• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Development in Romania

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Development in Romania"

Copied!
10
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Development in Romania

Corduneanu, Carmen and Iovu, Laura Raisa

West University from Timisoara (Romania), Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Finance Department

1 October 2007

Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12926/

MPRA Paper No. 12926, posted 22 Jan 2009 06:51 UTC

(2)

CORDU EA U CARME , LAURA RAISA IOVU

!

Keywords: !, " # $ # # " ! " % #! "! !"

1. Regional disparities in a global context

! ! # "" & " ' ( ! ! ! ( !& !& ( ( # )

* + ! # "", & " !( # "" " * ! "% ! " % !& # # # " #

")"! " !& ! " ( ) ( "& %! ! " !& "! ! !& ! ! " ! " & " + "

- $ !, + ! & " # ! " " % % .#& #-"! " # #

! ) - " / 0 *) (& #& !& *

"! ! " ( "& ! *! * % !" " "- ! % "! !" # # % (" * + ! ( !&

# # !,

- # # 1- " $ ! ) ! ! & " & " + # ! # * '

& ! % - # - !& " ! % # " !& ' ! % "

& " + . "! " ! ", - # - ! " & * # ( !& ! ! !& " ! "

* !( %% ! -#! " * !( ! "" -#! & * ! ! !& % ( '

% # ) ! !& * "! ! " * !( !& " # ! * ! *) ' !

#& " ", - #) " ! ) ! # " " ! " ! *) %% ! !

# # ! - ! !- # -" " ! #& # %% # " %% ! # ! + ! -

!& ! * # -" !& " % - # # ! ! # # (!& !& - ,

& !& ! & " ! # " " % # ! !& - & ! !& % # # ! & "

"! (!& % !& "" ! -#! /2 304 & * ! ! # #- ! % !& - #& " % #

"! , & " " "! - !& $56 " #! ) $76 !& - & ! & " # " ! !& %

7889 *) 6,:; 6,<; # ! !& ) 7888 / . 50, #- ! *) !& - #& " % #

"! !& 2 34 & * ! ! & " # " % 5=<6,> 7888 ! 7=5:,> 7889, ! "

"! ! !& ! *) !& ) 785> ! #& " 95; % !& - ,

! !& "! % !& * "! ! " ! $ "# # " ! ! " &

#& " !& ! # * # ! !& + #& -* # ' - # *-! *" -!

! " !& ) ! ) " # ! !& - , !& - " % !& 2 3 # ! - -"

(3)

(!& *) 6 >; !& "! " ) " / . 70 "" % . # ! - " %

:,?; !& ! % 7889$7886 ! 57; 788? & " * -# ! # ! " !" %

+ ! $ % -#! % # ! " ! (& #& !& ( *- "

/ . >0,

"! ! " ! ! ! !& (!& % % . # ! % ! *) - ! % 58,:;

/ . >0 !& ! % 788=$785> " ! "! # * " !& "& % % #

&- # ! *) .! % # -#!" " !& ! !& 2 3 "! !" # " " % 7>,?; 788?

! >8,:; 785>,

!& !& # ! ! (!& ! *) !& ! ! *) !& * + ! # ""

%% #!" ! " "! ! !& ! !& 2 3 (!& "& * -! - *) !& (!& ! " # "! -#! "

" # " / . 90, & & &)!& " "! ! % " " # " . !" " "- ! % #- !

' !" # " ! !, @ ( " % %- " *" ! !& -#!

% # # (!& !& ! ! # " . " ( - ! !& # # #! ! "

! &! . !" -#! - ) ! " #- ! ## - ! % # ! # " " ( " !&

# # #! !) -#! *) 5,6; ) ) ,

!& # #- "! # " !& ! !& "! ! # ! $# #! " # " * !( % " "

"! ! " - ! & " + ' ! # -"! # ! # # ! !

! % # "! - !" ( !& # - !) " (& !! #! #! % "! !", &

! # % #! % "! !" " " % !& # ! % (" ! #& " ! " ! "

% (" # " " #! ! " % " ! % !& ( & %% #!" " "! !

# - ! ",

2. Direct foreign investments dynamics and origin

! ! "! # ! "& ( !& ! !& ! " ! !& ") # ! ) #" % # # # $

"! * + ! % !& ! + ! # "" % "! -#!- A-"! ! ( !& "! !-!

# # & %% #! !& ! "! !& ! % # ! & " "& ( % #! "! !"

, ! !& * !& - # . " % ( ) # ! % ! # !

# " & " * "! - ! *) ! . . ! " ( % -" ! % " ## ! !&

#! !) ! & & % % "# " , B- ! !) " % # ! ! !

- !& " . ! " . ) ! & " ! ' # !& # ! .! (& #& ! ! # #

! & # !& # " " ! ( !& !& ! % ! . . !

% % "! !" "# # " * !( !& ! ) #) "! -#!- A-"! !" (

! , & " & ! ! % ( % ( ! #& " ! !& " " # !& )

& " *A #! ! -#!" ! " %% #! !& & " + % ) !" # #

* # ,

(4)

Figure 1 – Dinamics of companies with foreign participation and the value of apported capital in the period 1996/2006

& # " % ! + ! # "" ## ! & " ! % "! "C ! "! # " ,

# ! & " ! ! ( " . "! # # ! ! " ( !& !& ! + ! # ""

( !& # ! "! * !) # %-" " #! "! !" % ! " (

# # # $"! * + ! ! " ! % "! -#!- ! ! *- -# #) # - ! , %!

5= ) " % ! " ! " !& - * % # " ( !& % ! # ! & " # " *) 7><<,9;

788? # ! 5<<5, !& - & # ! # #- ! - & " & " ( &)!& ! "! & " *

! !& % !& "! ) 5::8,5; & & !& 5<<5, & #! - . "! "! -#!- "

! "% ! !& - & - * & " * " ( # ! # ) ",

! !& % 788? ! " ! # !& ! !& A !) % #! % "! !" # % " !

"! " - % ( *) -!& !& # , @ ( !& # ! % # " (

*) "! " % " -! - !& # "! ", !& ! ! - # ! & "

# # ! ! -# - * % # # ! ! " " # ! * " " & &

- * % " ! ! " !& % ! ! / . 60, #! !) " #! !& ! * % ! %

# ! % ( ( " -"! ) % ( *) " # " " #! - ! "! # *) ! ! " !",

!

! " ! # !

Figure 2 – Percentage of foreign capita taking in consideration the residency of the investors, on various continents

(5)

!

! " ! # !

Figure 3– Percentage of companies taking in consideration the residency of the investors, on various continents

@ ( ( ! # ! "! * !) % % # ! -"! ! *) ! # ! % "" -!

# " # ! ! ! , & " " !- ! " " # % *) -! " % # ! # %

- "! " % -" # # - ",

$

% &'

& ()

! " ! # !

Figure 4 – Percentage of foreign capital taking in consideration the residency of investors, from various economical groups

$

% &'

& ()

! " ! # !

Figure 5 – Percentage of companies depending on the home country of investors, from various economical groups

(6)

@ & # ! % #! "! !" *) " ! "! " - * "! ! "

" ! ! ! !& ' ! % " -"! % # - " !& -"! )

) ! # - # ! % * ' " #! " ! + ! % # " # " . "

# + ! % " # # ! ! " , @ ( # ) " #! )

! ! !& - # # ! % ( ! ' ! # " ! #! %

"! !" / . 60, !& # #- "! # " % #! "! !" # % *

"! ! " !& "! !-! % ! ! # "! ! " !& ! !& ) 788= !& - "& #& ?,?

* " % - " #! ) 9,=; % !& 2 3 ## ! !& - ! " % ! D 3 C",

3. Foreign investments destination and inter/regional disparities

- !& "! !&" * % A !& .! ) " ! "! *-! % % "! !" %

! !& : ! ", !& # #- "! # " !& ! !& - * % # " ( !&

% # ! ! # ! # ! !& % # ! - *) !& "! " !&

-#& "!$ % ! #& " !" % ! ) % !& !& " !& % # ! - % %

"" -! # " -! - " !& # ! # ! # " !& - & !& "

## !- ! ! #) % *-" "" # " ! *) # ! # " , ! !& " ! "! "C ! "!

! ( " ( "! " " *" - !& # #- "! # " !& ! !& % # ! "! * !) "!

!& "! " ! "- ! !& ! !& !&$ "! , & "! -#!- )" " "& (" !& !

!& - & % # ! ! ! !& !& " " -# "! " & % # !

# " " & & !& !& # ! , ! "! * !) ! "! % *-" "" ! *)

# " ! " ! % #! " !& ! % * # ! "& # ! *-! ! !& # # # " %

" !& ! * & ,

#*

#*

#

#*

#*

& ! +

! " ! # !

Figure 6 – The proportion of foreign investments on various regions UTS II (December 2006)

(7)

#*

#*

#

#*

#*

& ! +

! " ! # !

Figure 7 – The proportion of companies with foreign participation on various regions UTS II (December 2006)

!& - & & " * - !& ! " ! # "" ( !& ( % " ! " # !

!& * # ! "! ! " "! "! ! "! # ! "& ( !& ! !& " ! " & ) # "

* !( !& -#& "!$ % !& !& ",

Table 1

Indicators of regional development in Romania (national average=100)

Region GDP/inhabitant Unemployment rate

FDI/inhabitant SME/

Inhabitant

Rural Population 1998 2003 1998 2003 1998 2003 1998 2004 1998 2004

!&$

"!

=< : =7 > 5>> ? 57> : 56 > 7> = =5 > == 5 57> < 576 -!&$

"!

588 5 :6 = 557 6 58< 6 97 = := 7 585 9 555 <9 = <: =

-!& :6 : :5 7 <= 5 55= 6 ?6 6 ?? ? == 8 :> 5 57< 8 5>8

-!&$

"!

<8 8 :9 = 589 : 55< 55 < 7: 9 :6 < :? 5 578 : 55=

"! 588 < 557 < 585 < <7 8? << 5 6< 7 <5 7 579 9 :> : :8 9

!&$

"!

<6 6 <? ? :9 ? ?? = 95 < 6> > 58? 6 579 : 589 < 589 =

! 586 < 58= 7 <: 5 57> : := = 68 = 585 5 576 7 := 5 :: =

-#& "!$

%

5?7 7 5<9 < 9= 5 99 9 6<: > 9>8 : 5<9 5 76= : 79 : 78 :

- # E & ! ! "! # - %

! $"-*- *" " !) " ! *) !& " # "" % # # ! ! !& # # #! ! " !&

!& ! # - " !& # ! # !) /!& " # " * % - -"! - !& + #& -* #

(8)

# 2 ! ! 3 !- ( 0 ( !& !& "& !& * " ! ( "

% # - "! # - ! " /!& " " !- ! " ! % 2 ) -"! 0, ! " !& # " % !

!& * ( !& !& " -!& !& -* !& !& ! !& * ( !& ' ,

! !& " !& " ! " ! *) & ! -" ! " - ! "

$ -"! ! ( " "! ) %% #! *) !& "! -#!- -# # # " % # ! % "

* # ! " - ! !& # # !) % " - * # ! " % * # ! #! " % A # !

", & - $ " !& " ! #- !- ( !& ! - - ! (&

! "$* ! " ! " !! # ! !& " !& " # (& " #

!& ) " #! " -# ,

#! % "! !" !! #! !& ! & " ! ' "- " ! # ! % *

"! !-! ! % !& *-" "" ! % !! #! % # ! !)

", !& "- " ! ' *) !& "! ! ! # - #! % "! !" & E !& # !

% !& #) % "! !" F " " * % % # 2 ! #)

% ! !! #! #! % "! !", & " # ! " !& ! "! ! " %

#! % "! !" !& ! % #! " % !! #! % # ! !&

# ) ! " !& %- % ! % !& " " ! ! " A #!" % #!" %

!& " ! (& #& "-* !! ! !& 2 ! % !& , & ! -#! %

!& " ! . ! 1- ! % 5?; & " # ! *-! ! !& # !& "! !! #!

"! ! " % "! !" !& ,

: " % * ( !& G # G G ! !

' # ) !G *A #! , !& ) 788= !& # $% # % "! ! " %

! % ! # -* # " - # " "& * % 69< 89 " - # 59,76;

% !& ! ! -* # . " % !& ! 3 % !, & # $% # %

! ! " - # " " "! ! ! . ! ) 7: <8 " - /8,=6;0 !& ! % !&

- - % ! "& " ! :6; % !& ! ! % * . " ",

# ! % (" "! ! ! ?,? " - ( !& # ! #! .! # !" %

) ## ! !& ! % # ! ! %% # " " % !& ! $ " ! ",

.! ) ! ! ! ! ! $ " ! " " !& & "&

# % !& - - !), !& ! " !& ! * % ! % - # $

% # % !& ! % 788=$785> "& # 5= 7?9 " - % ! -#!-

& " - " % !& - , !& " - ! > 7=6 " - "& * # ! ! !&

! 3 "! % !& ! !& ! "& "- ! !& % # %

! -* # %- " % 69< 89 " % - ! ! %- " % 7: <8 " % - ,

4. Conclusions

3 ! #) % #& * % # & " ! !& - * $ - ! - ! ! # "

