• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

OpenIFS – FESOM2.0 coupled model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "OpenIFS – FESOM2.0 coupled model"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Jan Streffing (jan.streffing@awi.de)

OpenIFS – FESOM2.0 coupled model

References

[1] Carver et al, 2018, "The ECMWF OpenIFS numerical weather prediction model release cycle 40r1: description and use cases", in preparation to be submitted to GMDD.

[2] Danilov, S., Kivman, G., & Schröter, J. (2004). A finite-element ocean model: principles and evaluation. Ocean Modelling, 6(2), 125-150.

Wang, Q., Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Timmermann, R., Wekerle, C., Wang, X., ... & Schröter, J. (2014).

[3] Wang, Qiang, Sergey Danilov, and Thomas Jung. "FESOM1. 4: Formulation of an unstructured-mesh ocean general circulation model." 2014.

[4] Danilov, S., Sidorenko, D., Wang, Q., and Jung, T.: The Finite-volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM2), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 765-789, 2017.

* ESM-Project: https://www.esm-project.net/

BREMERHAVEN

Am Handelshafen 12 27570 Bremerhaven Telefon 0471 4831-0 www.awi.de

Outlook

→ Improving cold bias by tuning mixing

→ Coupling OpenIFS cycle 43

→ Use in ESM-project *

→ Higher resolution for both atmosphere and ocean T255L91/LR → T511/MR

→ Lower res. for palo climate applications Longer term:

→ Studying model bias origins

→ Atm. chemistry and dynamic vegetation

→ Final goal: FESOM2-based ESM for CMIP7

Outlook

→ Improving cold bias by tuning mixing

→ Coupling OpenIFS cycle 43

→ Use in ESM-project *

→ Higher resolution for both atmosphere and ocean T255L91/LR → T511/MR

→ Lower res. for palo climate applications Longer term:

→ Studying model bias origins

→ Atm. chemistry and dynamic vegetation

→ Final goal: FESOM2-based ESM for CMIP7

Atmosphere GCM: OpenIFS Atmosphere GCM: OpenIFS

Ocean GCM: FESOM2 Ocean GCM: FESOM2

Sea-ice: LIM3 Sea-ice: LIM3

Sea ice: FESIM Sea ice: FESIM

Atmospheric Chemistry and aerosols: TM5

Atmospheric Chemistry and aerosols: TM5

Ocean GCM: NEMO

Ocean GCM: NEMO Vegitation: LPJ-GVegitation: LPJ-G Land: IFS H-tessel Land: IFS H-tessel

Oasis3 MCT Oasis3 MCT

ECMWF+EC-Earth ECMWF+EC-Earth

EC-Earth EC-Earth

AWIAWI

- Provide high resolution atmosphere for coupling with FESOM2

- Potential alternative ocean model for EC-Earth 4?

- Starting from EC-Earth OpenIFS development branch - Adding in FESOM2 as additional ocean model

- Uses OpenIFS CY40r1v2[1]

- Thus far: development not fed back to EC-Earth project

- Separate repository at DKRZ gitlab

- Finite volumE Seaice Ocean Model (FESOM2.0) - Development: FEOM[2] → FESOM1.4[3] → 2.0[4]

- Unstructured triangular mesh - Flexible mesh generation

- Resolution in e.g. dynamically active regions, study areas, coastlines, tropics, etc.

- Saving computational resources

- OpenIFS-FESOM2 (OF-CM) results on T255L91/LR - 50y runs; Means of last 20y – PHC3 SST are shown;

- Runs with constant ghg and solar forcing; 1990 and 1850 run

FESOM 2.0

Goal and model setup

Simulation results

FESOM2 computational scalability on typical meshes

Compare to EC-Earth

- SO warm bias (cloud albedo + Cloud condensation nuclei/marine aerosols)

- Gulf Stream separation shifted northwards (low resolution) - warm western continental boundaries (weak upwelling)

- FESOM2 is colder than NEMO by ~ 0.5°C (strong mixing)

- sea ice regions show warm bias / low EOS ice concentrations - 1850 pre-industrial control run too cold

Sea ice concentrations at end of local summer / winter with const. 1990 and 1850 forcing

Mesh LR HR XR A1km

Resolution (Km) 25-100 10-80 4-40 1-30

Surface nodes 127k 1.3m 5.0m 14.0m

CPUs 0.28-0.4k 2.4-4.6k 1.7-18.0k 7.0-55.0k

SYPD 90-170 24-40 2-40 2-16

LR XR

1990

1850

Compare to ECHAM6-

FESOM2.0

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

assimilation of physical quantities and of nutrients; sensitivity study to the physical forcing and the corresponding model response; stochastic estimation of biogeochemical

Comparison results obtained with extended SCIATRAN version 17 to predictions of other radiative transfer models and MERIS satellite spectra are presented in this paper along with

Common problems of MDT models are the different scales, accuracies and basis functions of altimetry data and geoid data=. These issues are avoided by combining the normal

The research analyses which actors, institutions and processes have featured centrally in resource mobilization and bargaining in successive models of economic and

Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organi- zations supporting the

Comparison of simulated and observed monthly mean ocean bottom pressure time series at locations on the northern slope of the Atlantic- Indian Ridge (top) and in the Cape Basin

There are two main phases (CMIP1 and CMIP2), which study, respectively, 1) the ability of models to simulate current climate, and 2) model simulations of climate change due to

Difference between true depth and estimated depth (in meters, top) and estimated error reduction (in percent, relative to the initial error estimate of 200m, bottom); noisy