Errata zu Kochia 5

When you write “One of the important con- sequences of the mere existence of this formula is the following” on page 8, you suddenly switch from GL n to general Lie groups; it would

Errata to “Frobenius’s last proof” February 20, 2020.. Frobenius’s last proof

Proof of the equality between (3.18a) and (3.18c): The matrix B is column- pseudo-commutative, and thus has column-symmetric commutators, and therefore has weakly

• page 1, Abstract: In the first sentence, the subsentence “subset of sequences satisfying a degree-m linear recursion, i.e... Errata to “On finite sequences satisfying

This formula is easy and known, but since you are defining polarization, you might as well mention this formula, as you are using it several times (for example, you silently use

First, I think you should remove the words “in (4.7)” here, because they are confusing (they sounds... Second, this might need some

• page 13, proof of Theorem 11: You write: “We leave it to the reader to verify that this involution cancels the unwanted terms in s R λ/µ ”.. Frankly, some detail would be good

The following list of errata refers to the preprint version of Vesselin Gasharov’s article “A short proof of the Littlewood-Richardson rule” available from his web-