10: 156--183.
Li n d s ay D. C.(1969): New records far antarctic Umbilicariaceae. - BriL Antarctic Survey Bul!. 21: 61-69.
Li n d s a y. D.C.(1971a): Notes on antarctic lichens: II. The Genus Peitigera. - Brit. Antaret. Survey BuH. 24: 115-118.
Li n d s ay,D. C.(1971b): Notes on antarctic lichens: IlI. Cystocolcus niger (Huds.) Hariot. - Btit. Antarcl. Survey Bull. 24: 119-120.
Li ncls ay,D. C.(l97lc): Notes on antaretic lichens:V.1l1e genus Qchrolechia Massa!. - Brit. Antarct. Survey BuH. 26: 77-83.
Li ncls a y. D. C.(l972a): Notes on antarctic lichens: VI. TIlCgenus SplweropllOrIIs. - Brit. Antarc!. Survey Bull. 28: 43---48.
Li n d s a y. D. C.(1972b): Lichens from Vestfjella, Dronning Maud Land. - Norsk Polarinstitutt MeddeL 110: 1-21.
Li ncls a y. D. C.(1973a): Notes on antaretic lichens: VII. TI1egenera Cetraria Hoffm., HypogymJlia (Ny!.) NyL, MeJlcga::ia MassaI. Parme/ia Ach. and Plalis/JIalia Culb.ClCulb. - Brit. Antarc!. Survey BuH. 36: 105-114.
L i n d s ay. D. C. (197 3b): South Georgian microlichens: L The genera BlIeiiia and Rinodina. - Brit. Antarcl. Survey Bull. 37: 81-89.
Li n d s a y. D. C. (1974): New taxa emd records of lichens from South Georgia. - BriL Antare!. Survey BuH. 39: 13-20.
Li n d s ay D. C. (1975): The macrolichens of South Georgia. - Brit. Antarc!. Survey, Sei. Rep. 89: 1-91+III plates.
Li n d s a y. D.C. (1976): The lichens of Marion and Prince Edward Islands, southem Indian Oeean. - Nova Hedwigia 28: 667-689.
Lind say. D. C. (1977):Lichensof colddesens. - In:Scaward. 1\'1. R.D.(cd.)Lichenccology.183~209.Ncw York.
L0ngton R. E.& Holclgat e. 1\'1. W.(1979):The South Sandwich Islands: IV. Botany. Brit.Antatet. Survey.Sei.Rcp.94: I-51.
Magn usS 0n .A. H. (1929): Amonograph01"thcgcnusAccnospara. - K.Svcnskn Vctensk. Aknd. Handl.. Tredje Scr..7(4):1---4(X).
Na k a nish i . S.& Kas hiwaelani .H.(1976):A note cn rwo specics ofPhvscia inAntarctica. - Antarctic Record(National Institute of Polar Research."lokyo).56: 29--32.
No wak .1. (1983):Porosty(Lichenes). Tom1.Czcsc I. - FloraPolska.PolskaAkadcnua Nauk.241 pp ..XXXI plates. Warszawa. Krakow.
No wuk .1.& Tob0Icvvski .Z. (1975):Porosty Polskie. - Polska Akadcnua Nauk. Iinpp ..Warsza-va&Krakow.
(1v s t cdaI. D.O.(1983): Somc lichcns from Vcstfjel!a. Dronning Mauds Lanel. Antarctis. - Cryptoganuc. 131)'01. Liehenöl. 4:217~226.
o
v stc d aI. D.O. Lichen andlichcn Fromthc British-Swedish-Norwegian Antureue Expedition 1949-52 to Dronning MaudLand. Bryol.Liehenöl. 63-70.
o
v s tcclaI. D. O. (1986b): Crustosclichcns of Bouvctoya. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skriftcr185: 35-56.o
his s0 11. K.(1974): Arevision of thc liehen gcnusSphaeroplunns.~Thesis. Michigun Stare Univcrsity.o
xn er. A. N. (1956):PloraIischajnikivUkrami.Tom 1 Akadcmija Nauk UkramskcrRSR. 495 pp.Kicv.O:x n c r A. N.(1968): Floralischajnikiv Ukrauu.Tom2.~~AkadcmijaNauk UkramskotRSR.500pp.,Kicv.
o
xn er. A. N. (1974):Handbock01'rhe lichcns ofthc U.S.S.R.2. Morphology. Systemntic and Gcographical Distribution. - Akadcmija Nauk.283pp ..Lcningrnd.
o
zenda P.& CI auzaclc .G. (1970):LesLichens,etudc biologiquc ctFloreillustree ...._-801pp ..Paris.Pits c hmalln . H.& Reisig I. H. (l954): Zurnivalen Moosflora der Ötztalcr Alpen (Tirol).-~Rev.Bryol.Lichenol.23: In-13\.
Pod h0r sky. J.(1939):HöchststeigendeBlütenpflanzen. - Jahrb. zumSchutzederAlpenpflanzen und -tiere.11: 72-90.
Pot:I t.1.(l969): Bcstinunung sschliissel europäischer Flechten. - 757 Pp. Lehre.
Po e I t . J. (1973): Systemaue cvaluationofmorphological characters. - In: Alunadjian. V.&Haie, lVI. E. (eds.) The lichens: 91-"-115, Ncw York.
Lenden.
Poc It ..J. (1977): Die Gattung Umbilicaria(Umhilicarinccac)(Flechten des Himalaya14). - Khumbu Himal6(3): 397--435.
Poc11. J.& I-I uncck .S. (1968):Lccanora vinctonnnnova spec..ihre Vergesellschaftung. ihre Ökologie und ihre Chemie.~Östen.Bot.
Zeitsehr.115: 411---422.
PoeIt .1.& PeII eIe r. U.(1984): Zwcrgstrauchige Arten der FlechtengauungCalol'laca. - Plant. Sysl. Evol. 148: 51·-88.
Po eIt.1.& Vezda.A.(1977): Bcslil11ll1ungsschlüssel europäischer Flechten. Ergänzungsheft 1. - Bibliotheca Lichcnol., 9: \-258.
Po eIt.1.& Vc zcla.A.(,1981): BeslimmungsschlÜssel europäischer Flechten. Erg;inzungsheft 11.---. Bibliotheca Licheno!.. 16: 1-.390.
ru r v i s.O. W. The occurencc ofcoppcr oxalale in lichens growingOllcoppcr sulphide-bearing rocksinScanclinavia. - Lichenologisl 16:
Pur vi s.O. W. EIi x. J.A .. B r0 0m h e a d. 1.A ..J0n es, G. C. (1987):Tl1Coccurence01'coppcr-llorsticlic acid in lichens rrom cllpriferous substrata. - Lichenologist 19: 193--203.
Pur v i s . O. \\1 G iIbe r t. O. L. Ja m e s P.W. (1985); The intlucncc of coppcr mincraliz.ation on.Ac(lJ"Osporasmamgdllla.
Lichenologisl 17: 111-116.
Ra m bolcl. G. (1985): FiiHerlingsexpcrimente mit den an Flechten rressenclen Raupen von S'Clilla allrira Esp. (Lepidoptera. Arctiiclae).
Nachrichtenblau Bayer. Entomologen 34: 82-·--90.
Ra vc n. P.H. & A x e1 r0cl D. I. (1974): Allgiospcnn biogeography amI past continental movemcnts. - Ann. MissouriBOL Gare!. 61' 539---673.
Re cl0 Tl.J. (1985): Liquenes Antarclicos. - 123 pp .. 21 plates, Sanliago cle Chile.
Run e m a r k. H.(1956): Studies inRhi:ocw]Jo/l.I.Taxonomy of the yello\\' species in Eurüpe. - Opera Botanica](I):1-152.
San t eS S 0n, R. (1938): Amphibious PyrcnolichensI. - Ark. Botanik 29A (10): 1-67.2 plates.
S a11te s s0n.R. (!944): Contribulions to thc Lichen Flora01"South Ameriea. - Ark. Botanik 31 A(7):1-28.4 plates.
