• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of two beef production systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of two beef production systems"

Copied!
1
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Impact of EXT (INT = 100%)

OBJECTIVE

Determination of the environmental impacts of two contrasting beef production systems by life cycle assessment (LCA).

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

The extensive use of grasslands for beef production has the potential to reduce the environmental impacts per kg of carcass, especially if the animals reach desired slaughter maturity on the pasture (i.e. no intensive finishing period required).

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of two beef production systems

A. Chassot 1 , A. Philipp 2 and G. Gaillard 3

An extensive fattening system of Limousine x Simmental crossbred steers based on grass (EXT) was compared to an intensive fattening system of Simmental bulls (INT). The animals of EXT and INT were slaughtered at 20 and 13 months of age, respectively.

EXT: two grazing periods, the second one on an unfertilised mountain meadow, at low stocking rate; winter ration: low-quality hay and grass silage (1:1).

INT: continuously fed indoor with a ration composed of grass, maize silages (1:2), and concentrates (soybean meal and barley, 1,5:1).

The production data were based on experiments. The environmental impacts were quantified by using the software TEAMTM and the Swiss Agricultural Life Cycle Assessment (SALCA) database.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

• The environmental impacts of EXT were similar or lower than those of INT

• The largest differences were found in toxic effects on aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems

• The amount and type of fertilizers used to produce the feed were the main source of difference between the systems

E-mail: Andre.Chassot@alp.admin.ch

Environmental impacts per kg of carcass of an extensive (EXT) compared to an intensive beef production system (INT)

a

Animal ready for slaughter

S ys te m b o u n d ar y

Fertilisers

Calves Fuel Machinery Buildings Grazing Feed Calves Fuel Machinery Buildings

1Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux (ALP), Swiss Federal Research Station for Animal Production and Dairy Products, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland 2 Agricultural College, 9230 Flawil, Switzerland

3Agroscope FAL Reckenholz, Swiss Federal Research Station for Agroecology and Agriculture (FAL), 8046 Zurich-Reckenholz, Switzerland

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

116%

111%

112%

111%

107%

52%

46%

77%

84%

97%

101%

INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT INT EXT Depletion of non-renewable (fossile) energy ressources Global warming potential over 100 years Global warming potential over 500 years Formation of ozone at ground level (summer smog) Human toxicity Aquatic ecotoxicity Terrestrial ecotoxicity Total eutrophication Aquatic eutrophication Terrestrial eutrophication Acidification

Impact categories

a Within a production system and an impact category, each factor is expressed as a percentage of the sum of all related factors

Concentrates Minerals Milk

Calves Straw

Buildings Machines

Spreading of solid manure and slurry

Hay Grass silage Beef production system

Grassland Seeds

Fertilizers Pesticides

INT

Transport Litter Storage of organic fertilizers

Maize silage Crops

Cereals Straw

Feedingstrategy Storage / removal

Fuel Electricity

Livestock

Finishing Cattle rearing Production of animal feed

Concentrates Minerals Milk

Calves Straw

Buildings Machines

Spreading of solid manure and slurry

Hay Grass silage Beef production system

Grassland Seeds

Fertilizers Pesticides

INT

Transport Litter Storage of organic fertilizers

Maize silage Crops

Cereals Straw

Feedingstrategy Storage / removal

Fuel Electricity

Livestock

Finishing Cattle rearing Production of animal feed

Concentrates Minerals Milk

Calves Straw

Buildings Machines Seeds Fertilizers Pesticides

EXT

Fuel Electricity

Spreading of solid manure and slurry

Hay Grass silage Beef production system

Grassland

Transport Litter Storage of organic fertilizers

Crops

Cereals Straw

Feedingstrategy Storage / removal

Livestock

Cattle rearing Production of animal feed

Pastures

Organic fertilizers Beef production system (summering)

Mountain pastures

Finishing Concentrates

Minerals Milk

Calves Straw

Buildings Machines Seeds Fertilizers Pesticides

EXT

Fuel Electricity

Spreading of solid manure and slurry

Hay Grass silage Beef production system

Grassland

Transport Litter Storage of organic fertilizers

Crops

Cereals Straw

Feedingstrategy Storage / removal

Livestock

Cattle rearing Production of animal feed

Pastures

Organic fertilizers Beef production system (summering)

Mountain pastures

Finishing

Very positive < 67%

Positive 67 - 80%

Similar 80 - 125%

Negative 125 - 150%

Very negative > 150%

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Because of the environmental impacts caused by agricultural cultivation the overall evaluation (Figure 5) of Swiss bioethanol production from whey shows an overall impact that

(2012) - Handbuch für Technisches Produktdesign, Material und Fertigung - Entscheidungsgrundlagen für Designer und Ingenieure (2) Berlin:.. Springer-Verlag Berlin

The ILCD method provides global recommendations and characterization fac- tors for the modeling of the most common impact categories, linking emissions and resources consumed over

Life cycle energy efficiency and environmental impact assessment of bioethanol production from sweet potato based on different production modes. Environmental and energy assessment

According to the LCA conducted, 1 st generation bioethanol from sugar beet and 1 st generation biodiesel from rapeseed are currently the biofuel supply chains with the

Figure 3.3 shows the contribution of front-end fuel processing and supply chain in the life cycle environmental impacts of nuclear power generation; in other words, the

Renewable energy sources are focal point of efforts because they tackle all of those goals. Greenhouse gas emissions and share of renewables are closely connected, since around

In the present paper, three alternative scenarios of the distribution of frozen foods were examined from the ecological point of view: the classic shopping trip to the supermarket,