" " " % - $ #- !- ( !& ! ! ( " !& # - ! ",

- ! !- (!& & " * %% #! *) ( % % 1- !), " "- ! "! "

* & * " # - ! 1- % ( ' % # , -# % # "- ! !&

!& "! !-! # ) " #! " % - # !& # % !& ! ! " !& " #! " % # ),

& % "- " % # " ( !& ! "! " # % # !

!! #! " ! *) ' ! " * ( ' % # 1- % # ! ",

! % " ! " ! ! # - # ! " #! # !) " % "! -#!- " ! - "! #

" A # ! ! ! - * # ! " !& ! ( - "- # + ! % # # #! ! " !& "

" ( - ( * !! # " " ! *" ! % - ! ) - ) !,

(9)

( !& !! #! % "! !" ! ( " " #! " ( !& ! - % % !

# - # ! " ! #& ) #! #" #! ! #& #" " # " ! # -"! ) !&

! % "! ! # ! " ! ! *-" "" !", ( !&

! ! - #- !- " ! ' ! "! ! " *-" "" "'"

! " " ,

. 5 Dinamics of GDP and the European Union average GDP

2000 2004 Growing EU/15 7>; 7: :; 6 :;

EU/25 76 7; >5 5; 6 <;

- # E ! "! !-! % ! ! "! #" ! !! % 3 " "

. 7 Dinamics of GDP in the period 2000/2013

PROCE TUAL MODIFICATIO (%) I COMPARISO WITH THE PREVIOUS YEAR

ESTIMATIO S

7888 7885 7887 788> 7889 7886 788?H & !

788=$785> /;0

7 5; 6 =; 6 5; 6 7; : 9; 9 5; ? =; 6 ?;

- # E ! "! !-! % ! ! "! #" ! !! % 3 " "

. >

GDP on different fields of activity / procentual modifications /

2006 Average rate 2007/2013

(%)

-"! ) ? 9 6 5

#- !- 5 6 7 =

"! -#! " 5> 8 58 7

# " ? 6 6 =

GDP 6,7 5,6

Source: ational Committee of Prognosis

(10)

Annex 4

The source and destination of foreign direct investments (December 2006)

@ ; 33

3

; 3

@ 2

3 3

@ 75 8?; 7 89;

-"! 57 <9; > 5:;

# 58 7=; > 6?;

2 ) 58 79; 58 ==;

! ) 6 6?; 5? >5;

9 =7; > =>;

2 ! ! 9 9>; 7 86;

- > <?; 5 :>;

2 # > ?5; 7 =>;

!& # - ! "E 98 7> 75; 6> :;

! 588; 588;

(& #&E

! "! -#!-

% " % #! !)

# "E

$ -"! ) 68 ?; 5= =;

$# "! -#! " 5 ?; 6 =;

$! " !" ? 9; > 9;

$(& " # # ? =; 7? =;

$ ! # # ? >; 57 7;

$!- " 5 6; 6 ?;

$ #- !- 8 <; 9 6;

$ %% " " # " 7?; 79 7;

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

By focusing on transition countries paper empirically attempted to answer research questions, whether trade openness can actually reduce poverty and if democratic

(Table 3.) Following the survey responses, the main outcomes will be analysed and compared to 2020 and 2019 surveys conducted by Unilever on employee motivation and well-being in

B. Investigating the impact of trade openness on poverty with a linear classical poverty model employing a set of control variables employed by similar studies in the

While most of the studies have been concentrated on the development a credit scoring model based on the logistic regression with the dependent variable representing

The business model concept has many different usages such as converting company’s competence into economic value (Teece, 2010), creating value from an innovative solution (Chesbrough

Secondly, if expected correlations are found be- tween gaps in earnings and pension income and attitudes toward role of women in family life and labour market, it could

Current paper examines the effect of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on home country labor market using matched employer-employee dataset, which covers entire population

They are also perceived by many elements in the Japanese government as a critical solution to the overall population crisis that can preserve what Japan does not want to