• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Voluntary action from the perspective of social-personality psychology

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Voluntary action from the perspective of social-personality psychology"

Copied!
22
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

VOLUNTARY ACTION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF

SOCIAL-PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY

u. C. BAYER, M. J. FERGUSON, AND P. M. GOLLWITZER

1 Introduction

Social-personality psychologists have traditionally devoted little attention to the theoreti- cal and empirieal analysis of the issue of voluntary action. We see two different reasons for this:

1 According to the behaviourist perspective (e.g. Tolman, 1925), purposeful or goal- directed behaviour was solely used as a descriptive category to refer to behaviour that was performed in a certain way (e.g. with great persistence).

2 Motivational theories prevalent in traditional sodal and personality psychology (e.g. Murray, 1938) conceptualized humans as being mechanically driven by basic needs and instincts, thus preventing an analysis of human action in terms of volition.

The issue of volition only began to receive more attention in the seventies, when humans were perceived as agentie according to social-cognitive theories of personality (Mischei, 1973; Bandura, 1977). In recent years, the issue of volition has been kindled in research on self-regulation, wherein a host of theories on goal setting and goal striving have emerged (reviewed by Oettingen & Gol1witzer, 2001). Voluntary action also became an important issue in research on person perception, as it matters whether an action is perceived as voluntaryor not when inferences are made on a person's dispositions (Heider, 1958). Only very recently, however, has research begun to systematically examine the determinants of intentionality judgments with respect to others' and one's own behaviour (Malle et al., 2001). Finally, sodal psychologists have now addressed the issue of the causal impact of the phenomenal will by asking the question of whether it might simply be an illusion (Wegner& Wheatley, 1999).

In the present chapter, we present and discuss these different lines of research. We begin with delineating different types of goal theories by pointing to the kind of self-regulatory problems they attempt to account for. We then turn to analysing the importance of the concept of intention for interpreting and understanding the behaviour of others. Finally, we address the question of what kind of psychologieal variables determine the experience of voluntary action (i.e. the phenornenal will).

First publ. in: Voluntary action / ed. by Sabine Maasen ... Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 86-107

Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2008/5623/

URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-56238

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

1: SEPF: Specific personality traits (according to FFM) of a victim increase (solid line) or decrease (dashed line) the susceptibility to Cialdini’s principles of influence which

From these and other statements it seems clear that Klages uses 'Charakter' in the general hiological sense rather than in the special English sense; that for him the

Note that while deepened ideas are dichotomous rather than continuous, categorically separating voluntary action from other bodily movements, this idea of the voluntary is

These theories suggest religious/spiritual development of adolescents should be studied at three levels of personality (traits, characteristic adaptations, and

Another approach is to enable employees to identify an impostor, not according to strict rules but by sensitising the employees to the attributes of social engineering attacks

From CSP we have realized such efforts as the "Rearming March," in order to maintain a qualitative research that is critical of the traditional forms of research in the

El método utilizado para esta investigación fue la autoetnografía (ALVESSON 1999; HOLT 2003; ESTEBAN 2004), partiendo del hecho que mi posición como investigador se cruzaba con

‘A comprehensive factor analysis of personality questionnaire items: a test of twenty putative factor hypotheses’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12: