• Keine Ergebnisse gefunden

Limits and Potentials of Grasping User Interaction in Controlled and Open World Environments

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Aktie "Limits and Potentials of Grasping User Interaction in Controlled and Open World Environments"

Copied!
3
0
0

Wird geladen.... (Jetzt Volltext ansehen)

Volltext

(1)

374 Poster Presentations

Limits and Potentials of Grasping User Interaction in Controlled and

Open World Environments

Contrasting PIAAC Large-Scale-Assessment Usage Data with Web Analytics

Peter Böhm, Christoph Schindler, Heiko Rölke, Marc Rittberger

German Institute for International Educational Research, Germany {boehm, schindler, roelke, rittberger}@dipf.de

Keywords: usage data; web analytics; log data; computer-based assessment;

web portal; qualitative analysis

1 Motivation and background

Educational practices are becoming more and more digitalized and learning is realized in the open web as well as in controlled digital learning environ- ments. This provides new opportunities not only for new interactive teaching methods, but also for tracking the interaction with learning materials for im- proving teaching and learning as well as for assessments (cf. Siemens &

Long, 2011). On one hand, the field of Computer-based assessment (CBA) uses these new research capacities for improving competence assessments in controlled and validated test environments. On the other hand, in the open web, tasks are pursued in interactive situations and protocolled in logfiles. In this study, these two different situations of open and controlled environments are contrasted by analyzing the different fabrications and expressiveness’ of

In: M.Gäde/V.Trkulja/V.Petras (Eds.): Everything Changes, Everything Stays the Same? Understanding Information Spaces. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI2017), Berlin, 13th—15th March 2017.

Glückstadt:VerlagWernerHülsbusch, pp. 374—376.

(2)

Limits and Potentials of Grasping User Interaction in Controlled and ... 375

data. The main research questions are: To what degree can open and closed world log data of learning tasks be compared? Where do they differ and what conclusions can be drawn regarding the grasping of user interaction and pos- sible mutual optimizations of the log data gathering? By addressing these questions, hitherto disparate areas of research are linked.

2 Research design

PIAAC (Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competen- cies) is used as a case study for a controlled environment of a large-scale as- sessment with CBA tools, while the German Education Server (GES)1 serves as a case study for the open data environment. Here, like in the field of CBA, usage data is gathered but its expressiveness is limited because of the open, uncontrolled usage and usage data (Keil et al., 2015).

This study is methodologically based on an in-depth, qualitative compari- son of the quantitative usage data of one PIAAC test item and a comparable usage scenario of the GES. This comparison includes the production condi- tions of the test items, the usage data, the fabrication and syntax of the data as well as the expressiveness’ of metrics that can be calculated based on these data.

3 Expected outcome

By comparing these two different situations of data fabrications and the ex- pressiveness of the data, we aim to analyze the limits and potentials of usage data from closed, highly controlled environments and open-world, uncon- trolled websites. With open-world usage data, difficulties are expected in reliably recognizing visitors and the ‘real’ browsing behavior, while large quantities of log data are available. By contrast, CBA usage data is more con- trolled; in the case of PIAAC even extensive background information is

1 See http://www.eduserver.de/.

(3)

376 Poster Presentations

available on the participants. The number of participants is usually smaller than the number of users of large websites, whereby the test is realized under

‘artificial´ test conditions. These first insights address an exchange on an epistemological level between both worlds (CBA and web analytics), ad- vancing the examination of expressiveness of user interaction in different learning settings.

References

Keil, S., P. Böhm and M. Rittberger (2015): Qualitative web analytics: New Insights into Navigation Analysis and User Behavior – A Case Study of the German Education Server. In: F. Pehar et al. (Eds.): Re:inventing Information Science in the Networked Society. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on In- formation Science (ISI 2015), Zadar, Croatia, 19th21st May 2015 (pp. 252–263).

Glückstadt: Hülsbusch.

Siemens, G. and P. Long (2011): Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. In: EDUCAUSE review, 46 (5), 30.

Referenzen

ÄHNLICHE DOKUMENTE

The role of the general public in decision-making processes and with regard to economic expertise is also considered, since it has become increasingly important in the context

As the unlabelled group did not know that the data was about wind energy supply and thus, stances towards wind energy could not affect the graph evaluation, fluctuation

In der Beantwortung dieser Fragen kann sicherlich festgehalten werden, dass – nach der Phase der (Wieder-)Entdeckung der qualitativen Forschung mit Fokus auf Methodenentwicklungen

hier der Entwicklungspsychologie (in Anlehnung an Paul WATZLAWICK könnte man sagen "Man kann nicht nicht-interpretieren"), betone ich darauf aufbauend

VERBATIM is a qualitative archiving database, aiming to keep track of the interviews carried out by the company's sociologists in order to re-use them by recording all that

However, the indicator function of FDI stocks and flows suffers from several weaknesses: (1) As FDI (flow) data do not necessarily reflect actual investment activities by TNCs in

Assessment of the Reintegration of Ex-Combatants into Civilian Life in North Kivu, South Kivu and Ituri Democratic Republic of Congo (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012), 17-20. 7

This paper examined crowdsourced data from the Geo-Wiki crowdsourcing tool for land cover validation to determine whether there were significant differences in quality between