San te s s0 n. R. (1952): Foliicolous lichens 1. Arevision of the taxonomy 01'the obligatc1y foliicolous lichenized fungi. - Symb. Bot. Upsal.
12(11: 1-590.
San t e s s0n R. (1984): The Lichens of S"'edcn and No!"way. - 3.33 pp.. Slockholm amI Uppsala.
Sc h acle, A. (19.13): Flechtcnsystematik uncl Tierfraß. - Bcr. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 51: 168-192.
Sc hacle. A. (1956): Schneckenfraß an f-lechtcll.- Dechcniana 108:243~246.
Schlag i11t '" ei t.A. (1855): Beitrligc zur Kenntnis der Vcgctationsverhällnisseobcrhalb der Schnec1inie.- Archivf. Naturgescl1. 20: 139-148.
Sc h wab, A.J. (1986): Rostfarbene Arten der SammelgattungLCCldm(Lecanorales). Revision der Arten ivlittel- und Norcleuropas. -- lvlitt. Bot.
Staatssal11l11lungIvlÜnchen 22: 221---476.
Se a \\. a r d. lVI. R. D. B y I ins k a. E. A .. Top h a111,P. ß. (1983): The distribution anel ecology of UlJlhilicariapJ"OjJagulilcm(Vainio) Llano.~Nova Hedwigia 38: 703-716.
Si pie. P. A. The Seeond Byrcl Antarctic Expedition - Botany.I.Ecology ami gcographical distribution. - Ann. )'dissouri Bol. Garden 15:
Sm i t h R. I. L. (1972): Vegetation01'the Soulh Orkney Island with particular reference to Signy Islancls. - BriL Antarct. Survey Sci. Rep. 68:
1-124.
Sm i t h. R. 1.L. & Co r n er. R. W. lVI. (1973): Vegetation of the Arthur Harbour-Argentinc lslands region01'the Atltarctic Peninsula. - Brie Anlarct. Survey BuH. 33; 89-122.
Top h a m, P. B.. S c a war d, lVI. R. D. B y 1 ins k a. E. A. (1982):Ul/lbilicariapropaglll(fcm new10the llorthell1 hemisphere. - Lichenologist 14: 47-52.
Va i n i0 ,E. A. (1887-1897): i\ifol1ographia Cladoniarum Universalis I-JII. -- Acta Soc. Fauna Fl. Fennica(1)4: 1-509 (1887),(n)10: 1---498 (1894). (II1) 14(1): 1-268 (1897).
Va i ni0 E. A. (1903): Lichens. Expedition antarctiquc Belgc. - Resultats clu voyage du S.Y.Belgica en 1897-1898-1899.6, BOlanique, 46 pp, Anvcrs.
Ver s e g h y K. (1961): Die GattungQchrolechia. - Beih. Nova Hedwigia 1: 1-146.2 tab., 1 plale.
W ace N. lVI. (960): Thc botany of the southern oceanic islancls. - Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser.B. 152: 475---490.
W ace. N. lVI. (1965): Vascular plants. In: iVIieghem.J. van&Oye, P. van (ecls.) Biogeography alld ecology in Antarctica: ]01-266. The Hague.
Wal k e r F.J~(1985): The lichen genus[JSIl('(lsubgenusNCllroPOgOIl. - BuH. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Botany Ser., 13(,l):1-130.
Web er. W.A. (1962): Environmental modillcation amI the taxononlV01'thc crustose lichens.~Svensk Boum. Ticlskr. 56: 293-33.3. I coloured
plate. .
Wir I h.V.(1980): Flcchtentlora. Ökologische Kennzeichnung und Bestimmung dcr Flechten SÜdwestdeulschlands und angren7.cnder Gebiete.- 552 pp .. Stuttgan.
W und er. H. SchwarzfrÜchtigc. saxicole Sippen der GattungCalojJlaca (Lichenes. Teloschistaceae) in i'vfilteleuropa. dem l'vIil!elmeergebiet und - Bibliothcca Lichenol. 3: 1-196. 9 plalcs.
