• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

ADDITIONAL FILE 3 Questionnaire to evaluate the user-friendliness of the GenTB tool

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "ADDITIONAL FILE 3 Questionnaire to evaluate the user-friendliness of the GenTB tool"

Copied!
4
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)GenTB: A user-friendly genome-based predictor for tuberculosis resistance powered by machine learning. Authors: Matthias I Gröschel1, Martin Owens1, Luca Freschi1, Roger Vargas Jr1,2, Maximilian G Marin1,2, Jody Phelan3, Zamin Iqbal4, Avika Dixit1,5 and Maha R Farhat1,6. ADDITIONAL FILE 3. Questionnaire to evaluate the user-friendliness of the GenTB tool.

(2) User friendliness of the GenTB tool As previous GenTB users we would like to solicit your help to evaluate how easy it is to use GenTB. OPTION A: Only answer the questions below without running a prediction now.. OPTION B: Run a antibiotic resistance prediction based on provided FASTQ files and report on your experience using the questions below. To do this, please follow these tasks: 1) Create or login to your user account on https://gentb.hms.harvard.edu/ 2) Click on 'Predict' and then on 'Create a prediction from a set of pair-ended FastQ genetic sequences', and provide any dataset name and description. 3) Dropbox link to FASTQ files: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/tnvw8cg1fh0ag0w/AAAu0wk5Dwt6FwfqlwoGYv7ya?dl=0 3a) Download the FASTQ files and upload from your computer, or 3b) Download the FASTQ files to your personal Dropbox, and upload from Dropbox (in this case we need to send you a dropbox invite, please let us know). We appreciate your feedback and would love to hear back by next Monday, May 10th, 2021. Many thanks! Matthias, Martin and Maha. 1.. How pleasing did you find the GeTB site? Mark only one oval. 1 Not pleasing at all. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 Very pleasing.

(3) 2.. How clear was the information on GenTB? Mark only one oval. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Not clear at all. 3.. Very clear. How easy to use is GenTB? Mark only one oval. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Not easy at all. 4.. Very easy. How stable was GenTB during your evaluation? Mark only one oval. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Not stable at all. 5.. Very stable. How usable do you find GenTB? Mark only one oval. 1 Not usable at all. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 Very usable.

(4) 6.. Do you have any other feedback?. This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.. Forms.

(5)

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

Da sie auf einem Leihgerät und nicht auf ihrem privaten iPad arbeiten, empfiehlt es sich, dass Passwort ihres Dropbox- Zugangs nicht auf dem iPad zu speichern.. Klicken sie

Description: Sea-level rise in 2300 for scenarios consistent with current NDCs (total GHG emissions above 49 GtCO 2 eq/yr) relative to 2000 in cm.. This is a subset of Supplementary

OMV is on its way to establish itself as one of Europeans major energy supplier. Therefore, the company is interested in green energy technology and likes to invest in that field

Especially in applied computer science, which is supposed to support human activities by designing technical artifacts, the integration of the perspectives of diverse users is

From the health delivery point of view, are there health beliefs, cultural, or social factors involving the patient or family that are.. making care

Scotland To explore mental health stigma with the three largest ethnic minority communities (Pakistani, Chinese and Indian ethnic minority) groups in Scotland.. CBPR Focus groups

• Around 33% reported more difficulty in learning how to use tool compared with other usability categories: more so for those with less tool. experience

Columns are: geneID: the Ensembl Gene ID, pval: the p-value of the estimate, lfc: log fold change, lfc.lo: the lower bound (95% CI) of the lfc, lfc.hi: the higher bound (95% CI)