• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

A General Framework for Implementing a Multi-Subject Brain-Computer Interface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "A General Framework for Implementing a Multi-Subject Brain-Computer Interface"

Copied!
2
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

Proceedings of the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting 2013 DOI:10.3217/978-3-85125-260-6-44

Published by Graz University of Technology Publishing House, sponsored by medical engineering GmbH Article ID: 044

A General Framework for Implementing a Multi-Subject Brain-Computer Interface

P. Yuan1, Y. Wang2, T.-P. Jung2, X. Gao1, S. Gao1

1Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; 2University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA

Correspondence: S. Gao, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medicine School, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

E-mail: gsk-dea@tsinghua.edu.cn

Abstract. Recently, multi-brain computing has attracted growing attention in the fields of cognitive neuroscience and neural engineering. The potential of using a multi-subject brain computer interface (BCI) to improve individual human performance has been proposed and demonstrated in offline studies. However, little is known about the feasibility and practicality to implement such a system. This study proposes a general centralized system framework for implementing an online multi-subject BCI and demonstrates a collaborative BCI for group decision making using the proposed framework. The online test results suggest that the proposed framework can greatly satisfy the technical requirements of an online multi-subject BCI.

Keywords:Multi-brain computing, brain-computer interface (BCI), online BCI, collaborative BCI, decision making

1. Introduction

Two heads are better than one, known as collective intelligence, the mechanism and neural basis of which has recently attracted growing attention of researchers in psychology and neuroscience [Bahrami et al., 2010; Eckstein et al., 2011]. The collective intelligence has also been introduced to the neural engineering field. For example, the potential of using a brain computer interface (BCI) based on multi-brain computing, named collaborative BCI, to improve human performance has been explored by recent studies [Wang et al., 2011; Eckstein et al., 2011].

However, although the theoretical aspects of a multi-subject BCI have been proposed in these studies, a general system framework for developing and implementing an online system has not been well established. Therefore, it is of great importance to provide a general system framework of an online multi-subject BCI to researchers. To this end, this study proposes a centralized system framework of an online multi-subject BCI and demonstrates a collaborative BCI for improving group decision making.

2. Material and Methods

The system framework consists of four major modules: (1) an EEG recording module (comprising multiple EEG amplifiers and data recording computers), (2) a stimulus and feedback presentation module (including multiple LCD monitors, one in front of each subject), (3) a data-analysis module (implementing group EEG data analysis on a server computer), and (4) a control module (performing stimulus generation, feedback generation and synchronization control). Fig. 1 shows a schematic overview of the proposed system. In the system, the EEG data from a group of subjects are recorded with multiple EEG amplifiers synchronized by trigger signals from the computer server. A Media-Key multimedia teaching system delivers visual cues to multiple LCD monitors simultaneously. EEG data from each of the subjects are sent to the server via TCP/IP for real-time group data analysis. Visual feedbacks are presented on the screens to all subjects.

This study used the proposed framework to implement a collaborative BCI for Go/NoGo decision making.

During the experiment, a series of images including face images (Go tasks) and car images (NoGo tasks) were presented to the subjects. Seven groups of people (three subjects in each group) participated in the experiment. A 16- channel EEG amplifier was used for collecting data from each subject. A two-layer support vector machine (SVM) classifier was applied to predict the Go/NoGo decision with the first and second levels for individual and group classification, respectively. The experiment comprised a training session used to train the classifiers and a testing session used to evaluate the performance of the system. Each session comprised 120 trials.

(2)

Proceedings of the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting 2013 DOI:10.3217/978-3-85125-260-6-44

Published by Graz University of Technology Publishing House, sponsored by medical engineering GmbH Article ID: 044

TCP/IP Feedback

Stimulus

Trigger Brains

Amplifiers

Computers

Server

Figure 1. System framework for an online multi-subject BCI.

3. Results

Consistent with offline analysis, the online test showed that the collaborative classification significantly improved the performance of the individual classification. Using the EEG data within 300 ms after the stimulus onset, which was about 90 ms earlier than the mean behavioral response time (RT) (393 ± 69 ms), the mean accuracy of the collaborative classification was 82.4 ± 6.1% across all groups. It was 11.6% higher than the average individual accuracy (70.9 ± 6.2%, p < 10-4) and 7.6% higher than the best individual accuracy (74.7 ± 4.8%, p < 10-3). The results suggest that the proposed framework can greatly satisfy the technical requirements of an online multi-subject BCI.

4. Conclusion

This study demonstrates a general framework for implementing the multi-subject brain-computer interaction. In addition to BCI applications, the proposed framework might have potential for EEG-based group brain imaging of social processes and behavior.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 91120007, and National Basic Research Program (973) of China (No. 2011CB933204). P. Yuan is also supported by the Government Scholarship Program from China Scholarship Council.

References

Bahrami B, Rees G, Frith CD, Olsen K, Roepstorff A, Latham PE. Optimally interacting minds. Science, 329(5995):1081-1085, 2010.

Eckstein MP, Das K, Pham BT, Peterson MF, Abbey CK, Sy JL, Giesbrecht B. Neural decoding of collective wisdom with multi-brain computing. Neuroimage, 59(1):94-108, 2011.

Wang Y, Jung T-P. A collaborative brain-computer interface for improving human performance. PLoS ONE, 6(5):e20422, 2011.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Furthermore, we proposed a new signal processing method for reducing the inter- frequency variation in SSVEP responses (called CCA-RV method), and a real-time feedback mechanism

The current version, which is a further development of the Sprinter system (Ai et al., 2014), automatically recognises and classi- fies the pronunciation errors of learners and

One successful strategy to encounter this is to develop modular product structures (MPS). By using MPS, companies are able to provide a broad external variety while keeping

A biodiversity conservation strategy that com- bines the advantages of integrative and segrega- tive instruments improves habitat quality across managed forests and landscapes due

Convex programming, financial mathematics, risk measures, utility func- tions, efficient frontier, Markowitz portfolio theory, capital market pricing model, growth optimal

Keywords: Enterprise Modeling Languages, Semantics, Ontic Reality, Formal Semantics, Material Semantics, Semantics Specification, Meta Modeling.. 1 Context

Further, we explore techniques for collaborative decision-making (cf. Section 2.2) and reflect on the analysis and decision- making processes being knowledge-intensive processes (cf.

Finally, since this is the sequential Ellsberg Problem, we have to consider the sequence of (I) in round 1 and (IV) in round 2. That is, the Ellsberg preferences. Similar to